Iraqis inspect vehicles destroyed in an airstrike in Sadr City, Baghdad, Iraq, Friday, March 28, 2008. Iraqi police and hospital officials in Sadr City said five civilians were killed and four others wounded in the attack. (AP Photo/Karim Kadim)

US Forces Launch Airstrikes in Iraq

ROBERT H. REID | March 28, 2008 08:43 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »


BAGHDAD — U.S. forces stepped deeper Friday into the Iraqi government's fight to cripple Shiite militias, launching airstrikes in the southern city of Basra and firing a missile into the main Shiite stronghold in Baghdad.

The American support occurred as Iraqi troops struggled against strong resistance in Basra and retaliation elsewhere in Shiite areas _ including more salvos of rockets or mortars into the U.S.-protected Green Zone in Baghdad.

It was the first time American jets have been called to attack militia positions since Iraqi ground forces launched an operation Tuesday to clear Basra of the armed groups that have effectively ruled the streets of the country's second-largest city for nearly three years.

One militia barrage slammed into the headquarters of the Basra police command late Friday, triggering a huge fire and explosions when one of the rounds struck a gasoline tanker, police officials said.

Earlier Friday, U.S. jets struck a building housing militia fighters and blasted a mortar team that was firing on Iraqi forces, British military spokesman Maj. Tim Holloway said without further details.

Many of those groups are believed to receive weapons, money and training from nearby Iran, the world's most populous Shiite nation.

The crackdown in Basra has provoked a violent reaction _ especially from the Mahdi Army of anti-American Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. His followers accuse rival Shiite parties in the government of trying to crush their movement before provincial elections this fall.

Their anger has led to a sharp increase in attacks against American troops in Shiite areas following months of relative calm after al-Sadr declared a unilateral cease-fire last August.

Before dawn Friday, a U.S. aircraft fired a Hellfire missile in the Sadr City district _ the Baghdad stronghold of the Mahdi Army _ after gunmen there opened fire on an American patrol.

The U.S. military said the missile strike killed four militants, but Iraqi officials said nine civilians were killed and nine others wounded.

Another U.S. airstrike targeted a rocket-propelled grenade mounted vehicle in the mostly Sunni neighborhood of Azamiyah, killing two militants, the military said separately.

U.S. military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss Pentagon assessments, said commanders are wary of bringing major firepower into Shiite areas such as Sadr City, fearing large-scale civilian casualties could bring more backlash through Baghdad.

But, the officials said, American forces are more willing to offer air support in Basra, which is the centerpiece of the current showdown.

Defying a curfew in Baghdad, Shiite extremists lobbed more rockets or mortars against the U.S.-protected Green Zone, which has come under steady barrages this week. The attacks prompted the State Department to order embassy personnel to stay inside.

At least two rounds Friday struck the Green Zone offices of Sunni Vice President Tariq al-Hashemi, killing two guards and wounding four, his daughter and executive secretary Lubna al-Hashemi said.

In all, the U.S. military said 13 suspected militants were killed Friday and 26 on Thursday in Baghdad operations.

"As you know, we've been getting attacked and going after the enemy all day," said Maj. Mark Cheadle, a spokesman for the Baghdad area command.

An American soldier was fatally injured Friday in a roadside bombing south of Baghdad, the military reported without elaboration. The area is religiously mixed, and it was unclear whether he was killed in a Shiite district.

At least 26 people were killed Friday in fierce fighting in the southern cities of Mahmoudiya, Nasiriyah and Kut, according to police and army officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to release the information.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite who once maintained close ties to al-Sadr, has put his personal prestige on the line in the Basra crackdown, flying to the city five days ago to assume personal command of the operation there.

Al-Maliki has vowed there would be "no retreat" in Basra, the nation's commercial center and headquarters of the vital oil industry.

In Washington, President Bush said the battle against Shiite extremists presents "a defining moment in the history of Iraq" and a "necessary part of the development of a free society."

The United States has called the Basra campaign an important test of Iraq's ability to handle its own security affairs. But setbacks in the battle could increasingly draw in American forces, worried that a sustained fight _ and the backlash in Baghdad and elsewhere _ could wipe away many of the security gains of recent months.

The situation in Basra remained tense as a Friday deadline for gunmen to surrender their weapons and renounce violence expired, although a few complied. Al-Maliki's office announced a new deal, offering Basra residents unspecified monetary compensation if they turn over "heavy and medium-size weapons" by April 8.

Masked militia fighters, meanwhile, moved around freely in a southwestern neighborhood and there was little traffic, according to Associated Press Television News footage. Residents complained of rising food prices and power shortages.

The government relaxed a days-old curfew in Basra to allow people to move around in the city from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. to facilitate shopping and other necessary tasks.

"The situation was better this morning so I went to a small market near my house. I was surprised that the price of vegetables and meat had gone up fivefold," said Ziyad Khalid, 27.

Hamid Saaid, 47, said he saw dozens of people lined up for bread and to fill canisters with clean water from a tanker truck.

In Baghdad, the Sunni speaker of Iraq's parliament called a special legislative session Friday in hopes of launching an initiative to negotiate a peaceful end to the Basra fighting.

But the main Shiite political bloc, the United Iraqi Alliance, and its Kurdish allies refused to attend. The alliance includes al-Maliki's party and the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, the main political rival to al-Sadr's movement.

With so few lawmakers attending, parliament could approve no binding resolutions but instead established a committee to explore ways to mediate a settlement. The initiative was spearheaded by former prime minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, who brought al-Sadr's followers into the government under his administration.

Al-Maliki has insisted the fight is targeting criminal gangs in Basra, not al-Sadr's movement.

However, al-Sadr's followers sharply condemned the prime minister during sermons Friday in mosques across the country.

"He imprisoned and displaced thousands of Iraqi people under the name of democracy. He is killing the citizens in the south of Iraq," Sheik Jalil al-Sarghi said, referring to al-Maliki as U.S. helicopters buzzed over the office where the prayer service was held.

___

Associated Press writers Qassim Abdul-Zahra and Saad Abdul-Kadir in Baghdad and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.


 

Comments
216
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Wasn't Bush crowing about this being an Iraqi conceived, led and fought battle? Is it the Iraqi air force doing the bombing and strafing?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 AM on 03/29/2008

Bomb! Bomb! Bomb! Uh! Iran? Iraq? God damnit! We got's to bomb somebody! Listen up there, Baby George, they are playing "Our Song" your next beloved War Presinator, Johnny "Ride The Bomb" McCain
I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT BLOND LOBBYIST, bur Baby George is a great kisser! Sen. John RTB McCain

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 AM on 03/30/2008

I'll try again, see if I don't get censored this time... re: iski: looks like ramirez is straining the few neurons in his brain to their limit. Iski is how ISCI is called in Iraq because, you know, Arabs don't use the alphabet and "iski" sounds more like it's pronounced by the Americans. BTW, ISCI is an English acronym and it stands for Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, but most Iraqis don't know that. So, it's "iski"... Yeah, you can say I was screwing with your head, it was definitely fun.
As for my "contradiction", well, of course you can't understand it, because really you don't know much about what goes on in Iraq. Iski is not in the national government, that was my point, but they gave it control over some local stuff, you know, just to claim that democracy works, enough to fool the uninformed like you... Clear now? Please, don't disappoint me and say "yes"...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 AM on 03/29/2008

2nd attempt.

I think I got it. You used the acronym "ISKI" because it sounds like "ISCI" which is apprently the German acronym for Islamic Council of Iraq, which is known by Americans&Brits as the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, which has an acronym of "SIIC."

And you insist "Iski is not in the national government", even though:

"Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council is one of Iraq's most powerful political parties and the largest party in the Iraqi Council of Representatives."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Islamic_Iraqi_Council

Anything else?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 03/29/2008

I think I got it. You used the acronym "ISKI" because it sounds like "ISCI" which is apprently the German acronym for Islamic Council of Iraq, which is known by Americans&Brits as the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, which has an acronym of "SIIC."

And you insist "Iski is not in the national government", even though:

"Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council is one of Iraq's most powerful political parties and the largest party in the Iraqi Council of Representatives."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Islamic_Iraqi_Council

Anything else?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 03/29/2008

So, John McCain goes to Iraq and tries to go back to the same market place he went to last year,
but he can't because it is run by "shiite extremists" and is now unsafe for Americans. A few days
later we start a campaign against the shiites. Hmmm maybe McCain's crew didn't like being made
fools of and started something. Whatever started this the oxymoron military intelligence comes to
mind.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 PM on 03/28/2008

Nothing wins hearts and minds like aerial bombardment.

8

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 03/28/2008

Amanda:

We ran out of room.
Here is the list of political parties in Iraq:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_parties_in_Iraq

You said that ISKI was the "largest party." Which one is that, and why is it called ISKI?

Take your time.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 03/28/2008

Amanda:
OKAY! I found the link you provided at 11:25. It is here:
http://www.wsws.org/de/2008/mar2008/irak-m27.shtml
It leads to (I'm not making this up) the "World Socialist Web Site." Your selected article is in German. Opening graf:

"In several cities in the south Iraq fighting began again, caused by increasing problems between the prominent Shiite party ISCI and rival smaller Shiite parties and militias. The Islamic Council OF Iraq (ISCI) is the most important and leading Shiite party in the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki. The US troops are openly on the side of the ISCI."

Okay then. So the ISCI is allied with both the government AND the USA. BUT this DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS your earlier comment at 5:45, which insisted:

"ISKI, a religious fundamentalist party, won the elections but your government didn't think they were "acceptable." I bet you didn't even know that...."

This was an expansion on your earlier comments at 5:51 which claimed: "The American MSM showed Iraqis voting and heralded "democracy" had finally come to that wretched country. Then of course they failed to mention that the winning party (ISKI) was NEVER allowed to rule because...er... they're "religious fundamentalists" and as such "not acceptable."

Any closing thoughts on the ISKI?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 AM on 03/29/2008

Oh ramirez, looks like you're straining the few neurons in your brain to their limit.

Iski is how ISCI is called in Iraq because, you know, Arabs don't use the alphabet and "iski" sounds more like it's pronounced by the Americans. BTW, ISCI is an English acronym and it stands for Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, but most Iraqis don't know that. So, it's "iski"... Yeah, you can say I was screwing with your head, it was definitely fun.
As for my "contradiction", well, of course you can't understand it, because really you don't know much about what goes on in Iraq. Iski is not in the national government, that was my point, but they gave it control over some local stuff, you know, just to claim that democracy works, enough to fool the uninformed like you...

Clear now?

Please, don't disappoint me and say "yes"...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 AM on 03/29/2008

3rd and final try at pleasing the mod....
*********

I think I've got it. You used the acronym "ISKI" because it sounds like "ISCI" which is apparently the German acronym for Islamic Council of Iraq, which is known by Americans&Brits as the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, which has an acronym of "SIIC."

And you insist "Iski is not in the national government", even though:

"Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council is one of Iraq's most powerful political parties and the largest party in the Iraqi Council of Representatives."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Islamic_Iraqi_Council

Anything else?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 03/29/2008

BUSH SURGE = PUTTING NEW LIPSTICK ON THE PIG.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 03/28/2008

PLANE AND SIMPLE, HILLARY LOVES THE BUSH,,,,

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 03/28/2008

All Chickenhawks are busy in their basements today, killing Shia in their video games, then coming here and reporting how well "we" are doing in Iraq.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 03/28/2008

"Many of those groups are believed to receive weapons, money and training from nearby Iran."

Bullsh*. That's propaganda. Iran supports the Badr militia which is fighting alongside the Iraqi army against the Sadrists. The latter call for less Iranian influence in Iraq and are hardly going to get weapons, money and training for that.

First it was Iran supports Sunni insurgents, now it's that they support another nationalist group. If an accusation doesn't stick, try try again. It worked for Saddam, didn't it. In fact it's a matter of record that Iran opposes Iraqi nationalists and supports exactly the same Shiite sectarians that the US does: al-Maliki and his gang, and SCIRI.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 03/28/2008

|You know the foreign news sites are showing photos and telling the truth.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 03/28/2008

From Bill Roggio:
*****

Fighting in Basrah

Basrah has been the scene of the majority of the fighting. Major General Ali Zaidan said that 120 Mahdi Army and other Shia terrorists have been killed since the fighting began, while another 450 have been wounded. Iraqi police said they have captured 218 "militiamen" since the start of the operation on March 25. But the Mahdi Army is said to be controlling some neighborhoods in Basrah, while the Army is meeting stiff resistance when attempting to entry these neighborhood.

The Mahdi Army is targeting senior military and police leaders in the southern city.
-snip-

The Iraqi military continues to beef up its security forces in the South. The Army and police have committed the equivalent of two additional brigades of security forces. Maliki ordered five extra battalions to the city, putting the number of Iraqi Army in Basrah at 15,000 troops. Additional elements from the Emergency Response Units, Iraqi Special Operations Forces, and helicopter support have been moved to Basrah.

Coalition forces have served in a largely advisory and support role. US military and police trainers are embedded with their Iraqi units, while Multinational Forces Iraq is supplying logistical and air support for Iraqi forces. Coalition air forces conducted two attacks on Mahdi Army positions in Basrah, an Iraqi source told AP.

http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2008/03/fighting_in_baghdad.php

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 03/28/2008

At least people now understand that the surge was a political victory of the corporate media that is now going down in flames. You can see the talking heads thinking can we fool them one more time?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 03/28/2008

test

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 03/28/2008

Hey, Everyone!

See that Google Ad down below, offering "Yellow Ribbon Support our Troops"

Click on the ad so they get to pay $1 for your clickthrough, then close the window once you get there.

A few thousand clickthrough's and their ad budget will be toast.

PEACE!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 03/28/2008

A blogger wrote earlier:

"Indeed. The best response to violence is ask what they want, give it to them, and then say thank you."

The US attacked Iraq unprovoked. Iraq is responding to violence not the United States.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:44 PM on 03/28/2008

Bush blames every thing going on in Iraq on either Iran or al Qaeda. The Citizens in Iraq want U.S. out and the propaganda news clips of what Bush has the news media to show is from a selected group.
Why do you believe so many news personal are being killed. They are trying to control all news coming out of Iraq.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 03/28/2008

The Iraqi government is responding to the violence and threats posed by the militia of Al Sadr.
The USA is good with that.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 03/28/2008

"The Iraqi government is responding to the violence and threats posed by the militia of Al Sadr. "

So was Saddam Hussein...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 03/28/2008

Q: How come there are never any polls in Iraq where the residents are asked if they would rather have Saddam Hussein back in power?

A: Because the results wouldn't fit the template.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 AM on 03/29/2008

Is present conditions in Iraq the definition of the surge working? McCain says Americans don't cut and run. Hate to tell you John thats exactly what we did before in Vietnam, remember the helicopters at the Embassy. That wrong aggressive war we lost over 55,000 American soldiers. PLEASE, a reporter a pundit, I don't care, ask McCain about the parallels of Vietnam and Iraq. Every day the same ludicrous statements eminate from McCain but he is not challenged for the lies of both wars. Iraqi John should be confronted with facts besides a complacent media ignoring all.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 03/28/2008

Glad that surge and all that trining of the Iraqi army, plus the brething room we have given their government to get thing right is working out so well! We'll probably just have to stay there for more than a hundred years just so George Bush will have eyes on the ground to keep telling us just how well it's all going. (Hey, they haven't used that excuse for stying yet!)

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 03/28/2008

Another point here - The Iraqi armed trained by us and touted to be doing such a great job, and armed to the hilt, were unable to stop an uprising!! So we have to go in and to their job for them. i thought that was what we were training them to do - defend their country. What a waste of lives, money and effort.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 03/28/2008

Read the article. The Iraqi army is doing the fighting. We are providing air support.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 03/28/2008

Republicans alway suck in the BS and propagands which the Bush controlled news media gives them.
We have been 5 years , over 4,000 American deaths , over 50,000 wounded (if you listen to what Bush give there are about 30,000) and the mental brain injuries run about 10 percent of the soldier pasing through. Bush stated that the terrorist keep finding new and better ways of destroying us and "So Do We"... It looks as it Bush wins with the destruction he has done to our country and citizens,,, hands down and there was no contest. Bush has done the job ,, in which Bin Laden want to try to do to our country, Our economy is in a recession, Americans has lost their jobs , manufacturing plants , constitution , bill of rights , freedom and our social programs almost no longer exist. This is what Bin Laden wanted and Bush/Cheney did it for him.

The only thing which has happen so far is that Bush has a puppet government in place to let the oil companies steal the oil in Iraq and the rest is the total destruction Bush and his criminal mob has done to our country and to Iraqi country.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 PM on 03/28/2008

air support (meaning bombing) for an urban conflict! that always works wonders for the hearts and minds, doesn't it? collateral damage (civilians killed and wounded) guaranteed, yes? you don't use air bombing on a pacified area. i bet even maliki is not going to be happy, as usa bombs won't really distinguish between sadr shi'ite militias in basra and maliki-support shi'ite militias in basra. in fact, i bet the usa army and the british army will have trouble distinguishing between the two.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:54 PM on 03/28/2008

Oh,balkanization,we all know the truth-US bombs and missiles don't kill Iraqi civilians.We have photos of each and every Enemy Target.Before they are deployed,each weapon is programmed to search for a certain Enemy Target.The US military doesn't want anyone to know about this technology, so the eyewitness reports from Iraqis of missiles slowly flying (at about 1mph) through the streets looking for their target,or flying through crowded areas,finding the Target,and a hook coming out of the missile and carrying the Enemy to a safe detonation location,are being supressed.Oh,and don't you tell anyone either...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:24 AM on 03/29/2008

Ramirez: "Read the article. The Iraqi army is doing the fighting. We are providing air support"

Incorrect.

"US. troops also fought militants on the ground in Sadr City and targeted rocket and mortar teams elsewhere in the capital, another spokesman Maj. Mark Cheadle said"

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 03/28/2008

2nd attempt at reply:

Sadr City -- Baghdad
Basra -- somewhere else

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 03/28/2008

Whackamole dreams go on forever

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 03/28/2008

Sadr City is in Baghdad and the US is responding there to rocket attacks against the Green Zone. The government action against the Sadr militia is happening in Basra.

Having stated that, the Iraqi army assaults against Sadr may well spread to Sadr City if the militants in Basra are not sorted out.