Edwards Praises Both Clinton, Obama

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

MIKE BAKER | March 30, 2008 01:32 AM EST | AP


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Former presidential candidate John Edwards signs an autograph for Clara Frade at the Annual Young Democrats Conference in Research Triangle Park, N.C., Saturday, March 29, 2008. (AP Photo/Sara D. Davis)

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C. — Former Sen. John Edwards, in his first public speech since dropping his White House bid two months ago, praised Democratic rivals Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama on Saturday, but declined to endorse either candidate.

"I have a very high opinion of both of them," Edwards said at the Young Democrats of North Carolina convention. "We would be blessed as a nation to have either one of them as president."

Both Obama and Clinton have repeatedly lobbied Edwards for his endorsement, flying into Chapel Hill to meet with him privately and touting his accomplishments on the campaign trail. Before leaving the race, Edwards won a promise from both Clinton and Obama to make ending poverty central to their ongoing presidential campaigns.

On Saturday, Edwards pointed out the historical nature of both of their campaigns and said both were better suited in carrying forward his campaign platform than Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain.

"We are blessed, first, to have an extraordinarily talented African American who could be the next president of the United States," Edwards said. "There's no way to contest the fact that he's inspired this country."

"And Senator Clinton, who has served America for so long and so well, and has shown so much strength and leadership, has really forged an extraordinarily historic campaign as a woman for the nomination and for the presidency."

Pressed by reporters to detail any endorsement plans, Edwards declined to even say if he would endorse a candidate before North Carolina's May 6 primary.

"When I have something to say, I'll let you know," he said.

Though the Young Democrats convention focused primarily on state races, both Obama and Clinton sent surrogates to represent them. Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker gave a speech on behalf of the Illinois senator while Clinton's daughter, Chelsea, was scheduled to make an appearance later Saturday.


 
 

Comments
259
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- huffhuffpass See Profile I'm a Fan of huffhuffpass

Holding out his endorsement for potentially Attorney General offer from either of the candidates!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 04/01/2008
- Tsunami See Profile I'm a Fan of Tsunami

Edwards could SAVE the party by doing the right thing--endorsing Senator Clinton. He is waiting because he is hoping a locked convention will turn to him. Clearly, Obama does not have the votes to win and the Rev Wright issue will ikeep him from becoming President. Obama sat there and listened to the anti-American tirades. He allowed his young daughters to be subjected to the hatred of Rev Wright. So much for his good judgment. Clearly, Obama does NOT have the Right stuff. Clearly Obama has the Wright stuff.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 03/31/2008
- Cowboylove See Profile I'm a Fan of Cowboylove

John needs to endorse whomever he supports before the North Carolina Primary. As someone who supported Edwards, I cannot imagine him supporting anyone other than Obama. Hillary is - Edwards so often pointed out - the biggest recipient of corporate lobbyist money in the race. Her health care plan will force people who cannot afford it to buy PRIVATE health insurance or face fines or prison. Not exactly help for the working poor or their children is it?

Hillary has shown herself to be a pathological liar. Anyone paying attention the last 16 years knows that. Bosnia was a liar - a whopper - not a misspoken or misremembered event. The Clintons are not used to the u-tube world, and thus are finding it hard to lie and get away with it. It isn't stopping them from trying!

Come on, John! Cowboy up!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 03/31/2008
- Bozwellian See Profile I'm a Fan of Bozwellian

Think John is still nursing his "bruisings", being a bit petulent and enjoys the dangling of his endorsement as a bit of "revenge" but is hurting but himself ,the issues he supposedly embraces as dear to his core beingness. He ALL BUT endorsed Hillary at Young Dem convention with his noted remarks of what strong leadership skills she has shown. Wonder if was aware that her leadership in "management" was noticed by him..her campaign struggles financially even thou in the intial runup to the presidential camapgn she WAS by FAR THE MOST ENDOWED in funds and even was cavelier in her last run to retain her NY Senate seat which was run against GOP incompetents and not only was a semi easy win for her but was noted that it should have been an easy win and many wondered THEN why she "wasted" so many dollars on that race !! Now that the presidential race has proven to BE NOT INEVITIBLY HERS, and money was yet kinda' NOT budgtted any too correctly to point where she finds her campaign in NEED of $$$ infusion/etc...it too turns out that PAYING for campaign "essentials" to vendors includes the LATE PAYMENT OF HEALTH CARE expenses for her campaign staffers and their families. (we are told, just because payments made late none went without coverage...but uh, under HER plan, where MANDATORY, such lack of payment has CRIMINAL PROSECUTION POTENTIAL for those that FAIL TO PAY THOSE SORTS OF OBLIGATIONS !!!!)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 AM on 04/01/2008
- aht772e See Profile I'm a Fan of aht772e

as an edwards supporter, i think he knows that a bomb has more power before it is used than after it has exploded (nukes are good when you have them, once used, there is litlte threat left). By not endorsing either candidate, he can continue to pressure both to pay attention to the issues that he brought to the campaign. I can't imagine him being a VP nominee. (has anyone ever done that twice but for different nominees?) However, if he can manage to not offend any of the sitting senators on the democratic side, I sure would like to see a relatively young trial lawyer (as opposed ot a corporate one) sitting on the supreme court someday soon!

As for the mansion, do you people really believe that we will EVER elect anyone president who doesn't have the assets that include a really large house (or houses)? Does that mean that the poorer elements of society can never have anyone elected who genuinely supports them? Seems to me that RFK lived in a frigging compound, and he seemed believable about his support to help end poverty, and Teddy does also, and has a lifetime of legislative work to back up his beliefs. It is in both the economic and moral interests of ALL americans to support the safety nets that provide for the largest middle class possible and the protection of those too weak or unfortunate to provide for themselves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 03/31/2008
- Sargoth See Profile I'm a Fan of Sargoth

I'm glad that Edwards has not decided to jump into the masochistic brawl that the Democratic Contest has become. His positive words are reassuring after a constant stream of negativity. I'm also glad he hasn't endorsed anyone and hope he continues to remain a voice of neutrality in support of the wider Democratic Party. This is a man with tact and an awareness of the bigger picture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 03/31/2008
- bob5701 See Profile I'm a Fan of bob5701

John your a wimp!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 AM on 03/31/2008
- YellowPanties See Profile I'm a Fan of YellowPanties

From your comment and spelling, as well as your name, I can see you were born May 7, 2001, and therefore are only (almost) 7 years old. Please stay away from adult conversations until you're a bit older.

Thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 03/31/2008
- Abie56 See Profile I'm a Fan of Abie56

he is quickly becoming unimportant

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:05 AM on 03/31/2008
- AntonBursch See Profile I'm a Fan of AntonBursch

Guess what folks. Richardson was going to endorse Clinton, but changed his mind. This is a hard decision for these guys. They have been behind the scenes with both candidates. They know shit we don't know. Edwards has his reasons for holding off an endorsement. Could be as simple as not wanting to take sides in case this actually gets to the convention and somebody needs to make peace. The truth is that most people on both sides respect Edwards. That makes him unique as someone to help mend the party after the primary. We need someone to do that if you all didn't notice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 03/31/2008
- GravitonX See Profile I'm a Fan of GravitonX

Edwards recognizes a winner, but he is also tactful, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 03/31/2008
- mamacat See Profile I'm a Fan of mamacat

It is good to see a national leader like Sen. Edwards get out in front of the cameras and say something without being negative.
We should let the process of choosing a candidate proceed, respectfully, until someone is finally chosen. Isn't the purpose of the political process to try to run the government constructively?
Using lies, dirty tricks, and misinformation as campaign tools might succeed in the short term, but as we have seen for the last seven years, such methods are not good for the country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 AM on 03/31/2008
- Bozwellian See Profile I'm a Fan of Bozwellian

Think telling was his appear on Leno where he TOO acknowledged that he had the MISFORTUNE to be running in a historic race with the first "credible" female and black candidates and he as the white guy got rather short shrifted !!! Think he has hurt feelings and is being petulent and thinks this time , the nomination SHOULD have been his. The voters obviously DID NOT, and for a bumber of reasons. He has SOME good positions, or at least professes to hold some dear and ppromotes that he would promote ....Presently he enjoys dangling his "support' , leaves HIS options open but if he was truly TRUE to his professed concerns, in truth, Obama is closer in positionings than Hillary and if he DOES endorse Hillary, Edwards will be "Exposed" for his true positon/endearments/core principles. !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 AM on 04/01/2008
- ChrisS13 See Profile I'm a Fan of ChrisS13

Look how many Obama drones are attacking Edwards, simply because he doesn't choose to endorse Obama right now? He didn't do anything negative but he is waiting, probably waiting until his state votes, but that doesn't stop the Kool aid drinkers from attacking. It's very typical of Obama supporters. IF someone doesn't kiss Obamas ass publically, they will attack. Very cult like.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 03/31/2008
- Bozwellian See Profile I'm a Fan of Bozwellian

LOL, THE TYPICAL response from Clinton Campers...Blame the other for "attack", presently we get Hillary and Bill stumping that Obama WANTS TO NOT HAVE ALL VOTE....yeah, right, as it has been Obama who has restated he will agree to whatever the Dem party RULES in accordance WITH THE RULES !!! TO the Clintons, that means Obama is stopping the Clinton manipulation of the rules ...LOL, foolish and the Clinton do not realize how such is backfiring for the MANIPULATION TO NULLIFY AGREED UPON RULES IS SEEN AS A TYPICAL CLINTON PRACTICE and one that is NOT WANTED TO BE REPEATED AND REPEATED AND REPEATED and if once again used in their campaign, gives pause as to what they would do with the reins of WH empowerment expecially since executive powers have been enhanced via precents set in motion by the Bush folks during their reign...ARE THE CLINTONITES SO TOTALLY DENSE NOT TO REALIZE THAT THEY ARE THEIR OWN WORST ENEMY ? ...easy to gather they are !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 04/01/2008
- dajay See Profile I'm a Fan of dajay

Yes, very typical. What a bunch of crazies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 03/31/2008
- YellowPanties See Profile I'm a Fan of YellowPanties

You are trying your best to roil the waters but only other Hillary supporters are going to care. Those of us who are voting for Obama already know that your comments and people like you are just plain ridiculous.

Good day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 03/31/2008
- seakiev See Profile I'm a Fan of seakiev

I wonder if this is going to be another 'Bosnia' for Hillary? Interesting article on Political Punch this morning:

"Campaigning in Indiana on Friday, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, claimed to have been a 16-year vocal opponent of NAFTA.

"I spoke out against it starting in 1992 -- the president made a different decision," Clinton said. "I think now with 14 years of experience under our belt, we can see that in some parts of our country there have been, perhaps, some economic advantages, but in other parts of our country, like where we are right here in northwest Indiana, it hasn't worked as it was promised, and therefore I think we need to renegotiate it."

Given that Clinton was the headline attraction at a pro-NAFTA meeting in November 1993 and was praising NAFTA in public throughout the 90s, the claim seemed interesting. When was she "speaking out" against it?

Clinton campaign communications director Howard Wolfson says that Clinton argued against supporting NAFTA internally on the 1992 campaign before then-Gov. Bill Clinton decided to support it.

Would you consider that to be "speaking out against it"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 03/31/2008
- aufdeb See Profile I'm a Fan of aufdeb

I don't know exactly what to think of John Edwards. Perhaps I am being cynical but I think he has been holding out for a guarranteed position be it VP or Attorney General etc... and has been rebuffed. At this point, I do not think his endorsement matters that much just like Richardson who did not do so until after Texas. It was nice but did not really change the election dynamic much. I love John's spirit and comments but still hard for me to get by the huge mansion and all when he is supposedly for the little guy. I mean all it would take is a short video clip of his place and put in serious doubt his conviction to help poverty in this country. I do not think he helps Clinton or Obama as being VP so they have not offered it and this probably is why he has held back his endorsement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 AM on 03/31/2008
- Sargoth See Profile I'm a Fan of Sargoth

Do you have to live in poverty to fight poverty? I think it's exceptional that Edwards is successful and still cares. How many people living in gated communities don't even give a rat's ass about the poor or lower classes? John Edwards' words and actions say far more about his commitment to fighting poverty than where he lives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 03/31/2008
- Whinger See Profile I'm a Fan of Whinger

When you sit on the fence John watch out for splinters!

Still running with the hare and hunting with the hounds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 AM on 03/31/2008
- Alessan See Profile I'm a Fan of Alessan

This is proof, that although John Edwards has not formerly endorsed either candidate, he endorses
both of them by mentioning that they are good candidates, and people should vote for democratic
candidate, regardless of which Democrat it is. Every Democrat should think this way. John Edwards
has lead on every policy for these two candidates, including race issues in his campaign. Note
that Obama, didn't mention race u ntil the Rev was exposed.

Frankly I hope he doesn't endorse either candidate and waits until the nomination, whenever that is,
June or the convention. This is a Democracy for the people not just media pundits and Obama supporters and staffers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 03/31/2008
- GravitonX See Profile I'm a Fan of GravitonX

I can see why Clinton supporters would be afraid of another big endorsement anouncement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 03/31/2008
- sparkandy See Profile I'm a Fan of sparkandy

I think you're absolutely correct. If he endorses one or the other now it's just going to cause more bitterness and anger among Democrats. Plus, progressive Republicans, conservative Democrats, Indies, etc like and respect Edwards. His endorsement AFTER the nomination is a done deal may pull in some of those voters who right now think the Democrats are insane for all the fussing. Edwards may be the biggest gun the Dems have in the GE and he shouldn't waste ammunition on the fussing between Clinton and Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 AM on 03/31/2008
- iambananaman1 See Profile I'm a Fan of iambananaman1

attorney general edwards sounds pretty good to me

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 AM on 03/31/2008
- JiminNC See Profile I'm a Fan of JiminNC

Att. General Edwards knows more than he is saying. Read between the lines.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 03/31/2008
- nohat See Profile I'm a Fan of nohat

I agree, Jimin. Look at these two statements from Edwards:
"We are blessed, first, to have an extraordinarily talented African American who could be the next president of the United States," Edwards said. "There's no way to contest the fact that he's inspired this country."
"And Senator Clinton, who has served America for so long and so well, and has shown so much strength and leadership, has really forged an extraordinarily historic campaign as a woman for the nomination and for the presidency."
In the first, the candidate ---Obama---'could be the next president of the United States'. In the second, the candidate---Hillary---'has really forged an extraordinarily historic campaign as a woman for the nomination and for the presidency'. The one about Hillary is more about the candidate's campaign, as being historic; the one about Obama is more about the possible end result of the candidate's campaign, the presidency.
It is subtle, but it's there...but someone is going to pounce all over this post and say I am looking for things that just aren't there! I wasn't looking for things, I was just reading...and I could be wrong. Still, politicians are so careful about the wording of their statements, they parse every word, usually.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 AM on 03/31/2008
- nohat See Profile I'm a Fan of nohat

I see that someone else agrees with us--- Reflective, just below. And Reflective is right about the lawyer thing. No one is more careful with words, than a lawyer. They agonize over them. Bill and Hillary are lawyers and will comb Edwards' statement for clues.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 AM on 03/31/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in