Cancer Expert: Cell Phones More Dangerous Than Smoking Or Asbestos

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

The Independent   |  Geoffrey Lean   |   March 31, 2008 12:59 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.

The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment yet published of the health risks.

It draws on growing evidence - exclusively reported in the IoS in October - that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.

Keep reading.

Meanwhile, an Israeli start-up has just introduced the world's lightest cell phone.

The Guinness World Records named the Modu phone as the lightest cell phone in the world. At just 1.5 ounces and 2.8 by 1.4 by 0.3 inches, the Modu is a full ounce lighter than the already miniature Pantech C300. Without a doubt, it's the tiniest cell phone I've seen outside of Zoolander.

Tell us below: How often do you use your cell phone? Are you worried about radiation?


 
 

Comments
94
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I'd heard this from a cancer researcher before. She said she uses the
speaker as often as possible to keep the phone away from her head.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 04/03/2008

This is another hot issue where the government has allowed us to be killed, like war in Iraq, for the big bucks...d*mn us...now all of us will be trying to get health insurance companies to pay for our medical bills and they are going to say we are not covered...RIP OFF! the entire country. We are so tied to our cell phones it would take 30 years or more ..just like cigarettes, coffee, dairy products, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:42 PM on 04/01/2008

I say we don't do anything about this problem until we can weed out all the annoying serial cell phone users (10 years at least). You know the people I am referring to, the ones that take an extra 5 minutes at the checkout line because they have only one hand and the other is holding the phone to their heads, the ones that hold the phone to their ears in such a way that causes their elbows to knock into anybody nearby. Also included are the teens who talk on their phones so loudly that you can't help to hear their vapid conversations (really great on buses or trains). How about those drivers who are so busy talking that they don't move when the traffic light changes or they take 5 minutes to make a right turn with only one hand free.

I say we let these "talkers" get weeded out (survival of the smartest) before we do something about this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 04/01/2008

It was simply a matter of time before research was going to reveal the risks posed by prolonged exposure to both mobile phones and wifi on notebooks etc...Just a matter of time....And the billion dollar tech industries will be fighting these reports much like Big Tobacco fought research on the dangers of nicotine etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 04/01/2008

I'm not trying to dispute this study, but I'd like to boil it down to what it really means and it's real numbers. From this article, I see that using a cell phone is twice as dangerous as not using a cell phone. But what does that mean? A 1 in 10 danger becomes 1 in 5? Or a 1 in 10000 becomes 1 in 5000? Saying "twice" doesn't necessarily scare me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 04/01/2008

As someone who has not owned a cell phone since I quit working for a major telecom company, I rarely say this, but you (all of you) really had it coming.

I TOLD YOU SO.

Physics. It's not just a good idea, it's the law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 04/01/2008

Bad comments page - trying to read light-green text on a light-gray background gives me a headache - oh, and looks sucky.

Anybody agree?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:51 AM on 04/01/2008

Agree that light-green (or blue or red) text sucks. This one is however black on my screen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 04/02/2008

I agree, I can't read the green on grey either, but right now this text, on my computer, is black, they must have changed it

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 04/01/2008

Agree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 AM on 04/01/2008

By study you mean unpublished, non peer reviewed collection of unsubstantiated ramblings of unqualified quacks and nut jobs on the internet.

if you want to read some actual analysis of this story, go here - http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2008/03/cell_phones_and_cancer_real_or.php

Your article is credulous and incompetent. Perhaps you could try some journalism rather than unthinking fear-mongering.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 AM on 04/01/2008

Spoken like a dedicated cell phone user with no education in science.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 04/01/2008

Absolutely, this kind of stuff is just silly. This guy in not an expert, he's not even an oncologist! Every analysis and accumulated meta-analysis has shown that there is no demonstrable risk posed by these devices. If there were, it would make the cover of Nature in a nanosecond.

Stop linking to junk science! That's what the Drudge Report is for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 04/01/2008

Hopefully, studies will show that second-hand radiation from cell phones is equally dangerous and we can quickly move to outlaw their use in public places. (I'm serious.) Forget about cigarettes, microwave radiation is like getting x-rays. We're barbequing our brains out. (It's no wonder the bees are all dying.)

This is all Dick Tracy's fault. If he hadn't had that two-way wrist radio in his watch we'd all be just fine. (Some detective he was, huh?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:03 AM on 04/01/2008

And here's the real question,

What are we going to do about workplace exposure to Second Hand Cell?

http://www.wlsam.com/article.asp?id=638124&SPID=12107

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 AM on 04/01/2008

Cigarettes have been around a lot longer than cell phones. Of course, these rumors have existed for years, always denied, never proven. Now we're supposed to worry about cell phones after all. How about telephone lines, clock radios, electric shavers and blankets? And, last but not least- stress!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 AM on 04/01/2008

It is called non-ionizing radiation and it can affect you (walkie talkies are the same as are police radios). The simple fact that cell phone companies do studies that disagree, is like the tobacco companies studying the effects of tobacco. Do not believe everything (or maybe anything) reported by MSM.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 AM on 04/01/2008

If cell phones are so much worse than smoking, why is smoke related disease one of the largest killers and brain cancer one of the fewest?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 AM on 04/01/2008

I think the brief article here explained that the cancers from cell phones take at least a decade tto develop, so you would expect larger numbers of brain tumor patients in the next couple of decades. You would have to have a study showing a rise in the number of cases following a rise in cell phone use, and then look for other confounding factors to see if there is a link.

Anecdotally, I know two people with brain tumors right now, and no one with lung cancer.

What I'm afraid of with cell phones are the idiots driving and talking in to them, oblivious to the rest of the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 AM on 04/01/2008

Last night my brother told me of a coworker of his who has used cell phones extensively since they were new, and he recently found out that he has a very big brain tumor right where he holds the phone against his ear.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 04/01/2008

Next up... YOUR UNDERWEAR CAN KILL YOU!

Film at 11:00.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 AM on 04/01/2008

Scientist discover the leading cause of death is life. In a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, scientist at the WHO conducted a multi-year study which shows a high corrolation between living and death.

"We studied a cross section of the international population comparing risk factors such as smoking, obesity, cell phone use and fugliness. Suprisingly what we found was a high corrolation between those who were living and then later died." said Dr Smith.

His colleague went a step further. "In every single instance of mortality, we found a common risk factor - namely that each person had at one time been alive. The only conclusion we could reach is that life leads to death."

Health activitist with the WHO are calling on member nations to enact policies to deal with the life problem within their populations.

President Bush was quoted as saying "The US and A has already lead the way in Iraq and New Orleans and what the hell is the WHO anyway?".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 03/31/2008

Life is a sexually transmitted disease with a 100% mortality rate! :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 AM on 04/01/2008

I don't have to wait around for the adverse health effects caused by cell phones and wireless routers. I can't be around wireless hotspots without feeling like my whole body is vibrating, and if I'm around it long enough I get violently sick. I can feel it in my body when I'm about to get a call on my cell phone before it rings or vibrates. We've only had this technology for around ten years, so NO ONE knows what the long term health effects are. Everyday more cell towers and more powerful wireless routers are put up without a thought to whether or not this stuff is eventually going to make people sick. It took centuries and millions dead before people began believing that smoking was harmful. We'll repeat the same mistakes with technology, meanwhile the number of kids with autism grows at a staggering rate, and our bodies need more and more drugs to stay healthy. Everyone can argue about whether or not cell phones and electromagnetic frequencies from wireless routers are harmful, but to me it seems like the fight over global warming. If there's a possibility that there could be a global disaster, why wouldn't we want to take steps to avoid it? I'm reminded of this problem everyday of my life because there's no way for me to avoid being zapped by these things that are supposed to make our lives easier.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 03/31/2008

I've had a cell phone for 20 years now, and they've been around for nearly 30 years. Harmful, jury's still out but I agree it's good to minimmise exposure whenever possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 AM on 04/01/2008

the original cell phone "tower" was supposed to be put on every other telephone pole (hence "cell" phones little tiny cells everywhere like in your body)so that there would be no need for high power transmission of energy (and they would work everywhere becasue there are telephone poles everywhere) but when the govt sold the airwave "rights" to the rich they realized they would have to pay for the antennas on the telephone poles and that they could make more money putting up a few cell phone towers here and there and boosting the signal of the cell phones thru your friggen head and evrybody else's around you - which then weren't really cell phones anymore they were more like radio phones.... this is all your government at work folks - you're in good hands with uncle sam... this is the 2nd part of my post that was too long to post together but I think people should know this

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 AM on 04/01/2008

no one knows the long term effects of all these new anti depressants either but they do know the long term effects of cannabis and morphine as all our ancestors used them and were around long enough to get us here.. morphine reduces blood pressure at a level where there is no real "risk" of addiction and it doesn't really matter becasue high blood pressure is pretty hard to get down if you are already in good shape but just geting older and it has no side effects on kidneys etc that the others blood pressure medicines do BUT you can grow opium in your back yard for free just like cannabis so the big pharma will spend lots and lots of money lobbying people like hillbillary and others to keep these safedrugs out of the hands of free people and should they dare take care of themselves with safe homegrown medicines they will be put into prison which will again, make other lobbyists such as the prefab prison industry who makes alot of their products in third world country's and then "assembles" them here (so they are "made" in the usa), more money which they can then again give to the hillbillary's of the u.s. political system to further their sick agendas... now my point ion next posting as this is too long I guess

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 04/01/2008

Well ... something is going to kill you.


Reality Check: Doctor's don't save lives, they postpone Death.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 03/31/2008

Amen, you got that right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 AM on 04/01/2008

April fool? Otherwise--yikes!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 03/31/2008

From what I can tell from a quick search of this guy's publication record in PubMed, it looks like he's published a few papers on brain aneurisms, but he's not an oncologist, and I doubt he knows what he's talking about when it comes to non-ionizing radiation and brain cancer. In fact, a recent meta-analysis shows that cell-phone users are slightly LESS likely (by about 10 percent) to develop brain tumors.

http://tinyurl.com/39yaeq

So, to me, the most hazardous aspect of cell phone usage is getting smacked upside the head for forgetting to turn your ringer off at the movies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 03/31/2008

aneur Y sm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 03/31/2008

Check your Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. Both are correct, however the spelling with the Y is the more common spelling in the United States. Britain uses the "i" instead. Since we don't know the origin or age of all the bloggers, we do need to not be too judgmental (or judgemental in Britain) of words that have preferred rather than solely correct spellings. Many of us learned to spell words that now no longer have letters doubled, such as counsellor and counselor, so not all words that look wrong to you are necessarily incorrect spellings. (:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 AM on 04/01/2008

If you are going to use a cellphone, use a headset to reduce your exposure. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2005/tc20050427_5651.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 03/31/2008

But didn't we just hear that obesity is deadlier than smoking? Or was that salt? Or was it sugar? Or was it riding without a seat belt? Or was it alcohol? Or was it red meat? Or was it global warming? Where do cell phones fall in this horrifying collection of deadly things? Thankfully, another expert will emerge next week telling us about a new danger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 03/31/2008

Smoking is the #1 leading cause of all statistics, second only to obesity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 AM on 04/01/2008

MSNBC had a medical expert on today talking about this. She said basically all this guy did, was compile a bunch of information from online articles, but no real test has been done to prove this theory right? Or he wasn't basing it off of any realistic tests.They still don't know if it is true or not. This guy could be totally right but an actual and long term test needs to be conducted or have been going on already to find out if it i true. You can't just piece together a few articles and claim it's a legitimate study.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 03/31/2008

microwaves are non-ionizing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 03/31/2008

I used to get aching ears after long convos on the celly till I got a device that sticks to it and emits a long wavelength sound that is inaudible and cancels out the high frequencies. Believe it, its true. The high frequencies emited cause a heating or speeding up of the molecules and that can't be good. If it isn't natural than I say be careful and cautious. To those that poo poo it go brush with some more flouride or take a big drink of flouridated water because chances are its over your head anyways.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 03/31/2008

Just think about it a second....

Lots of folks have Microwave ovens..they use microwaves to heat or to cook food.
So...anything that puts out microwaves would do this...get close enough and it's going to hurt you.

What to do...

Use your cell phone sparingly...like emergencies or calling home etc.

Don't use it every darn blasted minute.

And especially don't use it while driving and be nice and don't use it at the checkout either!

Couple of weeks ago I saw a kid on a bike us