Feingold Calls Out Intel Chief For Saying Dems Want To Imprison Bush

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Feingold Calls Out Intel Chief For Saying Dems Want To Imprison Bush stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 04- 1-08 12:02 PM   |   Updated: 04- 9-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Feingold Fisa

Senator Russ Feingold is calling the Director of National Intelligence out for telling what seemingly amounts to a massive exaggeration if not downright fabrication of the recent FISA debate in Congress.

In a speech at Furman University in Greenville, South Carolina this past week, Vice Admiral Mike McConnell told a crowd that, during the debate over the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, members of Senate called for the outright abolition of the Intelligence Community and even the jailing of President Bush.

"We had a bill go into the Senate. It was debated vigorously," said McConnell. "There were some who said we shouldn't have an Intelligence Community. Some have that point of view. Some say the President of the United States violated the process, spied on Americans, should be impeached and should go to jail. I mean, this is democracy, you can say anything you want to say. That was the argument made. The vote was 68 to 29."

And yet, as Feingold notes, and as a review of the press coverage details, neither of the events McConnell refers to actually happened. The debate over FISA was spirited as Feingold and a minority of senators maneuvered to remove a provision granting telecommunications companies immunity for helping the government with warrentless wiretapping.

But as Feingold wrote in a letter to McConnell: "I am not aware of any Senator saying or suggesting that 'we shouldn't have an Intelligence Community' or that President Bush 'should be impeached and should go to jail.'"

In addition to penning the note to McConnell, Feingold has asked the Intelligence Director to produce actual evidence "of all statements made by Senators during the debate that you believe support [your] assertions."

A spokesman for Feingold said there was no timeline for when they expected a response.

Here is the complete text of Feingold's letter:

The Honorable J.M. McConnell Director of National Intelligence Washington, D.C. 20511
Story continues below
advertisement


Dear Director McConnell:

I have received a copy of your March 28, 2008, speech at Furman University. In it, you described Senate action on the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, stating:

"We had a bill go into the Senate. It was debated vigorously. There were some who said we shouldn't have an Intelligence Community. Some have that point of view. Some say the President of the United States violated the process, spied on Americans, should be impeached and should go to jail. I mean, this is democracy, you can say anything you want to say. That was the argument made. The vote was 68 to 29."

As you correctly noted, the bill was the subject of vigorous debate. Many members of the Senate expressed serious concerns about the lack of checks and balances included in the legislation and the potential impact of the new authorities on the privacy and civil liberties of Americans. Many Senators were also concerned that retroactive immunity for companies alleged to have cooperated with the President's warrantless wiretapping program would undermine the rule of law.

However, I am not aware of any Senator saying or suggesting that "we shouldn't have an Intelligence Community" or that President Bush "should be impeached and should go to jail." I would therefore appreciate your providing a list of all statements made by Senators during the debate that you believe support these assertions. If there are no such examples, you should issue an immediate correction and an apology.

While all sides of this debate deserve to be heard, to falsely attribute statements to United States Senators serves only to mislead the American people. It also undermines your credibility and that of the position of Director of National Intelligence.

Sincerely,

Russell D. Feingold
U.S. Senator


Senator Russ Feingold is calling the Director of National Intelligence out for telling what seemingly amounts to a massive exaggeration if not downright fabrication of the recent FISA debate in Congre...
Senator Russ Feingold is calling the Director of National Intelligence out for telling what seemingly amounts to a massive exaggeration if not downright fabrication of the recent FISA debate in Congre...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
296
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (11 pages total)
- DRaymond I'm a Fan of DRaymond 67 fans permalink
photo

Maybe McConnel was auditioning for a job as Hillary's spokesperson. Anybody who can make up such a story about what went on in the senate should be great at fictitious battlefield tales too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 04/01/2008
- rbspickles I'm a Fan of rbspickles 9 fans permalink

Heh :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 04/01/2008
photo

We certainly need an intelligence community in today's challenging world.

What we don't need is a bushified and myopic one, run by stupid neocons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 04/01/2008

I know they don't want to but they should.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 04/01/2008
- myshadow I'm a Fan of myshadow 8 fans permalink
photo

......well, yes he (bush and cheney addington, libby, gonzolez, mukasey, rove, card,meirs,)should be in jail......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 04/01/2008
- knosiswar I'm a Fan of knosiswar 31 fans permalink

The Mastermind Darth Cheney will escape any prosecution because everything he orchestrated will have GWB's signature.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 04/01/2008
- wm1066 I'm a Fan of wm1066 34 fans permalink
photo

Bush has been Cheney's 'cats paw' and he doesn't get it.
He will take the fall for Cheney.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 04/01/2008

This republican and Vietnam veteran thinks that GW should have been courtmarshalled and thrown in jail a long time ago for the simple act of desertion. If the military had done its job back then we wouldn't have this criminal in office. He is a disgrace to the Republican party and all that it once stood for. Wher is Ike when we need him?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 04/01/2008
- Idiocracy I'm a Fan of Idiocracy 4 fans permalink

Words of wisdom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 04/01/2008
- schatsie I'm a Fan of schatsie 87 fans permalink

I have to agree with you entirely. My son served in Iraq recently and I cannot tell you how much insomnia I had..

regardless of that, this Bush is one lousy role model for any citizen or immigrant coming into this country... Where else would a president not be impeached if he/she ignored the Presidentail Daily Breifing from August 12, 2001 with the title 'Bin Laden Attacking the US"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 PM on 04/01/2008
- Arleang I'm a Fan of Arleang 13 fans permalink

For that matter, where is Truman. Someone should be prosecuting the war profiteers!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 04/01/2008
- jsj20002 I'm a Fan of jsj20002 2 fans permalink

In 1970, this former Army JAG trial counsel prosecuted a member of the Idaho national guard for not reporting when he had been ordered to active duty for missing his required monthly meetings. He did exactly what his contemporary George W. Bush did, but he got caught and he received a reduction in rank from E-5 to E-1. The appropriate sanction for Lt. George W. Bush's absence from duty should have been dismissal from the officer corps and an order to active duty as an enlisted man, which may well have sent him to Vietnam.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:27 PM on 04/01/2008

I feel that Bush used false information to assassinated saddam Hussein. There Bush should answer for murder that same way we forced saddam to answer for it. Remember Saddam was executed for ordering the killing civilians for a failed assassination attempt. there for Bush order the US Military to invade a country and in the process killed far more civilians that saddam. So therefore I don't why Bush should not be held accountable for him order that same why.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 04/01/2008
- USAisEVIL I'm a Fan of USAisEVIL 2 fans permalink

Most civilized nations send their psycho killers to prison instead of giving them the death penalty. I agree that life in prison would be an adequate punishment for your President, and that the death penalty is morally wrong. As for the majority of your people who still want Bush to complete his term in office, this is why the world hates America. You are cowards and hypocrites for allowing your mass murderer to continue on with his killing spree for eight more months.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 04/01/2008
- ptarantino I'm a Fan of ptarantino 9 fans permalink

I saw Mike McConnell testify on CSPN about the FISA bill & was suprised how crafty & cagey he was in trying to side with telco corporations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 04/01/2008
photo

Of course, he was - the telco's are big contributors to rethug candidates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 04/01/2008

My question is why AREN'T Senators saying the Bush should be impeached and put in jail?!?

OBAMA 08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 04/01/2008
- wm1066 I'm a Fan of wm1066 34 fans permalink
photo

The answer is Reid !
Reid wont support any impeachment discussion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 04/01/2008

Man, I'd love to hear even ONE senator speak up and announce what everybody but the 25% wingnut simpleton component of the US population (and the War Criminal-in-Chief's allies and enablers) thinks: Bush should have long since been impeached and imprisoned.

This "honor among thieves" concept practiced by our political elite may be OK for the thieves, but it's really hanging the rest of us out to dry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 04/01/2008
- solid I'm a Fan of solid 24 fans permalink

Feingold is probably as close as you'll get from a Senator, calling for censure of Bushco. Only a few Representatives have called for impeachment, of course Kucinich being the most obvious one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 04/01/2008

McConnell lied and misinformed the public and said "There were some who said we shouldn't have an Intelligence Community" there by proving what we don't an Intelligence Community

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 04/01/2008
- sugarmoes I'm a Fan of sugarmoes 19 fans permalink
photo

bush SHOULD already be in prison. but i'll settle for him standing trial asap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 04/01/2008

Well I'm not a member of the Senate, but this Democrat would have no problem with Bush impeached and in jail where all good war criminals belong.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 04/01/2008

Here, here!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 04/01/2008

I'll see that and raise you Cheney & Rumsfield!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 PM on 04/01/2008

Count me in as long as we send all his cronies with him

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 04/01/2008
- calirighty I'm a Fan of calirighty 38 fans permalink

Really? What war crimes? I keep hearing about these supposed "war crimes" yet no one offers any examples of ACTUAL WAR CRIMES that Bush or anyone else has committed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 PM on 04/01/2008
photo

Let's try invading a sovereign that was not an immediate theat to the U.S. That standard is part of the Geneva Conventions which, if you had ever read the Constitution, you would know is the "law of the land." Shall I continue with torture (again, as defined by the Geneva Convention), the use illegal munitions (incendiaries in Faluga) (ditto), etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 04/01/2008

Besides all of the ways that Bush circumvented the Constitution in his dealings with Americans like for example warrantless wiretaps, let's just stick with the basics. How about if someone preemptively attacked the U.S. under the assertion that we were stockpiling WMD despite United Nations Resolutions that said we were not allowed to have those WMD? And suppose that the attackers ramped up support among their own public with a bunch of lies and/or deliberate misreadings of intelligence. So they attacked us even though the international community through the United Nations said that they should wait for weapons inspectors to see whether we had the weapons or not rather than launching a preemptive strike. And imagine that they preemptively shocked and awed us. In the process our infrastructure was destroyed, and hundreds of thousands (maybe a million) of us were killed and wounded. Now it's five years later, and it's "oops we didn't find those weapons, sorry for the 'collateral damage' but hey that's the cost of our brand of 'freedom' we're bringing to you." Would you regard those folks as war criminals or do you have another term for that kind of behavior?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 04/01/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect