Hillary must have promised people like Bill Nelson and the likes, something very special. He has been pushing hard to get her the votes there. Something is up their sleeves to work so hard to get something that isn't theirs. I use to have respect for Mr. Nelson, but, not anymore. He is one of the bought and paid for group in the Senate. She didn't out perform, she is trying to buy that state off. Guess it's time to find a new place to spend my money, other than Florida.Th­at state has become a black eye to this country.

Leave it to the Obama supporters to continue to alienate voters in the 2 most important swing states. FL & OH. By saying that voters there are "bigot", "racists" and "old out of touch voters" is really helping your candidate. Please explaing to me how the "bigotted racists" in these 2 states will vote for Hillary over McCain?

Your candidate claims to be a "uniter". Unfortunately, a lot of his supporters didn't get the memo and it will hurt Obama in the near and long term. PS: You want racism? Check out Obama "spritual advisor and mentor". Now that's racism....­.....

Clinton wants to play the same game that cost Democrats the White House in 2004: Red State, Blue State. Basing your entire strategy on getting Ohio and Florida not only lost them the presidency, but cost them several Senate seats and House seats in places where they had given up the field.

Only by carrying out a 50-state strategy did they take seats in Virginia, Indiana, and North Carolina, places where Kerry wouldn't dare to show his face in 2004. Clinton is aiming for that same losing strategy, ignoring the gains Democrats can make in places like Colorado and Kentucky if they treated them with respect.

Gee .....and this is buried in HuffPo. Imagine if this poll showed Obama ahead in those states. The Headlines would be screaming with flashing lights.

While Hillary might like to argue that only the states she wins matter, here are the facts: the candidate who has the most delegates after everyone has voted will be the nominee.

Obama will have the lead in pledged delegates at the end of the primary season. So, Hillary has to convince the Super Delegates that she should still be nominee. Polls like this will factor into it, as will false logic that says because Obama didn't beat Clinton in some of those states, that he couldn't beat McCain in those states. Hillary would love it if the decision of the Super Delegates were based solely on those factors. But they also have to weigh things like:

- popular vote
- demographic polling data
- the effects of the Rev. Wright stuff on Obama in a GE
- the effects of Hillary's net -11% favorable (and honesty) ratings
- which candidate will do better among independents
- anything that happens between now and June
- the effects on Hillary's GE campaign of a *perceived* illegitimate nomination (potential loss of a percentage of Obama's constituency, including African Americans and the new & young voters who have come out to support him)
- the effects on Obama's GE campaign of the potential loss of a percentage of Hillary's constituency
- which candidate is better for the Democrats in Congress. Say what you will about Clinton's Presidency -- it was a disaster for Congressional Democrats.

The larger the pledged delegate deficit that Clinton

So basically Peter Brown is saying Dems should run Hillary and win the racist vote.

Wyoming's governor is going to back Senator Obama!

If he wins PA I'll believe it...

This is no surprise as she has really been purporting that it is OBAMA that has been disenfranchising voters in FL. That is her strategy to tie him to the Bush-like antics of 2000. Clever, but it will not work. FL will not vote McCain once he is vetted in the general and they here his "non" ideas for Social Security, the Economy, and the other issues. This is March. Bill Clinton himself said that we he started in the general election that he was third behind Ross Perot (not an April Fools' joke.) But in November, well we know how that story ends. Republicans want HRC to win because they have some "new" weaknesses to exploit. If Obama wins, they run the risk of appearing racists especially when Rev. Wright begins to internationally explain the full balance of his views. This too shall pass. She has always started leading in the polls, but somehow it doesn't remain that way.

It's no use trying to make the Obamanuts face facts. So blinded are they by the messianic properties of that man that they can't see reason when it is staring them in the face.

I suppose most of them are young and haven't lived through any of the elections mentioned by previous posts. I have, and I know McCain is a shoo in if Obama gets the nomination. Though I will be disappointed to live through four more years of Republican rule, I have resigned myself to it by now. Let the Obamanuts romp and play and think they have a chance. Life's hardest lessons are only learned by experience­...and God knows that's a quality they, like their Messiah, lack.

Umm, looks to me like the Obamaniacs on this site are pretty pissed off about these latest polls. What's the matter baby? Aawwww, come to daddy lol!


You people are so pathetic, you've become a laughing stock! When the polls show Hillary down, you celebrate and gloat like there's no tomorrow. When the same polling companies show Hillary up or narrowing the gap like in today's Gallu poll (Obama 49%-Hillary 45%), then there's something seriously wrong with the polls and should be completely igonored lol. Which is it, people?


Rasmussen had Obama only down by 5% points in Pennsylvania yesterday. The Obama cultists where drinking and paryting in the streets after hearing the news, while at the same time conveniently and shamefully ignoring the USA Survey poll which has Hillary up by 12%. So you see, children..­.the only way we'll know to what extent the Rev. Wright and Bosnia stories have damaged both candidates is on April 22nd. I predict working class/white America in PA will give Hillary her biggest victory so far, thus sending shockwaves throughout the political and Obama world!

Oh, how nice ... too bad FL and MI won't count ..........­....... :-(

But this can't be true. Hillary has been attacked and attacked and attacked mercilessly all of this year. And I'm only referring to the attacks by just by Huffington Post.

Let's see. I love how one story says Clinton is strong in Ohio and Florida. Another story says she's strong in Indiana. The other says that her lead is shrinking in PA.

But no story says what is essentially the truth, "Clinton leads in OHIO, PA, INDIANA and FLORIDA."

This is indeed significant since the Democratic nominee cannot win the White House without winning at least one of these states. I think that Obama shot himself in the foot with his efforts to disenfranchise the voters in FL & MI. Democrats don't take kindly to being disenfranchised especially by fellow Democrats. Whatever short term gain Obama makes by doing this to try to win the nomination will surely come back to haunt him in the general election; and righfully so.

what's *really* disturbing is that the one and only thing anyone seems to be able to use against obama is some OTHER PERSON's out-of-context comments- as if obama himself had made them. comments that obama has come forth and renounced- so it's a weak case at best against obama.

meanwhile, more people are coming out of the woodwork on a nearly daily basis with ACTUAL, FACTUAL PROOF that hillary clinton HERSELF has been known to lie several times about several things and is PERSONALLY involved in a lot of shady dealings over the years.

obama: accused of association with SOMEONE ELSE.
hillary: accused of things SHE HERSELF said or did.

it is truly amazing and sad that there is actually a lot of people who support her. then again, this *is* the country that elected george bush not once, but twice. go figure...