The Obama Thugocrats have been saying for months that their Messiah can only beat McCain in the general. Other than their hatred for Hillary, this has been a major rational for Obama.

Here are the facts:

Hillary won in primary states where most of the educated population lives.

Obama won mainly in inbred caucus states where his supporters thugged their way to victory.

Obama supporters want to disenfranchise Michigan and Florida, because they know they will lose Michigan and Florida. They hate democracy. They know they can't win fair and square, so they will thug their way to the top by hook or crook if they have to.

In the states that count for an Electoral College victory, Hillary beats McCain and Obama loses to McCain.

Ergo, Obama Thugocrats have been basically lying for months now. They are not rational beings. They are Hillary hate mongers who support an empty suit because he makes them feel good. No policies, no potential for victory, just feelings of hatred for Hillary and a love for flowery speeches about hope and change that have no substance.

I voted for neither in the voting in my state. I'd vote for either rather than 4 more years...ea­sy choice.

Is this an April fools gag because the only thing I hear on this site is that Hillary should get the hint and drop out since no one likes her? I dont know what to believe in anymore.

so, in other words, some of the backwards-ass folks in rural parts of ohio (where I'm originally from, btw) and some of the out-of-touch senior retirees in florida would rather have a lying, scheming, coniving leader- even more so than a republican one?

not really a surprise. that being the case, florida and ohio vote "R" and hilary is not gonna win there during a general election *anyway* so... this is news?

Who is really better candidate clearly depends upon who can win 270 out of 538 electoral votes needed in the general election. Let do the math. Since FL & MI are not counted (although Clinton won both states with 44 electoral votes), revised electoral votes needed-to-win in this example would be 247 out of 494 electoral votes in the general election.

Obama won (probable win also included) the following states with 241 electoral votes:

AL, AK, CO, CT, DL, DC, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN (toss-up), IA, KS, LA, ME, MD, MN, MS, MI, MO, NB, NC, ND, OR, SC, SD, UT, VT, VA, WA, WI, WY.

Clinton won (probable win also included) the following states with 253 electoral votes:

AZ, AR, CA, KY, MA, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, TN, TX, WV.

Senator Clinton has earned more Electoral College votes than Obama. So, no doubt Clinton will definitely be a better candidate to defeat Senator McCain in the general election.

If nominee is other than Senator Clinton, there is no need to wonder why once again democrats have lost 8 out of 10 presidential elections lased 44 years. Democrats are guilty of picking wrong horse every four years.

Pick Obama and join LOSERS CLUB members with Humphrey (1968), McGovern (72), Carter (80), Mondale (84), Dukakis (88), Gore (00) Kerry (04) and Obama (08).

Pick Clinton and join EXCLUSIVE WINNERS CLUB members with Carter (76), Clinton (92-96) and Clinton (08-12).

Clinton wins!

Hillary fired for lies, unethical behavior from Congressional job: former boss
by Ed Morrissey

As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidenti­ality.”

I had also informed Hillary that the Douglas impeachment files were available for public inspection in the committee offices. She later removed the Douglas files without permission and carried them to the offices of the impeachment — where they were no longer accessible to the public.
Visit: www.Blacks4Barack.org

Oh NOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOOOO­OOOOOOOO!

Clutch the pearls, throw a hissy fit!

This is the same old story. In state after state, Sen. Clinton--due to her high profile and name recognition--has almost always led in the polls. Then Obama focuses his resources and talents, introduces himself, and the polls change. It's happening in Pennsylvania (and it'll happen in Florida, if he gets the nomination).

Pair Obama/Webb together and the white voters will come back to the DNC along with full support for Obama from the DNC leaders and the whole party and the Move On.org/527 assault on McCain would bring everyone back home.

The Florida numbers don't surprise me. Obama hasn't campaigned in Florida! Witness what he's done in PA to Hillary's insurmountable lead. Put him and his people on the ground in FLA and they'd change those poll numbers in a matter of weeks.

Well since Clinton has spent the past month or so hammering the lie that FL (and MI) 's delegate problem is ALL Obama's fault, I am not surprised by this. I wondered why she would kneecap Obama in a state w'ed like him to win, and now I see. It is so she can claim that she is "more electable".

Otherwise I am disappointed in how gullible people are. Didn't the Ohio people learn, or do they just like being suckered?

Doesn't matter - they'll more than likely go Republican anyway. . .

Daily polls mean nothing at all and who ever is out poll picking can find the one they like and post it. I think unless you have some kind of real poll that covers time and trends and not hopeful dailies you are wasting time and space.

So what, we rarely win in those states anyway.

These are the same people who've handed victories to Republicans in the last two presidential elections. When Obama gets the nomination, it'll be interesting to see if these two states let their feelings about race trump their own best interest. Will they once again go against themselves and vote Republican?