Justice Dept. Sues News Corp For Refusing To Pay FCC Fine

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Justice Dept. Sues News Corp For Refusing To Pay FCC Fine stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JOHN DUNBAR | April 4, 2008 07:46 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — In an unusual move, the Justice Department sued Fox Broadcasting Co. and another broadcaster Friday to collect $56,000 in fines for the broadcast of a raunchy reality show in 2003 that included scenes from bachelor and bachelorette parties.

Fox's "Married by America" included the "thrusting of a male stripper's crotch into a woman's face" in one show in addition to other scenes the agency found objectionable, according to a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

In October of 2004, the FCC issued a $7,000 fine against 169 Fox-affiliated stations totaling $1.2 million.

The fines were assessed regardless of whether a complaint was lodged against a particular station. Fox challenged the FCC's action and last month the FCC dropped the complaints against all but 13 stations, which were the subject of actual viewer complaints. The move lowered the total fine to $91,000.

Despite the decision, Fox, a division of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., said it would not pay the fines because the FCC's decision in the case was "arbitrary and capricious, inconsistent with precedent and patently unconstitutional."

The company appealed again, but on Friday, the FCC "returned without consideration" its claim, saying it was 14 pages over the limit. The agency said the company did not ask permission to exceed those page limits. Fox dubbed the FCC decision "offensive."

Since the FCC's February action, four stations have paid the fine and another station was dropped because no complaint was filed against it, leaving eight stations and $56,000 in fines. Five of the eight stations are owned by Fox, three are owned by the Sinclair Broadcast Group.

The Justice Department brought suit in Washington, D.C., Iowa, West Virginia and Tennessee.

Story continues below
advertisement

The action has been part of an aggressive campaign by the government to enforce indecency rules on television. Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving Fox and the broadcast of fleeting expletives, the first such broadcast indecency case to be heard by the high court since 1978.

ABC, which is owned by Walt Disney Co., paid FCC fines totaling $1.2 million involving a 2003 airing of an "NYPD Blue" episode in which a woman's bare buttocks were shown. But the company decided it would challenge the agency's ruling in court.

"We have an obligation to protect our children by enforcing laws restricting indecent content on television and radio," said FCC spokeswoman Mary Diamond. "For four years, News Corp. has failed to take responsibility for airing indecent programming during 'Married by America.' It is long past time for the company to accept responsibility and pay its fines."

Fox spokesman Scott Grogin in a brief statement released Friday night said, "We look forward to the opportunity to present the full factual and legal arguments in the Married by America case to an impartial and open court of law."

It is unusual for an indecency fine to be challenged in federal court. Most cases are resolved at the administrative level within the agency. The case against Fox will essentially start from scratch in a "trial de novo."

The stations still subject to the fine are in Tampa, Fla.; Detroit, Mich.; Washington, D.C.; Kansas City, Mo.; Des Moines, Iowa; Minneapolis, Minn.; Nashville, Tenn. and Charleston W.Va.

The six-episode "Married by America" series introduced a cast of single men and women and allowed viewers to match them up by popular vote. Five matched couples then went through dating rituals debauchery and whipped cream, but none married.

___

AP Business Writer Dibya Sarkar contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — In an unusual move, the Justice Department sued Fox Broadcasting Co. and another broadcaster Friday to collect $56,000 in fines for the broadcast of a raunchy reality show in 2003 t...
WASHINGTON — In an unusual move, the Justice Department sued Fox Broadcasting Co. and another broadcaster Friday to collect $56,000 in fines for the broadcast of a raunchy reality show in 2003 t...
Filed by Danny Shea  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
32
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)
- b2008 I'm a Fan of b2008 4 fans permalink

Since we have no control 100% of the time on what our children might be exposed to, the government SHOULD have restrictions on what is or is not viewable by children. Most kids can see anything they want in schools, libraries, someone else's house when their parents aren't home, and now right on their cell phones. We must have restrictions for their safety. Grownups can watch what they want or turn the channel. Kids won't do that on their own because it's something they were told not to do and that's what makes it desirable to them.

Since parents purchase TVs and other viewing media sources, they deserve some protection.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 AM on 04/05/2008
- Fair I'm a Fan of Fair 2 fans permalink

No mention of this by Bill O'Reilly??

Why??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 AM on 04/05/2008
- b2008 I'm a Fan of b2008 4 fans permalink

Or Sean Hannity, the BIG MOUTH!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 AM on 04/05/2008
- MACS I'm a Fan of MACS permalink

.
Because they are both sockpockets of ailes/murdock.

Any claim of independence or "Fair and Balanced" are frauds during evening prime time.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 04/05/2008
- mgloraine I'm a Fan of mgloraine 28 fans permalink

Censorship is unconstitutional. Complainants ought to learn to change the channel or program their parental controls. The penalty to Fox (or anybody) for airing tasteless, offensive material should be a well-deserved loss of viewership. If nobody watches, the media corp. will have to change its material or lose advertising dollars. But if people really want to watch that kind of baloney, it's not the FCC's business to say they can't, no matter how many individuals don't like the show (thirteen actual complaints are not very many, but BushCo will no doubt declare a war on obscenity as a result).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 04/05/2008
- noamjunior I'm a Fan of noamjunior 86 fans permalink

that would be fne if we were all equally freeto buy our own television station in practice. As it is - corporate control of both the technology and the airwaves (through their govt proxy) prevent all but a few billioniares from expressing thier opinions on Airwave said to belong to ALL Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 AM on 04/05/2008
- b2008 I'm a Fan of b2008 4 fans permalink

First of all, Bush don't have enough brains to complain about anything indecent, that's for sure. And secondly, censorship should always look out for America's children. If they didn't, all the sleezeballs in America would fill the screen with porno and other malicious and evil crap. Some people don't have any scruples at all so thank God for some laws.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 04/05/2008
- plainsman I'm a Fan of plainsman 16 fans permalink
photo

"patently unconstitutional?" They decide to use that phrase now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 04/04/2008
- Birdman I'm a Fan of Birdman 35 fans permalink

I'm sure GW will step in after all they cannot sue the propaganda arm of the US govenernment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 04/04/2008
- GalaxieGal I'm a Fan of GalaxieGal 2 fans permalink

He probably already included it in a signing statement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 04/07/2008
photo

The government is never going to be right entity to decide what we may or may not see & hear & say.
Fox should be fined because "five matched couples then went through dating rituals debauchery and whipped cream" on TV?
Who forces these people (who are offended by trash TV) to watch trash TV?
I don't watch Fox or VH1 or E! and what do you know?
I'm not offended.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 04/04/2008
- b2008 I'm a Fan of b2008 4 fans permalink

True, but you have no control over what our children watch when they are not at home. Some of this garbage can be seen in school or libraries. There should be restrictions to protect the kids at least.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 04/05/2008
- Harinama I'm a Fan of Harinama 11 fans permalink

WOW, amazing. So the fascist/im­perialist/­propaganda tools of media don't always present information that betters our minds and hearts? Who would have thought?

I have an incredible profound novel idea....

DUMP THE TV, and get information from many other sources.

Most (but not quite all) TV is for ignorant chumps who want entertainment and news presented to them in such a way as to make them ignore reality, and feel good about their rampant consumerism, militaristic imperialism, religious selfrighteousness and narrow worldview.

I love America, but many "Americans" make it difficult.­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 04/05/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect