Axelrod On Penn: 'You Can Use The Word Hypocrisy'

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Axelrod On Penn: 'You Can Use The Word Hypocrisy' stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 04- 7-08 10:20 AM   |   Updated: 04-15-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Penn Axelrod

Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod called Mark Penn's departure from the Clinton campaign "stunning," and coined the iconic quip for this morning's news on MSNBC's Morning Joe: "The sword is mightier than the Penn." Axelrod and host Joe Scarborough then spoke at some length about Penn's role, both in and out of the Clinton campaign during the campaign season, and the mixed messages that Axelrod believed were clearly sent on trade issues. Asked how Penn's wrangling with Colombian officials on trade colored Clinton's position on NAFTA, Axelrod criticized Clinton for her "indignation" and "moralizing," finally saying, "You can use the word hypocrisy, but there are certainly questions that arise from this."

Axelrod later attempted to clarify Obama's position on NAFTA: "Senator Obama has been critical from the beginning because NAFTA didn't include labor and environmental standards within the treaty that were enforceable. And he still believes they should be included...That's always been his position."

[WATCH.]

SCARBOROUGH: Let's bring in David Axelrod, if he still has his job. David, you haven't been fired, have you?


AXELROD: It's early in the day, Joe, so I can't say for sure. I think I'm still in place. But it turns out sometimes the sword is mightier than the Penn, right? I thought that up while I was waiting for you.

SCARBOROUGH: You have been waiting to say that for about a year and a half. So what about Penn?

AXELROD: Look, it's kind of a, it's a big thing inside that campaign because anybody who has been involved with Senator Clinton and anybody who has watched from the outside knows that he has pretty much called the shots for all nine years of her political career. And she stuck with him despite all the reverses in the campaign, she stuck with him through the revelation that his firm was working for Blackwater and working for Countrywide. So, you know, it's kind of stunning that this happened.

SCARBOROUGH: Well, does this prove she's a hypocrite on NAFTA?

AXELROD: Well, I tell you what, you all witnessed during the Ohio primary the, you know, Senator Clinton all of her righteous indignation, all her moralizing about, you know, something far more innocent than this which was an unpaid part-time adviser to Obama and his conversation at the consulate in Chicago with somebody which then was later disputed, the facts of which were disputed. Here is, Penn orchestrated this outburst that was used for political purposes and turned it into an ad. And how he could ankle on down to the Colombian embassy. And you know, remember, that the embassy, they weren't sure if he was there as a representative of his firm or a representative of Senator Clinton. I mean, I think there are issues associated with this. You can use the word hypocrisy, but there are certainly questions that arise from this.

SCARBOROUGH: We said earlier and I think most of us agree at this table, we could be wrong, but most of us agree that if Barack Obama is President of the United States, he's not going to pull us out of NAFTA. This is something you have to say in Ohio and Pennsylvania, but come on, no way in Hell any presidential candidate running now is going to withdraw from NAFTA or any of the other trade agreements.

AXELROD: Joe, let's take this in two parts. The first question is where has someone been from the beginning. And one of the things, the other thing that happened in Ohio is that Senator Clinton said, and she continues to say, despite all the evidence "I spoke out against NAFTA." She didn't. She in fact - her schedules came out - it turned out she was speaking at cheerleading meetings for NAFTA, and campaigned for NAFTA. And now, she switched her position. Senator Obama has been critical from the beginning because NAFTA didn't include labor and environmental standards within the treaty that were enforceable. And he still believes they should be included. And he has said that he will work with the Canadians and the Mexican government to try and get those included in the treaty. He has also said, Joe, and he has said this to labor audiences and business audiences, that trade is an important dimension of the global economy, that we have to compete and with have to win. But we have to do it within a set of rules that are fair to American workers and the entire economy, and that they have to be enforceable. And that's his position. That's always been his position. He hasn't changed it in order to influence a couple of primaries.


Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod called Mark Penn's departure from the Clinton campaign "stunning," and coined the iconic quip for this morning's news on MSNBC's Morning Joe: "The sword is migh...
Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod called Mark Penn's departure from the Clinton campaign "stunning," and coined the iconic quip for this morning's news on MSNBC's Morning Joe: "The sword is migh...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
306
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)

YEAH, DAVID AXELROD is such a nice decent fellow....­LOL....he is a SLIMEBALL HIMSELF.

HYPOCRISY? How about Obama taking money from OIL COMPANINES AND LOBBIESTS.

THAT is hypocrisy.

Penn was not running for office. He is allowed to disagree with HRC on that issue, its his perrogative.

I guess when you guys say "lets end partisanship and have unity" you mean crucifying anyone who disagrees with you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 04/08/2008
- vincealy I'm a Fan of vincealy 5 fans permalink

Penn has only left in the "Clintonian" sense . He is still a member of the staff is involved on the morning media calls . He 'left ' the way Hillary "ducked and ran " to the car in Bosnia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 AM on 04/08/2008

The "Rod" is mightier then the Penn!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 AM on 04/08/2008
- rosal I'm a Fan of rosal 335 fans permalink
photo

She was "furious" when she "found out". Are we to believe she didn't know? Come on people. Her husband is also involved with Colombia's business. Frank Giustra comes to mind.
She is sold to Corporate America, and Foreign Corporate. People from PA, do your homework. Do a little research, and see how much she cares about workers. Too bad she fooled the people in Ohio.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 04/07/2008
- RThM I'm a Fan of RThM 4 fans permalink

No, she knew. She was furious when she was found out. It may be the past tense, but it always depends on what "is" is with a Clinton.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 04/08/2008
- BIG JOHN I'm a Fan of BIG JOHN 14 fans permalink

IS THIS A SNAP SHOT OF HOW HILLARY WILL RUN THE COUNTRY THE SAME WAY SHE RUNS HER CAMPAGIN, IF SO, OMG. ARE WE IN TROUBLE. OBAMA'S CAMPAGIN IS RUNNING CIRCLES AROUND HER'S. MORE VOTES, MORE DELEGATES, MORE STATES, THE SUPER DELEGATES ARE FLOCKING TO OBAMA, HER CAMPAGIN IS IN MORE TROUBLE AGAIN. NOT TO MENTION BOSINA. IF YOU TRUST YOUR FEELINGS, HILLARY IS IN OVER HER HEAD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 04/07/2008
- riverhouse I'm a Fan of riverhouse 49 fans permalink

What's stunning is that with all the Penn hoopla no one in the Hillary campaign is admitting that Wolfson and his lobbying company have a $40,000 per month contract with Colombia to do the same lobbying for the trade agreement that Penn was fired for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 04/07/2008
- CLEDUC I'm a Fan of CLEDUC 2 fans permalink

"You can use the word hypocrisy, but there are certainly questions that arise from this. "

The headline is a little misleading. From the above, Axelrod was using the word "hypocrisy" - he was asked about "hypocrisy".

I did some digging a while back on NAFTA. I agree with Axelrod that Obama has been quite consistent. Obama is pro free trade but folks often get that confused with being pro NAFTA which is a speciifc agreement that Obama has several issues with.

One thing missed by some of the US media was how much Canada retracted the "leak" Goolsbee was accused of.
CBC reports on Canadian Government NAFTA lie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgxxWhzdhv0
Barack Obama NAFTA Scandal: A Smear Says Canada PM 3/3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ULhR5RQGUY&feature=related
CLINTON CAMP THE ONE MAKING PROMISES TO CANADA ABOUT NAFTA!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOLEK2lr3CM&feature=related

If there were any doubts of that, the new article below kills those doubts:
Canada working furiously to prevent NAFTA re-opening (Montreal Gazette)
http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=3d8691d0-d6ae-4417-af26-bd8204a22c26&k=55787

McCain is very much against reopening NAFTA. Hillary’s chances have slipped to about 10% since the “leak”. So how else could one explain the increased Canadian anxiety and actions over NAFTA getting reopened unless what Obama has maintained all along was true and the “leaked” memo was bogus? They can’t reconcile Canada’s actions after the “leak” with the memo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 04/07/2008
- Manx I'm a Fan of Manx 18 fans permalink

I think Joe Scarborough is sort of a chump for believing that Penn has left the Clinton campaign. It was merely a PR move to impress blue-collar workers in Indiana and Pennsylvania. Penn is still running the show behind the scenes.

But even before the events in Colombia, Paul Krugman wrote in The New York Times on June 11, 2007:

"...Why not evaluate candidates' policy proposals, rather than their authenticity? And if there are reasons to doubt a candidate's sincerity, spell them out: For example, Hillary Clinton's credibility as a friend of labor is called into question, not by her biography or life style, but by the fact that, as The Nation recently reported, her chief strategist (Mark Penn) - a man Al Gore fired in 2000 because he didn't trust him - heads a public relations company that helps corporations fight union organizing drives."

Hillary Clinton and Mark Penn are no real friends of labor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 PM on 04/07/2008

Good information! Do you know if the media and Pennsylvania and Indiana are covering the Penn story? It is not on AOL Top News Reports and seems to have been swept away from mainstream media outlets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 04/07/2008
- Tages72 I'm a Fan of Tages72 18 fans permalink
photo

Unlike Penn, I'd wager Axelrod isn't going anywhere soon.

The Obama approach to winning an election feels so unique because of its simplicity. It basically goes like this:

A: Ignore any attacks above or below the belt.

B: Don't stoop to the opponent's level.

C: For everything that's going wrong right now, promise to make it right.

D: Don't act like a candidate. Act like you're already the President-elect.

This isn't sarcasm on my part. It's the way politics SHOULD be played. It just sounds so original because few politicians have bothered to use this blueprint.

And it's going to work. As it should.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 04/07/2008

that works for fool elietest liberals, see kerry, there was real winner...

obamas record is, lie lie some more and whine like a crybaby everyone is beating up on the black man

he is a loser in the general

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 04/07/2008
- rosal I'm a Fan of rosal 335 fans permalink
photo

And I thought only McCan't was confused and disturbed. Does anybody in their right mind believe Obama" lies, and lies?"
Crickets, crikets, crikets

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 PM on 04/07/2008

The real question seems to be why Mark Penn was allowed to stay with the campaign as long as he has. Running his outiside business while a full time strategist for the Clintons would appear to have an inherent conflict in and of itself. Clients like the nation of Colombia seeking NAFTA-like trade agreements and Blackwater would on face value be the antithesis of what Clinton claims to stand for. Doing both the polling and strategy for a campaign is not a healthy combination. Why Bill and Hillary continued to support Penn - when all evidence showed that the rest of the campaign saw him as a problem - calls into question the judgement of the Clintons. Conflicts of interest. Big bucks from foreign countries. The appearance of duality and the internal divisiveness. Seems to be a Clinton standard as they are the ones who brought him into the campaign and allowed him to stay. The Clintons seem to come clean only when forced to do so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 04/07/2008

You may want to take notice that the Clinton's NEVER come clean !!!!

The real question is actually why Hillary isn't denouncing this enteire situation.­..I will tell you why...Penn is said to still be doing the polls for the campaign, offering advice and strategy.

Seems the only change is that the Clinton's no longer want the press to refer to Penn as the "chief strategist­"...other than that, what has changed ????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 04/07/2008

Absolutely NOTHIN! Say it again y'all!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 04/07/2008
- PhDiva I'm a Fan of PhDiva 20 fans permalink

Isn't this all telling us what a Clinton administration would look like? Lies, deceptions, false firings, mistakes, screw ups, squandered opportunities. I think this is really important. I say this as somebody who used to really admire Hillary Clinton. These major mistakes in her campaign make me question her abilities as a potential president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 04/07/2008

If you think about it, the answer is that the Clinton's could afford him. They have paid his firm over $30 million so far. All he did was $30 mil of damage to her chances. They wanted a Rove and they got one but Rovian tactics of the past no longer work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 04/07/2008

Always behind the curve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 PM on 04/07/2008
- LoloZ I'm a Fan of LoloZ 2 fans permalink

I think the Clintons timed this deliberately to take the attention away from their tax returns. Who DIDN'T know Mark Penn was such a scumbag? Nobody, including the Clintons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 04/07/2008

I said the same thing this morning. Nobody is talking about the $109 million dollars they made in under seven years. Amazing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 04/07/2008

I just wrote a blog post regarding how Clinton's mismanagement by herself and her campaign have led to her narrative of failure and elitism. Hillary could have comeback and still can. But follies like having Penn's resignation being announced on Sunday night so the media can have a hot juicy story for the morning talk shows just shows how down this campaign is. A release on Friday night could minimalized the damage.

Anyway my blog post is here: http://blog.hubdub.com/

drop in, take a read and relax in the understanding that this whole thing is a big mess

Ryan

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 04/07/2008
- JMorgan I'm a Fan of JMorgan 3 fans permalink

With all due respect, Ryan, Mark Penn has NOT left the campaign. By the campaign's own admission, he is still advising and doing their polling.

The announcement was timed to interrupt any focus on the Clintons' tax returns, released on the previous Friday ("take out the trash day"). The announcement was intended to obscure the fact that the Clintons did NOT release, as promised, last year's returns, or that the $10 million given to charity was to the Charity-of-Clinton (the Clinton Foundation) of which only $200k had actually been distributed for charitable purposes. And that Friday's release failed to explain the millions that Bill Clinton has gotten from Ron Burkle.

The announcement was timed to get the Clinton campaign through to tomorrow, Tuesday, when General Petraeus's testimony on the Hill will end this latest cycle of bad days for Hillary Clinton.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 04/07/2008
- plafayette I'm a Fan of plafayette 8 fans permalink
photo

You are right on the money! Additionally, do we really know whether or not Hillary opposes the trade agreement with Columbia? I ask this because it was also announced that Bush plans to send the agreement to Congress today or tomorrow. Another coincedence? Hardly. More like that excellent timing you are talking about. Mark Penn has not gone because maybe they are all backing this trade agreement and it wasn't supposed to come up until after she had "won" the nomination. According to her plan she was supposed to be done with the primary after Feburary 5th.

Not to mention that the trial should have started against crooked campaign finance deals tied to Clintons. I can see why she is so very desparate to "win" or cause a scandal for someone else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 04/07/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect