Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki Disagrees With Petraeus: US Forces Can Start Withdrawing

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki Disagrees With Petraeus: US Forces Can Start Withdrawing stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

KIM GAMEL | April 10, 2008 05:54 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A minibus with coffin leads a funeral march in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City, Baghdad, Thursday, April 10, 2008. Iraqi police say four more people were killed and six injured by U.S. helicopters in Baghdad's Sadr City district on Thursday. (AP PhotoKarim Kadim)

BAGHDAD — Iraq's prime minister got a show of support from political leaders of both Muslim sects on Thursday as he moved to isolate anti-U.S. Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his followers.

The meeting drew warnings from Sadrist lawmakers that the government's effort against them could backfire even as fighting between Shiite militants and U.S.-Iraqi forces eased somewhat after days of fierce clashes in Baghdad's Sadr City district.

The fighting has taken its toll on all sides. The U.S. military announced that an American soldier was killed by a roadside bomb Wednesday in central Baghdad, raising to 18 the number of Americans who died in Iraq the first 10 days of April.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, himself a Shiite, convened the meeting of the main political blocs to discuss the Iraqi-led crackdown on militias that began March 25 in the southern city of Basra, triggering the current crisis.

But the notable absence of the Sadrists signaled that al-Maliki was making good on a threat to try to isolate the movement politically if its Mahdi Army militia is not disbanded.

The Sadrists complained they were not invited to the meeting.

"The Iraqi prime minister is waging a political war," Sadrist lawmaker Falah Shanshal said. "But he is committing a big mistake because the Sadr movement enjoys the support of a large portion of the Iraqi public."

The developments came a day after Iraqi authorities announced they would lift a 2-week-old vehicle ban on Sadr City and another Shiite militia stronghold, Shula, this weekend. The intent is to provide relief to the residents who have suffered from food shortages as well as the violence.

Story continues below
advertisement

Sheik Salman al-Feraiji, al-Sadr's chief representative in Sadr City, welcomed the decision but warned "the battle is not over yet because the U.S. helicopters are still hovering over the city and U.S. forces are still surrounding it."

He also accused al-Maliki of waging a personal vendetta against the Sadrist movement, despite the government's assertion it is only targeting criminal gangs.

"Al-Maliki is refusing to listen to us or meet our leaders," al-Feraiji said. "We think that al-Maliki is determined to continue his mission, and the recent lull happened because of the U.S. criticism of the fruitless performance of his security forces."

Violence in Iraq had declined last year and early this year following a 7-month-old cease-fire by al-Sadr, an influx of American troops and a Sunni revolt against al-Qaida in Iraq.

But the recent government crackdown on the Mahdi Army has provoked fierce retaliation, underscoring the fragility of the security gains.

A marked reduction in casualty rates began around September 2007, and daily averages continued to decline throughout the rest of that year. However, since reaching a low this past January of 20 Iraqis killed per day, casualty levels have once again started to rise, with 26 killed per day in February and 41 per day in March, an Associated Press tally showed.

At least 261 Iraqi civilians and security personnel were killed or found dead across Iraq in the first nine days of April, an average of 29 per day, according to the tally. That's still about half of what they were a year ago; the daily average for April 2007 was 62 Iraqis killed.

The clearing of former insurgent strongholds also has led to the increasing discovery of mass graves. More than 30 bodies believed to have been buried for more than a year were unearthed Thursday by Iraqi troops at a house south of Baghdad, the military announced.

The killing of the American soldier pushed the average U.S. death rate to 1.8 per day so far in April, compared with 1.2 per day last month, according to the AP tally.

That was still lower than the 3.47 deaths per day in April 2007, but the percentage of deaths caused by roadside bombs was sharply higher.

During April 2007, at least 40 percent of the deaths were from roadside bombs. So far this month, at least 56 percent have been caused by the planted explosives.

Many of those were in northeastern Baghdad, which largely comprises Sadr City, a sprawling impoverished area that is home to some 2.5 million people, nearly half the capital's population. U.S. and Iraqi soldiers have restricted access to the area since the fighting broke out in late March between Shiite militants loyal to al-Sadr and government security forces.

Al-Maliki has found himself on the defensive after Iraqi forces were surprised by the fierce resistance by Shiite militias to an offensive that began March 25 in Basra.

But prominent Sunni politician Adnan al-Dulaimi, who leads the largest Sunni bloc in parliament, emerged from Thursday's meeting to say the operation was "a courageous step."

"We stand beside this government and support it. It was a good and blessed step to prevent militias in all provinces," al-Dulaimi said, adding his Accordance Front would begin discussions soon on ending its Cabinet boycott.

The meeting also was attended by Shiite lawmakers Hadi al-Amiri and Khalid al-Attiyah, the deputy parliamentary speaker.

Fighting continued in Sadr City but at a slower pace. The U.S. carried out two airstrikes targeting suspected rocket-launching sites, the military said.

It did not cite any deaths from the strikes, although Iraqi police said at least three people were killed in one of them.

U.S. and Iraqi soldiers also engaged in several gunbattles on Thursday, but "it has been relatively quiet," compared with recent days, said Lt. Col. Steve Stover, a military spokesman in Baghdad.

Police also said few mortar attacks were reported and more people were moving about the streets.

"We are happy with the decrease in violence. I was able to go to the market today and buy some food for my family," said 32-year-old resident Haider Jassim. "The prices have dropped slightly and more shops were open. We hope that this crisis will end soon."

___

Associated Press writers Sameer N. Yacoub and Qassim Abdul-Zahra in Baghdad, and the AP News Research Center in New York, contributed to this report.

BAGHDAD — Iraq's prime minister got a show of support from political leaders of both Muslim sects on Thursday as he moved to isolate anti-U.S. Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his followers. T...
BAGHDAD — Iraq's prime minister got a show of support from political leaders of both Muslim sects on Thursday as he moved to isolate anti-U.S. Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his followers. T...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
242
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)

It would be a welcome surprise if Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is correct in his remarks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 04/10/2008
photo

Maliki wants the troops removed "as the situation permits." That is an English phrase. It is easy to understand in context. I don't understand why people want to pretend it means anything earthshaking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:51 PM on 04/10/2008

It would be good if the pause wasn't needed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 04/10/2008

It will be interesting to see how the US aggressors will fare trapped in the mountains surrounding Tehran not being able to speak Farsi.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 04/10/2008
- KOisGod I'm a Fan of KOisGod 327 fans permalink
photo

We're looking at them trapped in the streets of Baghdad, not being able to speak Farsi.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 04/10/2008
- Highwind I'm a Fan of Highwind 7 fans permalink
photo

Can we get the hell out now? Let Iran deal with Iraq, we'll go to Afghanistan and Pakistan and take care of Al Qaeda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 04/10/2008
- Razz I'm a Fan of Razz 2 fans permalink

Like Bush, Maliki is a clueless and weak leader with absolutely no oversight on anything that they do or say. We have an idiot over here trying to twist another idiots arm to change direction, but to no avail. They have no idea what so ever how to handle the mess in Iraq. Anyone from the street here or there, can do the same job as these two moronic idiots are doing. Bush and Maliki are a disgrace to their country and their people. I can’t stand that repugnant cowboy, especially when he talks. I keep having seizures as soon as I hear Bush’s voice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 04/10/2008
photo

Bush and Maliki are both elected leaders. They do not want to "change direction.­" Iraq's new democracy has been making progress on all fronts, why would they want to change that?

The goal of international forces in Iraq is not to see how soon they can leave. Their goal is to help stabilize the country so it can recover from the war and 30 years of oppressive rule.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 04/10/2008
- Razz I'm a Fan of Razz 2 fans permalink

Your mean they were selected leaders not elected. Or do you mean the fundamentalist democracy that we’ve helped them install, where woman are afraid to walk outside without a burka. Or the so-called international forces which 98% are the US forces and 2% are the coalition? Give me a break.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 04/10/2008
- ejay579 I'm a Fan of ejay579 9 fans permalink
photo

International troops? What the hell are you talking about? Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, yes, the Coalition of the Unwilling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 04/10/2008
- Binx101 I'm a Fan of Binx101 30 fans permalink
photo

Your concise analysis seems to be missing the point that no asked us to invade Iraq. The UN specifically asked us not to do so, as did most of the world.

We (the United States) arbitrarily decided that Iraq was a threat and we invaded the country. If what you say is correct - a deal for Saddam Hussein to abdicate would have been the option. He was willing for peanuts and a promise of safety. But we turned down that option, because that would not have invalidated the contracts for oil with Russia and China as the invasion did. In the Hague World Court, a peaceful turning over of the government would have kept in tact, any international agreements.

The US was allergic to the idea that with tremendous Iranian influence, another iteration of Iraq would not fit with what the AHF and AEI had predicated guidelines, years earlier, for the invasion of Iraq (and Iran). When ever you think this wasn't about oil - bang your head on something hard.

Binx101
The Almost Daily Binx
www.binx101.wordpress.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:03 PM on 04/10/2008
photo

Dick Cheney's reply: "So"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 04/10/2008
- eladora I'm a Fan of eladora 9 fans permalink

Ring ring. Its 3AM in the White House and its Al Maliki calling W. "W , I'd like you to pull your troops out --we want our country back ." W: "Call back in six months, this is a recording"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 04/10/2008

I think people should read this story with some caution. I would love it if it was true but the fact is that it seems to me, as of now, the information is uncorroborated and the credibility of the source is unknown, and it comes from a government that is basically in a permanent state of chaos due to the infighting of the different factions that compose it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 04/10/2008

Prime Minister al-Maliki has said previously that he thought U.S. troops should pull out.

Who do you think is putting out "misinformation" or "uncorroborated" information, suggesting that we pull out of Iraq ???

But Bush says: "Pull out ??? We haven't even signed those oil contracts yet !!!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 04/10/2008
photo

The story is accurate. But it doesn't mean that Maliki wants all international troops withdrawn immediately.
The U.S. and Iraq are currently negotiating a Status of Forces agreement that will require a number of U.S. troops to remain in Iraq for a number of years.

Obama's advisers have recommended that we keep 60,000 to 80,000 troops in Iraq as a strike force. Clinton and McCain will probably recommend about 20,000 more than that. It is likely that troop levels will be in the 100,000 range by inauguration day.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:21 PM on 04/10/2008
- ejay579 I'm a Fan of ejay579 9 fans permalink
photo

Here we go again!!! International troops??? Give us a break.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 04/10/2008
- browndog2 I'm a Fan of browndog2 6 fans permalink

I think people should read the story period. The headline is mis-leadin­g...Sheep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 PM on 04/10/2008

Yes we are poor sheep who can't think for ourselves. We will let Gen Petroleum and Herr Bush tell us what's really going on. Just because most Iraqis still think its ok to kill Americans, and the puppet governement we installed wants us gone is no reason stop celebrating the Surge! I'm having a Surge Victory Party tonight. Wanna come by brownie? We can drink some beer and laugh at stupid libs who don't trust our brave Preznit anymore

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 04/10/2008
- TheRebel82 I'm a Fan of TheRebel82 3 fans permalink

It's funny how the iraqi government and the Bush regime arent even on the same page on this. Actually it isnt funny. Bush's blunder is killing thousands of people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 04/10/2008
- anney I'm a Fan of anney 9 fans permalink

So, a simple question.

Why doesn't Bush withdraw the troops and let al Maliki handle the mess? Wouldn't it be a SHOCK if the world discovered the Iraqis can function quite well without Americans in their country?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 04/10/2008
- john85msy I'm a Fan of john85msy 3 fans permalink

IMPEACH NOW!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 04/10/2008

So... Tell me again why we're not withdrawing troops? (I mean, other than the fact that Bush and Cheney are in charge lol)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 04/10/2008
- Grannysue I'm a Fan of Grannysue 131 fans permalink
photo

So, the Iraqi's want us to leave? But Bush isn't done with his little experiment yet, oh and Malaki probably meant you can take your soldiers out just leave the checkbook behind!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 04/10/2008

Has Bush given al-Maliki a Medal of Freedom and demanded his early retirement yet?

As the Iraqis continue to lie down, we will continue to lie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 04/10/2008

"Thank you, Faux-Prime Minister al Malaki. We'll get out of your country when we're good and ready, and not a minute before!! You better play ball or we'll install another fake one of you."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 04/10/2008
- TN I'm a Fan of TN 26 fans permalink

The republicans don't have the stomach to leave. They are afraid to leave. They want to spin it so it will be the dems fault. They don't have the stomach for a draft. But, they do have the stomach to watch more US soldiers die, and to watch the financial ruin of our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 04/10/2008
- biglover I'm a Fan of biglover 42 fans permalink

The repuglicans just don't want to be associated with "losing". Therefore, they will turn over this mess to the dems and when we do come out "responsibly or otherwise" whatever happens thereafter will be our fault. I hope the people of this country won't buy it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 04/10/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect