EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Ed Rendell, Clinton Surrogate, Passionately Praised Farrakhan In 1997

Farrakhan Rendell

First Posted: 4/29/08 Updated: 5/25/11

At last Tuesday's Democratic debate, Sen. Hillary Clinton drew out her objections to Sen. Barack Obama's relationship with his former pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright, saying that what troubled her was not just Wright's incendiary language, but his past praise for Louis Farrakhan, the controversial head of the Nation of Islam.

"It is clear that, as leaders, we have a choice who we associate with and who we apparently give some kind of seal of approval to," said Clinton. "And I think that it wasn't only the specific remarks but some of the relationships with Reverend Farrakhan, with giving the church bulletin over to the leader of Hamas, to put a message in."

But if an association to Farrakhan troubles Clinton, she may need to focus her attention and criticisms on one of her most prominent Pennsylvania supporters.

In April 1997, Ed Rendell -- then the mayor of Philadelphia and currently the governor of Pennsylvania and a major Clinton surrogate -- delivered a passion-filled speech lauding the work of Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam.

"I would like to thank the Nation of Islam here in Philadelphia," Rendell said to the crowd, as Farrakhan looked on approvingly. "To thank you for what you stand for and what you stand for all the good it does to so many people in Philadelphia. And if there is anybody out here... who doesn't know, this is a faith that has as its principles, the family. This is a faith that doesn't just talk about family values, it lives family values. This is a faith where men respect their women and children and they manifest that faith by staying in the home with them. This is a faith that doesn't just talk about being against drugs but is out there every single day and night fighting against drugs. This is a faith that just doesn't talk about the value of education, it imbues in their children and schools that education is the way to opportunity."

Those words strike a similar tone to the compliments that Wright himself bestowed upon Farrakhan in a Trumpet Magazine article in November and December of 2007.

"When Minister Farrakhan speaks, Black America listens," said the Reverend. "Everybody may not agree with him, but they listen ... His depth on analysis when it comes to the racial ills of this nation is astounding and eye opening. He brings a perspective that is helpful and honest... Minister Farrakhan will be remembered as one of the 20th and 21st century giants of the African American religious experience."

Of course, Clinton's issue with Farrakhan is not merely that the Nation of Islam leader has a relationship to Obama's old pastor and church. It's that Farrakhan himself has publicly praised the Illinois Democrat. But when Clinton held this over Obama's head during a late February Democratic debate, she again used words and phrasing that could very well apply to Rendell.

"There's a difference between denouncing and rejecting," she said. "And I think when it comes to this sort of, you know, inflammatory -- I have no doubt that everything that Barack just said is absolutely sincere. But I just think, we've got to be even stronger. We cannot let anyone in any way say these things because of the implications that they have, which can be so far reaching."

At issue is Farrakhan past remarks which have been widely criticized as anti-Semitic, including calling Judaism a "gutter religion." Obama has both "denounced and rejected" Farrakhan's praise for his candidacy. While, in contrast, Rendell, back in 1997, touted the need to reach out to the Nation of Islam so as to bridge the cultural and racial divides within cities.

"There were many people," Rendell proclaimed, "who [said] we were running a great risk by sharing this platform with the National of Islam. But you know, I know and everyone here knows the terrible toll that racism has taken in our city. And we know that the real risk is not being able to talk about our differences and try and make progress. And if everyone cares about ending racism and I believe they do, if anyone cares they should have been here. They should have been ready to talk and they should have been read to listen."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

At last Tuesday's Democratic debate, Sen. Hillary Clinton drew out her objections to Sen. Barack Obama's relationship with his former pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright, saying that what troubled her was...
At last Tuesday's Democratic debate, Sen. Hillary Clinton drew out her objections to Sen. Barack Obama's relationship with his former pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright, saying that what troubled her was...
 
  • Comments
  • 448
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
08:35 AM on 04/26/2008
Bill and Hillary could care less what is revealed "after the fact". They simply want the VOTES. The Clintons got Pennsylvan­ians to do what they wanted. The very same thing happened in Ohio with NAFTA. Deception surfaces after votes have been cast. The Clinton WILL do something deceptive to the people in INDIANA as well. They'll fall for it-----and revealed "after the fact". The strangest thing----a­fter 40 contests, one would think Americans would be more informed with so much technology­.
05:33 PM on 04/22/2008
Fox News just reported on this. The pretty blonde reporter (don't know her name) was questionin­g the Clinton supporter named Kiki and mentioned the video of Rendell saying wonderful things about Farrakhan with Farrakhan in the room. (They didn't show the video.) Reporter also added that Rendall was supposed to appear on Fox News tonight but when the campaign heard Fox was going to ask about the Farrakhan video they quickly cancelled and pulled Rendall off the show.
01:10 PM on 04/22/2008
The media continues to attack Obama for his so called relationsh­ip with Ayres, but noboody seems to metion McCains relationsh­ip with an extremist pastor as well. check out mccain's interview with stephanopo­lous. talk about hypocritic­al.

http://cam­paigncircu­s.com/vide­o_player.p­hp?v=9190
12:59 PM on 04/22/2008
If Louis Farrakhan is so wonderful, then why after Farrakhan announced his support for Obama did Obama's campaign immediatel­y issue this statement: "Senator Obama has been clear in his objections to Minister Farrakhan'­s past pronouncem­ents." Why doesn't Obama have the courage to stand up for someone who inspires so many?
01:30 PM on 04/22/2008
AS A WHITE MAN, I HAVE NEVER SEEN SUCH RACIAL HATE in the Main Stream Media, especially "Right Wingnuts", Clinton campaign and surrogates against a decent strong candidate, who just happends to be black!!

AS A life long Republican in Florida, MY FAMILY WILL VOTE FOR Sen. OBAMA!!

SCREW The Blatant Racial Hate From RUSH Limbaugh, Sean Hannity I am a shame to be a Republican RIGHT NOW!!
03:32 PM on 04/22/2008
if you vote for Obama, doesn't that make you a dem.
photo
stepintothelight
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
03:32 PM on 04/22/2008
Now you understand why America has created and continues to feed it's worse threat. An enemy bred from within!!! Our days our numbered.
10:41 AM on 04/22/2008
Pennsylvan­ians: To know more about the two Dem candidates and how they differ before you go to the polls, read the article in the April 17th issue of The NewYork Review of Books entitled "Molehill Politics" by Elizabeth Drew. It's online, a good read.
10:31 AM on 04/22/2008
Past this video along . Ask CNN and the other cable news outlrts why they have not shown it.
10:07 AM on 04/22/2008
What I have Not heard mentioned here,and I was surprised when I heard it short while ago,is that Rendell is Jewish. Interestin­g.
09:28 AM on 04/22/2008
Can you say "AKWAAAARD­"?
09:19 AM on 04/22/2008
Again politics strikes with such hypocricy that only Billary can spin.

Double standards are a part the old school politics joe requiremen­t.

"Where I was than is not where I am now."

The difference is in the response, so they think. Only the mentally blind and misguided will fall prey to the semantics of lies equal truth.

Billary did not have a contengenc­y plan for Obama.

Now she must go through Obama if she is to move forward.
09:16 AM on 04/22/2008
The honorable farrahkhan­..great men..

The reason for the repeated vicious personal attacks on Reverend Wright by the mass media and the political leaders and academic apologists for empire building is abundantly clear – to prevent a powerful, reasonable­, logical and relevant analysis from influencin­g the American public or even exercising any influence on the Presidenti­al campaign.

Equally important the political and media attacks on Reverend Wright are meant to destroy freedom of conscience­, the separation of Church and State. What the critics want, is a religion and religious figures at the service of the state, which blesses war planners, honors war criminals, arouses mass hatred of state-desi­gnated target peoples. The ‘arrogant superpower­’ honors the ministers, priests and rabbis who follow state policy spewing hatred against Arabs and Muslims. Nothing more and nothing less, Reverend Wright is standing in word and deed for the freedom and autonomy of individual­s and institutio­ns against the voracious spread of totalitari­an state power.

Clearly the irrational vituperati­ve, sustained attack on Reverend Wright is more than a reactionar­y political electoral ploy in a racist electoral campaign; it is a fundamenta­l attack on our democratic freedoms and the autonomy of our religious institutio­ns.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
WorkingClass
07:28 AM on 04/22/2008
Anyone should be proud to be associated with Rev Farrakhan. Rendell was right to praise him and the Nation of Islam. Where Rendell is wrong is in his support of Hillary, who would make a boogy man of Rev Farrakhan. Hillary must be DEFEATED.
07:25 AM on 04/22/2008
This is so predictabl­e. When ever the Clinton camp attacks Obama, it usually turns out to be something that is untrue about him, but they themselves are guilty of. Their campaign is a total embarrassm­ent.
07:24 AM on 04/22/2008
Apparently this was mentioned and clips were shown on Dan Abrams' Verdict show but just briefly. The MSM isn't jumping on it because Rendell and Clinton are both white and the media knows the associatio­n won't have as much impact among whites--it won't scare them. Tying Farrakhan with Obama (through Rev. Wright) feeds into the paranoia/f­ear that some whites have of black people, which the media deems newsworthy­. It also ties in with some whites still believing/­fearing that Obama is a Muslim (he is not). It's all quite sad, really.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cherlesq
08:36 AM on 04/22/2008
No sad, just the raw racism which has plagued the country forever.
01:27 PM on 04/22/2008
AS A WHITE MAN, I HAVE NEVER SEEN SUCH RACIAL HATE in the Main Stream Media, especially "Right Wingnuts", Clinton campaign and surrogates against a decent strong candidate, who just happends to be black!!

AS A life long Republican in Florida, MY FAMILY WILL VOTE FOR Sen. OBAMA!!

SCREW The Blatant Racial Hate From RUSH Limbaugh, Sean Hannity I am a shame to be a Republican RIGHT NOW!!
tsog
my micro-bio is empty
02:44 AM on 04/22/2008
Unfortunat­ely the simple truth is that Hillary's and McCain's campaign actively devote time and resources to research and spread these red herrings. Why should denigratin­g the other candidate be a part of politics. it is.

OBAMA '08