Sam Stein

BIO

Sam Stein

The Huffington Post

Lanny Davis: Clinton Campaign Moralist, Spin Doctor

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

April 21, 2008 12:20 PM


About Sam Stein

Sam Stein is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, based in Washington, D.C. Previously he has worked for Newsweek magazine, the New York Daily News and the investigative journalism group Center for Public Integrity. He has a masters from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and is a graduate of Dartmouth College. Sam can be reached at stein@huffingtonpost.com.


His is a ubiquitous presence on the campaign trail.

Lanny Davis, the crisis management communications guru, is not, technically speaking, affiliated with Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. But when it comes to surrogates in this never-ending Democratic race, his enthusiasm for the New York Democrat is seemingly unmatched; his elbows, uniquely sharp.

Indeed, Davis has gone where others only tread in private. In the wake of revelations over controversial statements of Sen. Barack Obama's former pastor, the Clinton campaign enforced a code of silence. Davis, in contrast, took to the op-ed page of the Wall Street Journal -- enemy turf in progressive circles -- expressing bewilderment about the relationship.

And even before William Ayers and the Weather Underground were thrust into the center of the political debate, Davis was posing questions to Obama on the matter during a segment of Fox News' Hannity and Colmes.

Advocacy on these issues, while usually not directed by Clinton's staff, has its side effects: Davis's words are often interpreted by media outlets as indicators of the campaign's unvarnished mindset. And it also raises questions, such as, is Davis practicing what he preached? After all, it was only two years ago that he wrote a book decrying the omnipresence of gossip and triviality in political campaigns.

"Scandal has become the chief instrument of mass political destruction for more than 30 years," he wrote on page two of his work, "Scandal: How 'Gotcha' Politics Is Destroying America": "More and more people are fed up with the food fight ideologues on both sides and share Shakespeare's sentiment, 'a pox on both your houses.' Across the spectrum there is a desire to debate the issues on the merits and find solutions -- and a disgusted with the politics of personal destruction."

To the casual (and not so casual) observer, there would appear to be a certain amount of friction between such political piety and Davis' current campaign conduct. But Davis, not surprisingly, doesn't see it that way. For him, Wright and even Ayers are hardly superficial matters.

"My view on Reverend Wright is, I don't care if you are black or white, if you sit silently and you listen to racism or bigotry or hate and you're silent, then you are complicit," he told The Huffington Post. "There is no such thing as context if someone says n----r. There is no context. If my Rabbi from the pulpit said they are all n----rs, would you ask me to understand the context, or would you say there is no context? There is no context that is bigotry. So you are using a double standard if you say [when Wright says] God damn white America, let's look at the context versus my Rabbi saying they are all n----rs... They are the same statements."

There is a moral dimension to such an interpretation, one that laces Davis's broader assessment of Obama. Take, for example, his view on Will Ayers, the unrepentant Weather Underground member with whom Obama has a 'friendly' but not serious relationship.

"Would I serve on the board with a murdering thug terrorist? No. This isn't gotcha politics," Davis said. "What bothers me about it is not that he is friends with the guy, who he disagrees with. It is, does he draw the line when it is somebody who justifies murder and justifies terrorism?"

The question, in essence, is not whether Obama relates with what Wright said or Ayers did -- "he doesn't share those views," Davis acknowledged, "there is not a shred of bigotry in Barack Obama's body" -- it is whether Obama has shown the requisite judgment in each instance.

But such moral policing demands consistency. And, in private, Obama's supporters and even impartial observers question whether Davis is nothing more than a shill on these matters. After all, it was two years ago when Davis was telling NPR that "the American people are angry" because "we can't even get issues debated anymore because we are so subsumed under the scandal culture."

Moreover, it was just a decade ago when he was the one spinning -- day in and day out -- the infidelities of former President Clinton.

"If you want me to compare character issues to what this reveals about Obama and what Bill Clinton's dalliances revealed about his character issue, I would not have to comment because this is an election about Hillary Clinton," he said when asked about this period of his life.

Moreover, Davis has also been involved in at least one politically controversial episode himself. In the late 1990s as a lobbyist for Patton Boggs, he successfully convinced the U.S. government to provide Pakistan a slate of F-16 jets the country had purchased but, because of its newly nuclear status, had not received. The move did not sit well with India or some foreign policy officials. Nor for that matter does Davis's current opinion that Pakistan should be as well-armed as its democratic neighbor.

"I had more mixed feelings before the election than I do now," he said. "But yes, I certainly feel that Pakistan and India should be treated the same but especially after 9/11. It's a complicated question. But now that [Pakistan has] gotten closer to being a democracy, it looks to me that they are much closer to where they need to be."

For all the quibbles over Davis' resume, it is difficult to deny that he has been one of Clinton's most committed surrogates. Davis got his start in politics as a student in the 1960s working for former New York mayor John Lindsay. He met the Clintons at Yale law school. And in the 1970s, he twice tried to run for Congress. He went to work for the White House counsel's office in 1996 as the point guy on inquiries surrounding fundraising scandals, Whitewater and Travelgate. White House press secretary Mike McCurry called him "my garbage man." Soon after, he was brought back to deal with the Lewinsky scandal.

Ten years later, he is soldiering on for Clinton's wife. And his passion -- or is it spin? -- is similarly fierce. Take, for example, Davis' opinion on Tom Shales, the Washington Post television critic who took serious umbrage with ABC's handling of last Tuesday's debate.

"Tom Shales has been a negative, cynical -- I won't use the word bitter, that's not the word you are allowed to use any more -- writer for years," he said. "Why doesn't he say Tom Shales, Washington Post, Barack Obama partisan, and write his piece?"

Or his opinion of the netroots, the Democratic activist base that aggressively targeted Davis's close friend and political ally, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, during the 2006 Senate campaign and has frictional relationship with Clinton.

"The real scary hatred and truly vicious personal attack language is coming from the left now and not from the right," Davis said. "[Lieberman's campaign] was the beginning of my understanding of the hatred and virulence from the left of Democratic Party that otherwise describes itself of liberal and tolerant."

But for all the complaints -- or, perhaps, because of them -- Davis seems aware that his candidate of choice may end up losing the nomination. And, perhaps cognizant of this reality, he made sure that his criticisms of Obama were tempered with a splash of reverence as well. Before hanging up the phone on a follow-up interview, Davis made one last request. That the following passage finds its way into the article:

"My regard for Barack Obama as a candidate, human being and intellect, is very high. And I have not changed my mind about that one iota. He excited me when he first started running and he still excites me if for no other reason than what he is doing for the younger generations... The Reverend Wright unease is derived from another set of issues but it has nothing to do with all the positive regard for him."

 
Comments
52
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

When Lanny Davis has completed all his speculations and they have done their worst, two and two still make four. Lanny Davis: The narrower the mind, the broader the statement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 04/22/2008

The conclusion then is either Mr. Davis is retarded, or Mr. Davis is nothing more than a sh*t-disturber, one who is all about Lanny Davis and what Lanny Davis said today and if what Lanny Davis said today is in print yet and if not why not. Insufferable inelegance to all his positions. One might expect more from a Yale Law grad. Then again, one might not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 AM on 04/22/2008

I wince to see a columnist dragging out all of Lanny's disgusting remarks, and quoting all the disgusting remarks, all over again, while denouncing Lanny for his disgusting remarks. Today strikes me as a prickly day to be airing the Lanny trash talk again, given we are locked in a battle to the death in Pennsylvania and a close race overall. It's sometimes poor timing to share your every thought.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 04/22/2008

Boy, Lanny Davis isn't very bright is he? A basic logic class might help fix him up a touch. How on earth can anyone think "G-D America" and "I hate "n*****s" are even remotely similar statements? There is a context for bigotry, Lanny. And you're using it to your advantage. Scumbag.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 04/22/2008

Moralist? New one for me. Also if he considers himself an authority on what has been said by Wright taking the words out of context and hammering them says his morals are based not on "morals" but on spin. Also he should be aware that the N word no matter how you show it and speak it has been shown to be a megative even when trying to promote a positive for a liar. Not impressed with anything he has to say because for someone to have anything worthy of my attention other than for a brief time has to earn some respect and for him I have none. He's just another sad person hanging onto the illusion of a candidate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 AM on 04/22/2008

Lanny Davis. There is only one. Only guy I know, when you see him on TV, he doesn't seem to take himself seriously when trying to talk about serious subjects. He seems to make himself laugh

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 04/22/2008

He'd sacrifice the US for Israel in a New York minute.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 04/21/2008

This guy is the official Wright commentator for Clinton. I find it laughable how much time Clinton & Co. have spent on Fox News. It is truely amazing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 04/21/2008

Of course there is a context when someone says n----r. There is a vast difference between saying those people are n----r and saying those people called me a n----r. Wright said the latter. Lanny's comments are just defaming distortion. If your going to slander someone at least be accurate about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 04/21/2008
photo

Lanny Davis is nothing more than a partisan political hack who has spent the greater part of the last 20 years defending Clinton Immorality, corruption and scandal. He knows that he is representing fraudulent people, hence that makes him complicit in their fraud.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 04/21/2008
- A. Siegel - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of A. Siegel permalink

Lanny Davis was also one of Joe Lieberman's strongest (and most abusive) surrogates in the 2006 campaign against Lamont. If Hillary were to win the nomination, have to wonder what Lanny will be doing when Joe stands up at the Republican Convention to praise John McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 04/21/2008

lanny is hillaries poodle

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 04/21/2008

If you could see into Davis' mind, it would be a house of mirrors, most of them cracked. With hucksters like him, it's clear why Clinton's campaign is where it is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 PM on 04/21/2008

Lanny Go Home - It's Over

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 04/21/2008

You gotta love Lanny for his unbridled enthusiasm towards Hillary. He is simply pushing the product.

Hillary will stay in this race no matter what because of her staff and blind support that they offer. Folks like Lanny (even though he is officially unaffiliated ) need her to stay as long as possible, because their careers as they know them will end with her campaign. Campaign insiders and pundits alike who have supported the divisiveness of the Clinton campaign will find themselves in new lines of work soon. Pundits like Lanny Davis and campaign staff like Mark Penn and Howard Wolfson are soon to be endangered political species. The sooner this race ends, the sooner their unemployed futures begin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 04/21/2008

by all means, Hill stay in - we love seeing you sink your own battle ship with all your lies and hypocrisy - karma is coming to get you - you can't raise money - you can't pay your bills - it kinda reminds me of the scene in Ghost, where Willy gets hit by a truck while being chased by Patrick Swayze and the demons come to take Willy's ghost away.... they're here!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 04/21/2008

Good point Mindact...let's see the video of Rendell spending those 30 minutes spewing platitudes about Farrakhan as the Nation of Islam chief looks to be sitting on a throne and gesturing proudly as Rendell throws praise his way. I want Hillary to reject and denounce Rendell for being associated with Farrakhan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 04/21/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect