Pennsylvania Primary Results: Latest News, Video

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The Huffington Post   |   April 22, 2008 09:33 PM



** PENNSYLVANIA RESULTS: **

99.44% Reporting

Clinton
1,237,696
54.6%

Obama
1,029,672
45.4%

The latest delegate figures are here, or check out this very detailed Pennsylvania delegate tracker. County by country results are here.

Clinton Survives Another Day: AP's analysis of tonight's primary: "Hillary Rodham Clinton survived yet another day. There will be little time for celebration, though. Time and money are running out."

Her win Tuesday in the important swing state of Pennsylvania was hard-fought. Barack Obama's well-funded effort to shut her down did not reach its goal of an upset.


The dynamics of the race are the same as they've been for more than two months. Obama is the front-runner, and California-based Democratic consultant Dan Newman points out that is more important the closer the campaign comes to the end of the primary season.

"He's content to essentially run out the clock with his narrow lead, while she needs something dramatic to happen," Newman said. "A one-run advantage in the first inning isn't a big deal, but a one-run lead in the ninth looms large."

Keep reading here.

The Hillary Victory Spin: Ben Smith reports that Clinton spokesman Mo Elleithee at the Park Hyatt in Philadelphia said: "There's beginning to be a subtle shift of psychology of a lot of the uncommitted supers. [They] are beginning to wonder why Obama has been unable to win this thing despite all the advantages he has.

"There's a lot of questions that are beginning to surface about him," he said, while superdelegates are learning that "every time she's got her back up against the wall, she delivers."

Here's her victory speech, where she told a spirited rally in Philadelphia that the "tide is turning" in her nomination contest against Barack Obama.

The Spin From Obamaland: "Sen. Barack Obama was en route from Philadelphia to Evansville, Ind., when the race was called," the Washington Post reports, "but the candidate and his advisers were all smiles when they boarded the plane, relieved that the dreaded blowout had not occurred. The news of a projected single-digit win for Clinton -- a projection that might yet change -- was transmitted via BlackBerrys as the campaign landed."

"We've been very clear from the beginning, we didn't come in with oversized expectations," said David Axelrod, Obama's chief political adviser. "We wanted to get our share." More here.

In Evansville, the Democratic presidential front-runner told supporters that he was able to narrow the gap in Pennsylvania, register a record number of voters and rally people of all backgrounds to his campaign. After the bruising Pennsylvania contest, Obama said bickering and tit-for-tat politics obscured the great issues of the day - two wars, a recession and a planet in peril. Watch the speech:

NYT Blames Clinton For "Mean, Vacuous, Desperate" Race: The Obama campaign is sending out a New York Times editorial released tonight that blasts Hillary Clinton -- whom the Times endorsed. Here's a sample:

The Pennsylvania campaign, which produced yet another inconclusive result on Tuesday, was even meaner, more vacuous, more desperate, and more filled with pandering than the mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled contests that preceded it.


Voters are getting tired of it; it is demeaning the political process; and it does not work. It is past time for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to acknowledge that the negativity, for which she is mostly responsible, does nothing but harm to her, her opponent, her party and the 2008 election.

If nothing else, self interest should push her in that direction. Mrs. Clinton did not get the big win in Pennsylvania that she needed to challenge the calculus of the Democratic race. It is true that Senator Barack Obama outspent her 2-to-1. But Mrs. Clinton and her advisers should mainly blame themselves, because, as the political operatives say, they went heavily negative and ended up squandering a good part of what was once a 20-point lead.

The editorial also knocks Obama:

He is increasingly rising to Mrs. Clinton's bait, undercutting his own claims that he is offering a higher more inclusive form of politics. When she criticized his comments about "bitter" voters, Mr. Obama mocked her as an Annie Oakley wannabe. All that does is remind Americans who are on the fence about his relative youth and inexperience.

Clinton Has Lost Fight For Popular Delegates: From Marc Ambinder:

As NBC's Chuck Todd points out tonight, Clinton's chances of winning the nomination based on pledged delegates is effectively over tonight.


If Obama keeps his pledged delegate lead to around 150, Clinton needs to win 70% of them on May 6 -- and if not, 80% of them after May 6.

That's more than next to impossible.

Here's the video of Todd:

Clinton Camp: $2.5M Raised Since Victory Called: Clinton spokesman Phil Singer writes: "As of 11:30PM tonight, we are at nearly $2.5 million since PA was called for HRC - 80% of that money is coming from new donors to the campaign. It's our best night ever."

"Stop The Drama, Vote Obama": Mark Halperin provides this photo of Obama communications chief Robert Gibbs leaving the Keystone State by jet plane "sporting a t-shirt with a pointed message for voters (and superdelegates?)."

Can Hillary Overtake Popular Vote? Probably Not: Ben Smith notes:

Terry McAuliffe, on MSNBC, suggested that Hillary could take the lead in the popular vote -- a technically meaningless, and flawed, measure, but one that could in theory provide a measure of legitimacy to Clinton's claims of victory.


He's referring to a count that, at least, would include Florida, and might also include Michigan -- not to any count that Obama partisans would accept; she'd likely need a wider margin than the early polls suggest to close the gap in any mutually accepted figure.

My rough estimate was that a 10% margin and giant turnout in Pennsylvania could give her 200,000 of the roughly 700,000 votes she'd need to take a clear lead; with 20%, she would have come within striking distance. Those numbers seem high now.

 
Comments
1496
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (21 pages total)

Obama is a great candidate and will rule the day!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 04/26/2008

Hillary's experience consists of 8 years in the shadow of her husband, the man the GOP tried to impeach because he tended to turn his dog loose in someone else's yard. Does tolerance of abuse count for strength? Also, look at the numbers. This could in no way be considered a decisive enough victory to call her the shoe-in. We still have a number of primaries to go. If in the end the popular vote goes to Obama, that's who should get the nomination; at least, if this election is back to being fair, unlike the last two.

It used to be the duty of the electoral college to vote according to the people they represent. Let's hope that, in this election, they remember that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 04/25/2008

just because MRS Clinton is running on the experience of her husband she may also believe herself to have his pattern of voter forgiveness. The longer she stays in this race and reveals herself the more her chances to remain in politics diminishes. She is, in essense, running out of beginner's luck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 04/25/2008

Everyone note how the media is spinning already the wright interview that comes on tonight. They have take out context those thing things they want us to focus on and are once againg telling us dumb Americans how we should think about the interview.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 04/25/2008

People in small cities should be upset. Hilliary is lowering herself to campaign in smaller cities. Her plan was to win the BIG cities and and take care of them after the election. She's a liar and a cheat.
Note she promised folks in upstate New York JOBS. The same promise she is promising everyone now. According to Fact Check she has not delivered. BUFFALO, N.Y. - She's reminded of it all the time around here, so Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton couldn't have been surprised when her failed 2000 campaign promise to bring 200,000 jobs to economically desperate upstate New York became part of the latest presidential debate. http://www.startribune.com/templates/Print_This_Story?sid=16074267 Also remember Hilliary has been promising Universal Health Care for 15 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 AM on 04/25/2008

Hrm, I think this just goes to show...

We need to find a way to combat Operation: Chaos.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 04/24/2008

apcalc says - She kicks his ass!!!!!!!!!! Obama is totally unelectable. The Republicans are saying it and her supporters know it too. There is NO WAY he can win.

I'm not sure it's such a great idea to accept who the Republicans think is electable and who is not...
my guess is that the Republicans would much rather run against Hillary Clinton (and have a great smear campaign ready) because ofd her high "negative" numbers. They have organized voting drives of Republicans crossing over to vote for Clinton, when possible. With Obama the Republicans are far less confident that their attack ads won't backfire or that McCain will make a slip of the racist tongue.
Time will tell - however, this former Clinton supporter switched after Super Tuesday to Obama

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 04/24/2008

The Daily Show - Jon Stewart on Hillary's assertion that "The Tide Is Turning"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DJjp9Bi3f0

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 04/24/2008

Classic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 04/24/2008

You cannot win a national election even with 100% of the support of African-Americans, college students, and upper-income liberals.

Obama will lose in November and lose by a very significant number " 5 to 10%. Obama"s base of support, while very fervent, is very narrow and I am persuaded that no amount of money, no hordes of glassy-eyed, clipboard toting youngsters, and no amount of loud declarations of Obama"s omnipotence will succeed in November.

The frenetic effort here, and on other blocs, to continually interpret reality to comfort yourselves and avoid the realities of Obama"s deeply flawed campaign is pathetic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 04/24/2008
photo

Hillary can not win with her HIGH NEGATIVE ratings, blue collar workers and senoir citizens hanging on to see a woman president in the whitehouse.

The delusional Hillary supporter and John McBush supporters are still afraid of Barrack Obama - as are the people that they support.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 04/24/2008
- 2351 I'm a Fan of 2351 permalink

But, interpreting reality to comfort yourself is exactly what Hillary is doing and the realities of Hillary's deeply flawed campaign is pathetic and Hillary is pathetic. She just looks so desperate. You know, when Obama wins the nomination, he will get those Pa votes. Hillary got a lot of the Pa votes because of her name recognition, not because she was considered to be the best candidate. People in Pennsylvania basically thought that she was devisive, negatively campaigned and the people polled really don't expect her to win the primary, as they expect Obama to win, but they just voted for her anyway. Why do you think that she is creating all of that turmoil in Florida, because she is desperate. So, when you speak of reality, it is best to look in the mirror.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 04/24/2008

It wasn't just name recognition - feminazis and racists vote, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 04/24/2008

You also cannot win a national election with 100% of bitter working class voters and... well, I guess that's about it. And old people. You need ALL those votes. And I promise you, African-American voters will be ESPECIALLY pissed if we cheat them out of this. I would be.

Besides that, there are far more converted Republicans voting for Obama than Hillary, unless of course they're a part of Operation: Chaos.

Hillary will fail if she is nominated. And if you're smart, you'll do the right thing and rally behind whatever candidate is elected. Despite me having just said that, I absolutely WILL vote for Hillary in the GE. It's much more important to get the Republicans out of power than it is to vote for foolish pride.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 04/24/2008

That's why he's depending on the groups of support that Hillary will deliver, when she bows out with grace and elegance. She could cause further mayhem by running as a third party, or be so jaded as to actually endorse McCain in the end. I believe the Clinton's and the Bush's are history, but they still do have sway and swagger.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 04/25/2008
- Hood I'm a Fan of Hood permalink

M.S.M. has been running a new scam for Clinton all day. Heres the link for Penn. Results. I"m no math expert but, Clinton won by only 9.2% not 10! How in the world can Clinton get credit for a 10% win? Can we spell a single didgit win instead.

By the way Ron Paul received 15.9% in the Penn. Primary. He still is popular with a large number of republicans.

http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 04/24/2008

That's what I've been saying. They said "HRC has to win by double digits" so they play games and round first to create the illusion she broke into double digits...
Typical.
Nothing is at it appears when it pertains to Clintons....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 04/24/2008



I want to know about how ABC news can predict a win for Hilarious with only 3% of the totals counted? I swear I was listening early on in the newscast? I know the election had to be pulled in numbers, with touch screens, come on guys. News of places where machines breaking down and people turned away. What the hell where is plan B! Paper it is as old as the Egyptians! There was so much time to plan and a mickey mouse scenario appears .. That really makes my blood boil!!!!!!
The polls were calling the race much closer than this, like 3% + or -
We get Hilarious with her negative ads and Barak is supposed to be the fool and just turn both cheeks like a little lamb. Damm the CNN and ABC and all the crap news, Get us an indepenant news source for a debate team. Hilarious does double speak and is getting very sickening

G

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 AM on 04/24/2008

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/23/the_speech_obama_cant_give/

Great article....the speech Sen Obama should give but can't

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 04/23/2008

Obama's speech was Presidential. Intelligent and moving. Assessing the goals of the country.
Hillary's was all about "her victory". Egotistical, shallow, divisive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 04/24/2008

Well summarised. I, I, I, versus We, we we.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 AM on 04/24/2008

I like the speech. Maybe it'll get delivered in due course.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 04/24/2008

THANK YOU for putting the results as 54.6% and 45.4%.
Clintonistas are crowing about 10% - they round the % first, then subtract. WHY?
It was "She has to win by double digits" - so they spin arithmetic to show she got double digits...

So typical.

Here's Hillary in her own words
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exsmFDYyK4U

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 04/23/2008

I think you miss the point. The truth is situational for the Clintons. I would run out of allowed space in this blog giving examples. Using the same math I was taught in 2nd grade, and my wife teaches in 2nd grade today, the Clinton campaing won by 9 with a remainder of 1/5th. Far below any level you can consider a keep on going blow out.

Using Hillary's notational concept further into her potential presidancy, if a teacher makes $35,000/year that means they are actualling making $50,000. And that means she improved teacher income by 50% without every spending a dime or actually improving teacher pay.

I think her kind of math is a lot more fun, but unfortunately is simply misleading just as both she and her husband have always been.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 04/24/2008

No, I didn't miss the point, I was calling the media out on supporting the spin.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 04/24/2008
photo

All this madness must stop
This is the fault of the Media
Hillary has already lost
She cannot and will not get the nomination
Americans are sick, sick, sick of this 3 ring circus

BARACK WON AND HE WON A LONG TIME AGO

NO CANDIDATE SHOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS
CRAZYMAKING OF THE CLINTONS

HOWARD DEAN--DO SOMETHING

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 04/23/2008

It's not the media's fault - it's squarely on the shoulders of Hillary Clinton. One has to question the purpose of this dissection of Obama - to what end? The Clintons have to know that the ONLY WAY they can win the nomination is to backroom, strong-arm, and cajole superdelegates to her side. Should she accomplish this, she will split our great Party in half. She loves to take credit for all the new voters - but they are Obama voters, not hers. She is getting 10% or less of the AA vote - nobody has talked about how much of that vote she has LOST due to her penchant to play racial politics. She is getting two-thirds of the female vote - this is the backbone of her campaign - but NO ONE is calling her the gender candidate. I think when history reviews this race, it will be clear that Hillary and Bill Clinton have done more to ruin this Party than any good they may have ever done. I cannot believe I am seeing the racial fear card being used by one Democrat against another. George Wallace could have run this Clinton campaign. It's sickening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 04/23/2008

DinOhio- Just be thankful that the fraud (Obama), that Lunatic mister (mr. Racist) and the rest of is buddies-the cabal of misfits, Scam artists, and terrorist, have been dealt a setback-because if Obama wins the nomination the Dems can kiss the general election goodbye

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 AM on 04/24/2008

Totally agree. The lobbyists own Clinton and McCain, they don't own Obama. They'll setlle for either one, but Obama has to be cut off.
The Clintons are not concerned with the democratic party - that ought to be obvious to all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 04/24/2008

The neo-cons or Democons need to get out of the Party.

The ones who are rich, anxious to create a Party that imitates the Republicans, and are all for those tax cuts for the wealthy and wars for profit. Hillary's people.

They think they control the Party and they will until Democrats refuse to fund them. DCCC.DLCC.

We are really allowing them to push Clinton on us, make up the rules as they go along.

How many committees are there?

Let the leaders know and contributions can take a walk until the will of the people prevails.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 AM on 04/24/2008

We have a three-way race. Obama needs a large portion of Hillary's voters to back him in the general. Enough to overcome the lifetime spice eaters (movie "Dune") and all the space (and truth) warping they will do. He is on the narrow way, the high road that keep his supporters, and bring in a majority of "his opponent" followers. Get use to it. In the future, you may not like the person sitting next to you under the big tent, but we's all Americans. If you were in their shoes, you probably would be thinking and acting like they do. It's human nature. Try to start practicing that "love thy neighbor" idea. Being smug about "it's not my side of the boat sinking" is about to be obsolete.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 04/24/2008

It was electronic voting so it's kind of suspicious. Results so different from exit polls? It happens in banana republics...
Bush, Rove, neocons (plus FOX and other pro-war crazies) love Clinton but they are scared of Obama.
And they are masters of vote rigging...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 04/23/2008

Don't even go there. Obama lost. He made a great race out it though, cutting Clinton's lead more than in half in a short time. PA was a state made for Hillary in its demographic makeup - the real story is that Hillary should have won by a much greater margin. She had the institutional support from state party leaders and had been organizing this campaign in PA for at least two years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 04/23/2008

Don't forget the fact she's a native of the state. That's good for a few percentage points. Look at how Hawaii went for Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 04/24/2008

I was wrong, she's from Obama's adopted state, but there was sometihing about the summer escape without a shower in the house.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 04/24/2008
- 2351 I'm a Fan of 2351 permalink

I think that is what most people are missing. Obama did a great job cutting her lead by such a big margin, but Hillary is out there spinning it as if she did this great thing. No, Obama did the great thing and I think that she only netted about 12 additional delegates from that race.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 PM on 04/24/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (21 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Related Tags