Clinton: Afghanistan needs more US attention

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

SARA KUGLER | April 27, 2008 11:51 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., speaks during a presidential campaign rally in Wilmington, N.C. Sunday, April 27, 2008. (AP Photo/Logan Wallace)

WILMINGTON, N.C. — Hillary Rodham Clinton said the assassination attempt Sunday on the Afghan president shows that the U.S. has failed to give proper attention to Afghanistan.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the assault that missed President Hamid Karzai but killed three and wounded eight others at a ceremony in Kabul. Gunman opened fire as a 21-gun salute echoed over the capital at an anniversary ceremony marking the mujahedeen victory over the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.

Clinton noted how she had met Karzai, and said, "He is a brave man trying under very difficult circumstances to hold that country together, and we have not given him the resources he needs."

Afghanistan needs to get "as much, if not more attention" than Iraq, she added.

Clinton was speaking at an evening rally along Cape Fear in North Carolina, which, along with Indiana, holds its primary May 6. She returned to the southern state, where her opponent Barack Obama is favored, after spending two days campaigning in Indiana and appealing to working-class voters who have helped propel her to victory in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

The polls show a much closer race in Indiana between the two Democratic candidates.

Speaking in a broadcast interview Sunday, Obama said race is not the reason he is struggling to attract working-class votes and insisted he can win over uncommitted superdelegates by showing he is "best able to not just defeat John McCain, but also lead the country."

Obama brushed aside a challenge from Clinton to debate before the May 6 primaries. "I'm not ducking. We've had 21" debates, he said.

Trailing in delegates and the popular vote, Clinton has been stepping up the pressure on Obama for more debates before the upcoming primaries, which are crucial to her candidacy. She also has been reaching out to uncommitted Democratic superdelegates in hopes of capitalizing on her Pennsylvania primary victory.

Clinton's Pennsylvania victory was buoyed by support from working-class and white voters, but Obama dismissed the notion that race will be a factor in the presidential election.

"Is race still a factor in our society? Yes. I don't think anybody would deny that," he said on "Fox News Sunday."

"Is that going to be the determining factor in a general election? No, because I'm absolutely confident that the American people _ what they're looking for is somebody who can solve their problems."

Addressing whether superdelegates should back the candidate with the most pledged delegates and popular vote, Obama said he believed voters will be frustrated if Democratic superdelegates choose to back the trailing candidate. He expressed confidence that he can convince superdelegates he is more electable.

"I think we should find that person who is going to be best able to not just defeat John McCain, but also lead the country. I happen to think I'm that person," Obama said. "I will make that argument forcefully to the superdelegates prior to the convention."

Speaking in Indiana to reporters, Obama declined to set expectations on a margin of victory in that state.

"I think winning is winning, 50 plus one," Obama said. "Indiana is a very important state, so is North Carolina, we're not taking that for granted. There's no doubt it's close."

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said superdelegates should make known their choices on the Democratic nominee for president by the end of June. Ultimately, he said he believes their decisions will be based on who is more electable, rather than who has the most pledged delegates, because that is what party rules stipulate.

"What's going to happen in the last nine primaries is there's going to be some feeling at some point that one of these candidates is more likely to win than the other and that person will get the nomination. I can't tell you who that is, I have no idea who that is, but that's what's going to happen," Dean said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

The Democratic Party stepped up its attack on Sen. John McCain, using a new ad to cast the presumed Republican presidential nominee as a commander in chief who would keep troops in Iraq for 100 years. The ad is part of a half-million-dollar, three-week national cable television campaign aimed at linking the Arizona senator to the policies of President Bush.

The ad set to begin airing Monday accuses McCain of wanting to remain in Iraq for "maybe 100" years, a link to a remark McCain made in January while campaigning in New Hampshire. The ad concludes, "If all he offers is more of the same, is John McCain the right choice for America's future?"

Since then, McCain has repeatedly said he has no intention of extending the war into the next century, but would keep a U.S. military presence in Iraq much as the United States has in Germany, Japan and South Korea.

The Republican National Committee charged that the DNC ad distorted McCain's comments, and it asserted again that the ad was illegal because it was made in coordination with the Obama and Clinton campaigns. Dean has denied any coordination with the campaigns.

The Democratic candidates have also acknowledged they would keep non-combat troops in Iraq to ensure its stability. But they have said they would begin withdrawing combat troops promptly upon becoming president, a step McCain has said would be precipitous.

___

Associated Press writers Mike Glover in Indianapolis and Jim Kuhnhenn in Washington contributed to this report.

 
 

Comments
253
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- ObamaSuperDelegate See Profile I'm a Fan of ObamaSuperDelegate

He should IGNORE her until after the May 6th primaries. Let her say whatever it is that she needs to say, spewing her nothings, pitting one group against another and just ignore her. He should talk to voters and let her just talk.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 AM on 04/28/2008
- Gmoney1 See Profile I'm a Fan of Gmoney1

Hillary did not win the debates - that's the stupid media pitching for Hillary - she is less intelligent than Obama and her articulation of an issue is not succinct - she loses an audience through excessive garble - the talking heads on the media tell the public what they should think and they fall right in line like rats - Hillary wants a debate because she is losing - why should Obama waste his time debating her - Hillary, her supporters and the media are starting a new bashing of Obama in order to diminish him -

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 04/28/2008
- Testtubebaby See Profile I'm a Fan of Testtubebaby

Testtubebaby says no more debates! lol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 AM on 04/28/2008
- dumboldfarmer See Profile I'm a Fan of dumboldfarmer

What, 21 or 22 debates were not enough? Give it a rest, Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 04/27/2008
- BethStuart See Profile I'm a Fan of BethStuart

Perhaps Clinton wants a debate with Obama so she can "totally obliterate" him. That seems to be her new favorite expression.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 04/27/2008
- Beowoof See Profile I'm a Fan of Beowoof

Her next one will be "what, are you chicken or something"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 04/27/2008
- RoseFromPhila See Profile I'm a Fan of RoseFromPhila

Barak does not do good at debates because there is no teleprompters, no speech writers, and no advisers to tell him what to say......... Obama is a fraud..... empty suit and has no substance.....

NEW HEADLINE>>> OBAMA AFRAID TO DEBATE HILLARY BECAUSE HE IS CLUELESS

OBAMA'S MASK IS SLOWLY SLIPPING OFF........

GO HILLARY!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 04/27/2008
- Shozen See Profile I'm a Fan of Shozen

Go Hillary go! We don't care where you go. Just Go, Go, Go! *

*Derived from Funky Winkerbean's cheers for losing football teams.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 04/28/2008
- bentenrai See Profile I'm a Fan of bentenrai

Yawn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 04/27/2008
- CapitalistRebel See Profile I'm a Fan of CapitalistRebel

You get a D- for grammar and sentence structure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 04/27/2008
- paciere See Profile I'm a Fan of paciere

someone praise CapitalistRebel?. people like you create killers similar to VA Tech shooting. you just love to shut people off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 04/28/2008
- TooLooze See Profile I'm a Fan of TooLooze

Lighten up. I doubt you're helping her cause.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 04/27/2008
- gregjones See Profile I'm a Fan of gregjones

All this over Hillary "I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base" Clinton...for President ? NO WAY !!!!!

Visit: Blacks4Barack.org
(A Multi-Racial Grassroots Org....Dedicated To Truth)

Luv You Arianna !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 04/27/2008
- Wolfgang See Profile I'm a Fan of Wolfgang

How can a group called Blacks4Barack.org and only has pictures of blacks on its web site be a multi-racial organization?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 04/27/2008
- uberlefty See Profile I'm a Fan of uberlefty

Guess what people Hillary is not in charge here and it is time she learned it. She and her feral minions have set a negative tone from the start. She believes that he has to prove something to HER so he can win the nomination. The people who think that he should debate will have already or will vote for Hillary. The people who think the debate is a waste of time are Obama supporters. So the question is what is the best way to spend his time and money to win the nomination? What we see in the debates is a predictable dynamic. We ask Obama stupid questions, posed by illiterate " swing " voters, about flag pins and his minister. Hillary nods her head and says that these are troubling issues. Her supporters nod along with her like bobble head dolls. If Obama calls her on her numerous lies and distortions. Her followers scream victim and the boys are pilling on. She is broke and she has lost. The more he indulges her the more she feels entitled to call the shots. Enough. She can spend her own money and buy her own air time to spread her vile rantings. Then when she is deep in debt she can go home to her empty house and watch election night coverage on FOX.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:57 PM on 04/27/2008
- DoubleAbsolut See Profile I'm a Fan of DoubleAbsolut

He must stop letting her dictate his campaign. She's the loser, and it's time that Hillary and her supporters faced facts. They need to get used to the idea that she will be campaigning for him eventually. Sooner better than later, if she's a real Democrat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 04/27/2008
- eurydice See Profile I'm a Fan of eurydice

And run all around that big empty house slamming all the doors.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:44 PM on 04/27/2008
- ATLiberal See Profile I'm a Fan of ATLiberal

The frontrunner who feels that they have a lead and nothing to gain with another debate, always turns more debates down. That is always the way it has been, and it makes perfect sense, from the frontrunner perspective.

Not, of course, from the candidate who is losing and has everything to gain, plus free airtime to boot to augment their broke campaign coffers.

This is basic politics. From boths sides. Period.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 04/27/2008
- Anonani See Profile I'm a Fan of Anonani

Of course, you are right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 PM on 04/27/2008
- adzeman See Profile I'm a Fan of adzeman

Debates equal free face time for the impoverished Clinton. I expect her to be self financing ala Romney within the week. The end is nigh for the Illusionist Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 04/27/2008
- KDH See Profile I'm a Fan of KDH

Obama: No more Debates. He doesn't want anymore questions that will help voters see him for what he really is. A typical run-of-the-mill politician.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 04/27/2008
- Anonani See Profile I'm a Fan of Anonani

Let us respect the frontrunner's prerogative to make this decison.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 04/27/2008
- alm123 See Profile I'm a Fan of alm123

Ditto.
You would think he would want to debate, to air the truth regarding his skills and experience.
HE IS NOT A FIGHTER NOW, HE WILL NEVER BE ONE AS PRESIDENT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 04/27/2008
- prittfumes See Profile I'm a Fan of prittfumes

It's okay because he will never be president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 04/27/2008
- CapitalistRebel See Profile I'm a Fan of CapitalistRebel

She's a fighter! That's right. She's fighting everyone! She's fighting the activist base of the party, the people that fought to defend her husband when he was caught banging an intern. She's ready to fight Iran; obliterate them even! Not to worry, our military can take it. Don't listen to Senator Obama telling you that if an unforseen crises occured, we would not have the resources to be able to handle it.

Hillary is a Republican when it comes to foreign policy. Look at her voting record, it doesn't lie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:37 PM on 04/27/2008
- Anonani See Profile I'm a Fan of Anonani

I completely support Senator Obama's decision to forgo debating for the 22nd time. First and foremost, he needs to focus on being out there letting the voters get to know him firsthand. His performance in a debate, in no way shape or form, accomplishes that. Debates boil down to simply who "won" the debate which is inevitably the only salient question that interests the media, and to some extent the viewers. I do not intend to vote for my candidate based upon won or lost debates. No truly relevant issues have surfaced in the muck that comes up in these debates. Recently, the sole purpose appears to be to poke holes in Mr. Obama's candidacy and to shore up the argument that he is unelectable, i.e. the flag pin, "bitter", Jeremiah Wright, Ayers, Rizik!

Mr. Obama has been a gentleman to a shrew and that dichotomy has not been lost on the Republicans who have added all kinds of ammunition, from Hillary, to their playbook for the national election against him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 04/27/2008
- hank48188 See Profile I'm a Fan of hank48188

Hillary and Obama have had 4 Debates, most of the other debates had about 10 people. All the ammunition the republicans have against Obama they got from the web, i knew about all this stuff long ago, like most people that read.. If you think John Kerry looked bad on that swiftboat just wait till you see Obama, Tony Rezko, Rev. Wright and William Ayers going down the river.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 04/27/2008
- ObamaSuperDelegate See Profile I'm a Fan of ObamaSuperDelegate

How do you suppose McCain will look when people start focusing on him? My left toe could be beat him with all of his baggage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 AM on 04/28/2008
- WomanInOrangeSweater See Profile I'm a Fan of WomanInOrangeSweater

Guess what? Obama doesn't have to reduce himself to her level. It's his choice. If there was an issues based debate and Hillary uses the opportunity to sling mud, he can rise above it and discuss the issues. It would work to his advantage. The problem is, he hasn't done it in any of the previous debates. I'm still hoping he will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 04/27/2008
- DemocraticRN See Profile I'm a Fan of DemocraticRN

This is the real Barack Obama.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/magazine/01axelrod.t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all

I know it is a long article, but please read it all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 04/27/2008
- paciere See Profile I'm a Fan of paciere

Obama is lying about race as a factor in presidential election. Barack Obama has history joining the Million Man March and he'll keep denying it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 04/27/2008
- colleen2 See Profile I'm a Fan of colleen2

"Barack Obama has history joining the Million Man March and he'll keep denying it."

Why is involvement in the Million Man March a bad thing?
Registering African American men to vote is a bad thing? Encouraging black men to participate in community activism and volunteerism is a bad thing?
Too scary?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 04/27/2008
- Anonani See Profile I'm a Fan of Anonani

Personally, I don't think that if he did that is a bad thing! What is your point? Did you not think that the purpose of the Million Man March was a worthy effort? Was it the message or the messenger?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 04/27/2008
- MadJeffersonian See Profile I'm a Fan of MadJeffersonian

And so what if he participated in it? Did they burn down Washington or something?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 04/27/2008