New York Times Circulation Plummets

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - New York Times Circulation Plummets stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

SETH SUTEL | 04/28/08 12:00 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?

NEW YORK — Circulation fell sharply at most top U.S. newspapers in the latest reporting period, an industry group said Monday, with the exception of the two largest national dailies, USA Today and The Wall Street Journal.

Those papers eked out gains of under 1 percent, while The New York Times, the No. 3 paper, fell 3.9 percent in the six months ending in March, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations.

Newspaper circulation has been on a declining trend since the 1980s but the pace of declines has picked up in recent years as reader habits change and more people go online for news, information and entertainment.

National newspapers like USA Today and the Journal have tended to hold their ground better, as have smaller-market dailies where competition from other media like the Internet isn't usually as intense.

Gannett Co.'s USA Today remained the top-selling paper in the country with an average daily circulation of, 2,284,219, up 0.3 percent, while The Wall Street Journal rose 0.4 percent to 2,069,463. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. bought the Journal's parent company Dow Jones & Co. last December.

The New York Times Co.'s flagship paper remained the third-largest with circulation of 1,077,256, down 3.9 percent from the same period a year earlier. That company also owns The Boston Globe and International Herald Tribune.

Metropolitan dailies have suffered the worst declines, a trend that continued in the most recent reporting period, with the Dallas Morning News reporting a 10.6 percent drop to 368,313.

The Dallas paper's corporate owner A.H. Belo Corp., newly spun out of broadcasting company Belo Corp., said as part of its earnings statement Monday that the company was culling back on less valuable circulation such as copies distributed through third parties.

Other metro dailies also posted steep declines, including The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, down 8.5 percent to 326,907, and the Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul, down 6.7 percent to 321,984.

Declines at other major papers were less severe, with the New York Daily News narrowly keeping the upper hand on its crosstown tabloid rival, Rupert Murdoch's New York Post. The Daily News posted a 2.1 percent decline to 703,137, while the Post fell 3.1 percent to 702,488.

Both Murdoch and Daily News owner Mortimer Zuckerman are going after Tribune Co.'s Newsday on neighboring Long Island. Newsday, meanwhile, posted a 4.7 percent decline in circulation to 379,613.

The twice-yearly report from the Audit Bureau includes figures from most major U.S. newspapers but not the entire industry. At the nearly 550 papers that reported comparable figures for both periords, average daily circulation fell 3.6 percent in the most recent period.

Several smaller to mid-size papers posted gains, including a Spanish-language daily in New York called El Diario La Prensa, up 7.6 percent to 53,856, while The Times in Munster, Ind., owned by Lee Enterprises Inc., rose 3 percent to 86.195.

The Chicago Sun-Times, reporting for the first time since being censured in 2004 for circulation misstatements, posted circulation of 312,274, but no prior-year numbers were available for comparison.

NEW YORK — Circulation fell sharply at most top U.S. newspapers in the latest reporting period, an industry group said Monday, with the exception of the two largest national dailies, USA Today a...
NEW YORK — Circulation fell sharply at most top U.S. newspapers in the latest reporting period, an industry group said Monday, with the exception of the two largest national dailies, USA Today a...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
92
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

Who cares? I'm surprised anyone reads the NYT after Judith Miller.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 04/28/2008
- azcamp I'm a Fan of azcamp 9 fans permalink

If we can't eat it, put it in our gas tanks or pay the mortgage with it--we can't afford it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 04/28/2008
- bikerdude I'm a Fan of bikerdude 68 fans permalink
photo

Sad but true. This is what happens when the corporatists are put in charge of government. Government is NOT about profit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 04/29/2008
photo

You can thank Bill Kristol:)

Now with Tony Snow(job) on Cnn, let's boy cott them too.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 04/28/2008

Time to get Ann Coulter on board.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 04/28/2008
- DennyCrane I'm a Fan of DennyCrane 24 fans permalink

Good. I hope they crumble. Jayson Blair, Judith Miller, Bill Kristol, endorsing Hillary. Those are enough reasons to stop reading that sorry excuse for a paper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 04/28/2008
- qwr I'm a Fan of qwr permalink

& Paul Krugman, and their attitude toward Israel/Palestine. Luo (by far the worst of all the Clinton propagandists) and others slanting their blog. I'm waiting for a big-market alternative to the NYT, even though I have made an effort to never open a NYT page again. Maybe the LA Times?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 04/28/2008
- rudyinbama I'm a Fan of rudyinbama 23 fans permalink

Paul Krugman was more vocal against the Iraq invasion tyhan Barack Obama.
Further, everything Krugman predicted internationally and economically has turned out.
Stop swift-boating one of the few honorable journalists anywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 04/28/2008
- bikerdude I'm a Fan of bikerdude 68 fans permalink
photo

LA Times?? Run by a gang of neocon beancounte­rs...There was a time when the LA Times could compete on a national news level with the Washington Post and the NY Times, but lately it is a shabby shill for the neocon agenda. They are also sliding into oblivion. Thank the real estate pros from Tribune Co.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 04/29/2008
- PrinceHal I'm a Fan of PrinceHal 6 fans permalink

Hey, the New York Times ain't perfect by a long shot, but it's the best newspaper this country has, and yet most of these comments are as negative as this one. And no, I don't like seeing Bill Kristol on the op-ed, either.

And by the way, HuffPo, shouldn't there be a story here to back up your headline, "New York Times Circulation Plummets"? I don't see one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 04/28/2008

" but it's the best newspaper this country has,"..

Yep.
Once upon a time in America.
The Old Grey lady is now sporting a pink neon mini and clear heels.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:40 PM on 04/28/2008
- unscum I'm a Fan of unscum 9 fans permalink

"it's the best newspaper this country" Hilarious, I feel off my chair. Check out Bill Moyer report on how the Iraq war was reported by these bastions of American media.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:53 AM on 05/01/2008
- myshadow I'm a Fan of myshadow 8 fans permalink
photo

'Good. I hope they crumble. Jayson Blair, Judith Miller, Bill Kristol, endorsing Hillary. Those are enough reasons to stop reading that sorry excuse for a paper.'



..........­.......and the run up to the war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 AM on 04/29/2008
- unscum I'm a Fan of unscum 9 fans permalink

Agreed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 AM on 05/01/2008
- Podewumun I'm a Fan of Podewumun 32 fans permalink

No article.

OK, anybody know the phone number of The Psychic Hotline?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 04/28/2008
- racom I'm a Fan of racom 3 fans permalink

I think it is 1-800-NYT-sucks!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 04/28/2008
photo

What? I tried that number and a pentagon operator answered?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 04/28/2008
- Tator I'm a Fan of Tator 9 fans permalink

It's a beautiful thing to watch.....­.after trashing our troops as more likely to murder (lower that the normal population) and having mental problems (Agian, lower than the normal population), and exposing national secrets that help us stop terrorism I hope they go broke.

It was only a matter of time before they crashed since they trash America constantly­....being a socialist rag that hates capitalism and against many of our constitutional rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 04/28/2008
- DumbDad I'm a Fan of DumbDad 32 fans permalink
photo

Well this sucks

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:47 PM on 04/28/2008

Many of our founding fathers didn't like capitalism either. They felt it threatened our democracy and would have had even stronger objections if the industrial revolution had happened during their time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 04/28/2008

Yeah - this began when they started printing both sides of an issue, I think that offended a lot of their faithful long-time readers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 PM on 04/28/2008
- nellie I'm a Fan of nellie 492 fans permalink
photo

Such a shame. Just last week they did that astonishing expose on the Pentagon propaganda program. It shows they have really top notch and courageous people there. But they're overwhelmed by the nonsense. If the Times would just do its job as well as it could, rather than promoting whatever agenda, they might have a different trajectory. People would subscribe on the net.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/28/2008

Umm... anyone factoring in website popularity? NYTime is like 98th, where the Wall Street Journal is in the 500s. Reducing paper should be celebrated, pinheads.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 04/28/2008
- bikerdude I'm a Fan of bikerdude 68 fans permalink
photo

Not quite fair comparison. The NYT online is free and the they charge for the WSJ online.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 04/29/2008

Two words: Judith Miller.

eff the effing effers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 04/28/2008

william kristol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 04/28/2008
- Paul I'm a Fan of Paul 32 fans permalink

David Brooks

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 04/28/2008
- Anastasia I'm a Fan of Anastasia 72 fans permalink
photo

Where's the link to the story?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 04/28/2008
- TRichards I'm a Fan of TRichards 19 fans permalink
photo

OK. OK. I know. "William" Crystal -- to give more gravitas to the lying S.O.B. of a propagandist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 04/28/2008

It's Bill Kristol, not the comedian Billy Crystal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 04/28/2008
- TRichards I'm a Fan of TRichards 19 fans permalink
photo

Oh my God! Billy Crystal didn't help keep old subscribers and bring in new ones!! Who wudda thunk it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 04/28/2008

Hello : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Kwh3ROYjuQ


-ralph

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 04/28/2008
photo

No video?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 04/28/2008
- msjentay I'm a Fan of msjentay 2 fans permalink

I'm confused by this as there's no explanation. Since this was under Politics, are we to assume that there's some political connection? I wish I could conclude that it is somehow tied to their endorsement of Hillary, but there's nothing here to support that. Oh, well. Let's just go with that...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 04/28/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect