Obama's Act II: Patriotism

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama's Act II: Patriotism stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar
First Posted: 04-29-08 03:24 AM   |   Updated: 05- 6-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Noonan Obama

I took the advice of Brian Williams today and read Peggy Noonan (just as I'll take his advice Sunday and skip the NYT), and he was right: it's a great and smart op-ed. Noonan describes the scene at Gate 14 in an airport somewhere in West Texas, central California and Oklahoma, and sets it up as a microcosm of America. What does Gate 14 want in this election? What kind of lives are they leading? What America are they living in? As someone who misses bringing her Diet Coke through security I agree with her anti-TSA sentiment, though as someone who has logged a primary in an airport (Iowa; Dallas) I recall people watching the screen, though of course many more waited for their flight with other distractions. But Peggy is going for something here so we'll give her that. Her point is, Gate 14 needs a president who talks to them, and gets them. The current president doesn't, and never will; who becomes the next one depends on who does. See Noonan:

Hillary Clinton is not Barack Obama's problem. America is Mr. Obama's problem. He has been tagged as a snooty lefty, as the glamorous, ambivalent candidate from Men's Vogue, the candidate who loves America because of the great progress it has made in terms of racial fairness. Fine, good. But has he ever gotten misty-eyed over . . . the Wright Brothers and what kind of country allowed them to go off on their own and change everything? How about D-Day, or George Washington, or Henry Ford, or the losers and brigands who flocked to Sutter's Mill, who pushed their way west because there was gold in them thar hills? There's gold in that history.

John McCain carries it in his bones. Mr. McCain learned it in school, in the Naval Academy, and, literally, at grandpa's knee. Mrs. Clinton learned at least its importance in her long slog through Arkansas, circa 1977-92.

Implicit in this analysis is that Obama's life experience might not have bred that classic apple-pie American patriotism, which is slightly unfair, but that may, too, be her point: Elections aren't fair, and they often come down to how the voter feels about a candidate which is often decided on points like this. And it's funny that she mentions patriotism on the day when the Rev. Jeremiah Wright story is gearing back up, because it has been said (and I think I heard Ryan Lizza say it first, actually), that the initial Rev. Wright incident was not about race but patriotism, and "God Damn America" and 9/11 chickens coming home to roost. Noonan doesn't even mention Wright (just the Wright brothers) but that part she sees:

This is an opportunity, for Mr. Obama needs an Act II. Act II is hard. Act II is where the promise of Act I is deepened, the plot thickens, and all is teed up for resolution and meaning. Mr. Obama's Act I was: I'm Obama. He enters the scene. Act III will be the convention and acceptance speech. After that a whole new drama begins. But for now he needs Act II. He should make his subject America.

Once again, this may not be fair but by gosh it's true. "I'm Obama" has somehow faltered, and the campaign knows this because they are taking him out of huge rallies and into smaller settings where, as the NYT puts it, "where he is seen talking with people and not at them." Not only that, he's been Kerry'd — he's now somehow become the candidate of arugula while Hillary and McCain are down with the people (that would be the same Hillary who's earned $109 million since 2000 with her husband, the former president, and the same John McCain who used his wife's corporate jet when his campaign was strapped for cash, under a provision in campaign finance law that specifically exempts aircraft owned by a candidate or his family from other jet-chartering requirements). But it's John McCain's campaign that loves to joke about the price of arugula — a vegetable that gets the cover treatment this week in Newsweek. Which means that Obama has a problem.

Noonan notes that the questions about his patriotism come not from the absence of a flag pin — now, it seems, the universally-accepted shorthand for wondering if someone is patriotic — and Noonan calls that out as ridiculous, but she still mentions it — but the absence of knowing what his patriotism is made of. Michelle Obama's comment in February that "for the first time" she was proud of her country has had surprising staying power (and recall that that was the first time that Cindy McCain stepped up and took the mike, saying that she was proud of her country). But — the people filling Obama's rallies are consistently the kind that Michelle Obama claimed she wasn't, earlier this month when she noted — angrily — that yeah, she went to Princeton and Harvard but she grew up on the South Side of Chicago. And the kids from Princeton and Harvard waved and cheered, and wore their Abercrombie & Fitch t-shirts.

All of this adds up to a problem — a patriotism problem for the candidate with by far the most diverse American experience. He spoke about it. Remember?

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.

That's it. Right there. From that speech that the media loved so much, which landed with such an impact that Mark Jurkowitz from the Project for Excellence in Journalism called it "the week of the speech," tallying up all the coverage and realizing that Obama's speech had just dominated. Dominated in one hell of a week — it was also, recall, the week of the Bear Stearns collapse, and the week of the 5th anniversary of the war. Big week — but that speech was the biggest, with 28% of the week's coverage. The economy got 16%. The war got 10%.

So it shouldn't be hard for the media to remember what Obama actually said in it — and guess what? Nothing in it has changed with the re-emergence of Jeremiah Wright. So Wright disagrees with Obama. Big deal. Doesn't that mean that he's adding to that big Conversation About Race everyone keeps saying we're having? Jeremiah Wright is the biggest red herring in this campaign, because everyone is assuming that his views are important because they may have secretly influenced Obama. Feh. If anything, this latest divergence should put that to rest. To my mind from the very beginning, the only issue about Wright was about what Obama knew of his theology and beliefs when he appointed him to his campaign in an official capacity. Nothing more. "God damn America" is protected speech under the First Amendment, just like flag-burning. Dissent is American, pure and simple, going back to throwing tea overboard in Boston harbor.

All of which brings us back to Peggy Noonan and her pals at Gate 14. They were all really into that speech back in March — it was a huge hit on YouTube, the transcript was the most-emailed story on the New York Times website (and HuffPo) — so it shouldn't be so hard to remind them why they liked it. Obama's patriotism doesn't have to be Wright Brothers and Sutter's Mill, it can be whatever he wants it to be, as simple as looking around and being amazed that he can raise his daughters in a country like this with the blood of slaves and slave owners running through their veins...where they, one day, could grow up and run for president.

The View From Gate 14 [WSJ]

Related:
In Week Of Iraq War Anniversary, Obama's Race Speech Dominated Media Coverage
[ETP]
Transcript: Tim Russert Show, March 29th, with Tucker Carlson and Ryan Lizza [MSNBC]

I took the advice of Brian Williams today and read Peggy Noonan (just as I'll take his advice Sunday and skip the NYT), and he was right: it's a great and smart op-ed. Noonan describes the scene a...
I took the advice of Brian Williams today and read Peggy Noonan (just as I'll take his advice Sunday and skip the NYT), and he was right: it's a great and smart op-ed. Noonan describes the scene a...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
74
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 24 fans permalink
photo

Who is at gate 14? Are they all in brown shirts and lederhosen? Do they get misty eyed by Henry Ford? How about GW Bush?

Noonan,
"It is important who he is. George W. Bush is an American of the big and real America. He believes in it all--in the vision of the founders, in the meaning of freedom, in the founding and enduring ideas of our country. He believes in America's historic insistence on humanity and not inhumanity in war, and he appears to have internalized the old saying that "one man with courage is a majority."

This is warm puke about an AWOL GW Bush, spoiled brat, alcoholic, drug abuser, who had just murdered thousands of Iraqis. Gate 14 are you misting?
Political hacks like Noonan and Sklar should never, never define our values.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 04/30/2008
- JeremyO I'm a Fan of JeremyO 3 fans permalink

Why do pundits talk about Obama's flaws like there's a perfectly reasonable alternative to him. Yes he has flaws, and yes we should know everything there is to know about a candidate who might be the next president, but just look at the flaws of Hillary Clinton and John McCain. Take Hillary for example, she may not be seen as less than patriotic, but for most Americans she represents all that is wrong with politics, and Washington insiders. They're corrupt, they pander to special interests, they flip flop. Right or wrong that is how people view her. Her negatives are sky high. So does focusing on Obama's relationship with flag pins change that? For the Democratic party, Obama may be unknown teritory as far as how swing voters will see him in November, but is there any question how swing voters will see Hillary in November?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 AM on 04/30/2008
- Tumult I'm a Fan of Tumult 2 fans permalink

Excellent Article. Obama's belief in this country is apparent in his 2004 DNC speech::

"My parents shared not only an improbable love; they shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation. They would give me an African name, Barack, or "blessed," believing that in a tolerant America, your name is no barrier to success.

Tonight, we gather to affirm the greatness of our nation not because of the height of our skyscrapers, or the power of our military, or the size of our economy; our pride is based on a very simple premise, summed up in a declaration made over two hundred years ago: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.­"

When we send our young men and women into harm's way, we have a solemn obligation not to fudge the numbers or shade the truth about why they are going, to care for their families while they're gone, to tend to the soldiers upon their return and to never, ever go to war without enough troops to win the war, secure the peace and earn the respect of the world. "

The only way people could see this man as less than patriotic is if they equate patriotism with flag pins, and not the Consitution, the Declaration, or Americas stated values.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 AM on 04/30/2008
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 24 fans permalink
photo

What twisted jingoism. Have these two scoundrels Sklar and Noonan found refuge for racial attacks on Obama with white supremacy in patriotism? Noonan says Obama cannot see the USA, of Henry Ford, Wright Brothers and Sutter's Mill. Why, well he was brought up a black you know.
And "Michelle Obama's comment in February that "for the first time" she was proud of her country has had surprising staying power". Well I guess it's because Rachel keeps repeating it out of context. Sort of like 'Gore invented the internet had staying power'.
Rachel I understand what Michelle Obama said much more clearly than how you and Noonan define patriotism. Let's just look back a few years when Noonan supported GW Bush the AWOL, addicted, psychotic, and helped slandered both John Kerry and Max Cleeland's war record. Noonan's definition of patriotism is definitely a Whiter Shade of Pale.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 04/29/2008
- Rachel Sklar - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Rachel Sklar 65 fans permalink

Seriously, what post did you read? Because your comment has nothing to do with mine. First of all, I say clearly that patriotism is whatever Obama wants it to be. Second of all, the reason I say that Michelle Obama's comment about feeling 'proud of her country for the first time' had staying power is because I have heard about it on cable and seen it referred to ever since. I have heard that comment in context and seen it replayed in context, thanks. I'm talking about how it has been used and repeatedly brought up. Noonan's column was smart because she put her finger on why Obama's patriotism has been made an issue. Did I say it was a legitimate issue? No. I said it was a REAL issue, and that how voters feel - rightly or wrongly - often informs how they vote. Which is why, I said, Obama has a problem. And my suggestion was, go back to something that worked to fix it - his race speech, and that one key paragraph that lays it all out, right there, why this country is great and why he loves it. He doesn't have to explain his patriotism, he's done it already. That was my point.

It's a ridiculous, ridiculous question to even entertain - is Obama patriotic enough? Does he love the country enough? For the right reasons? - and I have said that, I thought clearly. But it is being made an issue, and that is

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 04/29/2008
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 24 fans permalink
photo

Noonan's position is clear, Obama cannot possibly feel the same patriotism as white people. Her symbols of America greatness were strange to say the least. Many Americans of all colors, will not get misty eyed over Henry Ford, a fascist and racist.

Sklar, "Noonan's column was smart because she put her finger on why Obama's patriotism has been made an issue."
Here you have dropped off the 'great' comment that you originally labeled Noonans op ed.
Noonan's column was neither great nor smart. She was not putting her finger on an issue, but she was interjecting race into patriotism in a way that Henry Ford would be proud of her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 04/30/2008
- rich3324 I'm a Fan of rich3324 20 fans permalink
photo

In 2011 three years after McBush is elected, and our young men and women are still getting killed in Iraq and now Iran, many American still have no health care, gas is $5.00 a gal and we do not have an energy policy, I don't want to hear my fellow American complaining. You have decided flag pins are more important than vision. Get all misty-eyed over that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 04/29/2008

Thank you rich3324 - you expressed my sentiment (disgust) exactly.

I am so sick of pundits - they've taken the place of personal injury lawyers and used car salesmen in my book as the shallowest humans on earth. I wish they'd discuss real issues that affect our lives like our fears over the horrible economy, our dying environment and hideous war - instead of trying so hard to convince us that we really give a flying swirly twirly crap about preachers and lapel pins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 04/29/2008
- BubbaC33 I'm a Fan of BubbaC33 37 fans permalink

As usual for an Obama supporter you have ignored the point of this blog and susbtituted your own argument to attack. The point of the blog is not flag pins, but a sense of what America is all about. A sense of the history that has made this nation the second greatest on the planet. The traditional patriotism Obama does not seem to have, which is not necessarily a bad thing. BUt it will hurt him in the general election should he get that far.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 04/29/2008
- ajax2 I'm a Fan of ajax2 24 fans permalink
photo

bubba, "The traditional patriotism Obama does not seem to have, which is not necessarily a bad thing."

Peggy Noonan described those traditions. Sklar refrenced them. Is that what you are talking about, Peggy's White Vision? Does your disclaimer at the end "not necessarily a bad thing" mean that the attack on his patriotism will fail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 04/29/2008
- rich3324 I'm a Fan of rich3324 20 fans permalink
photo

You mean like a poor child who works hard and gets into Harvard on academic scholarships and students loans. Graduates from Harvard law and then rather than going into the private sector, he works in poor communities in Chicago? I alwyas thought this was what America was about.

BTW If the USA is the second greatest nation, what's the first.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 04/30/2008
photo

The American collective has a problem that is the root of all of this malarkey..­.DENIAL. And perhaps a touch of schizophrenia: a state characterized by the coexistence of contradictory or incompatible elements.

It is not that we expect politicians to tell the truth--they must tell the truth we want to hear; it's not that we expect politicians to lie--they must tell the selective lies that uphold our selective truths.

And at the core of that dysfunctional system of self-delusion is DENIAL. We do not what to hear about an empire of 737 military bases in countries that feel oppressed by them, but we do want to feel good about our global presence. We don't want to hear that we need programs for the poor that smack of evil SOCIALISM, but we want to feel good about bailing out billion-dollar corporations. We don't want to hear about Middle Eastern BLOWBACK and our crimes against other nations, but we do want to feel that our war in Iraq is a positive thing, and that it's just another indication of how great we are--which is, BTW, why we nned to stay in Iraq.

We damn Obama for being asociated with Wright...f­or distancing himself from Wright...f­or the fact that Wright exists.

Rev. Wright has the easiest path; he was damned from the beginning.­..he doesn't format his words for selective consumption.

Of course this is all nonsense--national insanity does not make for sane arguments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 04/29/2008

Problem is, voters need to vote smarter and they don't. They go for the shiny lapel-pins ( made in China) and the flip-flop "whats the flavor of the day" politician- or the egomanic who wants to drag the entire party down and doesn't realize she's in fact feeding into the hands of the direct opposition. The reason why? Advertising. We are so subliminally trained to have things drilled into our heads there has become such a great cognitive dissonance. BEAUTY SOAP BEAUTY SOAP BEAUTY SOAP! America gets the politicians it deserves, not the one it wants sad to say. on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:11 PM on 04/29/2008
- hhkeller I'm a Fan of hhkeller 2 fans permalink

Thats funny, I thought your were talking about Obama.
A practiced smile and a few repetitous slogans just don't add up to much substance.
Anyone who supports the NCLB is loser material.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 04/29/2008

My husband and I decided to vote for Obama after Edwards suspended his campaign and here's why - Obama made a statement that he wanted to lift America from the bottom up - not the top down as we have been doing for decades. A country is it's people. If our government says to heck with the poor, those without proper health care, vets living on the street, Katrina victims, and on and on - whose unpatriotic? It seems our government and those in charge - President Bush.

I want the patriotism that Obama speaks of!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 04/29/2008
- jgaines7 I'm a Fan of jgaines7 3 fans permalink
photo

After reading Peggy Noonan's article, I feel that she was wrong on two points. First, no, the security at Gate 14 does not know whether or not she's a terrorist. White women have joined terrorist organizations. Check your local Klan. Two, she and other's do question Obama's patriotism. Saying, "no one is questioning his patriotism, they’re questioning its content, its fullness," is asking, "How full of patriotism are you, Senator Obama?" It smacks of McCarthyism, to me.
I can understand Mrs. Noonan's frustration at Gate 14, but for her to put that all on Obama isn't fair. Why not place the blame where it belongs - on Al Qaeda, and the "Shoe Bomber."
I can see why Brian Williams recommended this article. Reading it was like reading a summary of the way the MSM's have caricatured Senator Obama for the past few weeks. Mr. Williams must have thought, as he read the article, "They do listen to me."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 04/29/2008
- NABNYC I'm a Fan of NABNYC 99 fans permalink

I disagree. There are millions of reasons to criticize Bush, Cheney, McCain, many of the politicians in Congress, yet for the most part they get a pass because they are white men, members of the privileged class, and much is overlooked and almost everything is forgiven from the people who are in that group.

For everyone else, on the other hand, the national hunt is on to find the most ridiculous reason to criticize or reject. "Well, I'm not racist but ... Obama's mother never was room mother in his 2nd grade class, and that's why I won't vote for him." It's so silly and absurd.

I particularly love seeing Chris Matthews and Tim Russert with their mouths hanging slackjawed to the ground as they wonder how Obama could have given money to his church. Yet both of them are devout Catholics and seem to be able to live with the fact that the Catholic church was silent in face of the genocide against jews, gypsies, homosexuals and so many others during WWII, and has the more recent shame of aiding and abetting pedophile priests to escape the law and continue to have access to children.

People are attacking Obama because he's black. Period. If the Clintons were not leading this disgraceful campaign against him, Democrats could unite and take the white house in November. If McCain wins, it will be because of this disgraceful witchhunt led by the Clintons.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 04/29/2008

Oy, Rachel.

It grieves me to say this, but this post is seriously off the track.

First, friendly blogger Brian Williams' comments about the Sunday NYT being "mindless fluff" are somewhat laughable given his vapid tenure on NBC Nightly News.

His comments about Peggy Noonan doing "the work of her career" and "must be considered an early favorite for next cycle's Pulitzer for commentary" defy credibility, especially given her most recent writing and appearances which are fascinating only in wondering if she will finally tip over into full-blown hysteria.

No, Obama's "next act" is not about waving the flag, donning the pin (didn't you comment on that earlier?), or Pledging Allegiance at every appearance.

It will be reclaiming the momentum and direction of his campaign which has been steered dangerously off course by Rev. Wrong's narcissistic preening, predictable invective and bitterness at Obama for not publicly supporting his world view, not to mention the latest paradigm shift by a media as relentlessly committed to furthering this destructive primary as his opponent.

Speaking of which, why have so few--even here at HuffPo--mentioned the fact that Wright was invited to speak at the National Press Club by Barbara Reynolds, a major Hillary Clinton supporter and vocal critic of Obama. Withyour purported reportorial chops, you got scooped on that one by Gawker for God's sake!

Come on Rachel. Climb off the Straight-Talk (right!) Express and come down to Earth with the rest of us regular folks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 04/29/2008

Rachel Sklar's article, "Obama's Act II: Patriotism", is easily one of the most penetrating and insightful article yet to appear in The Huffington Post. First, she takes up Brian Williams' challenge and convincingly demonstrates that whatever the merits of his claims about reporting in the New York Times, he failed to comprehend that Noonan's understanding of patriotism, and its manifestations, was rife with flawed, and destructive, assumptions. Sklar deserves credit not only for her creativity in identifying this as a challenge to confront head-on, but also for seeing the potential of using it to provide an instructive civics lesson. Second, Sklar recognizes the fundamental interdependence of this issue of patriotism with Obama's biography, and extrapolates to show how the story of his life, and the values practiced along the way, ought to remind us of the varied ways each of us has the potential, through our own conduct, to exhibit true and admirable patriotism. Third, Sklar evidences how Noonan, good as she has sometimes been of late, nonetheless, in her use of gate 14 in the airport as a reference point, overlooked the most relevant and crucial fact in the whole matter, namely, that Obama's Philadelphia speech on race not only got the attention of the crowds at all the gates 14 in the country, but it also was the leading news event of the day and the week. As I said, Sklar deserves a lot of credit for her insight, and the thoughtful way she presented it.
Napoleon

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 04/29/2008
- Mojane I'm a Fan of Mojane 11 fans permalink

What the hell are you talking about? The Wright distraction, huge, may not be seen as a big deal, feh, so what, to you, but you are not speaking for the millions of "plain old white folks" who vote and were indeed swayed by the latest Wright outings (note Gallup poll dive for Obama). I see it as a big problem for Obama because the millions I mentioned above did not read his "race" speech, did not listen to it, just listened to out-of-context parts of it and, if they did read it, probably missed a good deal of it's meaning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 04/29/2008

So, please explain to me why you and no one else in the entire media is discussing Clinton's problems with voters, for which she has as big of a problem, if not a bigger problem, than Obama does; as well as the fact that Obama has WON working-class voters in many states (FYI Clinton has not once won the African-American vote) and has IMPROVED from Ohio to Pennsylvania on these very voters??

I DON'T GET IT!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 04/29/2008

Perhaps because this is already over, Obama won a while ago,. and people in the party and the media are letting the charade play out for as long as Hillarys Hubris will last, which I am certain will be to the bitter end.

Nonetheless, Obama will have won in a clearly fair and well fought battle, as opposed to one marred by the appearance of an anti Hillary bias (other wise known as common sense).

But your overall point is correct. MOST people in this country despise Hillary Clinton, and she would lose in the general against Cheny/Wolfowitz, much less McCain, although after the "Completely Oliterate Them" statement, Cheney/wolfowitz would probably appoint her to be their Secretary of State for her top shelf diplomatic skills. For Christs sake, not even BUSH has said anything that asinine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:43 PM on 04/29/2008

As far as the African-American vote is concerned, the polls showed that Hillary actually was ahead of Obama in December. Now he is getting 90% of the African-American vote. That big difference is not only an affirmation of Obama's candidacy, but also a repudiation of Clinton's candidacy. If Clinton wins the nomination I see an extremely large percentage of African-Americans staying home and not voting. The same can be said of the young vote. Hillary does not inspire the young people to go out and vote; and as sad is it may be, young people NEED to be inspired to go out and vote. As far as the independent and cross-over republican vote is concerned, she has around a 60% unfavorable rating mostly due to her polarization in the independent and republican circles. Finally the college-educated and $50,000+ voters can be mirrored exactly by the working-class vote. I see these voters as more likely to vote for McCain based on their wallets (which the Republicans rightly or wrongly have exploited the rich vote), than working-class voters are to vote for McCain.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 04/29/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect