US report says al-Qaida gaining strength

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - US report says al-Qaida gaining strength stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MATTHEW LEE | April 30, 2008 05:50 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Al-Qaida has rebuilt some of its pre-Sept. 11 capabilities from remote hiding places in Pakistan, leading to a major spike in attacks last year in that country and neighboring Afghanistan, the Bush administration said Wednesday.

Attacks in Pakistan more than doubled from 375 to 887 between 2006 and 2007, and the number of fatalities jumped by almost 300 percent from 335 to 1,335, the State Department said in its annual terrorism report.

In Afghanistan, the number of attacks rose 16 percent, to 1,127 incidents last year, killing 1,966 people, 55 percent more than the 1,257 who died in 2006, it said.

The report said attacks in Iraq dipped slightly between 2006 and 2007, but they still accounted for 60 percent of worldwide terrorism fatalities, including 17 of the 19 Americans who were killed in attacks last year. The other two were killed in Afghanistan.

More than 22,000 people were killed by terrorists around the world in 2007, 8 percent more than in 2006, although the overall number of attacks fell, the report says.

The report once again identifies Iran as the world's "most active" state sponsor of terrorism for supporting Palestinian extremists and insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq, where it says elements of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps continued to give militants weapons, training and funding.

"In this way, Iranian government forces have been responsible for attacks on coalition forces," State Department counter terrorism coordinator Dell Dailey told reporters. Iranian forces are also giving weapons and financial aid to the Taliban in Afghanistan, he said.

About 13,600 noncombatants were killed in 2007 in Iraq, the report says, adding the high number could be attributed to a 50 percent increase in the number of suicide bombings. Suicide car bombings were up 40 percent and suicide bombings outside of vehicles climbed 90 percent over 2006, it says.

Story continues below
advertisement

"The ability of these attackers to penetrate large concentrations of people and then detonate their explosives may account for the increase in lethality of bombings in 2007," the report says.

In Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, al-Qaida and its affiliates remain "the greatest terrorist threat to the United States and its partners" despite ongoing efforts to combat followers of Osama bin Laden and his top deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, according to the report. It says Zawahiri has emerged as the group's "strategic and operational planner."

"It has reconstituted some of its pre-9/11 operational capabilities through the exploitation of Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas, replacement of captured or killed operational lieutenants, and the restoration of some central control by its top leadership, in particular Ayman al-Zawahiri," it says.

Dailey, however, stressed that al-Qaida is still weaker overall than it was before Sept. 11, 2001.

A primary reason for its resurgence was a cease-fire the Pakistani government reached with tribal leaders last year, the report says. That truce has since ended, but Pakistan's new government is now renegotiating a similar agreement that some fear could have similar results and further undermine efforts to battle al-Qaida.

The earlier cease-fire and instability in the region appear "to have provided al-Qaida leadership greater mobility and ability to conduct training and operational planning, particularly that targeting Western Europe and the United States," the report says.

"Numerous senior al-Qaida operatives have been captured or killed, but al-Qaida leaders continued to plot attacks and to cultivate stronger operational connections that radiated outward from Pakistan to affiliates throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe," it says.

Of particular concern are al-Qaida sympathizers who attacked a U.N. building in Algeria, killing more than 40 people and wounding more than 150 last year, the report says.

In Pakistan, the State Department recorded more than 45 suicide bombings in 2007, up from a total of just 22 such incidents between 2002 and 2006. Among those logged last year were the December attack that killed former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto and an October attack on her homecoming parade that killed more than 130 people, the worst suicide attack in Pakistani history.

___

On the Net:

State Department: http://www.state.gov

WASHINGTON — Al-Qaida has rebuilt some of its pre-Sept. 11 capabilities from remote hiding places in Pakistan, leading to a major spike in attacks last year in that country and neighboring Afgha...
WASHINGTON — Al-Qaida has rebuilt some of its pre-Sept. 11 capabilities from remote hiding places in Pakistan, leading to a major spike in attacks last year in that country and neighboring Afgha...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
317
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

Isn't this what Obama has been saying for a year now?

Good to know the State Department is waking up.... they'll need to be on the same page when Pres. Obama steps in the oval office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 04/30/2008
- Pammy1151 I'm a Fan of Pammy1151 8 fans permalink
photo

YES HE HAS He said this in the first debate and was jumped all over by Ms.Hillary and othrs except Biden.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 04/30/2008

Well, considering Biden voted with Hillary and Kerry to authorize the use of force in Iraq, he probably felt it would be better to keep his mouth shut.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 04/30/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1568 fans permalink
photo

The report once again identifies Iran as the world's "most active" state sponsor of terrorism for supporting Palestinian extremists and insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq, where it says elements of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps continued to provide militants with weapons, training and funding.

"In this way, Iranian government forces have been responsible for attacks on coalition forces," State Department counter terrorism coordinator Dell Dailey told reporters. Iranian forces are also giving weapons and financial aid to the Taliban in Afghanistan, he said.
----------

This is the part of the report that is designed to prepare us for the next phase of the NeoCon agenda : military action against Iran.

This is a nice trick.

You first designate "Palestinian extremists and insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq" as terrorists. Then, with our without any evidence, you keep repeating that Iran is supplying them weapons and training and so forth. Then you say that since some in these groups attack and kill U.S. soldiers (as in Iraq), Iran is a threat to our national security, and must be attacked.

Of course, McCain and Hillary would immediately oblige, he only with regular bombs, but she with nukes, since nothing less than obliteration of Iran would solve the problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 04/30/2008
- msmaggie I'm a Fan of msmaggie 10 fans permalink

I feel sorry for the next POTUS. He/she will be faced with a number of alternatives in Iraq as well as Pakistan/A­fghanistan­. All these alternatives will, you'll pardon the expression, suck. God help them. And us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 04/30/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1568 fans permalink
photo

What we need is a total reversal of the NeoCon approach to foreign policy. That reversal is possible only with Obama.

And, you are right, there are no "good solutions" now for Iraq. There are only bad solutions and worse solutions. But, at least those are solutions, and not the continuing problem we have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 04/30/2008

I have been thinking for years that Iran was the main target of this administra­tion...... and Syria.....

They only have eight months now.... I wonder what kind of drama they are going to come up with to justify the invasion..­...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 04/30/2008

And we must not forget that GHWB and Cheney gave Syria a big fat weapons deal to be part of the coalition of the bribed in the first Gulf War.

If we go in there we will, in part, be fighting (in part) against US made weapons supplied by the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 04/30/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1568 fans permalink
photo

You are exactly right. Iran is the big prize for the NeoCons. And it's documented in many of their writings.

Syria, I think, is important only because they are allied with Iran, and might help Iran retaliate within the region when we attack Iran.

Besides having the third largest oil reserves in the world, Iranians are capable of one day cahllenging Israel. Israel would like to maintain its current regional super power status, and be able to attack any country in the region at will, without any serious repercussions.

Whereas Israel had minimal interest in Iraq, it has major interest in attacking Iran.

Israel's desire, comined with U.S. desire to control Iranian oil forms the seed for a perfect storm.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:32 PM on 04/30/2008
- hope I'm a Fan of hope 76 fans permalink

oops.

i seem to have repeated myself. myself. myself.


:)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 04/30/2008
- hope I'm a Fan of hope 76 fans permalink

The Bush's can point to al-Qaida as a success.


At least someone besides their cronies benefitted from this administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 04/30/2008

Condolezzz­zzzzzzzzzz­a you never looked better!

Maybe if they quit looking under rocks in Iraq and start looking in Pakistan and Afganistan they might be able to make a difference.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 04/30/2008
- hope I'm a Fan of hope 76 fans permalink

The Bush's can point to al-Qaida as a success story..



At least someone besided their cronies benefited from this administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 04/30/2008
- wmbear I'm a Fan of wmbear 24 fans permalink

I THOUGHT THE SURGE WAS WORKING...

But according to this report it's not working, since terrorism in Iraq and elsewhere is up. Oh, wait, I see. The surge is working when it's about continuing the U.S. occupation of Iraq in full force. But the surge isn't working if it's about cooking up a reason to attack Iran. I get it now....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 04/30/2008
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 60 fans permalink
photo

The surge is working. Because the point of the surge was to increase the revenue flow to the war profiteers. The Bush empire has never been so rich.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 04/30/2008

What is so amazing is that even still---- I mean, right this very second, Americans in general believe that the GOP is better for national security. 75% of us feel the war is a disaster, yet 70% trust McCain on national security more than Barack or Hillary. How can this be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 04/30/2008
- nerakami I'm a Fan of nerakami 14 fans permalink

I think you have asked the right question. How can Americans trust a party and its nominee which led us into the worse blunder in American history. It escapes my ability to understand ....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 04/30/2008
- msmaggie I'm a Fan of msmaggie 10 fans permalink

Well one of the things that may shed some light is the current occupant of the WH. I find myself thinking that I will be ok with Obama, Clinton or McCain. The reason is obvious, my standards have fallen way, way, way, way down over the last 7 years. In other words, McCain (and everyone, including my doorman) is so far superior to Bush that he profits in the end.

Know this sounds rather stupid, but I think it's true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 04/30/2008
- oldtree I'm a Fan of oldtree 7 fans permalink

Do you think it is because we are occupying their country? I guess I'd be pissed off too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 04/30/2008
- wsblake I'm a Fan of wsblake 9 fans permalink

Yeah,but haven't they heard about how great Bush's campaign against Al-Qeada in Iraq is doing ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 04/30/2008

Uhhhh.... isn't this why we went to Afghanistan in the first place?

Are we going to invade Pakistan now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 04/30/2008
- haboob I'm a Fan of haboob 3 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:43 PM on 04/30/2008
- alaintex I'm a Fan of alaintex 2 fans permalink

Pakistan criticized U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama on Friday for saying that, if elected, he might order unilateral military strikes against terrorists hiding in this Islamic country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:10 PM on 04/30/2008
- alaintex I'm a Fan of alaintex 2 fans permalink

Obama said he would.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 PM on 04/30/2008
photo

Clearly the solution to this problem is to invade Iran and Syria.
Vote McCain, More the Same!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 04/30/2008
photo

Don't forget Venezuela.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 04/30/2008

Or Poland. Oh wait, that's from another Bush idiotic sequence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 04/30/2008
- phroso I'm a Fan of phroso 5 fans permalink

Whenever the news is bad for Obama (which is practically daily now), Arianna decides to highlight the war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 04/30/2008

Oh, so the Obama/Wright story wasn't the headline all day yesterday and got over 6k comments?

What's the weather like in Fantasyland?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 04/30/2008
- andyboy I'm a Fan of andyboy 72 fans permalink

PHROSO = LIAR

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 04/30/2008

Have you slept through the past few days? It is about time we had something on the war...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 04/30/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1568 fans permalink
photo

I remember a time when you thought that it was important to talk about this war and the harm it has done.

What has Hillary made you become?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 04/30/2008

Yeah, we should interrupt serious discussion of America's genocide in Iraq much more frequently!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 04/30/2008
photo

Hey George, when are we gonna "Smoke 'Em Out?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:29 PM on 04/30/2008

That's the next President's job. And this applies to fixing anything this President has turned to s**t.

Surely, nobody believed Bush when he pledged to get bin Laden.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 04/30/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1568 fans permalink
photo

Now, if the folks living in Pakistan and Afghanistan liked us, they would tell al Qaeda to go to hell, instead of providing them food and shelter.

But, to get folks to like us, we have to act less like cowboys, threatening them with nukes and obliteration, and use more diplomacy.

Talking to folks who don't like us is "hard work" for Bush, we know, and it is against the desires of McBomb, but even a Dem candidate for President opposes it.

So, what are the chances that anything would change in the future unless we put Obama in the White House?

We need change. We need a different approach.

This is the main reason I support Obama.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 04/30/2008

Exactly...­. diplomacy is always the best first action that can be taken by any side....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 04/30/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1568 fans permalink
photo

If you watched "Charlie Wilson's War", the end is very telling. We spent a billion supporting the Mujahedin to fight the Soviets, but we refused to spend a million on schools for Afghan children. Those children are now known as Taliban and al Qaeda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 04/30/2008
photo

"Now, if the folks living in Pakistan and Afghanistan liked us, they would tell al Qaeda to go to hell, instead of providing them food and shelter."

Maybe some of the folks give al Qaeda fighters food and shelter because they will be killed if they don't.
I think if they tell them to go to hell there would be repercussions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:49 PM on 04/30/2008

That may be true, but most people won't beg a tiger to protect them from wolves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 04/30/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1568 fans permalink
photo

They get killed by the other side when they are caught cooperating with al Qaeda. It goes both way.

There is no way al Qaeda can survive for long without a cooperative local population, especially with Pakistani/Afghan military and police supporting them against al Qaeda.

If the local population is convinced that they have a better future cooperating with U.S. or Pakistani or Afghan forces, rather than with al Qaeda, they would stop cooperating with al Qaeda.

You can see some evidence of that in Iraq. General Petroleus of ours did get some Sunnis to turn against al Qaeda for a while, and they fought al Qaeda. Now, it seems that Petroleus let Maliki destroy that initial success.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:14 PM on 04/30/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect