North Carolina, Indiana Primaries: Full Results, Exit Polls

The Huffington Post   |   May 6, 2008 01:37 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

INDIANA RESULTS - 99% Reporting

Clinton
638,192
51%

Obama
615,753
49%

NORTH CAROLINA RESULTS - 99% Reporting

Obama
889,513
56%

Clinton
657,616
42%

See complete exit poll breakdown here.

And the latest state of the race:

Obama won at least 94 delegates in the North Carolina and Indiana primaries, according to an analysis of election returns by The Associated Press. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton won at least 75 delegates, with 18 still to be awarded.


Sixteen of the outstanding delegates were from North Carolina and two were from Indiana.

In the overall race for the nomination, Obama led with 1,840.5 delegates, including separately chosen party and elected officials known as superdelegates. Clinton had 1,684.

Obama was 184.5 delegates shy of the 2,025 needed to secure the Democratic nomination.

ELECTION RESULTS NEWS:

1:30 AM - Obama Shifts To General Election Mode: "The Obama campaign appears poised to begin running its general election campaign after Tuesday night’s primaries seemed unlikely to change the math or the momentum in the Democratic nomination," the Wall Street Journal reports.

David Axelrod, the top Obama strategist, told reporters that Barack Obama would compete for the six remaining Democratic contests, where 217 delegates are at stake. But he said that the campaign would soon focus on the general election because likely Republican nominee John McCain had “basically run free for some time now because we’ve been consumed with this." He added: “I don’t think we’re going to spend time solely in primary states.”


Pressed by reporters whether that meant the campaign would make stops in general election states over the next month, Axelrod said: “You could infer that from what I said.

”

1:05 AM - Pledged Delegate Race Is Over: Politico's delegate counter estimates a net +15 for Obama: Clinton +2 in Indiana, Obama +17

What's interesting if these numbers hold is that this assures that Obama will win a majority of the 3,253 pledged delegates [excluding Florida and Michigan]. He's now at 1,494. Under this set of numbers, he picks up 101 for a total of 1,595. A majority is 1,627, so he's 33 short. If you assume he makes threshold in each of the remaining 24 districts for one delegate and then picks up at least one PLEO and one at-large in each of the 6 remaining contests, he's at 1,631. The battle for the majority of pledged delegates is over.

12:30 AM - Russert: Obama Is The Nominee: "We now know who the Democratic nominee is going to be," NBC's Tim Russert just declared on MSNBC.

The Meet the Press host was referring to Barack Obama, who won a decisive victory over Hillary Rodham Clinton in today's North Carolina primary and is within just a few percentage points of her in the Indiana vote count.


The network's Chuck Todd just ran through the math and calculated that Obama now leads Clinton in the "popular vote" by about 710,000 -- and by 200,000 if the disputed primaries in Florida and Michigan are counted. He also leads by about 160 Democratic convention delegates, Todd said.

12:24 AM - The Clinton Message: From Ambinder: "And the message to the media and to the superdelegates is: Everybody, let's take a deep breath. Let's look at the results. Let's think hard about the choices we face. Let's not rush Sen. Clinton."

12:06 AM - Clinton Cancels Morning Show Apparances: So says Tim Russert on MSNBC. "It's a sign of weakness she can ill afford at a moment when questions about whether she can continue are mounting."

11:30 - Take That Wright: "How Barack Obama ended his victory speech in North Carolina: 'May God bless you and the United States of America.' Damn he's good!"

11:15 - Clinton Muted: Ben Smith:

I've been out on the road with Clinton for the past few days, during which she was perhaps the sharpest she's been in her political career. Forceful, clear, connecting intensely with her crowds, utterly at ease with her message.

Tonight, that energy has really, strikingly vanished.

Bill, behind her, is somber too. And she's promised, "no matter what happens," to work to pull the party together.

From ABC's Rick Klein:

"A hint of healing to come? "We are all on the same team." "No matter what happens, I will work for the Democratic nominee, because we must win in November."


These could be the most important lines of the night.

To me, at least, Sen. Clinton's body language tells the story -- even if you don't look at the glum expression on Bill's face. Tonight, she needed a big win in a big state -- and she's winding up with a small win, while Sen. Obama won a bigger state.

Watch her full speech:

11:10 - Kos Doesn't Want Hillary To Drop Out (Yet): "If Clinton were to drop out this week, we'd face an uncomfortable situation in West Virginia, with Clinton likely crushing Obama. That would look terrible for the presumptive nominee. Better than that would be to garner enough superdelegate commitments this week, so that Oregon can push Obama past 2,024. That way, it isn't the supers who clinch it for Obama, but actual voters."

11:04 - Gary Mayor Predicts Indiana Shocker: The Washington Post reports:

As the fate of a nailbiter Indiana primary -- and possibly the course of the Democratic race -- hung on his city, Gary Mayor Rudy Clay said just now that it might take a while yet to finish counting the vote in Lake County, which includes Gary, and said that his city had turned out so overwhelmingly for Barack Obama that it might just be enough to close the gap with Hillary Rodham Clinton.


"Let me tell you, when all the votes are counted, when Gary comes in, I think you're looking at something for the word to see," Clay, an Obama supporter, said in a telephone interview from Obama's Gary headquarters. "I don't know what the numbers are yet, but Gary has absolutely produced in large numbers for Obama here."

10:24 - Clinton "Victory" Speech Delayed: So says Mark Halperin.

10:22 - Why Indiana Margin Closed: MSNBC explains how Clinton went from a double-digit lead in Indiana to a razor-thin margin.

10:14 - Obama 'Concedes' Indiana: "When Barack Obama took the stage to bask in his big victory in North Carolina's Democratic presidential primary, all but one of the television networks still were unwilling to call the day other contest, In Indiana," the LA Times notes. "But Obama showed no such hesitation, saying early in his remarks that he wanted to congratulate Hillary Clinton 'on what appears to be her victory in the great state of Indiana.'"

Here's Obama's full speech:

10:00 - How Does Clinton Win It? Obama supporter (to say the least) Andrew Sullivan writes:

There is no calculation that currently gives the Clintons a majority of the popular vote. There is now no mathematical possibility of them getting more delegates. Obama has won by far the most states. He has raised far more money; he has 1.5 million donors, mainly small sums. He has crushed her among new voters and young voters; and as a black politician, his support spans all races and classes. And recall: he is a freshman senator with a very funny name against the biggest brand name in American politics and a worldwide celebrity whose chief campaigner was a former two-term president of the United States.

9:30 - Obama Campaign's Talking Points: Lynn Sweet gets a copy:

"There really has never been any question that Senator Clinton would win Indiana," said a Obama talking points memo out Tuesday. Team Obama also blames Rush Limbaugh for urging Republicans to infiltrate the primary and vote for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.

8:50 - Obama Camp Expects To "Clinch" On May 20: More from Ambinder:

May 20 -- that's the date when the campaign unofficially expects to "clinch" the nomination -- when they'll officially have a majority of pledged delegates, which triggers, in their view, the standard for superdelegate decision-making set by party leaders like Nancy Pelosi.


As of tonight, Obama will be between 35 and 43 pledged delegates votes away from achieving that majority.

8:30 - Obama Campaign Confident: Marc Ambinder: "The Obama campaign expects to end the night with an expanded lead in the pledged delegate count and having erased Clinton's popular vote gains out of Pennsylvania."

8:19 - Clinton Camp Raises 'Tiebreaker' Comment: An email from Clinton spokesman Phil Singer:

Senator Obama called Indiana the 'tiebreaker' for the Democratic nominating process: "You know, Sen. Clinton is more favored in Pennsylvania," he added, "and I'm right now a little more favored in North Carolina, so Indiana right now may end up being the tiebreaker. So we want to work very hard in Indiana."
 

Comments
2251
Pending Comments
0
Post a Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (23 pages total)

An important story within the North Carolina primary that is getting buried, is the North Carolina U.S. Senatorial race. In this competitive race an African American candidate Marcus W. Williams was defeated by a white woman candidate Kay R. Hagan. African Americans overwhelming voted for Hagan over Williams, at the same time they voted for Obama. This clearly suggest that African Americans do not merely vote on the basis of race otherwise Williams would have fair much better. Indeed, black and white North Carolinas recognized that Hagan"s stand on the issues were far better than Williams.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 05/10/2008

has anyone seen any reports on this?

HUGE NC Vote MisCount Favored Obama
by internetstar, Fri May 09, 2008 at 06:39:47 PM EST

In at least one county, ballots were counted twice for Obama.
They gave him 15,000 extra votes.

"MECKLENBURG & WAKE COUNTIES -- Vote tallies are changing in the state's two largest counties, after certain ballots were counted twice in Mecklenburg and Wake counties.

The mistake didn't change the outcome of any elections, but it is a cause for concern to election directors.

For example, when Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama declared victory Tuesday night in North Carolina's primary, he was given approximately 15,000 votes more than he should have been.

That's 1 percent of all ballots cast.

In Wake County, early and absentee ballots were counted as part of the individual voters precincts and again as a whole.

"So in essence, those voters were recorded double," said Cherie Poucher of the Wake Co. Board of Elections. It was around 37,000 votes.

In Mecklenburg County, only absentee ballots - 2,400 in all - were doubled. "It doesn't change any of the results," said Michael Dickerson of the Mecklenburg Co. Board of Elections. "All the winners are still the winners."

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 05/10/2008

Indiana closer then we thought.

Hillary = 50.9 Barack = 49.1

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/99999999/NEWS05/80326049

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 AM on 05/10/2008

I HAVE TO STRONGLY CAUTION ALL OBAMA SUPPORTERS WHOSE STATES HAVE NOT YET VOTED, PLEASE GET OUT AND VOTE WHEN YOUR VOTING DATE ARRIVES. THE RACE IS NOT OVER, SO DO NOT BUY INTO WHAT THE MEDIA IS SAYING. THEY ARE GIVING OFF A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY.

IF THE MEDIA ARE ABLE TO GET OBAMA'S VOTERS TO STAY AT HOME, WITH THE FALSE SENSE THAT OBAMA HAS ALREADY WON, HILLARY WILL WALK OFF WITH THE NOMINATION, BECAUSE YOU BETTER BELIEVE THAT HILLARY IS TELLING HER SUPPORTERS TO GO OUT AND VOTE.

OBAMA SUPPORTERS, THIS RACE IS NOT DONE UNTIL ALL THE VOTING IN EVERY STATE IS DONE.
SO OBAMA VOTERS GET OUT AND VOTE, NO MATTER WHAT THE MEDIA SAYS, OBAMA NEEDS ALL YOUR VOTES, THIS RACE IS NOT OVER UNTIL ALL THE STATES HAVE VOTED!!!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 05/09/2008

As an Obama supporter, I refuse to take advise from anyone who writes in all caps.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 05/10/2008

I read Krugman and he wrote,

"More tirades from Obama supporters against Mrs. Clinton are not the answer " they will only further alienate her grass-roots supporters, many of whom feel that she received a raw deal.

Nor is it helpful to insult the groups that supported Mrs. Clinton, either by suggesting that racism was their only motivation or by minimizing their importance."

On the one hand, I have serious reservations about voting for Obama if he is the nominee because I see nothing more than vapid pronouncements about 'change.' On the other hand, I want what is right for the nation. It is not another Republican administration.

A lot of the comments I have read have been derogatory and insulting of Clinton and they have had the effect of tremendously alienating me from voting for Obama. When I read a lot of these vicious comments here and elsewhere I have to ask just what 'change we can believe in' is actually being promoted. Admittedly there is a sense of reprisal but there is a more important aspect . I am reluctant to vote for someone I do not support. Voting for Obama would be a vote against McCain and not an endorsement of Obama.

Obama's supporters may dismiss me as just being one voter but there are a lot of Clinton supporters like me. Many of the blocks of Clinton supporters would need to be wooed and swayed by Obama. I just do not see that happening.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:20 AM on 05/09/2008

Am a admirer of the Obama message of hope and change, and think that flyfisher has made a good point about ragging Hillary Clinton. Thankfully most of the worst negative approach has not been from Sen.. Obama, but from supporters, and should be soon forgotten as we go forward.
The point about not having enough specifics from the Obama camp, I think is not really fair. Specifics are a natural attack point from any opposition... either side. Once "specifics" are stated categorically, any change at all becomes fodder.
I think that Obama has done a good job of pointing up his philosophy, and his goals. If he were to say "I'll bring the servicemen home by March of 2010" then any one left by April of 2010 would be a failure.
I am hoping for a general change in direction. A litany of promises that could only be fulfilled with the total cooperation of Congress would mean nothing.
If Obama was losing. I would vote for Hillary and feel comfortable that she would represent me.
The idea that disgruntled Clinton fans would vote for John McCain because of bitterness over the Obama supporters, says to me that personal biases would override the real and basic convictions of the voter. Position on the issues are what matter to me... not anger over what might be said in the heat of battle.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 05/09/2008

What is wrong with the superdelegates? RUSH LIMBAUGH ADMITS TO INSTRUCTING FELLOW REPUBLICANS TO VOTE FOR HILLARY IN HIS "OPERATION CHAOS".

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/05/rushlimbaugh.html

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 AM on 05/08/2008

Was that Lake County or Cook County?
Ah, yes... there's those flashbacks from the 60's again.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 05/07/2008

obama can not beat McCain--black and left wing elitists are not enough to defeat moderates,blue collar and the right--how foolish you left wing geeks and black racist are---

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 05/07/2008

How ignorant you sound. Black folks have been voting for white folks ever since we were allowed to vote. 82% of blacks were Clinton supporters at the beginning of this race. And FYI, look up the definition of racist. One must have power or belong to the group who has power over another group to be a racist. Therefore, African Americans cannot be racist. They can be bigots and they can be prejudiced. You just need to step aside and let the Americans who love this country try to move her forward.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 05/07/2008

No no no no! Your definition of "racist" is not accurate. Let me help you out...

Racism is a belief system or doctrine which postulates a hierarchy among various human races or ethnic groups. It may be based on an assumption of inherent biological differences between different ethnic groups that purport to determine cultural or individual behaviour.

If you choose to believe this defination, it's evident that people, black AND white, have been throwing this term around very loosely for some time. Racism is about what you believe and is not related whether you're a minority or "another race having power over you". Saying Wright or Obama is racist is ridiculous since their words do not postulate a hierarchy of their race over another. We could stand to benefit from pulling our heads out of the sand to listen to the criticism given us and use it to better ourselves. Go Obama!!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 AM on 05/09/2008

A chimpanzee could beat McCain.


Independents for Obama '08

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 05/07/2008

I don't think you realize how racist your post makes you sound. All those years that Black people went out and voted for the white guy they felt had their best interest at heart, were you calling them Black racists then? When white people went out and voted for the person that looked like them, talked like them, walked like them, were you calling them white racists? Your post makes absolutely no sense in the grand scheme of things. There is no one more foolish than you and your short sighted, narrow minded view point. Instead of understanding that history has just been made, you choose to name call. You're probably a Hillary supporter, she's good at calling names too.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 05/07/2008

What do you mean when you talk about black racist [sic]???
Do you think that moderates and blue collar workers are all white???
Left wing geeks???? Do you mean people who have more than the four years of formal education that you had???

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/07/2008

Mostly all of the posts from this bigot contains something about "black". dr4ill tries that reverse psychology routine. A racist attempting to call others exactly what he is. A Racist. Just Hypocritical!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 05/07/2008

My 35-year-old son and his wife are blue collar moderates. Both are for Obama. Both are white Southerners, living/working in small-town America. There are countless many just like them, old, young, and in-between.

You're believing the MSM. It really doesn't serve you as an American to make that mistake. The media is not for you. They want you to be their faithful drone, though. Don't do it.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 05/07/2008

Oh dear. I guess your kids just did not get the memo on how they are supposed to feel about this election. How dare they be regular hard working folks and support Obama???? And, on top of that, they are WHITE??????? The nerve!!!!!!
Oh, wait... I am one of "those" too.


WOO HOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:38 PM on 05/07/2008

How do YOU know they work hard ?? CarlyCorday didn't mention anything about whether are son & his wife are hard working. Again, believing the MSM when they tell you that blue collar = "hard working." We don't know that; they might be lazy goof-offs.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 05/10/2008

For ANY of you think that Obama CAN choose Hillary as V.P., there is no way in hell that could happen.

How , in the world, could Obama choose that pathe for himself when his whole campaign was about CHANGE.

What would he say? Ok, I ran my campaign on change, so I changed my mind about Hillary and I now think she'd make a fine VP.

Oh, remember when I told you all that it's time to change the "old" Washington politics and start fresh? Well, now I think Hillary would make a fine VP. And so on...

If he were to choose her as VP, then the rest of the campaign would be about one thing and one thing only. His HYPOCRISY!

I believe the last thing he needs, going into the general, is her baggage! And besides, she's too divisive for him and his style anyway.

O in 08' - Great!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 05/07/2008

We're with you but we want Hillary to bow out as any other candidate in her positon would have done by now. It's frustrating. She ran a very nasty campaign. We car reconcile but she has to drop out; and not June 15th. That's way too long.


Independents for Obama '08

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 05/07/2008

Doc,

actually, in light of the performance record of "Hundred Years War" McCain & party's actual performance record including the issue of being the vaunted "party of family values:"

http://www.armchairsubversive.org

*Hypocrisy* is IMHO part n' parcel of the "Gang of Pedophiles" and Charles Keating's bought lapdog "Hundred Years War" McCain.

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 05/07/2008


Want to see a sample of why we HAVE TO vote for our Democratic nominee no matter who it is? I got the following email from two 20-something chicken hawks (Stay in Iraq! NO NO NO, not US! We don't want to BE in the fight! We want YOUR SON to do it!) who manage a web site that was sued by Rep. Abourezk (D-SD) for defamation:

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 PM on 05/07/2008

HAH? ?????

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:04 PM on 05/07/2008

Hey Doc Demon. I tried to scale it out in 2 posts because it was so long, but it didn't fly with the moderator. So I put it up on my Pofile.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 05/07/2008

cool. thanks

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 05/07/2008

I'm speaking to my fellow Obama supporters:

Stop attacking and antagonizing Clinton's people. Please.

We have been at each other's throats for much too long as it is. Granted, a portion of that has to lay at the figurative feet of the media, but talking heads aside, the voters were heard last night, and that's really who matters. All these windbags can rile up the infighting all they want for ratings, but it's time to realize that we all have the same goal right now: Put a Democrat in the White House who will initiate change in policy and perception.

Senator Hillary Clinton was one hell of a candidate. There isn't one person who could have withstood all she had opposing her, and she just took it head on with a smile and asked for more. I want her in the next administration to some degree and I hope you all agree with me that she earned it. This is Obama's Presidential campaign now, but that was a Clinton vs. Obama primary and it was ridiculous(SLASH)fun.

Now let's support our Democratic brothers and sisters, while we enjoy mopping the floor with that pathetic, sacrificial lamb, John McCain.

Yes, we ALL can.

Who's with me?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:24 PM on 05/07/2008

Are you part of her campaign ?

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 05/07/2008

Does it matter? The gest of it is that we need to unite as a party now and stop attacking one another. Or is it your choice to continue the backbiting because "this is the fun part"? I am not making fun of Hillary for that comment. I am trying to make a point to my fellow Obama supporters to just step back.

Ask yourself, "would Obama approve of this behavior?". If not, then we need to conduct ourselves accordingly.