Study: "Daily Show" Very Similar To "O'Reilly Factor"

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Study: "Daily Show" Very Similar To "O'Reilly Factor" stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DAVID BAUDER | May 8, 2008 04:10 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Sept. 25, 2007 file photo, Jon Stewart is shown during a taping of Comedy Central's "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" in New York. (AP Photo/Peter Kramer, File)

NEW YORK — A journalism think tank studying "The Daily Show" doesn't believe many people get their news from Jon Stewart _ because otherwise they wouldn't get the jokes.

The Project for Excellence in Journalism also said it was surprised at how much the Comedy Central late-night program resembles "The O'Reilly Factor," "Hardball" and other cable news shows in content.

The Washington-based organization asked its researchers to study a year's worth of "The Daily Show" tapes _ hardly a grim assignment _ after hearing the frequent claim that many young people learn about the world from Stewart instead of more traditional news sources.

Tom Rosenstiel, the project's director, said he doubts this is the case. He considers "The Daily Show" more of a political satire in the tradition of newspapermen like Art Buchwald, H.L. Mencken and Russell Baker.

"They're not making jokes about Dan Quayle is dumb or Gerald Ford is clumsy," he said. "They're not making jokes that you could get if you live in the country but don't read the news ... . You can't get the jokes if you're not watching the news. The jokes are designed to make you think more about the news."

A Comedy Central representative had no immediate comment on the study. Stewart has consistently ridiculed the idea that he's somehow a newsman, saying he's just a comic.

Politics, government and the Bush administration's policies in Iraq accounted for about half of the show's content, making it quite similar to the focus of serious cable news shows, the study said. About 8 percent of the show's time is spent looking at the behavior of the press.

The show is actually making some very serious political commentary, "but they use humor to do it," Rosenstiel said.

With some stories in no way conducive to humor, "The Daily Show" ignores certain big events. The Minnesota bridge collapse wasn't mentioned on the show, and the Virginia Tech massacre was largely ignored, the study said.

And, of course, sometimes the news gives way to pure comedy. On a January day when traditional newscasts led with severe winter weather gripping much of the country, "Stewart began his show by pondering what drink would be best to wash down a Jimmy Dean pancake and sausage on a stick," the study said.

The verdict: Gatorade.

While Stewart aims most of his firepower at Republicans, the show is actually pretty balanced in its bookings, the study noted. Of the clearly partisan, 15 guests were conservative and 18 were liberal. Presumptive GOP presidential nominee John McCain was a guest on Wednesday's show.

"The fact that the lineup of guests is actually even surprised me," Rosenstiel said. "I thought going in that there weren't that many Republicans who would be willing to go on the show."

NEW YORK — A journalism think tank studying "The Daily Show" doesn't believe many people get their news from Jon Stewart _ because otherwise they wouldn't get the jokes. The Project for Excelle...
NEW YORK — A journalism think tank studying "The Daily Show" doesn't believe many people get their news from Jon Stewart _ because otherwise they wouldn't get the jokes. The Project for Excelle...
Filed by Danny Shea  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
297
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)

I think you could very easily get your news from Stewart. He usually sets up all the jokes with a factual statement, and then proceeds to make fun of it.

I don't see how it's very similar to the O'Reilly factor. I mean, both use color film, that's about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 05/08/2008

Comedy is funny because it's true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 05/08/2008
photo

Yeah, very similar EXCEPT that Jon is talented comedian with a great team of writers and associates whereas O'Reilly is a complete pompus and opinionated JERK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 05/08/2008
- WmC I'm a Fan of WmC 16 fans permalink

"The fact that the lineup of guests is actually even surprised me," Rosenstiel said. "I thought going in that there weren't that many Republicans who would be willing to go on the show."

Didn't Rosenstiel even bother to listen to the interviews? Stewart has to be one of the best-informed and most balanced interviewers around. He obviously respects the interviewee as well as the intelligence of the audience. Second only to Bill Moyers in my estimation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 05/08/2008
- igmond50 I'm a Fan of igmond50 2 fans permalink

Dude you need to get out more. There are plenty of people better informed and more talented as interviewers than Stewart. Moyers and Stewart don't belong in the same sentence..­.except of course in this sentence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:08 PM on 05/08/2008

I can sum up everything Bill Moyers has to say right here so you never have to watch his show again:

"All Catholics are bad people. All Catholic priests molest children. Catholiism is bad - very bad. Religion is for losers. The Pope is evil. I hate Republicans. Please tune in to my show tomorrow when I say something else shocking and controversial so I can get lots of attention and publicity.­"

Now you never need to watch his show again. At least Jon Stewart seems like a regular guy who can maintain a normal relationship with a woman - not some guy who has to be with as many playmates as possible to make up for what he didn't have back in high shcool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 05/08/2008

If by 'get out more', you mean 'watch Bill Moyers more'... then don't you mean watch tv more?

And then I guess you mean stay in more...

Stupid cliche phrase... sorry, your attempt at an insult is mildly pathetic.

Next time, present a better case instead of just a denial and don't resort to petty behavior to make your opinion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 PM on 05/08/2008
- dr4Will I'm a Fan of dr4Will 10 fans permalink
photo

two ego maniacs from different viewpoints--at least they are both better than the other three ego maniacs--o­der-mann,t­immy and matthews!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 PM on 05/08/2008
- Hirnlego I'm a Fan of Hirnlego 113 fans permalink
photo

Jon is an ego maniac? LOL.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 05/08/2008
- shockmagog I'm a Fan of shockmagog 137 fans permalink
photo

The Daily Show is funny, while the Factor is un-funny. The Daily Show assumes the viewer has a fact-based background, while the Factor supplies its own set of facts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 05/08/2008
photo

touche!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 05/08/2008
- brizzle I'm a Fan of brizzle 3 fans permalink

And yes, "Overally" is my new word for the day... :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 05/08/2008
- brizzle I'm a Fan of brizzle 3 fans permalink

I think I understand what they're trying to say, but this article isn't well written. It is my understanding that the conclusion is that the Daily Show has about the same amount of content as a regular news show, but that it doesn't explain the news, only ridicules it in some way.

I don't think this is intended to conclude that John Stewart and Bill'O have similar views on the world or that their shows attend to the same audience..­.I believe this is only about the amount of news and how it is presented.

Overally, a poorly-written piece.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 05/08/2008
photo

I would agree with you. The Daily Show assumes that they're dealing with a reality-based viewer. Oreally pulls data out of his considerable behind and presents it to sheeple who hang on his every word as if he were something other than a liar.

Poorly written, poorly researched and poorly analyzed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 05/08/2008
photo

"I would agree with you. The Daily Show assumes that they're dealing with a reality-based viewer. Oreally pulls data out of his considerable behind and presents it to sheeple who hang on his every word as if he were something other than a liar."

I thought that was worth repeating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 05/08/2008

yeah right!. american think thanks has as much credibilty nowdays as George Bush

The Project for Excellence in Journalism think tank funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts

look into it !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 05/08/2008
photo

Yep, I smelled the BS too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 05/08/2008
- avicenna I'm a Fan of avicenna 23 fans permalink
photo

Is there a conflict of interest clause at the end of this study? Was it a randomized, placebo-controlled investigation in which they took "news naive" versus "news experienced" audience members and asked them if they "got the joke"? It just sounds like a subjective assessment of content with an unvalidated projection of whether someone could possibly learn something about what is happening in the world through watching the "Daily Show" without actually having being privy to the information already. I'd disagree - I think you may need to be "world savvy" - but not necessarily a voracious news consumer to both get the jokes and learn what the big media are talking about and what spin they are giving it. This study sounds like it is still trying to claim some relevancy to "traditional journalism" as a primary news source and feels slighted at the thought that a comedy show can both entertain and deliver the news.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 05/08/2008
- DRaymond I'm a Fan of DRaymond 66 fans permalink
photo

I agree there is a big difference. O'Riley tells people how they are supposed to think. Stewart helps people who do think laugh at the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 05/08/2008

There all wags like Jon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 05/08/2008

The larger question is how much comedy the news shows have, not how much news the comedy shows have. What the hell is The Project for Excellence in Journalism doing studying comedy shows? My guess is that they are having trouble finding any journalists to study.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 05/08/2008
- falco I'm a Fan of falco 19 fans permalink

First off, never trust any organization with the word "tank" in the name. It means someone else besides the researchers are footing the bill and are doing the owners bidding. The Rockefellers and Carnegies invented the concept. I agree that people would not "get" Jon Stewart unless they are getting news from somewhere. That somewhere is alternative news sites. Main Stream Media news is propaganda­/brainwash­ing that was taken over long ago by TPTB to influence and dictate our thinking and world view. Foreign news is more informative than ours. At least Russia had the balls to admit their media was state owned...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:54 PM on 05/08/2008
- Hirnlego I'm a Fan of Hirnlego 113 fans permalink
photo

Well, we knew this already. Jon has said atleast twice that that people come for the humour the information is something that the people already got.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 05/08/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 136 fans permalink

"The jokes are designed to make you think about the news." - describing Jon Stewart

As for O'Reilly, he tells people what to think and how to think it. His show is designed for the intellectually challenged and lazy.

Therefore, they are NOT very similar, unless one wants to count that they are both in English, and both deal with American news and politics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 05/08/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect