Hillary's Chances: Growing Chorus Says It's Not Going To Happen

  |   May 9, 2008 04:28 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

The chorus from major news outlets saying Hillary Clinton's candidacy is almost impossible is growing louder as the Clintons continue to push on. The AP reports on the nine superdelegates Barack Obama picked up today. Clinton picked up one. This morning, ABC declared that according to their delegate tallies, Obama had won more superdelegate support than Clinton for the first time. This afternoon, AP's tally showed Obama within half a superdelegate of Clinton.

When asked about Clinton this morning on NBC and MSNBC, former Democratic contender John Edwards said, "it's very difficult to make the math work." Edwards has yet to make an endorsement.

Read excerpts from the various articles below:

AP
:


Barack Obama all but erased Hillary Rodham Clinton's once-imposing lead among national convention superdelegates on Friday and won fresh labor backing as elements of the Democratic Party began coalescing around the Illinois senator for the fall campaign.


ABC
:

ABC News' Karen Travers Reports: For the first time this campaign season, Barack Obama has surpassed Hillary Clinton's support among superdelegates, according to the ABC News delegate estimate.


John Edwards on NBC and MSNBC
:
The former presidential candidate told interviewers on NBC and MSNBC that Barack Obama will probably top the Democratic ticket this fall.

Hillary Clinton has said that she can still win the nomination - but "it's very difficult to make the math work," said Edwards.



Comments
2440
Pending Comments
0
Post a Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (14 pages total)

And if he only had a brain ... Check out the YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 05/11/2008

Obama is sooooooo great. Praise be to Obama!!! Praise Jesus!!!! Praise Jesus!!!!!!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 05/11/2008

the page is turning without her...the focus now is making sure McCain does not extend the Bush catastrophe...

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 05/10/2008

Barack Obama does not mind having Louis Farrakhan's support; he quietly encourages such support as he needs all the black votes he can get. The many faces of Barack Obama.

Rev. Wright is 100% right on Obama: he is a politician and what he says is filtered throughh his political strategy.

Obama supporeters refuse to believe that Obama has serious flaws and will at times apply "old politics" to keep his campaign on track.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 05/10/2008

Funny how you don't address any issue other than race, don'tcha think?
Go peddle your bigotry somewhere else.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 05/10/2008

Right on!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 05/10/2008

SF94127 - go spread your racist fear mongering somewhere else. What you refuse to see is your racist attitude and views are your own -- Yep a party of one trying to get others to join your party good luck with that.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 05/10/2008

This kind of thinking is the problem: this "we are number one", "I am right you are wrong", "with us or against us", "flag pin=patriotism"...etc.

For too long the US and its citizens have gotten a lot of mileage out of creating and sustaining enemies. It's as if the only way to define what is American is by creating an enemy (Cold War,War on Terror, Axis of Evil) and labelling them because they don't walk or talk or look like us (though some have Oil). Enough already.

Obama's campaign is about this "Enough Already". We can hold on to our differences and use them against each other or we can put them aside and work towards our greater good.

We are all on this little blue ball, spinning in space while a handful behave in such detstructive ways that we are all in peril. We should not tolerate any candidate that wants to sustain differences by creating more conflict (100 years in Iraq McCain/ let's nuke Iran Hillary). THere's NO JUSTIFICATION for this kind of dialogue anymore.

Farrahkan is not the devil whites want to make im out to be. His rhetoric is about uplifting black AMericans and instilling responsibility and pride in who you are. (I'd never though t I'd find myself defending Farrahkan). WHat is the danger exactly? He's far less dangerous than the hatred spewed by O'Reilly and Hannity and Limp-baugh and reaches and influences far more people while offering nothing by way of ideas .

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 05/10/2008

You are right - pro black does not = anti-white. It's about self responsibility.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 05/10/2008

You're absolutely right "brooklyn...", I'm so sick of all of the divisions and distractions that benefit only the wealthiest what is it 1% of the population. Farrakhan is far less, far less harmful than the O'Reillys, Hannitys, drug addicted limpbaughs and Pat Buchanans who are allowed to routinely spew their hate with the endorsement and even encouragement of the major and cable networks...all while the world listens and looks on. The obsession with Farrakhan is absurd and distracts us from uniting.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 05/10/2008

You are way off base...I really hope that all the american people don't feel as you do...you first must be for the american people to begin with.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 PM on 05/10/2008

Barack Obama has been the first to acknowledge that he is an imperfect candidate. It is part of his "new type of politics" appeal. He makes mistakes, just like every other human being, including you and me.

Louis Farrakhan and his supporters have also made positive contributions to the melting pot that is our country. So have Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, John Hagee, and others. I certainly do not agree with every idea that any of them espouses, but I am willing to give them credit for the good that they have done, as well as the bad.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:34 PM on 05/10/2008

Dig it Gal, no one is completely right, or wrong. What I seek is a piece of the puzzle within the statements - however enraging, to find MY truth. Even a knuckle dragger such as I, can discern bullshit from the most eloquent - we are after all human.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:13 PM on 05/10/2008

Excellent post. Thank-you.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 05/10/2008

Obama is now unstoppable. I think even McCain and his wife will vote for Obama.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 05/10/2008

Before this is race is over, Cindy will be back on the illegally obtained medication she was caught stealing back in the late 1980s and eary 1990s. Read her profile on Wikipedia. This could be a problem.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 05/10/2008

Surely hope not and I'm a dem.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 05/10/2008

Yeah, sure you are.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 PM on 05/10/2008

In your dreams....

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 05/10/2008

~~~Hillary is to be pittied. She just will not bow out gracefully until she cheats and steals the nomination...her ultimate goal ~~~There was a time when the Clinton's were respectful politicians, but now that has diminished to the lowest ebb.~~~This woman has no shame. Unbelievable that it is.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 05/10/2008

The chance to leave with easy grace was in February. Now she must continue to be scrappy and concede as gracefully as possible. Perhaps then she can salvage a future life in government.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 05/10/2008

This is the definition of surreal. I can see this morning that the MSM is beginning to regurgitate the Clinton spin once again, I suppose they are more susceptible to threatening emails from frenzied Hillary "supporters". They are starting to play up West Virginia in an attempt to shape the perception that this would be a Clinton "comeback".

I threw up in my mouth a little and had to turn it off.

Trying to understand the spin that keeps this story ( and Clinton's campaign) alive is like trying to bend a Titanium pipe with your mind.

The harder you try, the more your head hurts.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 05/10/2008

Sat,12:33p
Oh, no. Was just telling my spouse this morning that....With all of Obama's positive news this week after winning NC primary and Hillary's bad news...Now we have to sit back and take the media spin all over again promoting her supposedly big wins in West Virginia/Kentucky? Please say it isn't so. But, of course, the pundits will begin talking up Hillary all over again (after her wins) just as if this past week on Obama's good news never happened.. I can't take it anymore.

From the beautiful Southwest.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 05/10/2008

He's going Monday to West Virginia, to campaign. It's a shame that the Media won't let it go. They know she'll win big in Kentucky as well but thank goodness he'll hopefully limp over the finish line after the 20th. Just not before they beat him over the head with her greatness pulling votes from the redneck states.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/10/2008

Testtubebaby: Don't get too uppity. You and others who call KY and WVA 'redneck' states may have to do a little begging for those Hill-ocrats to vote for your 'idol' come November.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 AM on 05/11/2008

Saw a funny site urging Hillary to drop out:

http://www.SurrenderHillary.com/gallery

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 05/10/2008

Hillarious!!!

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 05/10/2008

What the Democrats in the Congress should be talking about is getting "Rid " of the "Debold Corrupt Voting Machines. And going back to paper ballots.
If the Democrats do nothing about these machines they will once again lose another "Election.
You can bet the company run by Republican hacks will be rigging their machines for this upcoming election, and it will not matter how many democrats vote. Those States using the machines will go in favor of the republicans.
This is the "Stupidity " of democrats in the Congress they cannot control what they "refuse to see! its been obvious they have let the "Republican "Slime" in the congress run over the "Cowardly Leaders of the Democratic leadership.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 05/10/2008

The ever famous hanging chad. The great people of south Carolina it will come back and haunt yall this time as it did florida. Do not be fooled. Because you are black does not mean he understands your pain. I never saw him in the ghettos of Memphis. How can a rich black man or white man for that matter understand the needs or wants of the poor. Let him have grown up in the ghettos of Memphis or New York.

One thing all women no matter what race no matter what background understand is being put down. Because of all of this stupidness and lying once again we will have republican president. This time he will be the oldest president ever.

Nobody ever looks at the whole picture all candidates lie as do most people.

Them being president is never about us. Kinda like the 600 dollars thing.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 05/10/2008

Being "rich" in your 40's isn't retroactive.
It doesn't erase Barack's upbringing in Chicago's south side (who cares if he lived there his whole childhood). I've never been to Memphis, but why would I need to when I've lived in NEWARK? If you think that New York (I assume you mean the Bronx, Brooklyn, Harlem, etc?) is a lot different from Chicago's South Side, you've probably never been to any of those places.

Maybe you saw them in a movie or something?

This election boils down to two things, either you are afraid of the future and clinging to the past (i.e. what you are already familiar with), or you are reaching towards the future with all of your strength - and KNOW, not hope, know that this is a better place than the hate and fear of those who came before.

I am happy that after November, people with this mindset will either be freed of their fear and paranoia, or be driven deeper into it. Either way, the rest of us will already be on the next page.

Here's an analogy that maybe will make some sense down south; you can't win the Winston cup if you never take your eyes off the rearview mirror. More likely, you'll drive into the wall.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 05/10/2008

What are you talking about? Perhaps if you had gone to the ghettos of South Chicago you might have seen Obama. He didn't live in Memphis, he lived in Chicago. With that said, your post makes no sense whatsoever. Really, I can't even figure out what you are trying to say.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:34 PM on 05/10/2008

Scroll down: she identifies herself as a "white woman."

It's called "identity politics": I am a woman, I will vote for a woman (and if you are woman over 50, the chance that you are pro HRC is above 60%).

The rest of her base consists of "hard working white people" (which we all know REALLY means ignorant racists), latinos (who also don't like blacks), and out of touch old people of both sexes and most races.

With friends like those...well, with friends like those, you lose your bid for the Presidential nomination.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 05/10/2008

I did get that (and I read her post below and didn't which also made little sense) , but I still couldn't understand what she was saying. Chads and the great people of SC? By the way, I am from SC and happen to be a white middle aged woman. I voted for, campaigned for, and donated to Obama. I don't think it's going to come back to haunt us. By the way, Memphis and NY aren't the only cities with ghettos. Last I heard all cities have them, and there are some incredibly poor rural areas. Again, I don't get her point and probably never will.

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 05/10/2008

Does anyone know how the "white working class voters" in these states feel about Hillary implying that they would never vote for a black, or that they don't vote when they don't get their way? Just wondering..

replyReply favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 05/10/2008

part two

because this the democratic party can not unite around one meaning all the democrat's of this country and singly proclaim their support for one instead of spending a gazillion dollars to get them either of them in the number one spot.

To me this has been a silly waste of millions of dollars from people who could have donated this money to the homeless and less fortunate. This is why we are laughed at around the world and not respected. I could only imagine how much better this country would be if every four years these people who donate millions to a candidate for pres donated it all to the homeless and homeless veterans programs. Money that would well spend for their wars. Like maybe exxon. Imagine how many soldiers have did so they can pump oil. They donate to the candidates.