Thomas B. Edsall

BIO

Thomas B. Edsall

The Huffington Post

Union Leaders' Clash Over Dem Endorsements A Sign Of Racial Polarization

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

May 14, 2008 10:12 PM


Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

About Thomas B. Edsall

Thomas B. Edsall is the political editor of the Huffington Post. He is also Joseph Pulitzer II and Edith Pulitzer Moore Professor at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism. From 1981 to 2006, he was a political reporter at the Washington Post. He is the author of Chain Reaction and Building Red America. Tom can be reached at edsall@huffingtonpost.com.


Some black leaders within the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) are complaining that under Gerald McEntee, Hillary Clinton's strongest and most outspoken backer in the labor movement, union money is being spent to build white turnout for the New York Senator in what has become a racially polarized competition for the Democratic presidential nomination, according to a number of sources.

The conflict is emblematic of the intensifying hostility within Democratic ranks as the nomination fight slowly moves towards closure. The fact that the two leading candidates are a black and a woman has produced internal and external disputes involving civil rights, women's rights and a variety of other groups and leaders in the liberal wing of the party.

William Lucy, International Secretary-Treasurer of the 1.4 million member AFSCME, raised the issue of the union's spending on behalf of Clinton at a recent board meeting.

Lucy, according to sources, pointed out that Clinton is winning whites, while Obama is carrying blacks by 9-to-1 margins, forcing her supporters, including AFSCME, to concentrate on building white turnout.

In addition to his number two post at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Lucy is founder and president of the Coalition of Black Trade Unionists.

Tensions between McEntee and Lucy have been simmering outside of public view for years, and the Clinton-Obama contest has forced these tensions closer to the surface. While AFSCME under McEntee's direction endorsed Clinton, Lucy has personally given Obama $2,300.

A spokesman for AFSCME, who asked not to be identified, said only: "We don't comment on board discussions."

Sources familiar with the internal dispute say McEntee, who has a temper and does not tolerate disagreement well, has voiced outrage over dissent within his union. His anger has been directed not only at Lucy, but also at the Oregon State AFSCME, which defied McEntee and endorsed Obama. Oregon holds a primary this coming Tuesday, May 20.

Attempts to reach Lucy by phone and email were unsuccessful.

Nationwide, of the 16.9 million workers who are members of all the nation's trade unions, 2.4 million are black, 1.9 million Hispanic, and 657,000 Asian American, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. AFSCME, according to a spokesman, is 15 percent black.

McEntee's political stature rose dramatically in 1992 when he was one of the few labor leaders to back Bill Clinton. After Clinton won, McEntee enjoyed access to the White House and his calls to the president were returned. After McEntee's ally, John Sweeney, was elected president of
the AFL-CIO in 1995, McEntee became chairman of the labor federation's political committee.

McEntee and many other union officials took a hit in 2004 after they endorsed Howard Dean and had to watch his candidacy implode during the Iowa caucuses.

In the current election, McEntee has pulled out the stops for Clinton. So far, according to the Federal Election Commission, AFSCME has spent $415,800 on television and radio advertising, and has invested much more, $2.45 million, in a group called the American Leadership Project,
which has run ads for Clinton and against Obama.

Clinton met earlier this week with McEntee and other labor leaders to discuss her prospects and choices in the closing weeks of the campaign. McEntee pledged to stick with her until the end.

 
 

Comments
405
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

The issue has nothing to do with black and white. The question that should be debated is very simple. Why has AFSCME spent millions upon millions of dollars in this PRIMARY campaign? The answer is very obvious-this union is being run by an individual who perceives himself a king. Whether or not the majority of AFSCME members supported the initial endorsement is certainly debatable. There is no question that the overwhelming majority of members would not support the outrageous expenditures that have accompanied it. There are a considerable number of people across the country who will not earn in a LIFETIME of work what their union(AFSCME) has spent on behalf of Sen. Clinton in Iowa alone. That is disgraceful by any standard. The King and his Court have attacked Sen. Obama repeatedly in misleading attacks despite his 100% rating by our union. Despite the obvious conclusion that Sen. Obama will be the Democratic nominee Mcentee continues to squander money on behalf of Sen. Clinton in states like Kentucky,Puerto Rico, and yes Montana. It is apparent that his arrogance knows no bounds and that his supporters on the E-Board lack the courage or decency to stop this madness. It is no longer acceptable to keep the union's business in the union, our members can ill afford this type of leadership and it is time that Mcentee and his accomplices be held accountable for their actions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 05/19/2008

Obama is just going to have to work his ass off to turnout new voters, and record African Americans to overcome whites that just won't vote for a black president. It's sad that in 2008 racism and prejudice is still so prevalent.
Take a look at this video from WV to see just how ignorant people still are in this day and age.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-q4MDQ0cDI

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 05/16/2008

Why are racist Americans proud of that fact? Why don't Republicans want to talk to non-White leaders? Why are women voting disproportionately? Why do uneducated Americans seem to outnumber educated Americans? Why are there hungry children in our country? Why are our troops still in Iraq? Why do Americans vote against their own interests? Why do people care if Gays and Lesbians marry? Why doesn't Bill or Hillary not wear a flag pin? Why is McCain running for President? What color are Cindy McCain's eyes? Why do people not vote, and then complain about who the elected officials are? Why does a poor little girl in Florida have to go on YouTube to get help after being raped? Why is our country an International laughing stock?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 AM on 05/16/2008

PAposter ... Some people, like a child, ask many "WHY" questions? Simple answer = Because!
I'm a PERSON with a body, with white skin... I'm NOT now, nor ever will be, my body... My skin does NOT think... There are people who believe they're "Black" people... They believe in Race and Color... They self segregate by Belief, Race and Color... They believe in and work against what MLK Jr dreamed of, IE, "I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." Martin Luther King, Jr.
I don't like "Black" people... I don't like "White" people (Think: Skinheads, KKK)... I don't care about the Color of somebody's skin... Skin neither thinks, nor believes...
I have NO intention of ever Voting to put a person, running as a Black, White, Red, Yellow, or Brown, PERSON, into the Office of President... Barack chose to make HIS Campaign about Race/ Color... Barack's Campaign successfully played the Race/Color Card and blamed the Clinton's...
In General terms, the "Black" Community is a self segregating, failing Community... Far to many children with "black" skin tones are growing up "Black," going to prison, being single parents, etc... The "enemy" of the children with black skin tones is the "Black" Community... All the anger about other American's is self inflicted! POGO: WE have met the enemy and it is US... There are very few "White" people in America to do things to "Blacks"...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 05/18/2008

Are we going to continue to show the foreign countries that America is racist? To continue this pettiness on race appears to do be driving a wedge between America and it's allies. Who can they trust? The rhetoric is catching up with the actions now. People do not like being engaged in this race war. our 3rd war among wars on the American People. When will it stop? When Do we stop? Folks have to join the unions with certain jobs, why should anyone be allowed to rush the race card. Folks appear to be so deeply engaged in pushing the clinton button to keep the confusion going. Why? What's up with this. Just Dare to say no to this pettiness and move on in life in a more positive manner

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 05/15/2008

I think that unions can be very positive, however, it is things like this that make me dislike them. Sometimes when union leaders do things not in the best interest of all union members, it has the effect of making unions lose members. I don't blame Lucy for speaking up. I think that it was the right thing to do and I don't blame people for getting out of the union. I believe that this union should have withheld their endorsement until there was a nominee. Look at all of that money that has been spent and it looks like the endorsement was based on some leaders past relationship with Bill Clinton and I don't think that this was fair to Obama. I think that they need to get rid of McEntee, because that endorsement appears to benefit a few and not the mass. I think that we have to hold our union leaders accountable and this is why I agree with Lucy. This is why people get out of unions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 05/15/2008

AFSCME

Should never of endorsed Hillary, two failers in a row for the Unions President and to think, millions down a whole, AFSCME's logo, waving over a loser, time and time again.

I tld them don't do this and t to wait until the nominee, or give some to both, endorse all Democrats, but no the President and exsecutive council knows better and look where we are now, out of millions and the winner is looking at us like we were the fools.

Good thing he's not known for holding grudes, I stopped my contributions the day, I got a advertismant in the Mail with my Unions logo on it, with Hillary smiling, I promtly with drew and wrote a stern letter.

I donate and will donate directly to the candidate of my choice, local and National. sorry brothers and sisters, the Head is in the tank with too many losers for me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 05/15/2008

What did you withdraw from? Just contributing to Hillary or the Union?

It's all well and good to withhold contributions if you want to, but you're not much of a union person if you pull out of the union because you disagree with the leader's decision to endorse Hillary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 05/15/2008

Don't you have to pay union dues?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 AM on 05/16/2008

I have always thought highly of Bill Clinton until this nominating process and he brought out the race issue.I've also since learned how NAFTA came about,and its sickening because I supported him for so long and defended him strongly.I belong to a union and believ me when I say they are worthless and self centered. They have totally turned are unions into a corporation and god knows somebody needs to check into this for all union workers sake.They have sold us down the drain and its time we woke the hell up because they are dedinitely part of the promblem too. Now they are all about lining their own pockets and leaving the workers to fend for ourselves! God help us because we are taking it from all ends!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 05/15/2008

Bill Clinton brought out the race issue?

Isn't Obama black? Wouldn't that fact alone have brought out the race issue.

Barry has tried to avoid identification with his chosen race (yes, he chose to identify as a black man rather than a white man) by being photographed with crowds of white, young and youngish adorers. In Philly, Barry made a visit to a black area only once, and that was on the primary day. He had Philly in the bag, but he never bothered to show respect to the black people of Philly. Outgunned as she was, Hillary Clinton campaigned in both North Philly and West Philly. She knew Philly was gone, but she showed respect to the people she knew were going to vote against. her.

This bogus "race issue" and "race baiting" that Bill Clinton and Hillary are accused of is sheer lunacy. The record does not support either accusation.

90% of black are voting for Barry; nothing Hillary could say or do would've changed that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:10 PM on 05/15/2008

First of all Barack Obama is biracial, only Whites label him Black. Most intelligent people do not dismiss his mother. He didn't choose to be "identified" as Black, that's all you see when you look at him, you learn differently only when you listen. Senator Obama spent plenty of time in and around Philly. The race issue is only "bogus" to non-Blacks. Blacks always back the strong Democrat in the race, that has never changed. It just wasn't Hillary year, there is a woman out there that will represent all Americans, and her gender will be of little consequence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:28 AM on 05/16/2008

"The record does not support either accusation."

But their rhetoric during this campaign has like "Jesse Jackson won South Carolina too."
When I heard that I thought to myself, "why on earth would you be comparing him to a clown like Jesse Jackson." Then I figured out he was comparing Obama to Jesse Jackson because they are both of African decent. I get it now. Bill Clinton is a sleaze bag.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 05/16/2008

For the record, I am sick and tired of folks saying that 90% of African-Americans are voting for Obama and implying racial bias.

When Bill Clinton ran -- both terms -- HE got 90% of the African American vote.

When John Kerry ran -- guess what? HE got 90% of the African American vote.

Get over yourselves and know the facts. Rants like that make me sick to my stomach.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 05/15/2008

Me too "momof3inGA": Blacks are voting exactly as they have historically, the candidate just happens to be an interracial man this time. I believe women and rural whites (who will all leave in November) are the one's voting disproportionately. I've been making this argument for weeks. Every Democrat in recent history has won with the Black vote. Bill Clinton received 38% of the White vote, who do they think carried him to victory?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 05/16/2008

Bill Clinton and John Kerry got 90% of the African-American vote in the general election against the Republican candidate because they vote for Democrats. Barack Obama is getting 92% of the African-American vote because he is Black and could become the First Black President of the United States. Your comparison of two facts that don't support your argument make ME sick.
Barack Obama won South Carolina because he is half-black and Blacks voted for him just like they did Jesse Jackson.
Only in this race could a true statement be made into a racial comment by someone who has a lifelong commitment to helping the poor and middle class, Black, White, Asian, Indian, etc.
Don't try to justify your support of Obama by citing fake data. Admit it's either Black Pride, your teenage kid told you to like Claire McCaskill, I just want this to be over like John Edwards, or for spite like Ted Kennedy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 AM on 05/16/2008

What you are referring to is a case of good old time pandering..make an appearance, promise what you think the folks there want to hear and never give those folks another thought if it isn't to your political gain. There was nothing more to Hill's visit than old machine politics at work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 05/15/2008

hmmmm i used to be an member of AFSCME before my employer abused me and then cut my wage and then RIF'ed me. And this is the point. They are a union that pretends to be a union with out the union trimmins.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 05/15/2008

I always say if your union isn't working for the workers it's because there aren't enough wokers working in the union. Unions just like governments have a tendency to forget who pays the bills and it's up to us to make sure they don't forget by being there and aware.

I think the government isn't the only place that needs a scrubbing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 05/15/2008

Why is anyone still trying to turn voters out for Clinton? This race has been over for almost 3 months!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:56 PM on 05/15/2008

i don't think any one is trying, they seem to be "turning out" all on their own. what does that tell, given that this race has been over for 3 months? could it be that voters are sending a clear message about senator obama?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 05/15/2008

tells that they won't accept reality. the level of unreality among clinton voters these days is pretty high. yes she should continue through all the states if she wants. but she has already lost the nomination unless she strongarms superdelegates to overturn a fairly won race. if you push it, i suppose that's a legitimate political tactic, however distasteful. but most people accept the reality that she will not be the nominee unless she uses that tactic and causes such a huge uproar that we would then lose the GE election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 05/17/2008

This is not about Obama. a message got twisted that only the men who claim to be men of no color are are acceptable for running as President. Any man of color appears to have to be vetted by what every ASSOCIATE who HE knows from day one, says, does, or professes to be. And regardless of this outcome, that Man of color, aka Obama is having to pay an out ragious, uncalled for unamerican price for. Praise the Lord, My father did not have to make a choice of who he was in this this world. an American can be mixed with any other ethnic blood, except African, as long as he looks WHITE, regardless of demeanor, he is treated as white. It's that knowledge that someone is part African regardless of skin color, that person is treated unfairly. Many folks are getting tired of this division. It is on the rise now because Hillary wanted to win the votes at any cost. Hill is still engaged in child's play called tag me for the WH. This long grueling race dividing Primary is over, but no one has "tagged" Hillary, yet. So we keep going on and Hill is saying to the people of no color...VOTE for me,forget about the Dems, It's about me. This is so in appropro...Stop this drama. Delegates go to Obama. Stop this child's play and lets grow up and heal our scarred party. Please do not let this UNION further divide us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:53 PM on 05/15/2008

well stated finlandstation.

what do Obamanistas have against democracy anyway?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 05/15/2008

heyk6007
why are obama supporters so against workers and unions? is this another trend we can look forward to if by some divine intervention he wins this fall?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 05/15/2008

I support Obama.
I support workers.
I support Unions that give mebers votes on how money is spent.
I support democracy and debate as well.
Hope AFSCME can be united.

Obama 08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 05/15/2008

Troll! Definately a Troll!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 05/15/2008

It's unfortunate that Clinton supporters are so desperate that they would risk the well being of America over their political ambitions. It should be noted that even though blacks have supported Senator Obama by a wide margin. He has not encouraged racial behavior. Quite the contrary, Obama has encouraged inclusion and the dismantling of barriers between people. Hostilities between people need to be resolved not perpetuated. That should be what national leadership is all about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 PM on 05/15/2008

The Clinton supporters are risking the well being of America over their political ambitions?

What well being?

Have you been in a coma for the past 7.5 years?

What the hell is "racial behavior"???

America is a beautiful tapestry of diversity, and tapestries don't have colors that bleed into each other. The wonder of America is that there are so many different groups who live together relatively peacefully and who contribute to each other in so many ways.

What Barry has done is not being inclusive, it's being elusive. He's run from the fact he is a black man, until he was forced to confront the fact as a result of Rev. Wright.

The facts are the 90% of blacks are voting for Obama, whether he sought that vote or not. And it's hardly surprising that 90% of blacks are voting for him.

We Clinton supporters care about the state of affairs in America every bit as much as any of Barry's supporters, and to say otherwise is to drive the wedge further into the divide that now exists between the two political wings of the party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 05/15/2008

Whoa there Nellie! There aren't two different wings of the democratic party. During primaries we may prefer one candidate over another for the nomination....but after the majority decides on one candiate that's becomes the party's choice...Story over and better luck next time...that's how democracy works...majority rules and the same is true of the Democratic party.

Frankly since you chose to refer to Senator Obama as Barry and your remarks are leading, I find it hard tp believe you have ever supported Senator Clinton or any other democrat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 05/15/2008

you can't be serious. it was the obama campaign which started the fight about racial labeling in the first place. and as we can see by the posts on this site, his supporters continue to throw racial insults about low life, white workers in west virginia and pennsylvania. there is hardly a single post that doesn't in some manner express racial bigotry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 05/15/2008

"A troll or not a troll?" That is the question!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 05/15/2008

Trollstakeyourmeds........
Thanks for the history..but there is no way this person is a real democrat....or atleast not by in defination of the word I've ever known and I've been a Democrat for 50 years. Like it or not majority rules in this nation as well as in the democratic party...Senator Clinton will not recieve a majority of anything so she will not our nominee those are the facts.....If ones loyality is only to a candiate and not to the party...what do you call a person like that? Especially when their only purpose here is to stir the pot in hopes of somehow cheating to get there way...It's not only not democratic it's counterproductive to all that Democrats hold dear.

Senator Obama was not my first choice..I am a true Blue Edwards supporter but he is not the choice of the majority so for the good of my party and my country I've become an Obama supporter..and so will every other good democrat including both Hillary and Bill Clinton....

If your comment was meant to correct me for the misuse of your word, what do you prefer? ... but if you are saying you condone this type of behavior because you too have a problem with majority rule I just don't know what else to say to you because a troll is a troll even if you agree with them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 05/15/2008

I have been posting on this site for a long, long time. We had always reserved the word "troll" for repubes. I took my screen name because the trolls used to get so mad at us Libs that I could only picture them spitting all over their screens while yelling and screaming at us. It is such a shame that certain Dems feel the need to call other Dems trolls just because they don't support the same DEM!!! And, all the while, claiming to want to "unite" everyone. Sad...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 05/15/2008

Will this nomination race finally put to bed the notion that republicans are the only party of bigots and racist. There are bigots and racist in all walks of life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 05/15/2008

I don't think that was ever an assumption! Was it? Ugly people are just ugly people no matter how they vote...I thought that was a given!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 05/15/2008