Jason Linkins

BIO

Jason Linkins

The Huffington Post

WaPo Wastes Column Space On Wingnut Bigot's Garden Of Cliches

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

May 19, 2008 10:15 AM


About Jason Linkins

Jason Linkins is a Political Reporter at the Huffington Post, covering media and politics. He's based in Washington, DC. Previously, he wrote for HuffPo's Eat The Press, and has also contributed to DCist and Wonkette.


The well-manicured Opinion page of the Washington Post was sullied this weekend by a column from Kathleen Parker, whose apparent ambition is to be Maureen Dowd's rival in the relentless deployment of deflated clichés without ever removing her tongue from some unholy intellectual gutter of her own devising. Fred Hiatt, perhaps commemorating the recent gay marriage decision of the California Supreme Court, apparently found it necessary to commission a piece on John Edwards' endorsement of Barack Obama that was equal parts overheated and homophobic.

Mission accomplished, thanks to Parker, who reminds us all for the 8,263,825th time that Edwards is wealthy and has nice hair. Parker is a big fan of the failed policies that Bush has allowed to strengthen Iran's position one-hundred fold and doesn't want that to change through the sensible course of diplomatic confrontation Obama has espoused. And, all the while, she couches her argument's lack of intellect, sense or gravity with what Brad from Sadly, No! refers to as "the oldest trick in the Wingnut Punditry Bible: she lectures us about what Real Americans think." It's all like reading the first chapter of Richard Scarry's My First Book of Conservative Cliches.

The core of Parker's piece seems to be this:

While we're waiting to find out, Edwards's tortured Southern shtick is supposed to help Obama with the demographic of white, rural, working-class (non-college) Americans he's been having trouble with. Green room translation: poor, ignorant racists.

Huh! Funny thing about this "green room translation": Parker, just last week, penned what amounts to a paean for white supremacy for something called the Jewish World Review, in which she stood up for someone who said Barack Obama was not a "full-blooded American." The whole piece was accurately summarized by Atrios as "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer!" and given further damnation from Glenn Greenwald, who called it "repellent." And that's being kind, given doggerel like this:

Who "gets" America? And who doesn't?


The answer has nothing to do with a flag lapel pin, which Obama donned for a campaign swing through West Virginia, or even military service, though that helps. It's also not about flagpoles in front yards or magnetic ribbons stuck on tailgates.

It's about blood equity, heritage and commitment to hard-won American values. And roots.

Go ahead and read the whole thing in context of the larger piece if you want! It only makes the commentary seem less enlightened.

One of the more disconcerting facets of last week's coverage of the West Virginia primary was the media's obsession with fetishizing something called a "white working-class American" while simultaneously - almost unerringly - finding examples of that demographic who were the pinnacle of ignorance. It did a disservice to the voters of West Virginia, whose substantive opinions on the Democratic race and their preferences took a back seat to a constant parade of outliers that the media elite happily presented, and mocked, as bigots.

By celebrating "white working class-itude" alongside the worst examples of the same, the media sent the perverse message that such base and bigoted attitudes are a cherished American tradition. With that as background, it's hardly surprising that a coprophage like Parker should come along and connect these particular dots. It's a little disturbing that the Washington Post would elevate such a person to their opinion page, but in the zero-sum game of pageviews, it's perhaps just another example of the robust "economy of the asinine" at work. In the meanwhile, if Ms. Parker can truly be said to be a "full-blooded American," you can sign me up for an immediate transfusion.

 
Comments
27
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Whenever I read an article by Kathleen Parker I am amazed. First, that it was published. Second, that she actually was paid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 AM on 05/20/2008

There is something really wrong here. I guess none of the Founders were full-blooded Americans, which means that the documents they wrote (which are quite important) are not American documents.

Miss Parker, please wake up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 AM on 05/20/2008

What does full blooded American mean? Is that similar to checking the oil in your car. Are there people actually walking around that are a quart low on American blood. How does one achieve enough American blood? And is that North American or South American blood? Does Hispanic blood count since Mexico is in North America? And how does American blood affect the patriotism of a US citizen. Does Canadian blood count?

I'm so confused. I think I better find my dip stick and see if I'm low on American blood. Perhaps I'll drive into a wingnut shop for a blood change and lube job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 AM on 05/20/2008

Its amazing what Obama running as president, can bring out of some people. Wow! sounds like the thirties. Who are true full blooded Americans? My i suggest that this parker ......... along with the fellow and other people who questioned Obama's full blood Americanism, check their DNA. May i remind them, if they find sometime before, lets say 1865, their blood line included negroid blood. Then we should question their full blooded Americanism. Because before 1865, blacks slaves were not citizens. They were Africans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 05/19/2008

It must be mandatory that all people who question other people "full blood Americanism have their Dna result made public. We need to know who these non-full blooded Americans are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 05/19/2008
photo

Lighting up, I have to deal with the New York Times and MSNBC still daily.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 05/19/2008

What are you lighting up? Just curious... :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:20 PM on 05/19/2008
photo

I think it was funny and dead on, light up

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 05/19/2008
- dwt I'm a Fan of dwt permalink
photo

"...Kathleen Parker, whose apparent ambition is to be Maureen Dowd's rival in the relentless deployment of deflated clichés without ever removing her tongue from some unholy intellectual gutter of her own devising."

Inappropriate comparison. To be be fair: Maureen Dowd has brains, talent, and an actual sense of humor. On the other hand, if you substitute "Ann Coulter" in the above sentence, you are MUCH closer to the mark.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 05/19/2008

Nicely done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 05/19/2008

Did you use enough divisive words...call Clinton dems enough names...it was just an excuse to write it again...my mom said if you think it shouldn't be said, then why are you repeating it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 05/19/2008
photo

Kathleen Parker is a hack of the first water.

To paraphrase the Great Dr. Johnson, "Not only is she dull, but she is the cause of dullness in others."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 05/19/2008
- HST I'm a Fan of HST permalink
photo

Everytime I read one of the poor excuses of column by Ms.Parker I throw up in mouth a little bit.
It all started when I read one of her columns in which she claimed "school teachers make a lot of money".
Allow me to share some more insights from her latest:
"And ignoring the fact that one reason health insurance rates are so high -- and that so many poor rural folks lack high-quality medical care -- is the success Edwards and other trial lawyers have in convincing jurors that doctors owe the world always-perfect results."
Wow there you have it, one lawyer (whose client died btw), is the cause of the current lack of insurance in rural areas. Guess we could staff all those rural places with the malpractice quacks.
"Whether Edwards helps Obama seems questionable." Only to an idiot like you Ms.Parker.
"Clinton, who got a little face time as reporters took her temperature, was (as always) smooth and cool. " Really like that time she cried in front of the cameras? I guess it depends on what your definition of "always" or "smooth" is.
"When the time comes to sit across from the likes of Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a chill in the heart may beat a thrill up the leg." Ms.Parker's candidate of choice is against talking with Iran at all, so when that time comes it's best if that person is anybody but McSame.

Kathleen Parker = horse's a**

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 05/19/2008
photo

The Washington Post is a CIA asset apparently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 PM on 05/19/2008
photo

It is irony, that the first Black president will be of the blood of an African from the mother land and White America?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 05/19/2008
photo

Very poor effort on Ms. Parker's part, probably the best she could though, poor dear. I do not believe it is Obama and Edwards building resentment, it seems Bush and company are doing just fine with that all on their on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 05/19/2008
photo

they felt the need to compete with the nytimes on who could be the BIGGER BIGOT of the Printed Press.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 05/19/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect