Chuck Hagel Takes On McCain, Repeatedly Praises Obama

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Chuck Hagel Takes On McCain, Repeatedly Praises Obama stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 05-20-08 10:06 PM   |   Updated: 05-28-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Hagelbig

Chuck Hagel is quickly becoming Barack Obama's answer to Joe Lieberman.

The Republican Senator from Nebraska was a political thorn in McCain's side on Tuesday night, repeatedly lavishing praise on the presumptive Democratic candidate and levying major foreign policy criticisms at the GOP nominee and the Republican Party as a whole. At one point, Hagel even urged the Arizona Republican to elevate his campaign discourse to a higher, more honest level.

"We know from past campaigns that presidential candidates will say many things," Hagel said of some of McCain's recent rhetoric, namely his policy on talking to Iran. "But once they have the responsibility to govern the country and lead the world, that difference between what they said and what responsibilities they have to fulfill are vastly different. I'm very upset with John with some of the things he's been saying. And I can't get into the psychoanalysis of it. But I believe that John is smarter than some of the things he is saying. He is, he understands it more. John is a man who reads a lot, he's been around the world. I want him to get above that and maybe when he gets into the general election, and becomes the general election candidate he will have a higher-level discourse on these things."

Hagel, speaking to a small gathering at the residence of the Italian ambassador, took umbrage with several positions taken by the McCain campaign, including the Arizona Senator's criticism of Obama for pledging to engage with Iran. Engagement is not, and should not be confused for, capitulation, he argued.

"I never understand how anyone in any realm of civilized discourse could sort through the big issues and challenges and threats and figure out how to deal with those without engaging in some way...."

Hagel then offered a wry tweak of his GOP colleague. "I am confident that if Obama is elected president that is the approach we will take. And my friend John McCain said some other things about that. We'll see, but in my opinion it has to be done. It is essential."

Hagel, who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, went on to belittle the tendency for some within his own party to disparage those who tout diplomacy. "You take some risks in talking about this," he said, "especially in the Congress, because you can immediately be branded as an appeaser."

And when asked to respond to rumors circulating within political circles that the Bush administration was ginning up the possibility of war with Iran, the Senator even raised the specter of impeachment.

Story continues below
advertisement

"You've got the power of impeachment, now that is a very defined measure if you are willing to bring charges against the president at all. You can't just say I disagree with him, let's impeach him," said Hagel. An attack on Iran without Congress' consent, he added, "would bring with it... outstanding political consequences, including for the Republican Party."

Finally, he charged that if the preeminent foreign policy objective is to achieve security in Israel and stability within the broader Middle East, then the Bush track -- which McCain has endorsed -- is ill-advised.

"If you engage a world power or a rival, it doesn't mean you agree with them or subscribe with what they believe or you support them in any way," he said. "What it does tell you is that you've got a problem you need to resolve. And you've got to understand the other side and the other side has got to understand you."

Much of Hagel's address, hosted by the Ploughshares Fund, was spent weaving between Obama praise and McCain quips. He urged the media, for example, to focus on important policy issues an "not just why Barack [doesn't] wear flag pins on his lapel."

Asked whether he would be open to serving as Secretary of Defense in a hypothetical Obama administration, Hagel demurred. But in the process, he praised the Illinois Democrat for being open to a bipartisan cabinet.

"Take me out of the equation," he said, "I do think that the next president and Obama has talked about this, and McCain not as much, I think he is going to have to put together a very wide, smart, experienced, credible, bipartisan cabinet. And that is going to be required absolutely."

Chuck Hagel is quickly becoming Barack Obama's answer to Joe Lieberman. The Republican Senator from Nebraska was a political thorn in McCain's side on Tuesday night, repeatedly lavishing praise on th...
Chuck Hagel is quickly becoming Barack Obama's answer to Joe Lieberman. The Republican Senator from Nebraska was a political thorn in McCain's side on Tuesday night, repeatedly lavishing praise on th...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
766
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
- mishte I'm a Fan of mishte 6 fans permalink

The more I read about Hagel, the more I like/respect him even if I disagree with some of his domestic issues.

How sweet for Obama to have Hagel, a war-vet Republican rebuffing McCain and siding w/Obama. Gee, if he thinks Obama is on target, I might be inclined to take him seriously. McCain is losing it. Daily.

Hagel seems to have that trait rarely seen in DC - integrity. He has done humanitarian work, understands diplomacy/foriegn affairs, military and defense, business and economics (having been in the corporate world before politics), a long, term honorable position in the senate, and from what I can tell, he seems to be free of scandalous nonsense the media seems to thrive on.

Being on Obama's ticket, (or in his administration) would be a tangible reflection of one of the things Obama envisions, and that is to work through some of the partisan crap so that things can actually get done rather than non-stop non-productive bickering, posturing and politicking.

One thing Wa DC needs more of is integrity. It trumps party affiliation, because party politics wouldn't be misused by an honorable individual.

Hagel has protested against enough of the party line (at crucial times, too) to make me believe that he may use his own actual brain.

He is more seasoned than Webb, he and Obama could be an excellent ticket.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 05/21/2008
- Superbus I'm a Fan of Superbus 27 fans permalink
photo

This is why he is retiring. He would not have retained his seat in the Republican primary.

Nothing more than sour grapes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 05/21/2008
- UsofA I'm a Fan of UsofA 29 fans permalink
photo

Hagel is a man of ethics and conscience working in a Republican legislature devoid of both.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 05/21/2008

Could it be that there is -at least- ONE republican politician who has found his moral, intellectual, ethical compass..?­..He may be retiring for his own safety, once his republican collleagues actually read the newspapers. they will just mercilessly lynch him...Then of course, WHY doesn't he just run for re election as a Democrat.?­?....WHat a shining contrast THAT would be with jellyfish lieberman, who has shown he loves powermore than moral/intellectual honesty

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 PM on 05/21/2008
- LeoMarvin I'm a Fan of LeoMarvin 35 fans permalink
photo

How do they taste?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 PM on 05/21/2008

That's funny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 05/21/2008

To compare Senator Hagel to Joe Lieberman (even in passing) is beyond inapt. There is no comparison. Even when I disagree with Senator Hagel, I respect his views. I have absolutely NO respect for Lieberman, who has become a craven lickspittle to McCain's tired old prattle. Sigh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 05/21/2008

AGREED and DITTO THAT

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 05/21/2008
- Angelic11 I'm a Fan of Angelic11 23 fans permalink
photo

So do you guys in Florida want a re-vote; I live in Michigan and we sure as hell don't! When we sqauked about it no one listened..­.so we went to the polls ...and voted for Uncommitted and noooooooooow she wants to enfranchise us.

But back to the subject; Yeah, I like Hagel and such a ticket would rock the vote! Wow; what a concept...­yeah Barack, go for it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 PM on 05/21/2008

I could not have said it better!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 AM on 05/23/2008
- syllepsis I'm a Fan of syllepsis 24 fans permalink

I am glad that Sen. Hagel has said this.
We are teetering on the verge of total catastrophe thanks to our President, who is not mentally fit to be leading the country. I think everyone knows this by now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 PM on 05/21/2008

That's nice that they plan to act, but what use will it be if they wait until he attacks Iran. We're all screwed if he's allow to act first.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 05/21/2008

Is it possible that Hagel kept Lieberman in line by threatening to caucus with Dems if Lieberman jumped to GOP?

Lieberman has clearly switched but not officially jumped and, unless there some sort hidden information such as this. there was no reason for him to stay with the Dems because he could have had that same committee chairmanship he now has had he switched. He would have nothing to lose by switching now unless a hidden threat from Hagel to switch the other way was there. If that double switch had occured, Lieberman would lose his chairmanship.

Just playing devil's advocate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 05/21/2008
- LisainNYC I'm a Fan of LisainNYC 10 fans permalink

If Lieberman switched now, with Dems in control, he would LOSE his chairmanship because he would be in the minority party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 05/21/2008
- Lisette I'm a Fan of Lisette 37 fans permalink
photo

I read somewhere that Hagel is leaving the Senate.

Not good news for America!

We need people like Chuck Hagel!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 05/21/2008

I think Hagel's taken over the Straight Talk Express that McCain's abandoned ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 05/21/2008
- truelie I'm a Fan of truelie 8 fans permalink

Hagel for VP. With Barack, this is a real possibility. Barack is different. Don't be surprised if Hagel is picked as VP or SD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 05/21/2008
- WaspMan I'm a Fan of WaspMan 2 fans permalink
photo

Then again, maybe he ought to go with a democrat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 05/21/2008

We should stay away from quislings like Hagel who is looking for a position in the next administration - some friend he is. Remember Zell Miller in 2004.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 05/21/2008
photo

I have a great idea. How about we trade the Republicans Lieberman for Hagel?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 05/21/2008

With Senator Hagel on the Republican ticket I'll vote for McCain in a minute.

The reason is simple. I agree with Mark Shields who once said that Democrats are so inept they can not even organize a two-car parade. As proof -- the complete mess the DNC and party leaders made of the campaign that gave us Clinton and Obama as winners -- but only one could be crowned. Not by the voters but by the super delegates. It doesn't get worse than that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 05/21/2008

You do know, don't you, that Hagel is lobbying to be in the Obama Administration?

Between 2000 and 2006 our country was ruled by one party (Republicans) in all three branches of government. It is now ruled by one party in two branches of government. And our country is in the shitter. Exactly what is your beef with Democrats?

And what does the DNC have to do with anything? We pick our nominee, you pick yours. And yours sucks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 PM on 05/21/2008
- Cowboylove I'm a Fan of Cowboylove 44 fans permalink
photo

Republican Party forced Hagel out for opposing the Iraq war. Many have suggested Obama put him on the ticket. That's a bit far fetched, but I would love him to be Secretary of Defense. I think he would be brilliant and I think Obama should select him and announce his selection early on.

Obama should also appoint Joe Lieberman to be ambassador to Iraq. Poetic justice, that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 05/21/2008
- bigbenny I'm a Fan of bigbenny 42 fans permalink
photo

There's a bandwagon I can get on, Lieberman for ambassador to Iraq. Makes perfect sense. LOL

GO BO 08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 PM on 05/21/2008

Math is not your strong suit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 05/21/2008
photo

You are obviously a right wing troll. But who cares.

Obama has shown excellent organizational skills and President Obama will do quite well fixing the things in this country the Republicans have broken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 05/21/2008
- mesuki I'm a Fan of mesuki 12 fans permalink

I'll take the DNC's mess anyday then the mess that the republicans have made in Iraq. We're not perfect,but we have better judgement and more common sense. Also you may want to read the article,because there was nothing said about a McCain Hagel ticket!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 05/21/2008
photo

No, Senator Hagel, that is NOT going to be "required absolutely­." ESPECIALLY if you take YOURSELF out of the equation. Because a Chuck Hagel type of conservative should be the ONLY type of Republican Obama permits in his cabinet. THAT is what's gonna be "required absolutely," sir.

Still...un­derneath my Kucinich '08 bumper sticker lies a Ron Paul '08 sticker, and under that one lies the first man I wanted for President in 2008: Chuck Hagel. Love you, Senator! So glad you have stopped to take a properly horrified look at The Real John McCain. You had me worried there, for a little while, early last year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 05/21/2008
- Azor I'm a Fan of Azor permalink

I hope that the "take me out of the equation" part is just Hagel being the coy politician.
Unless there is a serious personal reason for really wanting out of public life, Hagel's dedication to the idea of service, his desire to right the things that he perceives as wrong, including his guilt for having voted for the war, the often repeated mutual admiration statements, the consistency of bipartisanship talk from both sides, etc. etc, cannot be just coincidence. I have no idea whether it will actually happen, and if yes what shape and form it may take, but I am almost convinced that there is serious consideration being given to the possibility of an important role for Hagel in an Obama administration

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 05/21/2008

I voted for Dennis K. in 2004, and Ron Paul in 2008. Hagel would be an excellent SD for Barrack. He
was a combat veteran in Nam, and knows what a soldier goes through. He is in tune with the American people and his state. My husband is from Nebraska and all of our friends there still support
Hagel. I believe he would win if he ran again, but is so disgusted with the GOP that he wants out.
We need a man with integrity and experience. He is the man. GO HAGEL AND BARRACK.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 AM on 05/22/2008

Chuck just went to the top of my Republican 'A' list, that is for sure and I did not have an 'A' republican list before I read this article.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:52 PM on 05/21/2008

OBAMA / HAGEL

NOW THAT'S A DREAM TICKET!!!

ESPECIALLY FOR US INDEPENDANTS!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 PM on 05/21/2008
- tds1273 I'm a Fan of tds1273 8 fans permalink

No.

Trojan horse threat. Same goes for any candidate with a high connection to the military-industrial complex- Clark, Webb, Powell, Hagel etc... Way to much anxiety with any of those tickets if you ask me.

That said, I have to think that Hagel would be at the top of Obama's short list for Sec.Defens­e. Their foreign policies are very much in line, and the social policies are not a factor. You get that military/c­onservativ­e boost where he really needs it, without alienating everything else that Obama stands for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 05/21/2008

You remember, of course, that Eisenhower was the commanding general in the European theater during World War II; and you remember it was he who also made the famous speech about the danger of the military-industrial complex. Don't paint everybody with the same brush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:20 PM on 05/21/2008

Hmmm. Food for thought I guess. I do like him as Secretary of Defense but I am pretty sure Colin Powell would like a shot at that. He definitely is itching to clean up his legacy after the Bush admin silenced him for his dissent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 05/21/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect