Spacecraft Lands Successfully On Mars, Sends Back First Images Of Polar Regions

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALICIA CHANG | May 26, 2008 11:01 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

This photo provided by NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona shows the surface of the northern polar region of Mars from NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander on Sunday May 25, 2008. (AP Photo/NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)

PASADENA, Calif. — NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander spent its first full day in the Martian arctic plains checking its instruments in preparation for an ambitious digging mission to study whether the site could have once been habitable.

The three-legged lander set down Sunday in relatively flat terrain covered by fissures outlining polygon shapes. The geometric cracks are likely caused by the repeated freezing and thawing of buried ice.

Images beamed back late Monday showed the elbow joint of Phoenix's trench-digging robotic arm still partly covered by a protective sheath. The sheath was supposed to fully unwrap after landing.

Mission scientists downplayed the problem, saying they could still wiggle out the arm for digging.

"This is a minor inconvenience," said Deborah Bass, deputy project scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena. "We're going to have to do a little bit of disentangling."

Bass said the process of moving the 8-foot-long arm was still scheduled for Tuesday.

It'll be another week before Phoenix takes the first scoop of soil. After the initial taste test, the lander will spend the rest of the mission clawing through layers of soil to reach ice that is believed to be buried inches to a foot below the surface.

"We've only looked at one tiny little slit" of the landing site, said principal investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona, Tucson.

While Phoenix continued to dazzle scientists with scenes from the Martian high northern latitudes, one image that it returned of the sun came out bleeded. Instead of a point in the sky, the sun appeared like a light saber sword. Bass said engineers were working to fix the problem.

Mission co-scientist Ray Arvidson of Washington University in St. Louis was pleased with Phoenix's progress so far.

"Like a union worker, it went right to work," he said.

Scientists were especially interested in how the polygon patterns in the ground formed at Phoenix's landing site. The fractures look similar to those found on Earth's polar regions. Arvidson said Phoenix appeared within reach of a shallow trough that could be a potential place to dig.

"I was just afraid that it'll be so flat and homogenous and that we'd be digging in soil and we wouldn't know the context" of how it formed, Arvidson said.

Launched last summer, Phoenix sailed through 422 million miles of space over a period of about 10 months. The riskiest part of the journey came seven minutes before landing, when Phoenix, operating on autopilot, had to use the atmosphere's friction, deploy its parachute and fire its dozen thrusters to slow to a 5 mph thump.

The lander executed the maneuver almost flawlessly. The only snag came when it released the parachute seven seconds later than expected. The late timing caused the spacecraft to land slightly down range from its bull's-eye mark.

Two hours after touchdown, Phoenix beamed back a flood of images revealing the first-ever peek of the polar horizon. It also sent back images of its unfolded heat shield and another of its foot planted in soil next to pebble-sized rocks.

Smith, the chief scientist, said Phoenix slid a bit after landing.

NASA on Monday released a grainy black-and-white image captured by its Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which had a bird's-eye view of Phoenix coming down on its parachute. The parachute appeared as a white speck connected to Phoenix, which looked like a dot.

Alfred McEwen of the University of Arizona's Lunar and Planetary Laboratory said the camera aboard Reconnaissance Orbiter has taken many unique pictures of Mars, but "this one's really unique."

"It's the first time any camera has imaged an actual descent through an atmosphere of another planet," said McEwen, who operates the orbiter's camera. "This will be on my Top Ten list."

Phoenix joins rovers Spirit and Opportunity on the Martian surface. During its primary three-month mission, Phoenix will study whether the ice melted in the past at the landing site and probe the soil for evidence of organic compounds. It cannot directly detect fossils or living organisms.

The $420 million mission is led by University of Arizona and managed by JPL. Unlike the twin rovers, which have been operating near the Martian equator since 2004, Phoenix has a limited lifetime. Winter will set in later this year at its landing site and likely will cover the lander with frost.

___

Associated Press writer Arthur H. Rotstein in Tucson, Ariz., contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

Phoenix Mars: http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu

 
Comments
311
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

It would be a wonderful accomplishment except that we did something similar, twice, almost 32 years ago. What happened in the meanwhile? Money for faith-based programs, but cuts for science. Money for unnecessary wars, but cuts for progress. Check our Gerard O'Neill's "High Frontier" published 35 years ago. It's enough to make you weep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 05/27/2008

Aren't those ice caps melting? Clearly a result of Americans driving SUVs, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 PM on 05/26/2008

Y'know. If you invert the image and squint under a black light, you can see.. the King of Rock and Roll in the upper left. It's either that or a smudge.

And speaking of long-gone idols. Where the hell is Pee Wee Herman? As soon as he did his cameo as "The Spleen" in "Mystery Men", he vanished!

This ain't fair.

Oh, yeah. Mars is cool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

*

Congratulations NASA, job well done!

Please check the first images taken from Mars, make sure there is no one living there, so we can export all Neocons to Mars, we will cover the expenses by returning our tax rebate checks.

*

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

Ok, but to me it looks like your typical failed state where al-Quaeda can flourish if we don't take steps to deter the local regime from tolerating their presence in the frozen wastes of their desert highlands. We must invade. Doubtless the planet's hidden mineral resources will pay the full cost, and we'll be greeted as liberators.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:58 PM on 05/26/2008

According to the Article Phoenix traveled 422 billion miles. At 420 Billion dollars thats good mileage!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 05/26/2008

That's $420 million, not billion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 05/26/2008

thx, good milage!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 PM on 05/26/2008
photo



Good job, NASA. Congratulations. It is good to know that despite their relatively small budget NASA is able to do some really worthwhile scientific stuff.

Despite all the trouble here on our planet, science and exploration must go on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 05/26/2008

Congratulations to the team who got her there and landed safe and sound!

Here's another report from NASA:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080526075337.htm

I'm all for space exploration for peaceful purposes. It adds vastly to human knowledge and our reach for the stars!

And I'd sure rather see the money spent on this purpose than on warmongering...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

Wow what a shock and breakthrough it looks like it looks like frozen tundra ice and rock amazing who would have thunk it how many billions did we piss away on this f*cking stupid endeavor..?

Ice and dirt frozen together no atmosphere and never warmer than 70 below zero let's move there that's the ticket what great place to go live..we could waste Trillions that would otherwise be wasted on aiding the poor or feeding the hungry, clean drinking water, Heath care housing the ever growing homeless we can't have any of that..let's go to Mars..screw the poor and hungry and homeless..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 05/26/2008

If you could read you'd know that it was $420 million.

It's amazing how some people actually revel in their ignorance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 05/26/2008

Reveling in their ignorance, like pigs wallowing in their own sh*t, is one of the best ways to identify a Bush Republican. People like darthdarcy are perversely proud of knowing nothing, and yet having deeply held opinions on all matters.

And when these cretins are asked how they feel about spending more than $350 million on just one f*ckng DAY of the Iraq war, they have nothing to say.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 05/26/2008

The reason for this mission was exactly because of the "frozen tundra ice," as you put it. ICE -- as in frozen water -- and therefore the possiblilty of evidence of life (current or previous), in even its most basic form. There is no way to diminish the level of importance of that potential discovery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

In have no doubt there is life in the universe besides earth..

The universe is a life factory, teaming with life why spend billions looking for single cell dead or simple microbial life..on a stupid dead planet the real stuff if out there in deep space..

An that for now cannot be explored with manned missions..

The very purpose of the Universe is to create life the more you know about it the more this is self evident and undeniable..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 05/26/2008

It looks boring because that is where it is safe for a robot to land, a man or woman could land in the more fun parts of Mars but alas congress has doll museums and bridges to nowhere to fund. do you really think that the few billion we would save from the killing of NASA will go to the people for a better life, it has not happened since Nixon started to kill NASA in the 70's and it will not happen now. The savings would go to the NRO and NSA and to pork. From the dawn of time nations that stop exploring and dreaming slowly die.

The meek shall inherit the earth the rest of us are going to the stars

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

I'd rather spend 420 mil on that than 2tril on an imoral war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 05/26/2008

Not to mention the nearly 9 billion dollars that went missing in Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 05/26/2008

I heard that NASA put an american flag on the mar, does that
mean that american now owns MARS, are we going to make
Mars a democrated planet, if we do find life on mars will the america
goverment put that life in prison and take over their planet for the american
national security. the planet earth is 75% water, i heard that we have only
explored about 1% of the bottom of the ocean , why don't NASA learn what's
on our earth before we invade anonther planet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

darthdarcy says:

"..we could waste Trillions that would otherwise be wasted on aiding the poor or feeding the hungry, clean drinking water, Heath care housing the ever growing homeless we can't have any of that..let's go to Mars..screw the poor and hungry and homeless.."

If we waited until everyone was satisfied, we'd still be trying to figure out how to build a fire (illegal and unnecessary wars notwithstanding).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

More money to Nasa and research in general.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 05/26/2008

It always amazes me how readily people attack anything positive being done by our government. I'll bet that most of those same people didn't have a single thing to say when we started burning hundreds of billions on the Iraq war. It would appear that for many, the capacity to think critically only kicks in when the spending is on anything besides war.

Open your f*cking eyes people. This entire Mars mission is being done for the cost of just over 1 bloody day of the Iraq war! Think about that! Our nation's priorities have been allowed to be completely and utterly subverted to enrich the benefactors of Bush Inc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

Frozen dirt and rocks and Ice that's positive..? Who knew..?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 05/26/2008

Spoken like a true right winger. Your mind is shut tight as a drum.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 05/26/2008

Part 1

I've looked at your posts and you are obviously NOT a right winger, as others claim. Just thought I'd throw that out at the start. In the end though, it doesn't matter if you are or you're not, cause the criticism is legitimate, but not particularly precise in it's scope.

I understand the ambivalence toward exploration of this type, but it is, if it can get there, an attempt to understand our world, more than Mars, or whatever. The only way we can ever truly understand where we came from, and by inference, where we are going, is by looking at the other examples in our "neighborhood" of terrestrial planets. The broad field is known as Comparative Planetology, and it is one of the scientific fields that has risen during my lifetime as a representative of a true renaissance in science.

Ostensibly all you see are rocks and ice (no ice so far), but this particular landing site is all about water, as in subsurface water...and that relates to us. Also, finding evidence of life is another possibility of the mission. If they find ice though, that will be a major accomplishment. Also, this is a very specifically focused mission with a very limited lifetime. In 4 months or so, the spacecraft will most probably be partially embedded in carbon dioxide ice, that will end the mission. This is part of a larger program of exploration, and thus is but one "node" in a larger goal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 05/26/2008

Part 2

These missions are an investment in knowledge. And that knowledge is a plus for mankind as a whole if it means we understand our own world even more as a result of this investment in time and fortune. I wish that planetary exploration were cheaper, but in a large scale relative sense, this 420 million spent on this mission is quite reasonable. I see missions like this as some of the only really positive things we are doing with our fortune. These are not done for profit, or to hurt anyone, these are missions designed to expand knowledge, no more. And if we can spend some of our fortune in this way, we all will be the better for it, because it will have expanded the horizons of human knowledge and experience. IF we don't endeavor to understand our world, we will always be reactive and lacking in understanding of cause and effect on a much wider scale than any human can perceive. If we remain ignorant of the forces that we are now able to investigate with great precision (with missions like this), we will be the lesser for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:44 PM on 05/26/2008

B.F.D.

How are our lifes made better or worse by knowing that there is ice on Mars, ice on the Moon or a Starbucks on Venus.

Quick answer - it makes no difference other than intellectual curiousity for a group of people who couldn't grow up and get jobs in the real world.

The clusterf*ck in Iraq is beyond debate. It is a given waste of lives and money. But that doesn't make NASA a good use of money. The primary mission for NASA seems to be to spruce up the space station so that billionaires who buy rides on Russian rockets have a nice place to visit.

Sorry for your rocketmen, but the ROI is nil on this deal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 05/26/2008

Fulfilling intellectual curiosity is what brought you the very technology you are using to type your ignorant gibberish. Everything from the electricity you use to watch NASCAR, to the Viagra that you undoubtedly need, are the result of research. And no, companies do not pay for the kind of 'basic' research that brings us 'basic' knowledge of how nature works. They can't. They would go out of business if they did. The kind of knowledge gained by exploring the subsurface ice on Mars must be done if we are to push back the frontiers of what we know. Will it eventually yield useful information? Maybe. History shows that nearly every endeavor to know more has produced benefit. It may be long term benefit (something the dull witted Rush Limbo listeners cannot manage) but the benefits are there. never-the-less.

Try pulling your head out of your @ss, just for a few minutes. You might like the air out here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 05/26/2008

There are families in America that go to bed hungry every night. There are combat veterans sleeping in the streets. Our roads are crumbling and our bridges are falling down.

NASA has outlived it's usefulness. We got our Tang and our Teflon - but America no longer has an extra $8 billion to spend on a bunch of kids playing rocket man.

I agree that we need a mechanism to launch satellites - but NASA is not required for that. The unmanned Atlas rockets were doing the job just fine. This spring the military shot down a failed satellite because NASA was incapable of retrieving it and returning it to Earth for repair.

What use is NASA then? Pictures of Mars and glitzing up the space station are not adequate justification for the money that is spent.

Shut this boondoggle down. Send the veterans to college or fix the country's infrastructure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 05/26/2008

The people that say space spending could be spent on earth problems are right boy I remember the heady days of the 1970's when Nixon killed Apollo 18 19 and 20 it ended hunger and poverty in America. When Reagan killed the solar power satellite program it helped end our dependence on oil. And when Clinton killed the manned mars program universal heath care was able to be funded. Yes all those wonderful things happened when we cut the NASA budget, not!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 05/26/2008

Nicely framed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 05/26/2008

Yes, nicely put....... Kudos.........."independent_voter" doesn't seem to know much about the contribution of science and exploration to all of our lives. As you rightly suggest, the problems he highlights have no connection to the money that we spend on space exploration.

Disclosure: I am also an independent voter who supports Obama

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 05/26/2008

People space is the future not America's future but all of mankind's. The Chinese and the Japanese know this and are working toward lunar exploration and colonization. We could have done this if we would have listened to Wernher von Braun and others in the early days of NASA We could have moved heavy industry to orbit built solar power stations to beam energy down to earth we could have turned the earth back into eden. But the religious right and the one earth environmental left have tried to kill the dream. Not all problems can be solved in space but not all problems are solvable if we do not use space.

The meek shall inherit the earth the rest of us are going to the stars

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 05/26/2008

The loss of Apollo's 18, 19 and 20 were a heartbreak to me. Apollo 20 was slated to go for Tycho, which would have been stunning in many ways, but also very scientifically rewarding, since it was far south of any of the other landings, and was in CLEAR context, aka Tycho. Landing on or near the rim would have afforded access to materials from deep in the crust of the moon. Also, with 6 landings, I had hoped personally to have seen men standing on the rim of a REALLY large crater (which Tycho isn't, but it's a LOT larger than North Ray Crater, which was visited on Apollo 16, and I believe was the single largest impact crater visited by humans), but that never happened.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 05/26/2008

But I'll bet you have no problem whatsoever with spending $12 billion/month on the Iraq war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 PM on 05/26/2008

No dummo - you're wrong. I have a very serious problem with the Republican wars.

But the fact that Bush & Co. made a disaster out of Iraq does not mean that NASA is doing worthwhile work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

Humanity distinguishes itself by its curiosity and thirst for knowledge about life and its origins. It's well worth this investment. Let's stop our idiotic wars and military overspending, and we'll have more than enough for exploration and taking care of our own people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 PM on 05/26/2008

http://techtran.msfc.nasa.gov/at_home.html

Link on "spinoffs" from the Space Program...

GO GO SPACE PROGRAM!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 05/26/2008

Why can't they get high res color photos?

Isnt this NASA??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 05/26/2008

Wow you retards cant even discuss a mars rover without turning partisan
Did you ever consider that all modren devices and innovations come from millitary needs everything from antibiotics to rocket propulsion and yes even the computer you use to whine with

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 05/26/2008

You noticed that too huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 05/26/2008
photo

"Did you ever consider that all modren devices and innovations come from millitary needs everything from antibiotics to rocket propulsion and yes even the computer you use to whine with."

This must be your newest armchair chickenhawk talking point for support of the congressional military industrial complex. Never mind that your statement is false, but when you are not toggling your joystick while playing Rainbow 6, stop to consider that spinoffs from weapons of war are purely accidental.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 05/26/2008
- Paul I'm a Fan of Paul permalink

Too bad it didn't land in the ninth ward of New Orleans.

Maybe people would learn something from it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 05/26/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Related Tags