Tens Of Thousands Of Iraqis Protest US-Iraq Security Deal

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Tens Of Thousands Of Iraqis Protest US-Iraq Security Deal stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT H. REID | May 30, 2008 04:15 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Iraqi demonstrators shout slogans during a protest in the Kazimiyah northern district of Baghdad, on Friday, May 30, 2008. Tens of thousands of Shiites took to the streets in Baghdad and other cities to protest plans for a long term security agreement with the United States. The banner in the background reads: "No to the security agreement between the occupation and the Iraqi government". (AP Photo/Hadi Mizban)

BAGHDAD — Tens of thousands rallied in several cities Friday against a proposed U.S.-Iraqi security agreement, raising doubts that negotiators can meet a July target to finalize a pact to keep U.S. troops in Iraq after the current U.N. mandate expires.

Although U.S. officials insist they are not seeking permanent bases, suspicion runs deep among many Iraqis that the Americans want to keep at least some troops in the country for many years.

"We denounce the government's intentions to sign a long-term agreement with the occupying forces," Asaad al-Nassiri, a sheik loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, said during a sermon in Kufa. "Our army will be under their control in this agreement, and this will lead to them having permanent bases in Iraq."

President Bush and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki signed a statement last December on the future of U.S.-Iraqi relations, saying they planned to finalize a new security agreement by July 31 _ in time for Iraq's parliament to approve the deal before a U.N. mandate expires at the end of the year.

U.S. and Iraqi officials began negotiations in March on a blueprint for the long-term security agreement and a second deal, to establish the legal basis for U.S. troops to remain in the country after the U.N. mandate runs out.

Rallies in Baghdad and several other Iraqi cities followed Friday prayer services and were the first in wake of a call by al-Sadr for weekly protests against the deal, even though few details of the talks have been released.

Most of the protesters appeared to be followers of al-Sadr, the hardline Shiite cleric and militia leader whose Mahdi Army battled American and Iraqi troops in Baghdad's Sadr City district until a truce this month ended nearly seven weeks of fighting.

But opposition to the agreement appears to be growing beyond the Sadrist movement.

Story continues below
advertisement

A militant Sunni clerical group, the Association of Muslim Scholars, denounced the "ring of secrecy" surrounding the talks and said the proposed deal would pave the way for "military, economic and cultural domination" by the Americans.

On Thursday, the head of the country's biggest mainstream Shiite party, Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, said some unspecified points under negotiation "violate Iraq's national sovereignty," adding that a "national consensus" was emerging against the proposed agreement.

Al-Hakim is al-Sadr's main rival in the majority Shiite community and maintains close ties to the country's main Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. Aides to the powerful ayatollah say he also has reservations about the deal.

Some congressional Democrats are also insisting that Congress should authorize any agreement that would obligate the United States to defend Iraq.

Before the Friday protests, al-Sadr's office in Baghdad issued a statement branding the negotiations as "a project of humiliation" aimed at turning Iraq "into a small stooge of the United States."

U.S. officials have declined to comment on the talks until the draft is completed.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said two weeks ago that "we are making progress" although other Iraqi officials acknowledged there were many unresolved issues, including how many Americans would remain and what they would do. American soldiers now enjoy full immunity from the Iraqi legal system.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not supposed to talk about the negotiations.

Rallies against the security deal occurred as the U.S. military was seeking to contain the public relations damage caused by reports that an American Marine handed out coins promoting Christianity to Sunni Muslims in the former insurgent stronghold of Fallujah.

Sunni officials and residents said a Marine distributed about 10 coins at a checkpoint controlling access to the city, the scene of one of the fiercest battles of the war.

One side asked: "Where will you spend eternity?"

The other contained a verse from the New Testament: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16."

Mohammed Hassan Abdullah said he witnessed the coins being handed out on Tuesday as he was waiting at the Halabsa checkpoint, although he didn't receive one himself.

The U.S. military responded quickly to the incident, first reported by McClatchy Newspapers, removing a Marine from duty pending an investigation. Military regulations forbid proselytizing any religion.

"Indications are this was an isolated incident _ an individual Marine acting on his own accord passing out coins," Lt. Col. Chris Hughes, a spokesman for U.S. forces in western Iraq, said in an e-mailed statement.

Distribution of the coins was the second perceived insult to Islam by American service members this month. A U.S. Army sniper was sent out of the country after using a Quran, Islam's holy book, for target practice in a predominantly Sunni area west of Baghdad.

"This event did not happen by chance, but it was planned and done intentionally," Sheik Abdul-Rahman al-Zubaie, an influential tribal leader in Fallujah, said of the coins. "The Sunni population cannot accept and endure such a thing. I might not be able to control people's reactions if such incidents keep happening."

__

Associated Press writer Sameer N. Yacoub and AP staff in Fallujah contributed to this report.

BAGHDAD — Tens of thousands rallied in several cities Friday against a proposed U.S.-Iraqi security agreement, raising doubts that negotiators can meet a July target to finalize a pact to keep U...
BAGHDAD — Tens of thousands rallied in several cities Friday against a proposed U.S.-Iraqi security agreement, raising doubts that negotiators can meet a July target to finalize a pact to keep U...
Filed by Nick Sabloff  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
183
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 (5 pages total)

According to McSame all's quiet and well in Iraqi land...so we can keep American troops there for 50, maybe 100 years...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 05/30/2008

But Iraq is a DEMOCRACY - we can't listen to their PEOPLE - the US only listens to the handpicked 'leaders' we put in power.....­....

and THAT approach worked out SO well with the Shah in Iran......­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 05/30/2008
- danoj I'm a Fan of danoj 17 fans permalink

I say the heck with um if they don't want our help. Let Al Quiada and the Iranians carve them up and eat them. Upon which they will beg us to come back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 PM on 05/30/2008
- Marlyn I'm a Fan of Marlyn 81 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, now that we've shock and awed them, and Abu Ghraibed them, they will be begging us to come back and "protect" them. And, oh by the way, we aren't leaving until we get all of their oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 05/30/2008

Iraq will never be the next Palestine. Thank God the new embassy has a roof large enough to land more than one helicopter when the time comes to Exit stage left. This will be better than Saigon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 05/30/2008

But the WHOLE Green Zone has been targeted - zeroed in........­.

Imagine trying to get all the US troops and equipment out along a few roads lined with IED's - and anti-tank missiles..­... or are we going to leave EVERYTHING behind?

If we're lucky they 'll LET us leave easily - if not we are in for deep trouble...­....

and if we hit Iran.... all those nice permanent bases in the middle of the desert are EASY targets for current gen Cruise missiles, as are our Supercarriers in the Gulf......­. we hit Iran and Armageddon DOESbegin - with the US getting bloodied badly..... past war games of thsi scenario have been ended early because they were too embarassin­g......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 05/30/2008
- Marlyn I'm a Fan of Marlyn 81 fans permalink
photo

sick!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 05/30/2008

But this time we'll be smarter; we'll ring Bagdad with fifty miles of cluster bombs before hopping on the copters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 05/30/2008
- JoeBlough I'm a Fan of JoeBlough 60 fans permalink
photo

Why would we have built permanent bases in Iraq, if we weren't going to use them?

The Iraqi's may be a backwards culture, but they aren't stupid. They can see Bush/Cheney's manipulations for what they are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 05/30/2008

Future malls..... why else would they have Pizza Huts and Burger Kings....

We're bringing capitalist overconsumption to Iraq along with Democracy.­..... who heeds electricity and running water if you can shop at the Gap?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 05/30/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 637 fans permalink
photo

Iraqis don't seem to care for rebub style freedom, why do Americans put up with it ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 05/30/2008
photo

But, but, but, I thought they were going to welcome us with flowers as liberators­...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 05/30/2008
- fourex I'm a Fan of fourex 15 fans permalink
photo

"Although U.S. officials insist they are not seeking permanent bases, SUPICION runs deep among many Iraqis that the Americans want to keep at least some troops in the country for many years."

Why would this be a suspicion? I'm sure they know that McCain says the U.S. may stay for a century. This is hardly a suspicion, more like policy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 05/30/2008
- gditty I'm a Fan of gditty 30 fans permalink
photo

My friends, the picture you see is not a demonstration shouting anti-american slogans...­.it's a parade!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 05/30/2008
photo

Millions of Americans also disagree,
but are too pussified* politically to protest.

*As in helpless, blindly rooting kittens.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 05/30/2008
- NYCMami I'm a Fan of NYCMami 14 fans permalink

Well, this is just no way to treat your "liberators".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 05/30/2008
- ChristiB I'm a Fan of ChristiB 4 fans permalink

Anyone else notice how McCain, Petreaus, Bush have been trying to sell us "sucesses" in Iraq lately?

How much you wanna bet that they will keep selling us the story of Iraq success so that they can pull the troops out and claim "victory" and McCain will be able to say "I told you so" before the election?

Bets anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 05/30/2008
- danoj I'm a Fan of danoj 17 fans permalink

Bush isn't going to pull out of Iraq because he 1 thing Dems don't have. He has balls, and that's why he got elected to a second term. Dems are weak thus McCain piss-pounding Obama daily on terrorism and security. he knows the dems haven't had a pair since Kennedy was Pres.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 05/30/2008
- aristippe I'm a Fan of aristippe 13 fans permalink

NO.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 05/30/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 146 fans permalink

The essence of democracy is that the people have a voice in the government. If the U.S. does not heed the will of the people of Iraq, what is the justification for being there?

Of course, we could just adopt the old Cheney excuse: "So?"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 05/30/2008
- ChristiB I'm a Fan of ChristiB 4 fans permalink

Anyone else notice how McCain, Petraeus, Bush have been trying to sell the Iraq situation as improved lately?

How much you wanna bet they are trying to sell us Iraq sucess - so they can pull the troops out and claim victory - and McCain will be able to say "I told you so" - before the election?

Bets anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 PM on 05/30/2008
- aristippe I'm a Fan of aristippe 13 fans permalink

Lately? Bush has been Selling that B.S. for 5 years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 05/30/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect