Governors Supporting Hillary Prepare For Switch To Obama

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Governors Supporting Hillary Prepare For Switch To Obama stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS | June 3, 2008 02:07 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill. gestures while speaking during a town hall meeting at Troy High School in Troy, Mich. Monday, June 2, 2008. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)

Eleven of the nation's governors will have to perform some political sleight of hand now that Barack Obama has effectively clinched the Democratic nomination for president. After months of supporting Hillary Rodham Clinton, they will have to convince voters they're just as happy with her rival.

Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland repeatedly has said Obama is less experienced than Clinton. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell said the election was not about choosing a rock star.

"He needs a little more seasoning," Gov. Mike Beebe of Arkansas said at a rally last August where he announced his endorsement of Clinton.

Nonetheless, an Associated Press tally of convention delegates found that Obama had effectively locked up the nomination as of Tuesday.

Other governors supporting Clinton include Jon Corzine of New Jersey and Ted Kulongoski of Oregon, along with the chief executives of Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New York and North Carolina.

Obama also has 11 Democratic governors, including Bill Richardson of New Mexico, Tim Kaine of Virginia and Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, frequently mentioned as a possible running mate.

She tried to minimize the downside of switching candidates.

"Every colleague that I have in this country will do everything he or she can to make sure we have a Democratic president," Sebelius said.

Story continues below

Six other Democratic leaders are uncommitted, among them Govs. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Brian Schweitzer of Montana.

Putting nasty campaign comments in the past is a political tradition. In 1980, GOP presidential candidate George H.W. Bush dubbed Ronald Reagan's financial policies "voodoo economics," then let bygones be bygones as he became Reagan's loyal two-term vice president.

Governors, whose shared priorities often transcend partisan politics, have a history of playing nice. Few have gone for the jugular in remarks about Obama, whose campaign declined to comment on Clinton's gubernatorial supporters.

Still, this year's long and bitter Democratic primary has given governors and other superdelegates plenty of time to go on the record with remarks about Obama that could come back to haunt them.

"There's a treasure trove of ammunition for Republican campaign consultants to dip into," said Chris Borick, a pollster and political scientist at Muhlenberg College in Pennsylvania.

Case in point: a YouTube clip of Rendell appearing on Bill Maher's "Real Time" in February, e-mailed to The Associated Press by the Pennsylvania Republican Party just minutes after being asked about Rendell and Obama.

"We're not electing a rock star," Rendell says on the eight-minute clip. "It's not a vote to see who's the most charismatic."

Expect to see more of the same in the fall campaign, said Michael Barley, spokesman for the Pennsylvania GOP.

"It's going to be very difficult for him to pivot now and support a candidate that he was actively campaigning against," he said, referring to Rendell.

Wanna bet? said Rendell.

"I don't mean to sound lacking in humility, but if they try to make something out of that, I'll kill them," Rendell said. "I'll turn it so they'll wish they never brought it up."

Rendell said he was careful in the primary to avoid going negative on Obama and noted that the race was about a choice, just as the fall campaign will be.

"You can go through issue after issue and the difference between Senator (John) McCain and Senator Obama is absolutely clear and those things transcend any other aspects of the campaign," Rendell said.

Other governors made the same point, playing what might be called the unity card.

"My support remains with Senator Clinton, but I also think that Senator Obama would make a great president," Maine Gov. John Baldacci said in a statement. "What's most important for Democrats is that we all come together to support our nominee in the general election."

"That's politics," said Matt DeCample, a spokesman for Beebe, the Arkansas governor. "He'll have no qualms about being able to confidently support whoever the nominee is and to do so without hesitation."

Not surprisingly, McCain's campaign sees things differently. Governors who took positions at odds with Obama will be fair game in the fall, said Tucker Bounds, a spokesman for the Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting.

"Voters do have a memory," he said.

With their statewide bully pulpit, governors play important roles in presidential campaigns, as they rally support for a candidate and energize a party's get-out-the-vote machinery.

Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida, a McCain backer, empathizes with his Democratic colleagues.

"It's got to be a little awkward, let's be honest," said Crist, whose name is on lists of possible McCain running mates.

Perhaps mindful that he waited until three days before Florida's pivotal primary Jan. 29 to endorse McCain, Crist acknowledged the problem is not unique to Democrats.

"There's an awful lot of people that are supporting Senator McCain that may not have been supporting him before he received the nomination because they understand the importance of party unity," he said.

Among those are Texas Gov. Rick Perry, originally a backer of Rudy Giuliani, and Rhode Island Gov. Don Carcieri, who first endorsed Mitt Romney.

A bigger question, says University of Dayton political scientist Grant Neeley, is how Obama's campaign will view the governors who didn't support him.

"Do you really want someone up on the dais with you who was not an ardent supporter to begin with?" Neeley said.

That may be a factor in Ohio, where not only does Strickland support Clinton, voters do, too _ by a 53 percent to 45 percent margin in the state's March primary.

Strickland said voters don't care whether he switches from one candidate to another. He said people are more interested in health care, education and ending the Iraq war so troops can come home.

"All of the political arguments and the back and forth regarding who may have said what about some other person, I think will be viewed as a political argument and irrelevant to the lives of most Ohioans," Strickland said.

___

On the Net:

Obama: http://www.barackobama.com

McCain: http://www.johnmccain.com

Eleven of the nation's governors will have to perform some political sleight of hand now that Barack Obama has effectively clinched the Democratic nomination for president. After months of supporting ...
Eleven of the nation's governors will have to perform some political sleight of hand now that Barack Obama has effectively clinched the Democratic nomination for president. After months of supporting ...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
166
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- Erdgeist I'm a Fan of Erdgeist 83 fans permalink
photo

This is not so much of a power shift as it is a paradigm shift. It is a bold step for the Democratic Party to frame the election as one of factionalism (Republican) vs. unity (Democratic). Hopefully, Senator Obama will make McCain pay dearly for the divisive campaign he plans to run.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 06/03/2008

The thing I don't understand is why would a party member let the primary fight get so dirty if they knew that they would have to support whomever won.... I'm a Democrat but sometimes I really have to question the foresight of our party leaders.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 06/03/2008

Everyone one of those superdelegates who haven't endorsed yet who holds a public office whereby they had to be voted in ..... their constituencies should be taking notice. Either way, I don't care who they're for. If they've not made a decision yet and let it be known, they've done so for political reasons and that should never be tolerated by any of us.

I'm from PA and those 4 who won't go or get off of the pot should know their seats are in jeopardy.

You've been selected, voted in, nominated, whatever--to lead--and that is what we demand of you!!!!!!!!!!

Damn it!!!! I'm mad now.

Obama 08!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 06/03/2008
- Teadye I'm a Fan of Teadye 24 fans permalink

Are you kidding? Most of them absolutely love this stuff. "it's just politics." Common political wisdom was that they needed a trial by fire to "temper" the nominee.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 06/03/2008

I live in Maryland and I intend to remember that O'malley, Mikulski and others went against an overwhelming vote for Obama to back Clinton. I voted for many of them, but they didn't represent me when it counted. That's the politics that keeps politicians honest or out of office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 06/03/2008
- andyboy I'm a Fan of andyboy 78 fans permalink

Regular old politics 101. Fingers ever to the wind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 06/03/2008
- Mayoyo I'm a Fan of Mayoyo 5 fans permalink

Who cares?
Warner or Hagel will be his VP.
He won't have to suck up to anyone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 06/03/2008

wanna bet on this? Hillary will be his VP. That is the only way he could have a chance at the presidency. Let's be honest for once.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 06/03/2008
- claudiam I'm a Fan of claudiam 25 fans permalink
photo

Sorry oscarp, think outside the box. We are tired of the politics of Washington as usual. Once the Hill dust settles you will think clearly once again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 06/03/2008
- mystic I'm a Fan of mystic 21 fans permalink

We have such a corrupt system, not democratic at all. The electoral system was specifically designed to be manipulated in case someone is nominated who is"not what we want" (read: "a black man").
So now this man is nominated "fairly and democratically" and then on Aug 28, a bunch of SDs suddenly announce that they've changed their minds about him being electable because (and any reason will do, like "we just don't like his smile") and declare Hillary the winner. They don't say that they were bribed by Hillary but that is inferred. And the country will what? Gasp like when Gore had his election stolen from him, but as Scalia says" Get over it"?????????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 06/03/2008

Seems like Ed Rendell is experiencing the jitters over his outrageous remarks as a democratic leader of a large state that the party needs, a state - that commits itself on paper to equal rights, after it's governor having told a group of journalists that it was his belief that some of his constiutuents could not vote for Sen. Obama because of the color of his skin. So much for upholding principles of human dignity, of equality and what one should be able to expect from a democratic governor concerning what HE MODELS in his words, and through his conduct and leadership.

Such is the aftermath that the entire democratic party now has to deal with because of comments like those from Ed Rendell which generated - what amounts to - a public leader condoning the repulsive and the unthinkable ( a posture which Richard Cohen so aptly captures in his Washington Post article released today).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 06/03/2008

Instead of staying on with the sinking ship, they want to jump off.

If you are true to your candidate...you should stay and not switch even when she doesn't have the numbers. Don't just leave her out that and say, well since it's apparent that you want be the nominee...we have to say bye.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 06/03/2008
- M.S. Bellows, Jr. - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of M.S. Bellows, Jr. 83 fans permalink

What, if you were in a convoy and your ship started sinking, you wouldn't jump onto the one that isn't? This isn't a popularity contest, and it's not even about the individual candidates; it's about acknowledging when the other guys' become the nominee and falling behind him. It's what they're -- and we're -- supposed to do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 06/03/2008

I think you are missing the point. These ppl saw the writing on the wall awhile back, yet they stood next to her...why not go ALL the way with her? It looks, IMHO, that they are being a little pretentious, hence the shipping sink analogy.

They can still stand behind her and acknowledge that she is their candidate of choice, and not pull their vote (if that's the case). Don't kick her while she's down (and trust me I am not fan of HRC). So, when he becomes the nominee, they can just acknowledge his candidacy while staying loyal to her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 06/03/2008

Be real, pal. You need to learn more about the political process. The fight is over between democrats. Now the "family" needs to unite against the real enemy: McCain and the republicans. There's no point in handing the presidency to them. It's late enough in the game and for the past month Obama has been fighting with both Clintons and McCain. Now it's time for the whole party to fight back at McCain if we want to have a shot in electing a democratic president. All true democrats want this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 06/03/2008

I was unsure if you were addressing me or not, but I can assure you that I am well versed in political dynamics. It's apparent that you rushed to judgment w/o full understanding of what was said. It only takes a second to read everything before you make a crass comment.

If you need more understanding, which it appears that you do, allow me to help you out. It was apparent several weeks ago that Obama was going to be the nominee, YET these same ppl forged on with Clinton. My point is that it makes no sense to abandon or kick her while she's down. Perhaps you don't know what it's like to be loyal to someone, but I do. Your loyalty knows no bounds. These ppl can stay loyal to her, and still endorse Obama…all the while saving face. That's my point! Do you understand now?

That is why these uncommitted SD have yet to endorse anyone. They don't want to step on her while she’s down. They won't the process to finish and then they will rally behind Obama. They are showing her respect, because like it or not, she is due just that. Perhaps it is you that needs a full understanding of the political process or what it means to be loyal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 06/03/2008

I was unsure if you were addressing me or not, but I can assure you that I am well versed in political dynamics. It's apparent that you rushed to judgment w/o full understanding of what was said. It only takes a second to read everything before you make a crass comment.

If you need more understanding, which it appears that you do, allow me to help you out. It was apparent several weeks ago that Obama was going to be the nominee, YET these same ppl forged on with Clinton. My point is that it makes no sense to abandon or kick her while she's down. Perhaps you don't know what it's like to be loyal to someone, but I do. Your loyalty knows no bounds. These ppl can stay loyal to her, and still endorse Obama…all the while saving face. That's my point! Do you understand now?

That is why these uncommitted SD have yet to endorse anyone. They don't want to step on her while she’s down. They won't the pr

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 06/03/2008

Do we want a Democrat in the White House to clean up the mess of the last almost eight years, or do we want to continue this stupid fighting within our party and guarantee another four years like we've had with George Bush? If the people we elect to represent us in America are willing to support the eventual candidate for the sake of the party and our country, shouldn't we be able to swallow our pride and move on? I address this to every woman (and you men) who have vowed to stay home, write in Hillary, or vote for McCain in the fall; your anger will only come back to bite you in the end. If it is perceived that Hillary's supporters have caused Obama to lose the general election, it will tarnish her legacy. It will then be more difficult for her or another woman to achieve what she has achieved. Senator Obama is a great candidate. He will support women's rights and carry the fight for all of the policies Hillary has been championing. He has a strong wife and women's rights supporter in Michelle. It's time to move on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 06/03/2008

I hate to inform you, but I am a female and a card carrying Republican. I was a Bush supporter pre-Iraq, and was devastated when he waged war for personal reasons. I respect him as our President, but I don't like him. As a female Republican, I take pride in saying that I am an avid Obama supporter.

If you are unsure about my original post, please see below.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:50 PM on 06/03/2008

Loyalty is important and they are displaying none.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:16 PM on 06/03/2008
- CarbonDate I'm a Fan of CarbonDate 5 fans permalink
photo

Actually, it just shows how soft Clinton's support was in the first place. People jumped on board because she was the presumptive nominee through 2007. Now it's 2008 and Obama's the presumptive nominee. They're jumping off one bandwagon and onto the next. Nothing new.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 PM on 06/03/2008
- MyThought I'm a Fan of MyThought 10 fans permalink

It would be the same if it was the other way around - those supporting Obama if it was Hillary that one.

It's such a NON-story - again, you can't trust the Associated Press - the screw up news regularly.

Lesson from this whole race - the media are pathetic, the bobble-headed pundits are pathetic and we desparately need to get some quality journalism in the US - it's so bad, absolutey horrible.

Morrow would be rolling over if he saw how pathetic journalism, if you can call it that, has become.

The people can speak here - don't buy their papers, let their advertisers know - time to for the MSM to smarten up and "class" up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 06/03/2008
- M.S. Bellows, Jr. - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of M.S. Bellows, Jr. 83 fans permalink

If we didn't need better journalism, we wouldn't need Huff Post -- and volunteer "off the bus" bloggers like Mayhill wouldn't keep scooping the MSM.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 06/03/2008

Mayhill Fowler... right... she's not scooping anyone, she's secretly recording conversations by pretending to be an innocent observer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 06/03/2008

Where I live in NYC, my district rep in the House pledged her support for Clinton despite her constituents' preference for Obama. Hmph. If I wasn't in agreement with so much of her politics and her support of impeaching Cheney I'd have an easier time voting against her the next time she's up for reelection.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 06/03/2008
photo

It's not that awkward. IT'S POLITICS. The one you want doesn't win so you endorse the next best thing. Hell former Republican Presidential candidates Romney & Huckabee got behind McCain, just like McCain got behind Bush...etc etc.....

The Democrats need to take a hint on how to be adults. Obama's & Clinton's policies were virtually identical. PERIOD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 06/03/2008

even as an obama supporter i still love my gov, Rendell for VP '08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 06/03/2008
- Fotios I'm a Fan of Fotios 20 fans permalink

And McCain doesn't have the same problem? Conservatives, especially Christian Conservatives HATE McCain. Die-hard republicans HATE McCain. Right-wing political pundants (Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter) hated McCain in January. McCain has massive problems with the Republican base that pales in comparison with Obama's problems. McCain's problems are idealogical, Barack's problem is that people thought Hillary was more experienced. Idealogical problems are a lot harder to overcome than preference problems.

Also, don't forget the Libertarians. McCain has a new right-wing party to contend with this year and Bob Barr looks pretty tempting to the anti-McCain conservatives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 06/03/2008
- harriscrl3 I'm a Fan of harriscrl3 191 fans permalink

You know whats interesting if it was the other way around it would be easy as pie. Thats what I notice about Obama supporters they dont bash Hilary so if Hilary becomes the nominee the transition would be easy for them. There is pleasure other than being a supporter in seeing Obama as the nominee you get to watch these people essential spin themselves out of this one.

But to be fair to these governors they are just taking their cues from the candidate they endorse if Hilary had led like a democratic loyalist we basically wouldnt have had this problem. These two candidates are extraordinary in their own right there was no need to denigrate one in order to elevate the other they bought different talents to the table.

BTW i dont remember Corzine or Patterson saying damaging stuff about Obama but I could be wrong. So its not all of Hilary's governors

Carol

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 06/03/2008
- GaNavy I'm a Fan of GaNavy 2 fans permalink

Well said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 06/03/2008

What most senior democrats are facing now is exactly what Barack has tried to do all along this primary,You dont cat fight in your own house. If Hillary had become the nominee,it would have been easy for barack and his backers to make peace with her and her team as they NEVER at anytime attacked Hillary nor her surrogates on a personal level.

Now Hillary supporters are bitting their nails as to where to go now or what to do giving all the personal i mean very personal attacks they had thrown at Senator Obama.To make matters even worst they were 90% of the time false attacks.Simply deformation of characters. They were out,not just to win the nomination from him but to completely destroy his career.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 06/03/2008
- the964kid I'm a Fan of the964kid 67 fans permalink
photo

This group of 11 governors who supported Hillary are the next biggest losers, aside from Hillary herself, after she concedes this race either tonight or in the next few days. All these governor set their own careers back significantly. Their own voters and the whole world was watching and these guys made the wrong call. Some will have an easier time then others trying to put their critical words of Obama back in the bag. Some lost the very real chance to have been a VP this November, and others will lose later when their constituents vote these chumps out. To these 11 governors I can say: we won't forget any of you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 06/03/2008
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 37 fans permalink

yeah. Because Obama has such overwhelming support in states like Ohio and PA, that these governors are really in toruble because a few guys in a South Carloina barber shop chose Obama during a straw poll caucus.


*snicker*.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:12 PM on 06/03/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect