Bush, EU Threaten Iran With New Sanctions

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com Share this on Facebook

DEB RIECHMANN | June 10, 2008 12:15 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
US President George W. Bush, left, talks with Slovenia's Prime Minister Janez Jansa in Brdo Pri Kranju, Slovenia, Tuesday, June 10, 2008. President Bush opened his last summit with the European Union on Tuesday with a long list of trans-Atlantic issues on his plate, Iran's nuclear ambitions, Afghanistan's woes, climate change, Mideast peace and perhaps even the U.S.-Europe flap over chickens. (AP Photo/Yves Logghe)

KRANJ, Slovenia — President Bush and European allies on Tuesday threatened tougher sanctions to squeeze Iran's finances and derail its potential pursuit of a nuclear weapon. Bush said the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran would endanger world peace.

"They can either face isolation, or they can have better relations with all of us," Bush said of Iran's leaders while capping his final European Union-U.S. summit.

The president and EU leaders embraced new financial sanctions against Iran unless it verifiably suspends its nuclear enrichment. They said Iran must fully disclose any nuclear weapons work and allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to verify that work.

Iran is also under fire for defying three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions and continuing to enrich uranium _ which can generate both nuclear fuel and the fissile material for the core of nuclear warheads. Iran insists that it has only civilian uses in mind for its nuclear program.

The president flatly said Iran "can't be trusted with enrichment."

"A group of countries can send a clear message to the Iranians," Bush said. "And that is: we're going to continue to isolate you, we'll continue to work on sanctions, we'll find new sanctions if need be if you continue to deny the just demands of a free world."

Speaking to reporters on the lush, sun-splashed lawn near Brdo Castle, Bush also fielded questions on economic woes at home and climate change.

Bush essentially rejected the idea of possible government intervention to prop up the value of the U.S. dollar. He said he believed in a strong-dollar policy, but that world economies will end up setting the value of the dollar.

On global warming, Bush declared, "I think we can actually get an agreement on global climate change during my presidency," which ends on Jan. 20, 2009.

He said no global warming agreement can be effective without China and India. The United States has been at odds with allies about whether any climate strategy should include mandatory emission reductions, among other sticking points.

Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa, the president of the European Council, said European members and the United States might have different approaches to some of its common challenges. He said a global agreement without the developing countries would be a short-term solution.

But he added "those who are the most developed have to take the leading role."

The summit, consisting of about three hours of meetings and a working lunch, took place in a modern glass building on the vast Brdo grounds in the shadow of Slovenia's jagged mountain peaks. The president had a long list of issues to cover with his European counterparts, but Iran seemed to dominate.

Six world powers _ the United States, Russia, China, Britain, Germany and France _ are developing a package of fresh penalties and incentives aimed at reining in Tehran's alleged atomic ambitions. The EU's foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, plans to visit Iranian leaders soon in Tehran to appeal to them to accept negotiations over the nuclear standoff.

Bush's national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, said that Solana will convey that message when he travels there, adding that Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wasn't expected to be among those consulted.

The plan is to figure out a way to make the Iranian people aware of the offer, Hadley told reporters traveling with Bush to Germany. He said officials want to demonstrate to the Iranian people that acceptance of the offer would end their isolation. The package involves concrete political, economic and diplomatic benefits including support for a peaceful nuclear energy program, Hadley added.

"All of this is available if they suspend the enrichment and come to the table," he added. "On the one hand, there is a way out for the Iranian people. On the other hand, as the president said, if they do not take it, then the Iranian people need to understand that the choice their regime is making is going to result in increasing isolation of the Iranian regime and, regrettably, the Iranian people as well."

He also said the EU and the United States are on the same page in stepping up pressure on Iran.

Bush and the heads of the EU, a political and economic coalition of 27 countries that works to promote security and commerce across the continent, called on Tehran to stop its support for terrorist organizations destabilizing the Mideast. The statement said the United States and the EU would work to ensure that "Iranian banks cannot abuse the international banking system to support proliferation and terrorism."

It was unclear whether the freshly stated concern over Iranian banks meant that Europeans had signed on for the kind of tough measures the U.S. favors, such as banning business with Iranian banks, or merely represented a repeat of previous calls for closer monitoring of dealings with them.

The Bush administration has warned that Iran is using an array of deceptive practices to hide involvement in nuclear proliferation and terrorist activities.

Iran insists that it has only civilian uses in mind for its nuclear program. Yet it is under fire for defying three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions and continuing to enrich uranium, which can generate both nuclear fuel and the fissile material for the core of nuclear warheads. Iran has also stonewalled attempts by the IAEA to delve into allegations that several Iranian projects appear to represent different components of a nuclear weapons program.

"A mutually satisfactory, negotiated solution remains open to Iran," the statement said. But the leaders also said that they would fully implement U.N. sanctions against Iran and were "ready to supplement those sanctions with additional measures."

Bush warned that if Iran ends up with a nuclear weapon, "the free world is going to say why didn't we do something about it at the time? ... Now's the time for there to be strong diplomacy."

Iran's central bank, also known as Bank Markazi, is involved in these deceptive acts, according to the U.S. government. The White House has been looking at new steps to cut off more Iranian banks from the international financial system and has been seeking backing from European allies.

Tensions over Iran are only rising. An Israeli Cabinet minister warned Friday that Israel will attack Iran if it doesn't abandon its nuclear program. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert distanced himself on Sunday from the statements but didn't explicitly reject them.

Verbal threats and political tensions have increased between Iran and Israel after Ahmadinejad said in 2005 that Israel should be "wiped off the map."

"First of all if, if you were living in Israel you'd be a little nervous, too," Bush said Tuesday. "If a leader in your neighborhood announced that they, he'd like to destroy you. And one sure way of achieving that means it through the development of a nuclear weapon. Therefore, now is the time for all of us to work together to stop them."

Bush flew to Berlin later Tuesday for a social dinner with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. During his weeklong stay in Europe, he also is going to Italy, France, London and Belfast.

___

Associated Press Writers Snjezana Vukic and William Kole in Kranj, Slovenia, contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

U.S.-European Union summit: http://tinyurl.com/3vwqog

Transatlantic Economic Council: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/inter_rel/tec/index_en.htm

 
 

Comments
66
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- betz55 See Profile I'm a Fan of betz55 permalink

If Bush, et. al. wants nuclear transparency with Iran then there needs to be complete transparency with Israel. The Iran issue is 100% Israeli.

NOBODY, not Israel, not America, has produced the smallest scrap of evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program. Indeed the US intelligence community confirmed that Iran is not doing this.

All rules apply except to Israel ? Again ? Pure BS. Make Israel adhere to the standards that it and the US, and the EU want to impose on Iran.

Israel refuses to sign the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty ,which Iran has done.

Israel refuses to allow IAEA inspections of their nuke facilities, which Iran has done. Israel refuses to comply with any UN resolutions, which the US protects it from.

The media silence about Israelis nuclear weapons and their lack of membership to the NPT while maintaining such harsh rhetoric with regard to Iran's nuclear program, which is legally allowed to enrich uranium as a NPT member, is outright double standard and hypocrisy.

Iran has every right to defend themselves against Israel. The IAEA in Israel ? The reaction would be spectacular and filled with claims of persecution and divine right.

It's absurd the pretense that Israel stands as the pathetic guardian against the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the ME. Israel is the biggest bully, destabilizing, warmongering, belligerent aggressor there and needs to be dealt with before Tehran.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 AM on 06/11/2008
- RTIII See Profile I'm a Fan of RTIII permalink

I agree with a lot of what you've said but not all...

Israel, we reasonably believe, already has nuclear weapons. Le's assume it's true. I agree that _they_ shouldn't have any role as "guardian against the proliferation of nuclear weapons" beyond simply safeguarding what they already presumably have.

Secondly, Israel is no saintly nation, agreed, however, who was it who started the recent war between Israel and Lebanon? Who has been conducting assassinations in Lebanon to have essentially a coup d'etat? ...The point here is that there's plenty of destabilizing going on from others than Israel, too.

Thirdly, Iran may have signed the NPT, but if I understand correctly, they aren't living up to the treaty. If they were, this current carrot & stick would not be necessary.

As for Israel living up to UN resolutions, I agree with you. And I'm pretty pissed off about Gaza, too!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 06/12/2008
- MagisterLudi See Profile I'm a Fan of MagisterLudi permalink

Russia, Britain and France, all countries opposed to U.S.A policies SUPPORT sanctions against Iran.
Even (incredibly) Russia, who stands to gain billions, lost patience with Iranian head-case games.

EVERYONE in the world knows that Iran is building a nuclear bomb.
AND there isn't a country in the world that wants Iran to have it.
The ONLY disagreement between members of world community is how to stop the Mullahs from getting it.

Yes, Bush is an idiot.

No, war isn't necessary.

Yes, Iran should be stopped.

Probably, some sabotage of supplies and installations will be in the works.

Russia's GRU Speznaz should collaborate with CIA and Massad on that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 06/11/2008
- CC1 See Profile I'm a Fan of CC1 permalink

Dead-on right. :D

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 AM on 06/11/2008
- deminmo See Profile I'm a Fan of deminmo permalink

Many countries continue to do business with Iran.
Diplomats can talk to N. Korea, but they can't talk to
Iran?
If three sanctions haven't worked, why would anyone
believe 4 or even more will?
How long do you really believe that Bush will hold off
military action, despite the rehtoric about diplomacy,
and with all the military programs and special security
department inititives?
Check out "Vigilant Shield 08" planned for Oct. 15-20

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 AM on 06/11/2008
- yappnmutt See Profile I'm a Fan of yappnmutt permalink

if israel did not have nukes then iran would not need nukes. oh, excuse me, israel doesn't have nukes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 06/10/2008
- MagisterLudi See Profile I'm a Fan of MagisterLudi permalink

Now Iran needs nukes because Israel has nukes?!
Another convenient front.

Israel has nukes as a last resort weapon. A tiny country ONE military loss from annihilation ( a wet dream of Anti-Semites everywhere, who can't stand the idea of a strong Jew ).

Iran wants nukes because it's afraid of U.S. surrounding Iran on all sides: A-Stan, Iraq, Saudi, Kuwait and military bases in all the other -stans.

And Iran want nukes because the ruling Ayatollahs are afraid of their own people.

Are they justified in their fear? Yes.

THIS is the issue 1 to address!!!!

Can the world community negotiate some degree of security for Iranian mullahs, while
stopping nuclear prolifiration?

THIS is the issue 2 to address!!!!

The neurotic preoccupation with Israel only muddles the waters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 06/11/2008
- escobar See Profile I'm a Fan of escobar permalink

What a sad collection of greedy cowards they all are.
Same as it ever was.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 PM on 06/10/2008
- vippy See Profile I'm a Fan of vippy permalink

Bush went to the little European States, whoever heard of Lithuania LOL.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:39 PM on 06/10/2008
- MagisterLudi See Profile I'm a Fan of MagisterLudi permalink

Bush will feel at home in Lithuania. They're bunch of fascists just like Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 AM on 06/11/2008
- Namtillaku See Profile I'm a Fan of Namtillaku permalink

Isn't this always where it starts?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 06/10/2008
- 08politicaljunkie See Profile I'm a Fan of 08politicaljunkie permalink

I can't even read this entire article; Bush is quoted too much. He shouldn't be permitted to do anything else before he leaves office. It's hard for me to believe our allies and the rest of the international community trusts him either. How dare he accuse any nation of being a threat to peace anywhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 06/10/2008
- Srkdqltr See Profile I'm a Fan of Srkdqltr permalink

Actually....... The terrorists have already hit and no one has noticed. Who do you think controls the gas prices?
Bush is just digging us into higher prices. Of course, gas is his and the Veeps business so they will reep the profits. They don't care about us, (the folks in the land) as they will make zillions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 06/10/2008
- deminmo See Profile I'm a Fan of deminmo permalink

Srkdqltr,
It's called "Disaster Capitalism".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 06/11/2008
- SeriousBlack See Profile I'm a Fan of SeriousBlack permalink

The only thing shrub should be doing is SingTFU.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 06/10/2008
- lefilmnoir See Profile I'm a Fan of lefilmnoir permalink

Thanks to the Bush Administration, the only country facing isolation is the United States.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:53 PM on 06/10/2008
- texastornado See Profile I'm a Fan of texastornado permalink

The UN should sanction this country until these @#$holes are out of office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 06/10/2008
- HanFeiTzu See Profile I'm a Fan of HanFeiTzu permalink

Hey you guys in the EU; you have him now please do the correct thing and take him to The Hague. Don't pass GO, go directly to, oh well you know. He's a fool that you undoubtedly acknowledge in private. It's time to show the world some guts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 06/10/2008
- escobar See Profile I'm a Fan of escobar permalink

That is what I have been thinking.
I think they hope to get rich as the USA self destructs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:16 AM on 06/11/2008
- CC1 See Profile I'm a Fan of CC1 permalink

Horrible to hope for destruction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 AM on 06/17/2008
- lochnessmonster See Profile I'm a Fan of lochnessmonster permalink

Yikes!!! What a group!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 06/10/2008
- MissingAmerica See Profile I'm a Fan of MissingAmerica permalink

To Hell with Bush. It's time to stop listening to this little tyrant and start impeaching him. Impeachment is finally on the House floor; everybody support your Congressment and notify John Conyers of your desire to see this finally happen!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 06/10/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in