Why Is Bush Helping Saudi Arabia Build Nukes?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Why Is Bush Helping Saudi Arabia Build Nukes? stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 06-10-08 11:00 AM   |   Updated: 06-18-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Saudis Bush

Wall Street Journal:

Here's a quick geopolitical quiz: What country is three times the size of Texas and has more than 300 days of blazing sun a year? What country has the world's largest oil reserves resting below miles upon miles of sand? And what country is being given nuclear power, not solar, by President George W. Bush, even when the mere assumption of nuclear possession in its region has been known to provoke pre-emptive air strikes, even wars?

If you answered Saudi Arabia to all of these questions, you're right.

Read the whole story: Wall Street Journal

Here's a quick geopolitical quiz: What country is three times the size of Texas and has more than 300 days of blazing sun a year? What country has the world's largest oil reserves resting below miles ...
Here's a quick geopolitical quiz: What country is three times the size of Texas and has more than 300 days of blazing sun a year? What country has the world's largest oil reserves resting below miles ...
Filed by Will Thomas  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
21
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 84 fans permalink

The ONLY "good" thing about this:

Bush can negotiate treaties like this, but CONGRESS has to approve them...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 06/12/2008
- paulbikes I'm a Fan of paulbikes 8 fans permalink

I think at the bare realistic minimum, we need to reduce our nuclear capabilities to just enough to blow up the earth one time, i think 8+ times is overkill, but thats just me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 06/10/2008
- demfriend I'm a Fan of demfriend 22 fans permalink
photo

The House Of Saud has long been close and dear friends of the bush family. That they majority of the 9/11 guys came from the country has meant little in the scheme of things with the administration so why should any nuke support shock us? OPEC has made record profits and we are paying record prices for gas/oil/fuel and how does that compute? Bush asked his oil buddies for a price and increase in oil production break and they said they could do nothing to help. It's all speculation that has fueled the increase they say. It is partly true but the speculation is also fueled by OPEC and what is expected of the oil producing countries. It all forms a circle which comes back to why the economy has exploded in the negative in the past few years and it all rests on the desk of the president who specializes in bankrupting businesses when left to his own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 06/10/2008
- joebhed I'm a Fan of joebhed 45 fans permalink
photo

I think the deeper parallel between this Saudi insanity and our nuclear assistance to the Shah after the overthrow of Mossadegh by the CIA in Iran is this.

NUCLEAR IS FOREVER.
Regimes come and go.

So the bad guys who replaced the good guys can be replaced by some really bad guys, and then some total crazies.

Every nuclear plant built anywhere in the world ought to be considered on this basis.

Take a look at the global map of a hundred years ago.
Then 200 years ago.

The deadly 'by-ptroducts" of nuclear fission must be kept isolated from the environment and from any of those crazies for thousands of years.
Thousands of years.

We can't make nuclear power safe anywhere in the world.
We tried an Atoms For Peace Program.
Guess what?
It didn't work.

Markey is right that the Saudi's could be financing technological breakthroughs for solar energy development.
Hopefully Obama will negate these deals, if Mr. Exelon and the NEI allow him to do so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 PM on 06/10/2008

Because he's a treasonous traitor in bed with the country that DID attack us, Saudi Arabia. What? You not paying attention yet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 06/10/2008

What would be fitting is if Bush and Cheney were sent off to Gitmo for decades without a trail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 06/10/2008

Soon they will help some african countries with nuclear program, since they are getting more oil in africa than anywhere else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 06/10/2008

I don't know if i am getting this right or wrong. I believe that 9 of the 11 9/11 highjackers were from saudi Arabia. Now , what country do you think has a link of the terrorists Iraq or Saudi.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 06/10/2008
- drblack I'm a Fan of drblack 19 fans permalink

Bush believes what religious extremist Hagee tells him.
McClellan even said the Hagee could call Bush and talk whenever he wanted to.
Bush wants to start a nuclear war because that will bring back jesus.
THis is what the right wing christian extremists want.
I hope people are beginning to understand why it is so dangerous to allow religion to make public policy instead of reason.
The right wing christians want to start a nuclear war so that jesus will take them away.
These are dangerous people. The christian extremists are way more dangerous to the US than any foreign enemy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 06/10/2008
- lisakaz2 I'm a Fan of lisakaz2 83 fans permalink
photo

Guess Bu$hie doesn't mind if the hijackers next time have a nuke stolen from the Saudi govt. This is CRIMINALLY STOOOOPID.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 06/10/2008

Ok, let me get this straight. An extremist, Muslim government in the ME has a nuke program and the US saber rattles and the neo cons, including their darling daughter aslo-ran is calling to turn them into a sea of glass. Meanwhile, an extremist Muslim government in the ME has a nuke program and we are helping them build it.

Double standard anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 06/10/2008
- BadCompany I'm a Fan of BadCompany 2 fans permalink

Why not help them get nuclear power?
It seems likely that they bought nuclear bombs a long time ago.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 06/10/2008
photo

Bushs have been buddies with the Saudi Royal Family forever.  The fact that we're getting reamed on the price of oil AND the Saudis have not always supported Bush in Iraq, speaks volumes.  They call the shots.
The US must become energy independent as fast as possible.A­nd, Bush needs to be shut down, NOW.  Our Congress is responsible for not stopping this man. He is not and never has been the president of this country. A­ll he and his cronies wanted was hegemony in the Middle East.Chene­y represents Haliburton. He has given them enough treasure to make them more powerful than most governments. This administration has simply been CEOs for the US oil companies. Oil company execs are by definition not good stewards of anything but their profits.  That's why we don't have our "leaders" asking us to cut down on our oil consumption or they didn't tell US car manufacturers to make more fuel efficient vehicles.  That's why Cheney wrote the US energy policy behind closed doors and gave billions in tax gifts to oil, and no support for alternative renewable energy. That's why everything is so fucked-up.­These guys decry government, yet they use our government to build their business to the point that it is untouchable by our government, and they use their business to suck our country's treasury dry.  I liked "government by the people" better than fascist control by Haliburton and EXXON.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 06/10/2008

This is just the latest advance in the Bush non-proliferation policy: giving nuke technology to our "allies."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 AM on 06/10/2008
- robXdion I'm a Fan of robXdion 185 fans permalink
photo

Funny, when Michael Moorer said this in "Fahrenheit 9-11", everyone got mad. It was, "How dare you attack our nobel, gracious, and honest Dear Leader?!"

Bush isn't the only one getting brought down a notch. So are the American people who were 85% behind him in 2002.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 06/10/2008
- ibsteve2u I'm a Fan of ibsteve2u 137 fans permalink
photo

This, in the WSJ? WTF? is this an "act of contrition", or more Murdoch camouflage?

Not that I can differ with the sentiments and implications that Rep. Markey outlines..­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 06/10/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect