Honda's Zero-Emission Car Unveiled: FCX Clarity

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Honda's Zero-Emission Car Unveiled: FCX Clarity stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOMOKO A. HOSAKA | June 16, 2008 11:31 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Canadian actress Laura Harris reacts during an interview by reporters about the new FCX Clarity at a Honda Motor Co. plant in Takanezawa, Tochigi prefecture (state) Monday, June 16, 2008. The Japanese automaker has begun commercial production of its new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car, called the FCX Clarity. (AP Photo/Katsumi Kasahara)

TAKANEZAWA, Japan — Honda's new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car rolled off a Japanese production line Monday and is headed to Southern California, where Hollywood is already abuzz over the latest splash in green motoring.

The FCX Clarity, which runs on hydrogen and electricity, emits only water and none of the noxious fumes believed to induce global warming. It is also two times more energy efficient than a gas-electric hybrid and three times that of a standard gasoline-powered car, the company says.

Japan's third biggest automaker expects to lease out a "few dozen" units this year and about 200 units within three years. In California, a three-year lease will run $600 a month, which includes maintenance and collision coverage.

Among the first customers are actress Jamie Lee Curtis and filmmaker husband Christopher Guest, actress Laura Harris, film producer Ron Yerxa, as well as businessmen Jon Spallino and Jim Salomon.

"It's so smooth," said Harris, who played villainness Marie Warner on the hit TV show "24" and was flown over by Honda for the ceremony. "It's like a future machine, but it's not."

The FCX Clarity is an improvement of its previous-generation fuel cell vehicle, the FCX, introduced in 2005.

A breakthrough in the design of the fuel cell stack, which is the unit that powers the car's motor, allowed engineers to lighten the body, expand the interior and increase efficiency, Honda said.

The fuel cell draws on energy synthesized through a chemical reaction between hydrogen gas and oxygen in the air, and a lithium-ion battery pack provides supplemental power. The FCX Clarity has a range of about 270-miles per tank with hydrogen consumption equivalent to 74 miles per gallon, according to the carmaker.

Story continues below
advertisement

The 3,600-pound vehicle can reach speeds up to 100 miles per hour.

John Mendel, executive vice president of America Honda Motor Co., said at a morning ceremony it was "an especially significant day for American Honda as we plant firm footsteps toward the mainstreaming of fuel cell cars."

The biggest obstacles standing in the way of wider adoption of fuel cell vehicles are cost and the dearth of hydrogen fuel stations. For the Clarity's release in California, Honda said it received 50,000 applications through its website but could only consider those living near stations in Torrance, Santa Monica and Irvine.

Initially, however, the Clarity will go only to a chosen few starting July and then launch in Japan this fall.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has called for a statewide network of hydrogen stations, but progress has been slow.

The state has also recently relaxed a mandate for the number of zero-emission cars it aims to have on roads. By 2014, automakers must now sell 7,500 electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, a reduction of 70 percent.

Spallino, who currently drives Honda's older FCX and was also flown in for the ceremony, said he will use the Clarity to drive to and from work and for destinations within the Los Angeles area. The small number of hydrogen fuel stations is the "single limiting factor" for fuel cell vehicles, he said.

"It's more comfortable, and it handles well," said Spallino of Redondo Beach. "It's got everything. You're not sacrificing anything except range."

The world's major automakers have been making heavy investments in fuel cells and other alternative fuel vehicles amid climbing oil prices and concerns about climate change.

Although Honda Motor Co. was the first Japanese automaker to launch a gas-electric hybrid vehicle in the U.S. in 1999, it has been outpaced by the dominance of Toyota's popular Prius.

Toyota announced in May that it has sold more than 1 million Prius hybrids, while both the Honda Insight and the hybrid Accord have been discontinued due to poor sales.

Honda also plans to launch a gas-electric hybrid-only model, as well as hybrid versions of the Civic, the sporty CR-Z and Fit subcompact.

Toyota has announced that it would launch a plug-in hybrid with next-generation lithium-ion batteries by 2010 and a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle later in Japan later this year.

U.S. carmaker General Motors Corp. plans to introduce a Chevrolet Volt plug-in electric vehicle in 2010. It also introduced a test-fleet of hydrogen fuel cell Equinox SUVs.

Honda has no plans for a plug-in electric vehicle. President Takeo Fukui said he does not believe current battery technology is good enough to develop a feasible car.

The company has not revealed how much each car costs to make, and it is unclear when, or if, the car will be available for mass-market sales. Takeo has set a target for 2018, but meeting that goal will depend on whether Honda can significantly lower development and assembly costs as well as market reaction to fuel cells.

TAKANEZAWA, Japan — Honda's new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car rolled off a Japanese production line Monday and is headed to Southern California, where Hollywood is already abuzz over the...
TAKANEZAWA, Japan — Honda's new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car rolled off a Japanese production line Monday and is headed to Southern California, where Hollywood is already abuzz over the...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
467
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

What does 40% of the population at or below the poverty level do, that can't afford to trade. Not to mention the retired people on a fixed income that have noway to suppliment income do. I guess they can go to the local soup kitchen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 06/21/2008

All of this is fine. But no matter how advanced we are in NEW vehicles or how much we wring our hands, we are missing the boat. The key to helping today, not tomorrow or next week, in the alternate-fuel vehicle and higher-mileage vehicle arena is some kind of effective, and relatively inexpensive, retro-fitting of existing vehicles. We can say as often as we want that people should junk them and start again. But the reality is that people won't junk investments that have cost them tens of thousands of dollars. Consumers simply cannot afford to do this. But there is great good to be done (as well as money to be earned) in developing retro-fitting devices. It's the very simple, and real, difference between what people "should" do and what they "will" do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 06/19/2008

Fuel cells suffer from limited thermodynamic efficiency just as much as any other chemical system. Since the understanding of these facts is non-trivial and rather incomprehensible to the non-scientist, people tend to believe that the theoretical efficiency of a fuel cell is 1 and that the practical efficiencies approach that number. The truth is VERY different:

http://www.efcf.com/reports/E04.pdf

Happy reading. And don't be disappointed that hydrogen is as much a non-starter as ethanol. With enough lobbying they will jam it down your throat, anyway. Few politicians know the science well enough to understand the scam.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:16 PM on 06/18/2008
- elpollo I'm a Fan of elpollo 3 fans permalink

Well, the sun is big and 97% hydrogen. Transportation seems to be a problem though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 06/18/2008

Honda better make a gasoline or diesel hybrid that can compete against Toyota's Prius. Making 200 toy cars is an advertising gimmick, not a technical achievement worthy of a serious car manufacturer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 06/18/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

Diesel is 1.50 higher at most stations than gas. So what are you talking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 06/21/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

frantaylor See Profile I'm a Fan of frantaylor

Certainly they can, but the pump you use to compress the air generates quite a bit of heat. This lost energy is why the smart money uses batteries.
Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 06/16/2008
- + New dolphy See Profile I'm a Fan of dolphy

Batteries are very expensive and making and disposing them creates a lot of pollution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 06/18/2008
photo

Hydrogen + Hollywood - brace yourself for the next smug alert.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 06/17/2008
- noneIn2008 I'm a Fan of noneIn2008 27 fans permalink

A lie by slight of hand. What is the source of hydrogen? Source of energy for the hydrogen? What is the gross energy balance, including the generation of the hydrogen. The gross green house gases are greater for running this type of vehicle, when your balance boundaries include the energy for the hydrogen generation, distribution and storage. We need to condemn those who mislead the population with these distracting lies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 06/17/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 277 fans permalink

Lithium Ion Batteries from A123 and other companies allow cars to drive 200 miles on a charge, with 0-60mph in 3 sec or less.

The "Battery problem" is solved. The latest generation Lithium ion batteries are: non-toxic, non-explosive, non-self discharging, good for 10,000 charge cycles, low cost, extremely high power to weight ratios well over 1 hp per lb.

Hydrogen has half the energy density of normal liquid fuels, even when pressurized to 1000 atmospheres!

There is plenty of natural; methane fuel that we should burn up before it kills us: Methane Hydrates.
Methane can be converted to alcohol.
http://www.novus-energy.com/technology_faqs.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 06/17/2008
- Camel54 I'm a Fan of Camel54 20 fans permalink

One problem with your analysis is you're referring to the potential energy of hydrogen from combustion. Fuel cells don't use combustion energy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 06/17/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 277 fans permalink

Alcohol can be used in fuel cells, without the 15,000 PSI storage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 PM on 06/17/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 277 fans permalink

200 miles is enough for some 99% of all road vehicles.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 06/17/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 277 fans permalink

Fuel cells have only a 1000 hours lifetime and 100 start/stop cycles Lithium Batteries last far longer. The power per lb for fuel cells is about 25 watts per lb, versus 2000 watts for A123 batteries. Charge time is as little as 5 minutes also.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 PM on 06/19/2008

The solutions to our foreign oil dependence and dependence on fossil fuels generally really comes down to three key issues:
1. How to rapidly switch millions of drivers over from a primarily internal combustion vehicle to a primarily electric vehicle. Hydrogen fuel cells fit into that solution only in special cases where a piston or turbine internal combustion engine is the only option. Otherwise, a plug-in hybrid requires no special fueling stations and can offer a combination of decent range, amazing fuel economy, all-season durability, and competitive pricing that fuel-cell vehicles are still years away from.
2. How to rapidly increase capacity of our electrical grid to handle the 35%-60% increase in demand such electric vehicles will make over the next 5-10 years.
3. How to replace coal and nuclear fission powerplants with a truly clean alternative.
You can read some of my thoughts on these matters at http://www.blgould.net/NewAmerC.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 AM on 06/17/2008
- athenalong I'm a Fan of athenalong 2 fans permalink
photo

PRECISELY!

These are the same questions that I had!

I just watched an episode of 30 days about coal mining. Truly horrifying! We MUST get off the coal as well. What it is doing to the people who mine it as well as the environment is alarming.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 06/17/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 277 fans permalink

1 trillion $ to replace nukes coal and imported oil with solar and wind. See my profile for details.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 06/17/2008
- nexus1961 I'm a Fan of nexus1961 5 fans permalink

GM.. Ford..
How d'you like THEM apples?
Just keep sitting on your hands, as YOU become the Edsels & Hudsons of the 'oughts!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 AM on 06/17/2008

GM heard you. They're rolling out an ingenious new "plug-in hybrid" by 2010 called the "VOLT" http://gm-volt.com What makes GM's car unique is that unlike most current gas/electric hybrids, the Volt's gas engine is not directly connected to the powertrain (transmission, drive-shaft, axles, wheels).&n­bsp; The small, flex-fuel (E85) engine is little more than a generator to replenish the batteries when driving beyond the base 40 mile range of a full charge.&nb­sp; This engine gives the car a total range of a little over 400 miles on a full battery charge and a full fuel tank of about 6-7 gallons.&n­bsp; GM engineers are also looking at an equally small bio-diesel engine as an option.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 06/17/2008

Any idea on what the MSRP is projected to be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:22 PM on 06/17/2008

360 miles on 7 gallons i.e. 51 miles per gallon is not much better than a second generation Prius. The next Prius will likely beat that by more than an inch. If GM can not do better than that with a fully serial hybrid they really suck. The Volt should be getting close to 80mpg (real world).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 06/18/2008
photo

BMW has built and is testing a fleet of 50 hydrogen cars also. I don't think it plans to produce them in any quantities in the near future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 AM on 06/17/2008

Isn't Chevy testing the Equinox, which is also a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle?

I'm glad to see Honda getting on board, but where is the story of an AMERICAN company with a car in the same status.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 AM on 06/17/2008

For $600 /month ... that car better be producing gold bars from the exhaust for me to even consider it ...

I'd rather walk and lose some weight than drive that and lose my financial security ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 AM on 06/17/2008

This is a promotional effort from Honda, so Honda is paying most of the cost of the lease.

The true cost of this car is well over a million dollars, and an actual lease would be more like $12,000 a month. In ten years they hope to get the cost of the car down to only $100,000.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:14 AM on 06/17/2008

It'll get cheaper... the sad part is that for those of us middle to lower income, it will be awhile before we can afford it. My Little Ford Escort is going to probably have to due for at least another 5 or 8 years until I see the price drop to $10,000. Even $10K is a little steep, but I can swing $10K for a car.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 AM on 06/17/2008
- SeanOcali I'm a Fan of SeanOcali 20 fans permalink
photo

Hydrogen concepts are cool and all, but the real future lies in batteries and ultra-capacitors that use carbon nanotubes and other forms of nanotechnology. We're looking at electric vehicles that are bigger, more powerful, and drive further than the current combustion engine powered kind. Imagine an electric Hummer that can go hundreds of miles without a recharge. And in the case of ultra-capacitors, they can be charged up faster than you can fill a tank of gas.

The great thing is that we don't have to rely on a non-existent future market to bring us this technology. The market demand to develop this tech is already there in portable electronics (cellphones, laptops, etc.).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 AM on 06/17/2008
- Infostream I'm a Fan of Infostream 13 fans permalink
photo

wow our nation has completely failed at teaching science, and more importantly LOGIC. THIS CAR IS ONLY ZERO EMISSION IF THE METHOD TO PRODUCE THE FUEL IS ZERO EMISSION. SHEESH!
The 2 methods to produce hydrogen are from water using ELECTRICITY = BIG DIRTY COAL, or making it in a dirty process from hydrocarbons = BIG OIL AND NATURAL GAS. Once again the dimwitted public is being sold a "solution" that is more of the same problem and the attention hungry celebrities lead the way for the rest of the lemmings. Carbon Fiber car bodies could double mileage for all cars and make them safer. How about tax credits for companies that promote telecommuting instead of carpools [which nobody wants to do]? Oh yeah and there is one simple mechanical way to triple mileage that has been around since Newton, but it won't catch on with a public that is unaware of the law of conservation of energy (of course americans don't seem to understand the law of conservation of matter either, because they just don't seem to understand that extra 30 pounds of belly fat got there because they ate 30 pounds of food their body didn't need).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 AM on 06/17/2008
- Ray46 I'm a Fan of Ray46 5 fans permalink

You could use solar cells or wind turbines for example to generate the hydrogen fuel or buy Renewable Energy Offset Credits This would make it net zero emission.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 AM on 06/17/2008
- noneIn2008 I'm a Fan of noneIn2008 27 fans permalink

The energy balance does not work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 06/17/2008

and what was the co2 dump for the concrete that formed the production facility that built the "zero emission " contraption???? etc etc etc.... i'm not saying it's not an improvement, just saying "zero emissions" is kinda a lie.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 06/17/2008
- SeanOcali I'm a Fan of SeanOcali 20 fans permalink
photo

Give me a frickin break! Everyone knows the biggest problem right now is that motor vehicles burn fossil fuels directly. Power plants are a thousand times easier to regulate, alter and control than the millions of individually owned vehicles on the raod. You can't magically make everyone's car run off geothermal, clean coal, solar, or nuclear power. But you can do that with electric power plants. That is why it's crucial for automobiles to run off hydrogen or electricity. So that the vast array of alternative electric generating technologies can be used to power those vehicles. Otherwise, you're stuck with gasoline burning cars and there's not a damn thing anyone can do about it.

If my car ran off electricity or hydrogen, I could generate my own power. I could put solar panels on my roof, install new technology to recycle waste heat, etc. What I can't do is drill for oil in my backyard and put a refinery in my garage.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 AM on 06/17/2008
- Infostream I'm a Fan of Infostream 13 fans permalink
photo

What "everyone knows" is the problem because it's wrong! WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW IS THAT BURNING ANY HYDROCARBON PRODUCES C02, IT IS BASIC INESCAPABLE CHEMISTRY. This hydrogen scam is just the existing energy cartels (who you probably work for SeanOcali) fooling everyone into buying more of their greenhouse­-gas-produ­cing products. We need to wake up and bypass these fake scam "solutions" and go directly to science that really works like the ones I mentioned in addition to electric cars with a supply of clean electricity from solar, wind, tidal, hydro, geothermal and space-based technology. Think about it, the cost of all silicon based technology [like computers] has decreased by over 200% in the last 10 years, but solar cells still cost the same and don't work any better?! I bet your bosses are behind stopping any progress in the solar energy field too Sean.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 06/17/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect