Honda's Zero-Emission Car Unveiled: FCX Clarity

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Honda's Zero-Emission Car Unveiled: FCX Clarity stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TOMOKO A. HOSAKA | June 16, 2008 11:31 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Canadian actress Laura Harris reacts during an interview by reporters about the new FCX Clarity at a Honda Motor Co. plant in Takanezawa, Tochigi prefecture (state) Monday, June 16, 2008. The Japanese automaker has begun commercial production of its new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car, called the FCX Clarity. (AP Photo/Katsumi Kasahara)

TAKANEZAWA, Japan — Honda's new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car rolled off a Japanese production line Monday and is headed to Southern California, where Hollywood is already abuzz over the latest splash in green motoring.

The FCX Clarity, which runs on hydrogen and electricity, emits only water and none of the noxious fumes believed to induce global warming. It is also two times more energy efficient than a gas-electric hybrid and three times that of a standard gasoline-powered car, the company says.

Japan's third biggest automaker expects to lease out a "few dozen" units this year and about 200 units within three years. In California, a three-year lease will run $600 a month, which includes maintenance and collision coverage.

Among the first customers are actress Jamie Lee Curtis and filmmaker husband Christopher Guest, actress Laura Harris, film producer Ron Yerxa, as well as businessmen Jon Spallino and Jim Salomon.

"It's so smooth," said Harris, who played villainness Marie Warner on the hit TV show "24" and was flown over by Honda for the ceremony. "It's like a future machine, but it's not."

The FCX Clarity is an improvement of its previous-generation fuel cell vehicle, the FCX, introduced in 2005.

A breakthrough in the design of the fuel cell stack, which is the unit that powers the car's motor, allowed engineers to lighten the body, expand the interior and increase efficiency, Honda said.

The fuel cell draws on energy synthesized through a chemical reaction between hydrogen gas and oxygen in the air, and a lithium-ion battery pack provides supplemental power. The FCX Clarity has a range of about 270-miles per tank with hydrogen consumption equivalent to 74 miles per gallon, according to the carmaker.

Story continues below
advertisement

The 3,600-pound vehicle can reach speeds up to 100 miles per hour.

John Mendel, executive vice president of America Honda Motor Co., said at a morning ceremony it was "an especially significant day for American Honda as we plant firm footsteps toward the mainstreaming of fuel cell cars."

The biggest obstacles standing in the way of wider adoption of fuel cell vehicles are cost and the dearth of hydrogen fuel stations. For the Clarity's release in California, Honda said it received 50,000 applications through its website but could only consider those living near stations in Torrance, Santa Monica and Irvine.

Initially, however, the Clarity will go only to a chosen few starting July and then launch in Japan this fall.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has called for a statewide network of hydrogen stations, but progress has been slow.

The state has also recently relaxed a mandate for the number of zero-emission cars it aims to have on roads. By 2014, automakers must now sell 7,500 electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, a reduction of 70 percent.

Spallino, who currently drives Honda's older FCX and was also flown in for the ceremony, said he will use the Clarity to drive to and from work and for destinations within the Los Angeles area. The small number of hydrogen fuel stations is the "single limiting factor" for fuel cell vehicles, he said.

"It's more comfortable, and it handles well," said Spallino of Redondo Beach. "It's got everything. You're not sacrificing anything except range."

The world's major automakers have been making heavy investments in fuel cells and other alternative fuel vehicles amid climbing oil prices and concerns about climate change.

Although Honda Motor Co. was the first Japanese automaker to launch a gas-electric hybrid vehicle in the U.S. in 1999, it has been outpaced by the dominance of Toyota's popular Prius.

Toyota announced in May that it has sold more than 1 million Prius hybrids, while both the Honda Insight and the hybrid Accord have been discontinued due to poor sales.

Honda also plans to launch a gas-electric hybrid-only model, as well as hybrid versions of the Civic, the sporty CR-Z and Fit subcompact.

Toyota has announced that it would launch a plug-in hybrid with next-generation lithium-ion batteries by 2010 and a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle later in Japan later this year.

U.S. carmaker General Motors Corp. plans to introduce a Chevrolet Volt plug-in electric vehicle in 2010. It also introduced a test-fleet of hydrogen fuel cell Equinox SUVs.

Honda has no plans for a plug-in electric vehicle. President Takeo Fukui said he does not believe current battery technology is good enough to develop a feasible car.

The company has not revealed how much each car costs to make, and it is unclear when, or if, the car will be available for mass-market sales. Takeo has set a target for 2018, but meeting that goal will depend on whether Honda can significantly lower development and assembly costs as well as market reaction to fuel cells.

TAKANEZAWA, Japan — Honda's new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car rolled off a Japanese production line Monday and is headed to Southern California, where Hollywood is already abuzz over the...
TAKANEZAWA, Japan — Honda's new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car rolled off a Japanese production line Monday and is headed to Southern California, where Hollywood is already abuzz over the...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
467
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- Erdgeist I'm a Fan of Erdgeist 83 fans permalink
photo

In addition, let's think about shrinking airlines and replacing most of them with a high-speed rail system. Rail is vastly cheaper. The airlines as with auto are hugely subsidized. Airlines don't pay for much of what it takes to put people in the air nor does Ford or GM pay for the roads.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 06/17/2008
- gevan I'm a Fan of gevan 19 fans permalink

re: Honda Insight. You might think that a big company could put a few yen into ADVERTISING if they really wanted to sell a product.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 06/17/2008
- c1ee I'm a Fan of c1ee 4 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 PM on 06/16/2008
- noneIn2008 I'm a Fan of noneIn2008 27 fans permalink

Coal and oil are renewable solar energy, just on a longer time scale. Captured a few years back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:28 PM on 06/17/2008
- truelie I'm a Fan of truelie 8 fans permalink

Yup! All this while the Americans spend their time making big ass hummers to destroy the environment. Way to go America!!! I hope gasoline will go to $5. Next up for America's automakers: school bus that looks cool on half a mile per gallon. I've never been more proud. What global warming? We own Iraqi oil. Who needs tiny Japanese cars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:18 PM on 06/16/2008

Excuse me but where do they get the hydrogen from? Takes energy to do that. Hydroelectric energy could do that without emitting any gases and the hydrogen - oxygen combination can be catalytically done so no real heat (and nitric oxide) would be produced. Interesting idea.

Do you want to drive around with a tank full of hydrogen? Remember the Hindenburg?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 06/16/2008
- lthuedk 1 I'm a Fan of lthuedk 1 64 fans permalink
photo

I wonder what molecule, hydrogen or propane is more energetic in bond breaking. I note that many municipalities now have fleets of propane powered vehicles operating safely. There are many solutions available for handling gases, one of which is working with small volumes.

If he hydrogen can be produced on demand, rather than tapping from a contained source-like from a fuel cel-would the resulting volume not be safer?

Oh how the oil barons would like other forms of energy to disappear. No wonder Bushists are so anti-Science.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 06/17/2008
- Ray46 I'm a Fan of Ray46 5 fans permalink

Actually burning hydrogen is much safer than gasoline in an accident.

The Hindenberg fire was due to its exterior paint , similar in composition to solid rocket booster fuel and not the hydrogen.

Per
http://www.clean-air.org/hindenberg.htm
The silver appearance of the Hindenburg was due to a surface varnish of powdered aluminum in a paint formula that resembles the chemistry of modern solid booster rocket fuel.

Regardless of much speculation, translation of a letter handwritten in German on June 28, 1937, by Hindenburg investigator and electrical engineer Otto Beyersdorff states "The actual cause of the fire was the extreme easy flammability of the covering material brought about by discharges of an electrostatic nature ..." Recently, NASA investigator Dr. Addison Bain has verified this finding by scientific experiments that duplicated the vigorous ignition by static discharge to the aluminum powder filled covering material. Spectacular colors of this type of combustion were produced from the burning skin of the giant airship. Dr. Bain concluded that the Hindenburg would have burned and crashed even if helium would have been used as the lifting gas. Dr. Bain noted that the particular type of aluminum powder particles, which are flake like in shape, are particularly sensitive to electrical discharge..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 AM on 06/17/2008

Even without taking flammability into account, the hydrogen tank is compressed to 10,000 psi. If one ruptured in an accident, it would be very dangerous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 AM on 06/17/2008
- dac253 I'm a Fan of dac253 23 fans permalink
photo

Wow, man. I need one of those engines for my Westy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 06/16/2008

ZERO emissions, my ass.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 06/16/2008
- SeanOcali I'm a Fan of SeanOcali 23 fans permalink
photo

You ass it is. Burning hydrogen emits zero emissions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 AM on 06/17/2008

as stated in the article there is and emission, h2o. and where pray tell do you think the h2 came from??? a high school education is an important thing to have.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:34 AM on 06/17/2008
- teacake I'm a Fan of teacake 15 fans permalink

If one takes a closer look, it's NOT really all that good of an idea after all.

Here's the problem: Fuel cell is NOT as efficient as battery-powered vehicles. The only advantage fuel cell option has is the range. But if proper research is 'allowed' to take place, better battery technology would enable a competitive range.

The evil oil cartels would not let go of their grip on the energy market. They want to continue to take control of any and all sources of energy. And fuel cell technology would allow them to do this better than battery-powered alternative. Oil companies have been known to buy patented battery technology then kill it or lock it up so that people would continue to be depending on the oil cartels for their survival.

The bottom line is whatever the solution to energy crisis is, the dirty hands of the evil oil cartels MUST BE KEPT OUT of it. In fact, the world would be a healthier place, economically and otherwise, if the evil oil cartels are destroyed - completely and permanently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 PM on 06/16/2008

You use the term "evil oil cartels" a lot. Are the "evil oil cartels" part of They by any chance? Maybe the NWO? Illuminati? Zionists? Freemasons? The evil corporations, man. They get together and act all....corporation-y. Did I mention they're EVIL? EEEEEVILLLL!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 06/16/2008
- Glacial I'm a Fan of Glacial 7 fans permalink

Corporations exist to make money. In fact, the executives of public-owned corporations can be criminally prosecuted if it can be proven they're NOT making as much money for shareholders as possible.

If I were a corporate executive with that mandate (and responsibility), and had the opportunity to buy and thus suppress a new technology that would harm my business and shareholders, legally and ethically I'd have to do it or resign. No big shadowy conspiracy necessary.

As for evil, I am certain that Big Oil played absolutely no role whatsoever in pushing us into war with Iraq, which has killed thousands of Americans and tens of thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands, of Iraqis, so they can get access to cheap underexploited oil reserves. That's pretty evil. Wonder why Cheney's energy policy group meeting in 2001 is still classified? Seems to have worked out great for energy companies. I've heard rumors that maps of Iraq were involved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 06/16/2008
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 35 fans permalink

"Oil companies have been known to buy patented battery technology then kill it or lock it up so that people would continue to be depending on the oil cartels for their survival."

Actually, you mean Toyota. They pretty much locked up battery supply and choked off supplyto prop up Prius sales.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 06/17/2008

We are so far behind. WAKE UP DETROIT! Even Brazil, is kicking the crap out of us in technology. No offense to Brazil. Love Ya. We have become so complacent as a nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 06/16/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

In Maine the tides are quite extraordinary due to the resonance of the water cavity known as the Bay Of Fundy. They build a dam across an inlet and can generate electricity from a turbine as the tide flows in and out. In theory they are actually slowing down the earth's rotation but I think there are too many zeros in the calculation for it to really matter.

Fusion is really the only known technology that will work in the long term. Really smart people have been trying for many years to get it to work in a practical manner. You people with your oddball steam generators would be much more productive if you focussed your energies on how to make practical fusion. This is the really fascinating stuff. I'd be all over if if I were 20 years younger and not so involved in software.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 06/16/2008
- FZliveson I'm a Fan of FZliveson 88 fans permalink
photo

Fusion is NOT the only known technology that will work in the long term.
Hydrogen (the most plentiful thing on the surface of the earth) is one sure
thing. Then if people would resurrect some of the things patented by
Nikola Tesla, you would see several concepts that have been sent into the
dungeons of time,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 06/16/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Yes, hydrogen is the answer, because jamming another proton in there and turning it into helium is the key to the fusion process.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 PM on 06/16/2008
- sassafra I'm a Fan of sassafra 20 fans permalink
photo

utilizing gaseous hydrogen is *not* the answer you think it is. yes, there's tons of hydrogen on the earth. the probem is, that hydrogen is *bound* to other atoms in molecules such as water. to extract that bound hydrogen and free it into gaseous hydrogen, one must , as the case of water , put energy into the system such as performed by electrolysis. the electrical energy for that electrolysis would come from electrical generating plants that generate energy from: coal/oil (particulates, so2, co2 pollution), fission nuclear plants (hideously long lived radioactive pollution),. the other types of plants are too small in use to generate much and are limited either by time availability or location., geothermal, hydro, wind, tidal.

this car is *not* non polluting due to the polluting nature of the method used to get the hydrogen gas to power it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 PM on 06/16/2008
- Danny I'm a Fan of Danny 5 fans permalink

Solar energy from the sun (duh) is plentiful, too. And free, except for the technology to capture it. Entrepreneurs out there? Make it affordable, please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:28 AM on 06/17/2008

thank god for Japan

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 06/16/2008
- Geovan I'm a Fan of Geovan 6 fans permalink

There is no plan to sell hydrogen powered cars in Japan. Toyota and Honda know how to play the US game very well after years of US imposed quotas, tariffs and other barriers. They are not innovating to save the environment or to reduce oil, they are only playing by game rules set up by the Big 3 and Big Oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 06/16/2008
- teacake I'm a Fan of teacake 15 fans permalink

Oil cartels are not as dominant in Japan as it is in the US and Europe.

There are better fuel technologies available, but because of the iron grip of the oil cartel, these technologies are not "allowed" to see the day of light.

Again, it's the evil oil cartels that are keeping the rest of us from enjoying a more efficient source of energy and cleaner and healthier air.

To solve our problem is to first destroy the evil oil cartel.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

I have tried to tell you people of this great American named Stan Meyer who invented the water car and got a patent on it. But Wikipedia, just like other places have badmouthed this man because the neocons did not want his invention publicized because they are OIL MEN!

His site showing his water powered dune buggy is here: http://waterpoweredcar.com/stanmeyer.html

His case of fraud is here: http://www.thelastoutpost.com/site/1167/default.aspx

And you can see the powers that be did all they could to make it seem like this man had nothing. But he proved ALL OF THEM WRONG and got the patent. He died in 1998 I believe and his patent ended this year, I believe, and that's why everybody is coming out now with their versions of a water car. However, their version is using a fuel cell NOT SIMILAR TO Stan Meyer's because his produces hydrogen as the vehicle moves and emits steam, not VAPORS.

This is the epitome of clean fuel and what has happened to his plans I'm sure not many would know. They broke into his place and took a lot of stuff. But he gave some plans to NASA and hopefully, they will produce something in his name.

I'm trying to give Stan Meyer's his profs! So don't listen to everything you read especially from wikipedia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:54 PM on 06/16/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Patent numbers, please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

Listen frantaylor :), I love you, too! Look it up. I swear you young people don't want to do no work. You want me to deliver the goods "hand picked" or what? You know his name and it was patented in 1998. Now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

The system of the present invention in its most preferred embodiment is for a combustion system utilizing hydrogen gas; particularly to drive a piston in an automobile device. The system utilizes a hydrogen generator for developing hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas and other non-volatile gasses are fed to a mixing chamber also having oxygen fed thereto. The mixture is controlled to regulate the burning temperature; that is, to lower the temperature velocity of the hydrogen gas to that of the commercial fuels. The hydrogen gas feed line to the combustion chamber includes a fine linear control gas flow valve. An air intake is the source of oxygen and it also includes a variable valve. The exhaust gasses from the combustion chamber are utilized in a controlled manner as the non-combustible gasses.

The hydrogen generator is improved upon to include a holding tank to provide a source of start-up fuel. Also, the hydrogen gas generator includes a switch to the power source operable from one position to another dependant upon a pressure sensing switch on the combustion chamber.

The simplified structure includes a series of one-way valves, safety valves, and quenching apparatus. The combination of apparatus comprises the complete assembly for converting the standard automobile engine from gasoline (or other fuels) to the hydrogen gas mixture.

OR NOW?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

Hope you find what you're looking for. I'm done. I did my duty for today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 06/16/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

This guy has just admitted (see post below) that he has no idea what he is talking about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

And who is that? Me? I didn't make the procedure. I'm only telling you about it. It's up to YOU to find out more. Now go do some work:)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

By the way, I'm a girl:)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:12 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

You put me through all that work and you won't even say "thank you". Men!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 PM on 06/16/2008
- hoopesaz I'm a Fan of hoopesaz 23 fans permalink

"But Wikipedia, just like other places have badmouthed this man because the neocons did not want his invention publicized because they are OIL MEN!"

As Wikipedia would say, "[source]".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 06/16/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

Another technology that's very easy to use is the compressed air powered engine. It works like an internal combustion engine except it uses compressed air, so there's no pollution except for the oil that's used for lubrication. You can buy green electricity and power an air compressor to fill up your engine that can get you about 200 miles per full tank.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 06/16/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

And again you are foiled by thermodynamics. Batteries are the best energy storage device. Springs work well too but wind-up cars are impractical due to the enormous stresses created by a large wound-up spring.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 06/16/2008
- incontempt I'm a Fan of incontempt 2 fans permalink

They are making compressed air cars...so perhaps he is not foiled

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 06/16/2008
- nastyvirus I'm a Fan of nastyvirus 2 fans permalink

I'll hold out for a zero fuel model.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 06/16/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

These are already available at your local bicycle shop.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:35 PM on 06/16/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

I emit a lot of heat and water vapor when I bike, though. Maybe some salts too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 06/16/2008
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 121 fans permalink

Ok, my friend. Read what you called a "fraud" and reevaluate your decision please:

http://www.thelastoutpost.com/site/1167/default.aspx

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 06/16/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

How is the Hydrogen fuel produced?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 06/16/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Apparently from the mouths of raving lunatics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:10 PM on 06/16/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

Seriously though, if you produce hydrogen from clean energy sources such as solar, wind or geothermal, then fuel cell using hydrogen is non-polluting. Iceland will be all geothermal and electric in ten years because they have so much excess geothermal energy that can produce electricity that they can use to produce hydrogen. Hey, even Bahrain has invested billions in wind and solar because they have can see that oil will not be here long.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 06/16/2008
- nastyvirus I'm a Fan of nastyvirus 2 fans permalink

Yes, and methane hexachloride is derived from the mouth of Bill O'Reilly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 06/16/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

By burning coal to produce electricity. BWAHAHAHAHA!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 06/16/2008
photo

Actually it is worse than this. When Bush was promoting the use of hydrogen as fuel, it was revealed that the plan was to strip the hyrogen from the hydrocarbons in petroleum.... he wouldn't want his ol' buddies in the oil companies to end up on the short end of the dip stick....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 06/16/2008
- DanBest I'm a Fan of DanBest 20 fans permalink

H2O. Strip the 2 oxygen off and you have hyrogen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 06/16/2008
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

The problem is where do you get the energy to break those H-O bonds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 06/16/2008
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

I understand that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 06/16/2008
- Geovan I'm a Fan of Geovan 6 fans permalink

By using natural gas. And current large scale operations produce awful amounts of CO2. Why do you think Cheney/Bush approved hydrogen cars? Because they're oil men and the oil companies provide the natural gas. Honda knows who runs America's energy policy. Honda could easily produce pure electric cars also, but electricity producers are not in our way too powerful White House.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_production

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:23 PM on 06/16/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect