Taliban Destroying Bridges, Planting Mines In Prep For Battle With Afghan Troops

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Taliban Destroying Bridges, Planting Mines In Prep For Battle With Afghan Troops stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

NOOR KHAN and JASON STRAZIUSO | June 17, 2008 06:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Afghan soldiers walk at Kabul airport for taking flight to be transferred to Arghandab district where is partly controlled by the Taliban militants in Kandarhar province, south of Kabul, Afghanistan, Tuesday, June 17, 2008. About 700 Afghan army troops have moved from Kabul to Kandahar to deal with the Arghandab threat. (AP Photo/Musadeq Sadeq)

ARGHANDAB, Afghanistan _ — Taliban fighters destroyed bridges and planted mines after overrunning villages outside southern Afghanistan's largest city, Afghan officials and witnesses said. Hundreds of farm families fled while the Afghan army rushed in troops.

Afghanistan's Ministry of Defense said Tuesday that between 300 and 400 militants _ many of them foreigners _ took over the Arghandab region 10 miles northwest of Kandahar. But NATO disputed the account, saying its troops there saw no signs of a Taliban offensive.

Afghan officials, fearing a major battle, told residents to leave the area.

The Taliban have long sought to control Arghandab and the good fighting positions its pomegranate and grape groves offer. With control cemented, militants could cross the flat plains to make probing attacks into Kandahar, in possible preparation for an assault on their former stronghold.

The reported offensive on Monday came three days after a Taliban attack on Kandahar's prison that freed 400 insurgents.

However, NATO's International Security Assistance Force and the U.S.-led coalition offered a strikingly different picture of the Arghandab region than the one portrayed by Afghan officials. The U.S.-led coalition said in a statement that it had sent a patrol through Arghandab that met no resistance.

"Recent reports of militant control in the area appear to be unfounded," the statement said.

Coalition spokesman Capt. Christopher Colster said troops patrolled for about five hours on the west side of the Arghandab River _ where Afghan officials say the militants are _ but didn't make any contact with insurgents. The troops also didn't report seeing fleeing civilians, he said.

Story continues below
advertisement

"In talking to our folks they do not have any imminent concern that Kandahar is about to fall to the Taliban," U.S. Defense Department press secretary Geoff Morrell said in Washington.

NATO aircraft, meanwhile, dropped leaflets in Arghandab telling residents to stay in their homes _ even though the Afghan Defense Ministry was telling them to leave.

"Keep your families safe. When there is fighting near your home, stay inside," NATO spokesman Mark Laity quoted the leaflet as saying.

Despite that message, more than 700 families _ perhaps 4,000 people or more _ fled Arghandab, said Sardar Mohammad, a police officer at a checkpoint on the east side of the Arghandab River.

On the west side of the river, hundreds of Taliban controlled about nine or 10 villages, Mohammad said.

"Last night the people were afraid, and families on tractors, trucks and taxis fled the area," he said. "Small bridges inside the villages have been destroyed."

The Ministry of Defense _ which rushed in some 700 Afghan soldiers _ said insurgents got close to a police checkpoint in Arghandab and asked the police to "join them." The ministry said the fact the militants had to use a translator shows that foreign fighters were behind the assault.

Haji Agha Lalai, a provincial council member, said the militants were destroying bridges and planting mines in hopes of repelling attacks from Afghan and NATO forces.

"From a strategic military point of view, Arghandab is a very good place for the Taliban," he said. "Arghandab is close to Kandahar city, allowing the Taliban to launch ambushes and attacks more easily than any other place in the province. Secondly, it's covered with trees and gardens _ they can easily hide from airstrikes."

The Taliban assault outside Kandahar was the latest display of strength by the militants despite a record number of U.S. and NATO troops in the country.

A Taliban commander, Mullah Ahmedullah, called an Associated Press reporter Tuesday and said about 400 Taliban moved into Arghandab from the Khakrez district to the north. He said some militants released in Friday's prison break joined the assault.

"They told us, 'We want to fight until the death,'" Ahmedullah said. "We've occupied most of the area and it's a good place for fighting. Now we are waiting for the NATO and Afghan forces."

The Taliban regime ousted from power in a 2001 U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan regarded Kandahar as its main stronghold, and its insurgent supporters are most active in the volatile south of the country.

The U.S. and NATO have pleaded for additional troops over the last year and now have some 65,000 in the country. But the militants are still succeeding despite the efforts of the alliance.

One of the Afghans fleeing Arghandab said families were being forced out just as grapes need harvesting, meaning financial ruin for thousands. Haji Ibrahim Khan said Taliban fighters were moving through several Arghandab villages with weapons on their shoulders.

"They told us to leave the area within 24 hours because they want to fight foreign and Afghan troops," Khan said. "But within a week we should be harvesting, and we were expecting a good one. Now with this fighting we are deeply worried _ the grapes are the only source of income we have."

Two anti-Taliban leaders from Arghandab have died in the last year, weakening the region's defenses. Mullah Naqib, the district's former leader, died of a heart attack in October. And police commander Abdul Hakim Jan died in a suicide bombing in February.

The assault Monday came one day after President Hamid Karzai angrily told a news conference he would send Afghan troops into Pakistan to hunt down Taliban leaders in response to the militants that cross over from Pakistan.

His spokesman, Humayun Hamidzada, said Tuesday that Karzai does not intend to send troops into Pakistan and was only making "a strong point" that Pakistan needs to crack down on militant safe havens.

___

Associated Press writer Rahim Faiez contributed to this report from Kabul.

ARGHANDAB, Afghanistan _ — Taliban fighters destroyed bridges and planted mines after overrunning villages outside southern Afghanistan's largest city, Afghan officials and witnesses said. Hundr...
ARGHANDAB, Afghanistan _ — Taliban fighters destroyed bridges and planted mines after overrunning villages outside southern Afghanistan's largest city, Afghan officials and witnesses said. Hundr...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
56
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

I wonder why NATO would say that they saw no sign of an offensive? The Taliban over-run a village close to Kandahar, armed to the teeth.......yet NATO seemingly sees this as no threat. I guess they figure that the Taliban got tired of hanging around in Pakistan and came to that village for some R&R.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 AM on 06/18/2008

Does US adminstration get it , Pak ISI and military is giving cover and support to these so called Taliban to carry out these atrocities. Some of ISI opertaives are embedded and direct Taiban activities. As long as American adminstration does'nt call the Pak bluff and act with heavy hand Afghanistan will remain unstable.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 06/18/2008


The ONLY model that will work in Iraq and A-stan is the Chechen model currently employed by Putin ( a political genius).
1.Russia provided UNLIMITED money resources for reconstruction of Checnya
2.Put gave political control to a former terrorist, local tribal "silovik" Kydarov.
3. Russia wants only one thing form Checnya--peace.
4. Kydarov did an great job silencing the chaos-breading local Islamic fighters with his own Chechen private army. These are the same fighters that Russia had trouble put down some years earlier!

Hey idiot Bush, live and learn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 06/18/2008
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 146 fans permalink

Perhaps we need a "surge" now in Afghanistan. This fight is the war we should have focused on getting right in the first place. Iraq was a distraction built on lies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:29 PM on 06/17/2008
- wndrwrthg I'm a Fan of wndrwrthg 33 fans permalink
photo

Just because you do not make contact does not mean they are not there. Generally contact is the perogitive of the sought after.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 06/17/2008
- jdfast I'm a Fan of jdfast 3 fans permalink
photo

Hey W, Afganistan is were the bad guys are or haven't you figured it out yet. You got a bunch of "want to be's" in Iraq (which you invited in with insufficient troops on the ground) and now there is not enough army to go around and we have to beg from NATO. How about asking Pakistan to help. Bet that they would rush troops right into the fray! NOT!!! They got our money and told us to go fu-- ourselves. Great allies and good job on depending on them W. Great foreigh policy decisions. How much money did you buddies make?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 06/17/2008

And didn't I see a photo of Marines guarding the opium harvest? Who is making the money off that and it's most likely going toward weapons to kill US soldiers and marines.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:46 PM on 06/17/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

Is chickenhawk a bad word?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 06/17/2008
- realpolitic I'm a Fan of realpolitic 146 fans permalink

Only to chickenhawks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 06/17/2008
- KoolBreez I'm a Fan of KoolBreez 15 fans permalink


If we could stop the export of Toyota trucks to Afghanistan, we'd essentially cripple the only mode of transportation they have : )

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 06/17/2008

Just in time for the elections! How convenient for McCain, I'm sure he..the media will link Iran to it somehow

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:05 PM on 06/17/2008
- jdfast I'm a Fan of jdfast 3 fans permalink
photo

Naw, just give Darth a little more time. He will have Iran, Iraq and Afganistan all with WMD and the media will believe him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 PM on 06/17/2008

I'm curious where the guy in the middle picked up a US made medium machine gun, commonly used by the Marine Corps. I think it's referred to as a SAW. The shape of the magazine is very distinctive. Did he take off a dead Marine, or did some gun runner sell it to him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 06/17/2008
- KoolBreez I'm a Fan of KoolBreez 15 fans permalink

BPCentrisAmerican,

US military gave the Afghans a lot of weapons; first to the Mujahadins during the Soviet occupation and then to the Northern Alliance during the invasion of Kabul. There are enough of our guns to change hands over there...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 06/17/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 134 fans permalink

Err, ahhh.

That picture is of a friendly Afghan. Not the Taliban. He is on our side.

Why shouldn't he have a Marine Cops machine gun?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 06/17/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

The Officers on the ground in Afghanistan asked for 7,000 more troops from Bush, and he sent only 3,300 yet he claims he listens to the commanders on the ground..

So this is the result and now more Americans will die among other Collation forces..

Can you imagine we let scum like the Taliban to push the United States Military around after their part in defending and protecting al-Qaeda and allowing 9/11..?

This is all part of the myth of Republicans knowing what's best for National Security and Foreign Affairs..

Bush has allowed us to be attacked let the perpetrators to get away and now has allowed them to re establish themselves while recking our army in Iraq.. and plundering the Treasury..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 PM on 06/17/2008
- thebanana I'm a Fan of thebanana 7 fans permalink

Looks like we've turned another corner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 06/17/2008
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

The US has been turning the corner for the last 7 years, we've gone around hundreds of times. 1984 anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:20 PM on 06/17/2008
- Fentwin I'm a Fan of Fentwin 4 fans permalink

Indeed, what kind of dodecahedron war are we fighting anyway?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 06/17/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 134 fans permalink

Part of the problem is that the Administration deliberately, and the media went along with , miidentifing the Taliban with al Qaida when they were seperate groups.

Remember the villification of the American Taliban? Fighting for the religious students who were the de facto government of Afghanistan was not the same as fighting with Bin Ladin.

By failing to make the distinction we have now backed ourslves into a corner.

Many of our allies who we have in charge of Afghanistan are not that much different from the Taliban. Notice all the women under the veil?

We should make a deal with the Taliban. For the capture of Bin Ladin and all his crew we will negotiate with the Taliban and work them into the government of Afghanistan.

We don't really give a rats ass who rules Afghanistan. And the people of that country can be served ONLY by ending war and conflict (There will be enough conflict in peacetime if the history of Afghanistan is any clue)

We want Bin Ladin and the dirt bags of his crew. If negotiating with the Taliban would get us there and bring an end to the endless war.

More power to the negotiations!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 06/17/2008
- wmbear I'm a Fan of wmbear 24 fans permalink

SOMEHOW, BUSH/CHENEY & CO. WILL FIND A WAY...

To blame the "loss" of Afghanistan on the Democrats....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 06/17/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect