Scientists Find Bugs That Eat Waste and Excrete Petrol

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Scientists Find Bugs That Eat Waste and Excrete Petrol stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 06-18-08 07:42 AM   |   Updated: 06-26-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Scientist

The Times :

Ten years ago I could never have imagined I'd be doing this," says Greg Pal, 33, a former software executive, as he squints into the late afternoon Californian sun. "I mean, this is essentially agriculture, right? But the people I talk to - especially the ones coming out of business school - this is the one hot area everyone wants to get into."

He means bugs. To be more precise: the genetic alteration of bugs - very, very small ones - so that when they feed on agricultural waste such as woodchips or wheat straw, they do something extraordinary. They excrete crude oil.

Unbelievably, this is not science fiction. Mr Pal holds up a small beaker of bug excretion that could, theoretically, be poured into the tank of the giant Lexus SUV next to us. Not that Mr Pal is willing to risk it just yet. He gives it a month before the first vehicle is filled up on what he calls "renewable petroleum". After that, he grins, "it's a brave new world".

Mr Pal is a senior director of LS9, one of several companies in or near Silicon Valley that have spurned traditional high-tech activities such as software and networking and embarked instead on an extraordinary race to make $140-a-barrel oil (£70) from Saudi Arabia obsolete. "All of us here - everyone in this company and in this industry, are aware of the urgency," Mr Pal says.
Related Links

* Biofuel: a tankful of weed juice

* The arithmetic of crude oil

What is most remarkable about what they are doing is that instead of trying to reengineer the global economy - as is required, for example, for the use of hydrogen fuel - they are trying to make a product that is interchangeable with oil. The company claims that this "Oil 2.0" will not only be renewable but also carbon negative - meaning that the carbon it emits will be less than that sucked from the atmosphere by the raw materials from which it is made.

LS9 has already convinced one oil industry veteran of its plan: Bob Walsh, 50, who now serves as the firm's president after a 26-year career at Shell, most recently running European supply operations in London. "How many times in your life do you get the opportunity to grow a multi-billion-dollar company?" he asks. It is a bold statement from a man who works in a glorified cubicle in a San Francisco industrial estate for a company that describes itself as being "prerevenue".

Story continues below
advertisement

Inside LS9's cluttered laboratory - funded by $20 million of start-up capital from investors including Vinod Khosla, the Indian-American entrepreneur who co-founded Sun Micro-systems - Mr Pal explains that LS9's bugs are single-cell organisms, each a fraction of a billionth the size of an ant. They start out as industrial yeast or nonpathogenic strains of E. coli, but LS9 modifies them by custom-de-signing their DNA. "Five to seven years ago, that process would have taken months and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars," he says. "Now it can take weeks and cost maybe $20,000."

Because crude oil (which can be refined into other products, such as petroleum or jet fuel) is only a few molecular stages removed from the fatty acids normally excreted by yeast or E. coli during fermentation, it does not take much fiddling to get the desired result.

For fermentation to take place you need raw material, or feedstock, as it is known in the biofuels industry. Anything will do as long as it can be broken down into sugars, with the byproduct ideally burnt to produce electricity to run the plant.

The company is not interested in using corn as feedstock, given the much-publicised problems created by using food crops for fuel, such as the tortilla inflation that recently caused food riots in Mexico City. Instead, different types of agricultural waste will be used according to whatever makes sense for the local climate and economy: wheat straw in California, for example, or woodchips in the South.

Using genetically modified bugs for fermentation is essentially the same as using natural bacteria to produce ethanol, although the energy-intensive final process of distillation is virtually eliminated because the bugs excrete a substance that is almost pump-ready.

The closest that LS9 has come to mass production is a 1,000-litre fermenting machine, which looks like a large stainless-steel jar, next to a wardrobe-sized computer connected by a tangle of cables and tubes. It has not yet been plugged in. The machine produces the equivalent of one barrel a week and takes up 40 sq ft of floor space.

However, to substitute America's weekly oil consumption of 143 million barrels, you would need a facility that covered about 205 square miles, an area roughly the size of Chicago.

That is the main problem: although LS9 can produce its bug fuel in laboratory beakers, it has no idea whether it will be able produce the same results on a nationwide or even global scale.

"Our plan is to have a demonstration-scale plant operational by 2010 and, in parallel, we'll be working on the design and construction of a commercial-scale facility to open in 2011," says Mr Pal, adding that if LS9 used Brazilian sugar cane as its feedstock, its fuel would probably cost about $50 a barrel.

Are Americans ready to be putting genetically modified bug excretion in their cars? "It's not the same as with food," Mr Pal says. "We're putting these bacteria in a very isolated container: their entire universe is in that tank. When we're done with them, they're destroyed."

Besides, he says, there is greater good being served. "I have two children, and climate change is something that they are going to face. The energy crisis is something that they are going to face. We have a collective responsibility to do this."

Power points

-- Google has set up an initiative to develop electricity from cheap renewable energy sources

-- Craig Venter, who mapped the human genome, has created a company to create hydrogen and ethanol from genetically engineered bugs

-- The US Energy and Agriculture Departments said in 2005 that there was land available to produce enough biomass (nonedible plant parts) to replace 30 per cent of current liquid transport fuels

Read the whole story: The Times

Ten years ago I could never have imagined I'd be doing this," says Greg Pal, 33, a former software executive, as he squints into the late afternoon Californian sun. "I mean, this is essentially agricu...
Ten years ago I could never have imagined I'd be doing this," says Greg Pal, 33, a former software executive, as he squints into the late afternoon Californian sun. "I mean, this is essentially agricu...
Filed by Olivia Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
102
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

WTH is up with the "bad words filter"? All I said was "pig s hit".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 06/18/2008
- AnnArky I'm a Fan of AnnArky 35 fans permalink
photo

If I were an oil exec. I'd buy up this technology and snuff it as fast as I could. But, not to worry, I'm sure they're already working on it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 06/18/2008
- swooge I'm a Fan of swooge 13 fans permalink
photo

This is carbon neutral because the carbon comes from plants and animals that absorb carbon from the atmosphere. The bugs excrete oil which can be refined into gasoline directly and need no additives. It does not, however, lower current carbon levels directly but through replacement of fossil fuels which release stored carbon.

I think it's a stop-gap measure or partial solution because I'm skeptical that it could replace all of our fossil fuel use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 06/18/2008

Gasoline has additives, and most of them are rather nasty. Read the gas-pump warning label next time you fill up. Even if the bugs produce gasoline directly, which is doubtful, there will likely be additives.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 06/18/2008
- swooge I'm a Fan of swooge 13 fans permalink
photo

Some of those additives actually increase efficiency and therefore reduce carbon emmission, which is what we're talking about.

I know there are some environmental concerns about additives but those are not about green house gases.

Can anyone stay on topic here?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:29 PM on 06/18/2008
- Cathexis I'm a Fan of Cathexis 7 fans permalink

1. Animals do not absorb CO2 from the air.

2. Plants can absorb CO2 from the air but they will absorb an amount within a limited range -- any additional CO2 over that need will remain in the atmosphere.

Thus, this is NOT a carbon-neutral solution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 06/18/2008
- swooge I'm a Fan of swooge 13 fans permalink
photo

Animals are made of carbon. They get it from the plants or animals they eat.
Plants use the CO2 they absorb from the atmosphere to grow larger.

Using plant and animal material IS carbon neutral because the plants and animals are absorbing their carbon, ultimately, from the atmosphere.

This is basic 5th grade science here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 06/18/2008
- Toonadude I'm a Fan of Toonadude 15 fans permalink

This LS9 outfit needs to be careful.
All of that genetic manipulation may run afoul of President Bush's religeous beliefs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 06/18/2008
- mathme I'm a Fan of mathme 29 fans permalink
photo

So, what happens when these microbes get loose and starts slowly transforming the world into crude oil? Not with a bang but a whimper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 06/18/2008

These bugs aren't terribly different from the yeasts that produce the worlds alcohol,
and last time i checked, said bugs weren't rampaging in the wild, turning everything into
booze and fusel oils.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 06/18/2008
- mathme I'm a Fan of mathme 29 fans permalink
photo

Ew... that did just give me an unnecessary vision of future hygiene products!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 06/18/2008
- TXfemmom I'm a Fan of TXfemmom 192 fans permalink

Let's face it, we could find that land space to wash out hands of the Arabs and Venezuelans. We just have to make sure that some oil company does not purchase the patent and information and squash the production of it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 06/18/2008
photo

I suspect that's exactly what will hapen; big oil already has a man on the inside, at the top....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 06/18/2008
photo

nah, to late, if the trial works, its over, the news will be out. plus to get the patent, they would need to have these guys SELL it....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 06/18/2008
- TXfemmom I'm a Fan of TXfemmom 192 fans permalink

I wonder how much petrol they could excrete were they to be turned loose on some of the PUB PUTRID politicians? I can see it now, Cheney full of hot air, little petrol.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 06/18/2008
- leduck I'm a Fan of leduck 44 fans permalink
photo

How many bugs would be needed and how much food needed to replace all Middle East oil?
asumming we even knew which barrel really came from the Middle East.


something tells me on a gut level that this is a panacea...­.
but someone will make money off this stupidity
just like faith healers a hundred years ago

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 06/18/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 84 fans permalink

Nice step in the right direction, HOWEVER: The article said it was carbon negative. I'm wondering where the extra carbon is going. If it truly is carbon negative, then there must be some waste somewhere and I'm wondering what _that_ is / is like. Would it be harmful? What fraction of extra carbon is there? What will we do with _it?_ Hopefully, there's a lot of it, AND it's very useful to make things as solids. Keep in mind that diamonds are essentially pure carbon, so a carbon based material can be very strong (or at least hard)...

BTW, the land area point is specious. Firstly, you can go vertical - larger vats, stacked vats, etc. Secondly, this can be widely distributed. Using lands that are unsuitable for many other purposes (polluted lands) would be a reasonable thing so long as the people operating the equipment are not exposed to risks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 06/18/2008
- TXfemmom I'm a Fan of TXfemmom 192 fans permalink

By carbon negative, they mean that the microbes absorb and use more carbon than what is produced during the production of it and then use of the petrol.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 06/18/2008
- jvarga I'm a Fan of jvarga 4 fans permalink

Bacteria, like all living things, are made of carbon. So for a carbon dioxide fixing species, increased bacterial biomass will remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Additionally, this end product won't be the only thing the bacteria produce (metabolism works that way) so more of the fixed CO2 will be sunk into those end products as well.

Also you can't just use bigger vats / taller vats /wider vats. Undoubtedly these organisms will have fairly specific growth conditions, one will be a temperature which will become increasingly inefficient to maintain as the volume gets larger. The cultures, especially in steady state fermentors, are not static. They require constant mixing to circulate nutrients and prevent wastes from building up. The larger the volume the more difficult this becomes. And since I'm lazy and haven't looked into this I don't know if its an anaerobic process or not. If it's not anaerobic, you'll have the issue of proper aeration which gets more complex as the volume increases. Wrong oxygen levels can cause switches in metabolic pathways so I'm thinking that this is one big concern (unless they have a very highly engineered bacteria).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 06/18/2008

Not sure about the GM stuff, but regular yeast can be grown both aerobically and anaerobically. In the aerobic phase it tends to put most of it's energy into reproduction; in it's anaerobic phase it puts more energy into fermentation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 06/19/2008

Waht culod psiosbly go worng?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 06/18/2008

The only thing green about this process is the money they hope to make. This may (or may not) reduce greenhouse gases, but what about the additives they will most likely have add to make this burn effectively in cars? Greenhouse gases are not the only pollutants produced by petroleum powered vehicles. Hydrogen cars on the other hand emit only water. This will only lead to bigger cars. Here we go again. (Of course Silicon Valley is world famous for its hype. So this maybe nothing at all.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 06/18/2008

ICE-9 was another great idea that had odd and surprising side effects.
So it goes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 06/18/2008
- GerryS I'm a Fan of GerryS 40 fans permalink
photo

great analogy!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 06/18/2008
photo

As a figment of the imagination of the person who invented ICE-9 ..... I second the motion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 06/18/2008
- GerryS I'm a Fan of GerryS 40 fans permalink
photo

and when we die we will be put in those vats to fuel our SUV's?

soylent fuel-

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 06/18/2008
- Mort I'm a Fan of Mort 38 fans permalink
photo

...bugs that eat waste, excrete petrol....­..... (oh yeah, they cause birth defects too, but we won't talk about that.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 06/18/2008

As cool as it is that they've managed to make bugs crap oil, this strikes me as more than a little pie-in-the-sky. Don't get me wrong, I'm rooting for these guys, but most "great ideas" make it to this point and then fizzle out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 06/18/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect