Scientists Find Bugs That Eat Waste and Excrete Petrol

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Scientists Find Bugs That Eat Waste and Excrete Petrol stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 06-18-08 07:42 AM   |   Updated: 06-26-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Scientist

The Times :

Ten years ago I could never have imagined I'd be doing this," says Greg Pal, 33, a former software executive, as he squints into the late afternoon Californian sun. "I mean, this is essentially agriculture, right? But the people I talk to - especially the ones coming out of business school - this is the one hot area everyone wants to get into."

He means bugs. To be more precise: the genetic alteration of bugs - very, very small ones - so that when they feed on agricultural waste such as woodchips or wheat straw, they do something extraordinary. They excrete crude oil.

Unbelievably, this is not science fiction. Mr Pal holds up a small beaker of bug excretion that could, theoretically, be poured into the tank of the giant Lexus SUV next to us. Not that Mr Pal is willing to risk it just yet. He gives it a month before the first vehicle is filled up on what he calls "renewable petroleum". After that, he grins, "it's a brave new world".

Mr Pal is a senior director of LS9, one of several companies in or near Silicon Valley that have spurned traditional high-tech activities such as software and networking and embarked instead on an extraordinary race to make $140-a-barrel oil (£70) from Saudi Arabia obsolete. "All of us here - everyone in this company and in this industry, are aware of the urgency," Mr Pal says.
Related Links

* Biofuel: a tankful of weed juice

* The arithmetic of crude oil

What is most remarkable about what they are doing is that instead of trying to reengineer the global economy - as is required, for example, for the use of hydrogen fuel - they are trying to make a product that is interchangeable with oil. The company claims that this "Oil 2.0" will not only be renewable but also carbon negative - meaning that the carbon it emits will be less than that sucked from the atmosphere by the raw materials from which it is made.

LS9 has already convinced one oil industry veteran of its plan: Bob Walsh, 50, who now serves as the firm's president after a 26-year career at Shell, most recently running European supply operations in London. "How many times in your life do you get the opportunity to grow a multi-billion-dollar company?" he asks. It is a bold statement from a man who works in a glorified cubicle in a San Francisco industrial estate for a company that describes itself as being "prerevenue".

Story continues below
advertisement

Inside LS9's cluttered laboratory - funded by $20 million of start-up capital from investors including Vinod Khosla, the Indian-American entrepreneur who co-founded Sun Micro-systems - Mr Pal explains that LS9's bugs are single-cell organisms, each a fraction of a billionth the size of an ant. They start out as industrial yeast or nonpathogenic strains of E. coli, but LS9 modifies them by custom-de-signing their DNA. "Five to seven years ago, that process would have taken months and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars," he says. "Now it can take weeks and cost maybe $20,000."

Because crude oil (which can be refined into other products, such as petroleum or jet fuel) is only a few molecular stages removed from the fatty acids normally excreted by yeast or E. coli during fermentation, it does not take much fiddling to get the desired result.

For fermentation to take place you need raw material, or feedstock, as it is known in the biofuels industry. Anything will do as long as it can be broken down into sugars, with the byproduct ideally burnt to produce electricity to run the plant.

The company is not interested in using corn as feedstock, given the much-publicised problems created by using food crops for fuel, such as the tortilla inflation that recently caused food riots in Mexico City. Instead, different types of agricultural waste will be used according to whatever makes sense for the local climate and economy: wheat straw in California, for example, or woodchips in the South.

Using genetically modified bugs for fermentation is essentially the same as using natural bacteria to produce ethanol, although the energy-intensive final process of distillation is virtually eliminated because the bugs excrete a substance that is almost pump-ready.

The closest that LS9 has come to mass production is a 1,000-litre fermenting machine, which looks like a large stainless-steel jar, next to a wardrobe-sized computer connected by a tangle of cables and tubes. It has not yet been plugged in. The machine produces the equivalent of one barrel a week and takes up 40 sq ft of floor space.

However, to substitute America's weekly oil consumption of 143 million barrels, you would need a facility that covered about 205 square miles, an area roughly the size of Chicago.

That is the main problem: although LS9 can produce its bug fuel in laboratory beakers, it has no idea whether it will be able produce the same results on a nationwide or even global scale.

"Our plan is to have a demonstration-scale plant operational by 2010 and, in parallel, we'll be working on the design and construction of a commercial-scale facility to open in 2011," says Mr Pal, adding that if LS9 used Brazilian sugar cane as its feedstock, its fuel would probably cost about $50 a barrel.

Are Americans ready to be putting genetically modified bug excretion in their cars? "It's not the same as with food," Mr Pal says. "We're putting these bacteria in a very isolated container: their entire universe is in that tank. When we're done with them, they're destroyed."

Besides, he says, there is greater good being served. "I have two children, and climate change is something that they are going to face. The energy crisis is something that they are going to face. We have a collective responsibility to do this."

Power points

-- Google has set up an initiative to develop electricity from cheap renewable energy sources

-- Craig Venter, who mapped the human genome, has created a company to create hydrogen and ethanol from genetically engineered bugs

-- The US Energy and Agriculture Departments said in 2005 that there was land available to produce enough biomass (nonedible plant parts) to replace 30 per cent of current liquid transport fuels

Read the whole story: The Times

Ten years ago I could never have imagined I'd be doing this," says Greg Pal, 33, a former software executive, as he squints into the late afternoon Californian sun. "I mean, this is essentially agricu...
Ten years ago I could never have imagined I'd be doing this," says Greg Pal, 33, a former software executive, as he squints into the late afternoon Californian sun. "I mean, this is essentially agricu...
Filed by Olivia Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
102
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 (4 pages total)
- SCG I'm a Fan of SCG 110 fans permalink
photo

The name of these oily bugs?

Cheneys

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 06/18/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 87 fans permalink

God, let's hope not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 06/18/2008
- jvarga I'm a Fan of jvarga 4 fans permalink

What's nice about this is that the feedstock isn't locked into 1 specific thing. Once the scale up problems are solved, it sounds like they can put up one of these plants wherever a good source of waste is being produced.

However, as we hear more about this and about Venter's plan I fear we'll face an uphill battle with the extreme crazies who'll demonize it with terms like "frankenfuel" and protest it due to its genetic engineering component.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 06/18/2008
- billu I'm a Fan of billu 2 fans permalink

Figure it out... Any solution needs to have 3 phases. Short term relief, mid term sustainability during transition and the solution. You cannot concentrate one any one part at the expense of the others or quite plainly people will die, starve, go cold ect.. The "greens" only want to hear about the solutions and the non-greens only want to talk about the first two. You will almost never find a monolithic solution to a complex problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 06/18/2008

I think this is really cool and a major breakthrough, but I can't help but think that this is really the wrong way to go about solving our energy crisis.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 AM on 06/18/2008
- Sumocat I'm a Fan of Sumocat 32 fans permalink

You're only looking at it just from the energy perspective. The other angle is waste processing. The ability to turn agricultural waste into fuel would help alleviate both the waste and energy problems.

Note, I wrote "help alleviate". By itself, this does not look like an all-encompassing solution. But coupled with other projects, like thermodepo­lymerizati­on to turn organic waste into petroleum and Craig Venter's plan to convert CO2 into fuel, we're looking at a next generation of waste processing that actually produces energy, and that would be a major step forward for us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 AM on 06/18/2008

There's already a company doing this sort of thing, but without the bugs...

Google "Changing World Technologies" and/or TDP, if you're curious.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 06/18/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect