Everglades Sale To Florida One Of Biggest Conservation Deals In US History

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BRIAN SKOLOFF | June 24, 2008 06:05 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »


WELLINGTON, Fla. — In one of the biggest conservation deals in U.S. history, the nation's largest producer of cane sugar reached a tentative agreement Tuesday to get out of the business and sell its nearly 300 square miles in the Everglades to the state of Florida for $1.75 billion.

The deal with U.S. Sugar Corp. results from a convergence of interests: The state is trying to restore the Everglades and clean up pollution caused by Big Sugar and other growers, while the American sugar industry is being squeezed by low-price imports.

Republican Gov. Charlie Crist declared the agreement "as monumental as the creation of our nation's first national park, Yellowstone."

Under the deal, the state would buy U.S. Sugar's holdings in the Everglades south of Lake Okeechobee, including its cane fields, mill and railroad line. U.S. Sugar would be allowed to farm the 187,000 acres for six more years, after which it would go out of business.

The state would then protect the land from development, which has been encroaching on the Everglades for decades.

State officials would also build a network of reservoirs and marshes to filter water flowing into the Everglades and help restore the River of Grass to a cleaner, more natural state. For generations, farming and development have blocked the natural flow of water and allowed fertilizers and other pollutants to spill into the wetlands.

Negotiations are still going on, and officials hope to sign a final agreement by September.

David Guest, a lawyer with the environmental group Earthjustice and a longtime foe of U.S. Sugar, gloated over the announcement. "In the old days, you didn't just beat your opponent, you also ate them," he said. "Today, we're eating U.S. Sugar."

The deal would not end sugar production in the Everglades. Some 300,000 acres of land, or close to 500 square miles, used by other companies would remain in production.

"But it makes it a lot more manageable," said Ken Ammon, deputy executive director of the South Florida Water Management District, the state agency overseeing restoration efforts. "It totally changes the face of Everglades restoration ... No one ever thought that a whole corporation like U.S. Sugar would up and potentially leave the Everglades."

Ammon said that considering the land and the other equipment on the property, the sale price "looks like a tremendous deal" for the state.

U.S. Sugar chief executive Robert Buker called the deal "monumental" but said he was saddened to see the demise of his company. Its 1,700 employees, including those who work in the mill and operate the cane-cutting machinery, will lose their jobs, though the state is offering them retraining.

"We built a company that right now is the pillar of the agriculture community in Florida," Buker said. "Because of that, I stand here today with mixed feelings. ... On the other hand, I'm excited about what we're doing here today."

The entire American sugar industry has struggled with stiff competition from imported sugar.

At least 33 mills have closed nationwide in the past decade as producers try to remain competitive in a market flush with sugar from the likes of Brazil and Thailand, which have lower labor costs than U.S. producers, said Phillip Hayes of the American Sugar Alliance.

"Sugar producers are receiving less for their product now then they did when Jimmy Carter sat in the Oval Office," he said.

Last year, U.S. Sugar _ which grows and refines sugar and sells it wholesale or packages it under private labels for about 60 customers, including Publix and Albertsons supermarkets _ shut down its other mill, blaming foreign competition.

In recent years, U.S. Sugar has also had to bear the higher costs of cleaning up its water before it enters the Everglades.

The company's vice president, Robert Coker, said U.S. Sugar began talks with the governor last year "to make sure our business for the long-term was sustainable."

"Out of those discussions with the governor, he put on the table that maybe we should just buy U.S. Sugar out," Coker said. "After we caught our breath and picked ourselves up off the floor ... we all decided that this was a good deal for the people of Florida, for the Everglades and the environment, and a good deal for our employees and our shareholders."

The Everglades restoration effort is the largest of its kind in the world. It is aimed at undoing or rerouting decades of flood-control projects that were built to make way for houses and farms.

A key component was approved by Congress in 2000. The project was originally estimated to cost $7.8 billion and take 30 years. The price tag has since ballooned by billions because of rising construction and real estate costs, and it is unknown how long it will take. The state and federal governments are supposed to share the costs 50-50.

(This version CORRECTS by deleting that U.S. does not subsidize growers.)

 
Comments
80
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

This is almost literally in my back yard and in no way am I pretending to know how and why processing sugar has a negative impact on the everglades.

BUT Somebody explain to me how any of this makes a difference if Gov. Crist is allowing FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT to build a Fossil Fuel power plant less than 1,000 feet away from the same Arthur R. Marshall National Wildlife Refuge.

This WEST COUNTY ENERGY CENTER will have 12 stacks pumping greenhouse gases into the Everglades and deep well injecting 21 million gallons of wastewater into porous aquifer. This can't be good for the Everglades or the many residential neighborhoods surrounding this area. Will this be more beneficial than processing sugar??

Seems hard to believe one doesn't have something to do with the other.
http://riverofgas.evergladesearthfirst.org/powerplant.htm
http://riverofgas.evergladesearthfirst.org/pipeline.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 06/28/2008

I do not know the back room deals involved in this plan, but if it really is going to help the everglades, then good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 06/26/2008

One thing to remember: Comments are never going to be closed on here for me and others...

On Exxon Valdez:

Shows how Supes are in the corporation's pocket...Exxon makes record profits...they can afford to pay this off...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 06/26/2008
photo

To me it looks like a bail-out and stealing another billion or so from the public trust. With their biggest problem being the ever encroaching salt water, they were losing it anyway. No, this is just another crony favor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 06/25/2008
- PatA I'm a Fan of PatA permalink
photo

"I`m sure libs do their utmost to stop this dastardly conspiracy"

What are you talking about? Just because you can spell conspiracy doesn't mean that you know what is going on with the Everglades.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 PM on 06/25/2008
photo

I don't get this. We are at the "Green" section on HuffPost. One of the world's most unique ecosystems is at stake and the environmentalists won a major surprise victory over industry. Over 3/8 of the wetlands that were used by the polluting industries are going to be turned back into wetland and used to purify the water that drains into the everglades.
Why the hell are there so many angry posts here? Just because the guy who's responsible is a republican? And cynics can just take their defeatist attitude elsewhere. If you think Florida's going to be under water you're mistaken. We're not going to let that happen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:02 PM on 06/25/2008

Let's try saving environments that won't be covered by the ocean inside of 100 years, instead of wasting time, money, effort on making ourselves feel good inside. Is it practical to even think of restoring lands at or under sea level? If so, someone please explain why? Are we going to build a giant wall to keep the ocean out of America like they're trying to do with immigrants? Are we that good? Buy land in the Rockies and your grandchildren will be rich.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:24 PM on 06/25/2008

Saving tropical environments can help to slow down global warming, potentially minimising ocean levels rising.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 AM on 06/26/2008
- Mort I'm a Fan of Mort permalink
photo

Good news for alligators and snakes. Bad news for human beings.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 06/25/2008

Fine by me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 06/25/2008

Seems to me that both the gators and snakes were here before you were...by a few million years. Or maybe not, since you seem to be particularly neolithic in your views.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 06/26/2008

This is a sweetheart deal if i've ever seen one. All while the state is in a SEVERE budget crisis. i don't know what in God's name they were thinking. So now we not only paid 1.75 Billion dollars for a failing company, but we're going to have to spend tens of millions more to get rid of the old plant and clean up the mess? It makes no sense. Except to our beloved Republican governor and legislature. I can't even express how pissed off I am at this. In the meantime, just to be safe they cut almost 100 million out of the Corrections budget. Now Crist wants another 4% from everybody. This is insane.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 PM on 06/25/2008
photo

There's something you forgot in your little economic calculations. The value of our natural world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:08 PM on 06/25/2008
- Bula I'm a Fan of Bula permalink

Why should the US taxpayers pay to buy out a money losing industry? End the sugar tariffs and this problem will go away on its own. I do not understand why free traders like Bush are not held to the fire over sugar and ethanol tariffs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 06/25/2008
photo

Tariffs were not the problem. Its cheap labor in other countries that is. In any case, the issue is not corporate welfare but conservation of the second largest wetland ecosystem in the world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 06/25/2008

Sounds like the sugar company is being short sighted.

Sugar cane is a much better source of ethanol than corn.

In fact, I believe Brazil is energy self-sufficient because of heavy investments in sugar cane.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 06/25/2008
photo

Speaking of short-sighted, how about destroying the amazing biodiversity of our unique wetlands to grow monoculture grids of sugarcane?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 06/25/2008
photo

What is Charlie up to ? I wonder if he thinks this will make we Floridian go for Off Shore Drilling.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:13 AM on 06/25/2008

All these whining and bitching comments jeez folks, let's up the level of discourse PLEASE, I woulda thought by now everyone has moved beyond this.

Anyway
My how things have changed I remember in my school history textbooks it was touted as a public good to drain swamps, potholes and such because they were 'useless' and convert them to agriculture and urban sprawl because that was 'progress'. Now at least we as a species acknowledge that we were wrong as we learned more about the functions that these so called 'useless' lands actually provide in 'environmental services'.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 AM on 06/25/2008
photo

you obviously are not a Florida resident..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 06/25/2008

I am a Florida resident, born and raised, and a former employee of the Park, and I agree w/ JScott. What's your point?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 06/25/2008

This is the way it should work. If you want to take property, then pay for it. Don't regulate it out of someone's possession.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 06/25/2008

But it's okay if private business continue to take from others via pollution?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 AM on 06/25/2008

It is REAL questionable whether the EAA is private property. How much did U.S. Sugar pay for it?

$0. U.S. Sugar made out like bandits, because that's what they are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 06/25/2008

Employee people, supply a product, and make a profit for their shareholders. Bastards!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 06/25/2008

It sounds good, but I'm no expert and know that the devil is in the details. Something that does hit me, however, is the statement that U.S. Sugar couldn't compete with the low prices on the imports. Once again homegrown products are being crowded out by importation. I fail to understand why we must import products that we already produce in sufficient quantities to not only sustain us nutritionally, but also sustain a workforce. That part makes no sense. More and more it feels like we have followed Alice down the rabbit hole.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 06/25/2008
photo

this decision is a little bit of an oxymoron since Charlie Crist just voted to drill for oil offshore here in Florida.. so there appear's to be a little conflict between these two decision's ..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 06/25/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect

 
Right Now on HuffPost
FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE

MOSCOW — Presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry...

STANDOFF IN HONDURAS HEATS UPMilitary Blocks Ousted President Zelaya's Plane From...

(AP) TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — Ousted President Manuel...

Related Tags