Iraq Names 35 Companies "Qualified" To Bid For Oil Contracts

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Iraq Names 35 Companies "Qualified" To Bid For Oil Contracts stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

SEBASTIAN ABBOT | 06/30/08 04:32 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Iraq's Oil Minister, Hussain al-Shahristani, gestures as he speaks at a press conference in Baghdad, Iraq, Monday, June 30, 2008. The Iraqi government announced the opening of six oil fields for bidding from international firms in order to boost production. (AP Photo/ Khalid Mohammed)

BAGHDAD — Iraq opened international bidding for eight enormous oil and gas fields Monday, paving the way for investment in a nation with some of the world's largest petroleum reserves.

If approved, contracts to update and manage those fields could involve the biggest foreign stake in Iraq since its oil industry was nationalized more than 30 years ago and help Iraq reach its goal of nearly doubling petroleum production by 2013.

That could be good news with the price for a barrel of oil breaching $143 for the first time ever on Monday. But the contracts won't be signed for a year, and if Western firms win a dominant role it could feed perceptions that U.S.-led forces toppled Saddam Hussein to get at Iraq's natural resources.

Those concerns were heightened by expectations that Iraq would announce short-term no-bid consulting contracts with five Western oil firms on Monday. The New York Times reported about two weeks ago that the firms included Royal Dutch Shell PLC, BP PLC, Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron and Total.

But Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani told a news conference Monday that the Iraqi government was still negotiating with the companies, which he did not identify. He said the firms were demanding a share of oil production while Iraq wants to pay in cash.

The minister said the short-term contracts were meant to boost production until the government awards longer-term deals next June. But some believe the consulting contracts could give the winning firms an advantage in bidding for the development contracts, which al-Shahristani said Monday would include 35 foreign companies.

The firms he named included seven from the U.S., three from Britain and others from Russia, China and other countries.

Al-Shahristani said the companies would be invited to bid on the oil fields of Rumeila, Zubair, Qurna West, Maysan, Kirkuk and Bay Hassan and the natural gas fields of Akkaz and Mansouriyah.

Story continues below
advertisement

"These fields were chosen because their production can be raised in a short time and at a low cost," said al-Shahristani.

He said even the longer-term contracts would include cash compensation and not a share of oil production.

"We don't see a need to allow anyone to share our oil," al-Shahristani said.

Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said Monday that there is no American influence on the Iraqi government's oil decisions.

"Politics does not come into this," al-Dabbagh said. "There is no preferential treatment for anyone, no matter who."

All the oil fields the minister mentioned Monday are currently producing crude, and al-Shahristani said the new contracts would raise Iraq's production by 1.5 million barrels per day. Iraq currently produces 2.5 million barrels per day and hopes to raise that to 4.5 million by 2013.

Adding 1.5 million barrels of oil each day to the world's supply probably would move the price downward. But some analysts were not convinced it will happen, given the deterioration of the Iraq's infrastructure and potential instability.

"I'm pretty skeptical of that figure," said Jim Ritterbusch, president of energy consultancy Ritterbusch and Associates. "Amount is one thing, timing is another. They still need to upgrade their infrastructure and while things have stabilized, I think you're assuming a best-case scenario on security and other issues."

Iraq has been able to boost production to its highest level since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003 because of a reduction in violence.

Al-Shahristani said the country needs help from foreign firms to boost production further because some of its oil fields "suffer from old age and need modern technology to check their deterioration."

Iraq nationalized its oil industry in the 1960s, and participation by foreign firms since then in the development of the country's natural resources has been limited.

With fuel prices at record levels, foreign firms have been anxious to tap Iraq's estimated 115 billion barrels of oil reserves and 112 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. And the Iraqi government could use the revenue to rebuild infrastructure and deliver services.

The deadline for the oil and gas bids announced Monday is the end of March, and preliminary contracts will be signed next June. Every company bidding must have an Iraqi partner and pass along at least 25 percent of the value of the contract to Iraqi companies, said al-Shahristani.

The process of awarding contracts to help develop Iraq's oil industry has been delayed by the inability to finalize a law dividing the country's oil resources. Negotiations have been stalled by disagreement between the central government and the Kurdish regional administration in northern Iraq. The Kurds have signed more than 20 oil deals with foreign firms to work in Kurdish-controlled fields since drafting their own oil and gas law in August 2007.

The Shiite-led Iraqi central government says the deals are invalid with no national oil law in place.

Several Democratic senators in the U.S. recently asked the Bush administration to block the Iraqi government's reported no-bid deals with Western firms until the country finalized the oil law, but the White House refused.

On Monday, Senator Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York, called for an independent audit of the risks those contracts could pose to political progress in Iraq if they are signed without an agreement on how to divide the nation's oil revenues.

"Signing these deals without a revenue-sharing law is like putting the cart before the horse," Schumer said.

But Iraqi government spokesman al-Dabbagh said the country had never considered a no-bid process, saying "there was never any intention to award the contracts without a tender."

Major oil companies distanced themselves from talk of no-bid deals.

"We have been providing services to Iraq from outside the country for a number of years," said Robert Wine, a spokesman for BP. "We submitted a study of the Rumeila fields several years ago and if the discussions do lead to deal, they will focus on the technical services in that report. We need to clarify _ this is not about access to the country's oil resources, or exploration. It's a management contract, to provide technical resources."

On Monday, the Times reported that a small U.S. State Department team helped draw up contracts between the Iraqi Oil Ministry and the five major oil companies reportedly getting no-bid contracts.

State Department spokesman Tom Casey confirmed a small number of U.S. advisers were providing "technical support" to the Iraqi Oil Ministry. But he said "they are not there to try and give the Iraqis any kind of specific requests or to make decisions or to even push in an individual direction."

Casey said the decision by the Iraqis not to announce contracts for several Western firms Monday was their own and not influenced by Washington.

___

Associated Press writers Meera Selva in London, Sameer N. Yacoub in Baghdad and AP Diplomatic Writer Anne Gearan in Washington contributed to this report.

BAGHDAD — Iraq opened international bidding for eight enormous oil and gas fields Monday, paving the way for investment in a nation with some of the world's largest petroleum reserves. If appro...
BAGHDAD — Iraq opened international bidding for eight enormous oil and gas fields Monday, paving the way for investment in a nation with some of the world's largest petroleum reserves. If appro...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
80
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- Tulka2 I'm a Fan of Tulka2 266 fans permalink
photo

When will it sink in? When will ordinary Americans understand we have been boarded by pirates?! The war was about oil. It was always about oil. It was and is blood for oil. And now... ? What assurance that the U.S. will even get oil...? No, it will go to the highest bidder. The whole nation ignores the blood. I do not want vengence, but i do call for simple human justice. The time for impeachment is past. We need criminal trials.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 PM on 06/30/2008

How did a breakfast cereal make it onto the list of qualified contractors? Granted, it is loaded with nutritive vitamins and minerals that help to start a day right, but I'd hardly say that it was ready to bid on a multi-billion oil contract in a volatile fledgling nation. Maybe it should just sit this one out and try to get a sub-contract with Kuwaiti oil and work its way up to the stickier issues of the Iraqi reserves. Or maybe it should just think about adding dried strawberries. That'd be good, Total with strawberries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:48 PM on 06/30/2008

"Greater oil production is key to rebuilding Iraq's devastated infrastructure and delivering energy to the country."

What about that $100B from oil sales that Iraq has stashed away somewhere, money that was supposed to be going to rebuild Iraq's devastated infrastructure?

Nah, Uncle Sam (read U.S. taxpayers) will take care of that - we're such nice, understanding people...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 06/30/2008

Apparently Paul Bremmner, Bush's viceroy shortly after the invsion, spent that in no time at all. That has been gone since 2004.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 06/30/2008
photo

Yes we did, no we didn't. Yes we did, no we didn't. Yes we...


Conflicting and confusing stories, how unexpected­...

Uh huh ...sure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:21 PM on 06/30/2008
photo

Makes me wonder, though, how Bush will retaliate if HIS oil companies LOSE OUT to foreign companies. Will he BOMB the fields? Whatever it takes, RIGHT!! If every American were to WRITE to the Iraqi government and TELL THEM NOT to give in to any DEAL by these crooked oil companies for Bush, and if they LISTENED, we'd no longer have any reason to keep troops there, no more reason to slaughter Iraqis and no reason or justification to invade Iran, PRICE BE DAMNED!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 PM on 06/30/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

You want to believe soooooo badly that this war was so Bush could "steal oil" that you think about how Bush will bomb oil fields? You're not serious, right? You're being farcical, right? Sarcastic?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:22 PM on 06/30/2008
- ymax I'm a Fan of ymax 3 fans permalink

Yes!

You do smell like one big Repug.

DUBYA did go to war for oil to his friends and all the military supply companies.

They all gave him alot of money to become the Chiff DECIDER and then he will pay back

1000 folds.

Way to go BU$H.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 PM on 06/30/2008
- ccpostman I'm a Fan of ccpostman 22 fans permalink
photo

It was always about the oil.

Bush only guarded the oil Ministry during the invasion.

Say what you want, It's already written in all the books and is factual history!

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/04/16/1050172643895.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 AM on 07/01/2008
- demfriend I'm a Fan of demfriend 23 fans permalink
photo

Does this mean, could this mean that bush and friends might not end up with the sweet deal that mission accomplished was meant to hand them? If Iraq is in a position to make it's own rules and not take the rules the US gave thme to take this could be a upset for the people who made the Iraq war happen. How many wars have been fought over the need for oil?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 06/30/2008
- helonias I'm a Fan of helonias 240 fans permalink
photo

I wondered how much big oil paid him to say that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 06/30/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 633 fans permalink
photo

You don't have to pay them, just take one of their kin and put a knife to their throat, they will co operate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:44 PM on 06/30/2008
- WIpatriot I'm a Fan of WIpatriot 36 fans permalink
photo

Don't even need the knife, just say you know where so-and-so lives...'n­uff said.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 06/30/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 274 fans permalink

I hope this the Iraq Government actually asserting itself, but it's likely all just spin to cover the no-bid contracts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 06/30/2008
- Bluesue I'm a Fan of Bluesue 21 fans permalink

Well good forthe Iraqis for standing up to this administration and big oil. Bush/Cheney must be having a meltdown today. After all, the war in Iraq was all about handing those chosen companies the oil fields in Iraq. I just hope this isn't a sham by the Iraqis to make the handover more palatable.

From the NY Times:

"Until about 35 years ago, the world's oil was largely in the hands of seven corporations based in the United States and Europe. Those seven have since merged into four: ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell and BP. They are among the world's largest and most powerful financial empires. But ever since they lost their exclusive control of the oil to the governments, the companies have been trying to get it back."

and this:

In 1998, Kenneth Derr, then chief executive of Chevron, told a San Francisco audience, ''Iraq possesses huge reserves of oil and gas -- reserves I'd love Chevron to have access to.''

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 06/30/2008
- esquire07 I'm a Fan of esquire07 25 fans permalink

And there it is folks... the true reason for illegal occupation of Iraq, the bankrupting of the United
States, the killing of tens of thousand sof Iraqis, thousands of dead US troops, destuction of a nation.

What a joke. Wait till the Bill comes due for the US, not gonna be pretty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 06/30/2008
- bleek I'm a Fan of bleek 11 fans permalink

Is it safe to speculate on all this oil? :-o

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 06/30/2008
- RatgurlSD I'm a Fan of RatgurlSD 10 fans permalink

What do you think is driving the gas prices right now?

Speculation!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:34 PM on 06/30/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 633 fans permalink
photo

There are no free elections in Iraq, any candidate that went against the grain ( and there are many grains ) would get his head blown off. No security, no free elections, no representative government. this is not complicated stuff .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 06/30/2008
- Superbus I'm a Fan of Superbus 27 fans permalink
photo

This is good news, so why is everybody so upset about more supply in the world economy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 06/30/2008
- Razz I'm a Fan of Razz 2 fans permalink

Do you see it working?
Have you checked the gas prices?
Or are you living on Mars?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 06/30/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 633 fans permalink
photo

He is a die hard repub, mars is far too close to earth for him, try Alpha Centauri.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 06/30/2008
- Razz I'm a Fan of Razz 2 fans permalink

Now don't tell me you need time for this kind of news to get into the system, in the works so that we will see cheaper oil?
Then how is it that a small new from Yemen upsets the entire oil industry and crude oil jumps $5 a barrel the very moment the news hits the market?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 06/30/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 633 fans permalink
photo

Go to your local gas station and watch the prices plummet. Just stand there until they do.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 06/30/2008

Why do you try to reason with the troll? All he knows how to do is to swallow whatever Rush vomits and then vomit that same thing out. 0 individual thought.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 06/30/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

Yes gas in our area just went to 4.19 a gallon, 4.99 for diesel

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 PM on 06/30/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080630132348.o5p2d1bs&show_article=1

"Iraq said on Monday it has failed to sign technical support agreements with global oil majors which were aimed at helping boost the war-torn country's oil production.

Iraq is negotiating with Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, Chevron and Total, and a consortium of other smaller oil companies, Oil Minister Hussein al-Shahristani said at press briefing.

"We did not finalise any agreement with them because they refused to offer consultancy based on fees, as they wanted a share of the oil," he said. "

****

The Iraqis are NOT rolling over and letting the U.S. companies do what they want!!!!

A little investigation would show that many comments here are unfounded.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 06/30/2008

Of course quoting Wayne Breitbart is the definitive source....
:eyeroll:

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 06/30/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

It doesn't matter that it's a Breitbart story, the RELEVENT part is the QUOTE from the Iraqi Oil Minister at a Press Conference:

"We did not finalise any agreement with them because they refused to offer a consultancy based on fees, as they wanted a share of the oil"

It seems you don't like the content of the story, so you dismiss it and offer an excuse, saying it's not credible.

I think a lot of people who supported the war in Iraq because of WMD have moved to the CENTER and realize what a mistake it was. It's time for the conspiracy theory wing to move to the center and admit that it's NOT about oil.

There's no evidence that we went to war to "steal the oil". Sure, Bush lied, but that doesn't prove his motives.

The whole "we're there to steal the oil" argument seems like piling on, to me. It's exciting to think of such a grand plot when you are against the war and Bush, but you have to temper that with facts and common sense. Please.

www.regularenergyfreedom.com

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:47 PM on 06/30/2008
- Razz I'm a Fan of Razz 2 fans permalink

This is another form of misinformation so that the American public thinks we are not there for oil.

----------WAKEUP. Nothing is sacred but OIL for the Bushco's.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 06/30/2008
- pithy I'm a Fan of pithy 10 fans permalink

Imagine the shock and consternation (can we say "awe") on the faces of the no-bid CEO's to discover that the Iraqi government, the true democracy we installed, is now showing a set of balls?

Maybe they did get the "autonomy" lessons we provided?

I hope they stick to it big-time!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 AM on 06/30/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

Wait... don't you see that your statement goes against conventional wisom at HuffPo?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 06/30/2008
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect