Fox's Poison Pill PR, And How It Boomerangs Back

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Fox's Poison Pill PR, And How It Boomerangs Back stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Huffington Post   |  Rachel Sklar
First Posted: 07- 7-08 09:08 AM   |   Updated: 07-15-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Fox News Carr Shep Andycoop Olbie

The big news today after a slow long weekend is David Carr's takedown of the Fox News PR department in the New York Times. I mean "takedown" in the nicest possible way, because considering the subject matter and impetus, it's the nicest possible piece.

Consider the backstory. Last weekend, Jacques Steinberg wrote a story about how FNC's cable news competitors were gaining ground. Fox retaliated via its morning show, "Fox & Friends," which struck back at the "hit piece" by claiming Steinberg was the "attack dog" of TV editor Steven Redicliffe, whom they alleged was a disgruntled former employee. They illustrated this with photos of Redicliffe and Steinberg — doctored to make them look as awful as possible. In Steinberg's case, the modifications carried the faint whiff of anti-Semitism; per Carr: "In a technique familiar to students of vintage German propaganda, his ears were pulled out, his teeth splayed apart, his forehead lowered and his nose was widened and enlarged in a way that made him look more like Fagin than the guy I work with."

Pretty nasty stuff, whether or not the anti-Semitic element was intentional (and Fox head of PR Brian Lewis said it was not, calling the claim "vile and untrue"). Considering all that — not to mention all the evidence Carr had at his disposal for the column — the article really could have been a hit piece. But instead it was more like a think piece, not only tracing the "scorched earth between Fox News and those who cover it" but also extrapolating that bridge-burning strategy into what Fox has potentially lost out on:

Fox is so busy playing defense -- mentioning it in the same story as CNN can be a high crime -- that its business and journalism accomplishments don't get traction and the cable station never seems to attain the legitimacy it so clearly craves.

There have been few stories about Bill O'Reilly's softer side (I'm sure he has one), and while Shepard Smith's amazing reporting in New Orleans got some play, he was not cast as one of the journalistic heroes of the disaster. The fact that Roger Ailes has won both Obie awards and Emmys does not come up a lot, nor does the fact that he donated a significant chunk of money to upgrade the student newsroom at Ohio University, his alma mater.

That's an interesting point, especially when you consider all the great press someone like Keith Olbermann has received over the past few years, or Anderson Cooper. Not that O'Reilly suffers from lack of coverage, but there isn't a "hero" of Fox in the same way — a promotional "face" of the network to inspire fans and bloggers and Google hits (if Google hits were ratings, Fox would be in trouble: "Anderson Cooper" leads with 2.28 million, followed closely by "Keith Olbermann" with 2.2 million, while a combined "Shep Smith" and "Shepard Smith" gets 821,000). As a handsome, affable and hard-working straight-up news guy — logging plenty of TV hours and with a big-leagues paycheck — Shep has been relatively under-covered.

(Yes, it's true he is not captured dreamily in a bulletproof vest that matches his eyes and has not told the president to shut the hell up — that does tend to make a difference. But still.)

Nonetheless, considering how dominant Fox News is in the #1 spot — with 9 out of the top 10 Q2 cable shows — their controversies get covered far more than their stars. As buzz goes, we hear more about Mika Brzezinski than Martha McCallum, more about Chris Matthews than Neil Cavuto, more about Wolf Blitzer than Brit Hume, more about "Reliable Sources" than "Fox News Watch." There are apples-to-oranges arguments about all of them, to be sure, but the ratings differential is significant enough to be counted among them.

(Actually, upon reflection, the closest Fox has gotten to general-interest who-is-this-guy-you've-gotta-know profiles is Greg Gutfeld. That's an apple falling far from any tree, but you get the picture.)

Story continues below
advertisement

Back to Carr. Make the connection between his opening thought ("[W]henever I type seven letters - Fox News -a series of alarms begins to whoop in my head") and the relative lack of ink for the "good" stuff. To the extent that news stories grow out of PR pitches, that's an interesting indicator of just how likely a Fox pitch is to land. Which no doubt exacerbates their belligerent attitude for all other, less friendly stories. Ergo, Steinberg-as-Fagin.

Two more observations about the article:

(1) I was surprised not to see a mention of Irena Briganti, whose acid evaluations of competitors are legendary (and so effective her dismissal of Anderson Cooper as "the Paris Hilton of cable news" was re-used in Fox ad copy; never mind her blistering poison pill "wish-well" to Olbermann). How many cable PR people make the news themselves?

(2) The Jossip offshoot: Carr refers a colleague who was threatened by "a Fox News public relations executive" that they'd slime him if he ran with his story about CNN ratings gains; within a day, the smear showed up "around the blogs." Jossip owns up to owning that smear, pointing to an item they did about Tim Arango, who wrote the story in question. No one says either way whether the rumor about Arango was grounded in fact, but that appears to be beside the point for Jossip, which articulates its editorial standards thusly: "If it's an interesting story, we're going to run with it. It's kind of that simple...If there's dirt, we've got a shovel." Alrighty then.

As a counterpoint, note that Carr declines to name the Fox News PR executive who made (and apparently made good on) the Arango threat. See above re: nice. "For the record, everyone I dealt with at Fox News in connection with this column was polite, highly responsive, and got right to the point," said Carr. "A guy could get used to that." You never know, maybe now he will.

p.s. For the record, ETP loves potatoes.

When Fox News Is The Story [NYT]
How David Carr Dared Take on Fox News' (And might live to tell about it) [Jossip]
Q2 Cable Program Ranker [TVNewser]

Related:
Bauder: Watch Your Back When Fox News Wishes Well
[AP]
Irena Briganti, Quote Machine [ETP]

Update:
Irena Briganti, The Most Vindictive Flack Who Will Ever Yell At You
[Gawker]

Photo of David Carr courtesy of NYMag.com/Patrick McMullen; photos of Steinberg/Redicliffe courtesy of Media Matters by way of Fox News.

The big news today after a slow long weekend is David Carr's takedown of the Fox News PR department in the New York Times. I mean "takedown" in the nicest possible way, because considering the subject...
The big news today after a slow long weekend is David Carr's takedown of the Fox News PR department in the New York Times. I mean "takedown" in the nicest possible way, because considering the subject...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
20
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Rachel loves potatoes and has that bombshell figure? Face it fellas, she's beyond mere mortal women! WOW!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 PM on 07/08/2008
- vipersdad I'm a Fan of vipersdad 5 fans permalink

Perhaps the Fox agenda is all about the chaos and controversy and not about the news.

It's the "Ann Coulter" system - say Bat-$hit crazy stuff as often as possible and try to grab headlines.

That Shep's reporting post-Katrina went largely unheralded is because Fox didn't play it up -

....because they are not about the reporting - and because positive press is 10 times less effective than negative press at attracting Ad Dollars.....

Until we are able to send clear, loud, and consistent messages to the advertisers who keep Fox news on the air, the only message those advertisers are getting is that Fox has strong ratings.

Hit them in the pocketbook - it's the only thing they understand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 07/08/2008
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 43 fans permalink

It is news when the dying NYT gets anything right. But FAUX NOISE is an obvious, obscene, obnoxious blight upon the news media. Letting the NYT do a job on FAUX is a charitable way of honoring the NYT's past when it was America's only newspaper of record. That past, however, is long gone. Letting the NYT play like it's still a newspaper of record for a day may be the MSM's quaint way of honoring the NYT's legacy; it may be seen as a kindness or mitzvpa(sp) to a dying NYT.
Who supplied the NYT with the catalog of FAUX NOISE's most glaring short comings which this blog again covers?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 07/08/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

Olbermann, and Cooper are only commentators like oreilly, they are not news men. Shep is a bonified
Newsman. Seems for what ever reason the commentators get more coverage than regular newsmen.
Go figure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 AM on 07/08/2008
- dadw5boys I'm a Fan of dadw5boys 261 fans permalink
photo

SINCE BLOCKING THE FOX NETWORK IN MY HOME LIFE IS SO MUCH BETTER.

FOX NETWORK WILL DUMB DOWN YOUR WHOLE FAMILY!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:11 AM on 07/08/2008

FoxNews should be classified as a 527 on the side of McCain. There is not a single liberal-leaning oe even independent reporter/anchor at that "station." Both CNN and MSNBC have reporters/anchors of all party affiliations. Now, thanks to FoxNews analyst Howard Wolfson and the still-operating Clinton campaign's insistence that Fox is the most "fair and balanced," the general public will view them as a legitimate news organization.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 AM on 07/08/2008
photo

Good point! So true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:47 AM on 07/08/2008
- andhakari I'm a Fan of andhakari 5 fans permalink

The people who watch FOX don't surf. They don't read. They don't travel. They watch FOX.
That is their world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 07/08/2008
- noamjunior I'm a Fan of noamjunior 80 fans permalink

I heard photoshop is coming out with a new FOXNEWS plug-In filter- makes the subject of any photo look like a stereotypical Jew from a nazi propaganda poster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 PM on 07/07/2008

FOX News, or rather "FAUX News" as some perhaps more aptly call it, is truly a blight amongst the cable news media.

Adam50, you are correct in your assessment of the station and its effect on the nation.

I read David Carr's piece in the NYT. Well written and informative.

I watched FAUX news a few times when it first came on the air. After those few times, I've never watched it again. I was so appalled at the lack of journalistic integrity and the mean spiritedness of the staff.

Now, my only inkling of what that crappy news station is up to comes via articles like Mr. Carr's and blog posts. I am relieved to know that I'm not missing anything worthwhile by not watching FAUX News.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 07/07/2008

Fox News loves the criminals Bush and Cheney.

Which means Fox News hates America and her Liberty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 07/07/2008
photo

Of course the face rendering was anti-semitic and Fox's response is the the typical, "We don't know what you are talking about and shame on you for saying it" bull. The "feign ignorance" defense that is the cornerstone of rightwing ideology.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 07/07/2008

So there no corloation between this and what FOX news did to the NYT's reporters

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:54 PM on 07/07/2008

Foxnews characters are not liked because , they are spiteful and nasty people. Noone likes to be lied to on a daily basis. And a lot of them don't look like normal people they , remind me of robots, there is something fake about their image. I find them a very hateful bunch who are bad for the image of America. They divide America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 07/07/2008
photo

Faux News is starting to act like the Church of Scientology. Any criticism or mention of them that isn't 100% worshipful and they attack in the most hysterical manner. Either Falafel O'Reilly sends his creepy little stalkers out to ambush and harass those who displease him, or he threatens people with "Fox Security". You can see this thuggery in action when the New York Post ran a smear job on Lara Logan, and Newscorp's obsession with Keith Olbermann is almost as demented as John Hinckley's fixation on Jodie Foster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 PM on 07/07/2008
- Bluedog12 I'm a Fan of Bluedog12 11 fans permalink

I like the analogy. Can't wait until Jabba the Hut Ailes goes on Oprah and jumps over the couch to cozy up to uberhater Ing-ra-ham. Oprah does need a new couch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 07/07/2008
- rbdc I'm a Fan of rbdc permalink

Scary how similar Fox News is to the Bush White House. They both start with a political agenda and divide the world into those with 'em and those against 'em; then they try to intimidate the hell out of those against 'em -- using any means available to them. It's certainly an ugly world view and modus operandi.

Potato-loving p.s. doesn't makes sense unless you read Carr's NYT column.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 07/07/2008
- Rachel Sklar - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Rachel Sklar 63 fans permalink

Sometimes there has to be a bonus for having done the homework.

:)

Nevermind that I really, really love potatoes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 07/07/2008
- DasBoot I'm a Fan of DasBoot 22 fans permalink
photo

Ah, Rachel likes Nirvana...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 AM on 07/08/2008
- rbdc I'm a Fan of rbdc permalink

Aw, gee whiz, teach! Can't we be spoon-fed?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 AM on 07/08/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect