Fed May Extend Emergency Wall Street Lending,Plans New Rules TO Protect Homeowners

RSS stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com Share this on Facebook

JEANNINE AVERSA | July 8, 2008 09:23 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »

Show your support.
Buzz this article up.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is reflected in a piece of glass during his keynote address at the FDIC Forum on Mortgage Lending for Low and Moderate Income Households, Tuesday, July 8, 2008, in Arlington, Va. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)

WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve will issue new rules next week aimed at protecting future homebuyers from dubious lending practices, its most sweeping response to a housing crisis that has propelled foreclosures to record highs.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke spoke of the much-awaited rules in a broader speech Tuesday about the challenges confronting policymakers in trying to stabilize a shaky U.S. financial system. To that end, Bernanke said the Fed may give squeezed Wall Street firms more time to tap the central bank's emergency loan program.

To prevent a repeat of the current mortgage mess, Bernanke said the Fed will adopt rules cracking down on a range of shady lending practices that have burned many of the nation's riskiest "subprime" borrowers _ those with spotty credit or low incomes _ who were hardest hit by the housing and credit debacles.

The plan, which will be voted on at a Fed board meeting on Monday, would apply to new loans made by thousands of lenders of all types, including banks and brokers.

Under the proposal unveiled last December, the rules would restrict lenders from penalizing risky borrowers who pay loans off early, require lenders to make sure these borrowers set aside money to pay for taxes and insurance and bar lenders from making loans without proof of a borrower's income. It also would prohibit lenders from engaging in a pattern or practice of lending without considering a borrower's ability to repay a home loan from sources other than the home's value.

"These new rules ... will address some of the problems that have surfaced in recent years in mortgage lending, especially high-cost mortgage lending," Bernanke said.

Story continues below
advertisement

Consumer groups have complained that the proposed rules aren't strong enough, while mortgage lenders worry that they are too tough and could crimp customers' choices.

The Mortgage Bankers Association urged the Fed to "take a balanced approach in devising final regulations so that the credit crisis is not worsened."

Meanwhile, the Center for Responsible Lending, a group that promotes homeownership and works to curb predatory lending, warned the Fed that weak regulation and oversight has led to the "worst credit crunch in generations."

The Fed _ under former chairman Alan Greenspan _ came under attack for not acting early on to crack down on dubious lending. Some critics complained that Greenspan, who ran the Fed for 18 1/2 years _ failed to act as a forceful regulator especially during the 2001-2005 housing boom, when easy credit spurred lots of subprime home loans and many exotic types of mortgages.

Meanwhile, signs emerged Tuesday that the housing market's slump is likely to persist through the summer, and the real estate market may not recover for at least another year.

The National Association of Realtors' pending home sales index slipped by 4.7 percent in May to the third-lowest reading on record. The decline "suggests we are not out of the woods by any means," said the group's chief economist, Lawrence Yun.

In an extraordinary action aimed at averting a financial catastrophe, the Fed in March agreed to let investment houses go to the Fed _ on a temporary basis _ for a quick, overnight source of cash. Those loan privileges, which are supposed to last through mid-September, are similar to those permanently afforded to commercial banks for years.

"We are currently monitoring developments in financial markets closely and considering several options, including extending the duration of our facilities for primary dealers beyond year-end should the current unusual and exigent circumstances continue to prevail in dealer funding markets," Bernanke said in prepared remarks to a mortgage-lending forum in Arlington, Va.

The Fed's decision to act _ temporarily at least _ as a lender of last resort for Wall Street firms was made after a run on Bear Stearns pushed the investment bank to the brink of bankruptcy and raised fears that others might be in jeopardy. It was the broadest use of the Fed's lending powers since the 1930s.

Bear Stearns was eventually taken over by JPMorgan Chase & Co., with the Fed providing $28.82 billion in financial backing.

Those controversial decisions have drawn criticism from Democrats in Congress and elsewhere that the Fed is bailing out Wall Street and putting billions of taxpayer dollars at risk.

Bernanke, in appearances on Capitol Hill has said he doesn't believe taxpayers will suffer any losses.

In his speech Tuesday, the Fed chief defended those actions anew. If the Fed didn't intervene, he said, problems in financial markets would have snowballed, imperiling the country.

"Allowing Bear Stearns to fail so abruptly at a time when the financial markets were already under considerable stress would likely have had extremely adverse implications for the financial system and for the broader economy," Bernanke said to the mortgage forum, organized by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Dodd, meanwhile, praised the Fed's actions in a statement Tuesday, saying, "I am pleased that the Federal Reserve is now taking steps to issue new rules for mortgage lending and to improve oversight of our financial system. As documented by the Senate Banking Committee, it was the lack of regulatory will, not lack of regulatory authority, that contributed to the current credit crisis."

The Fed's consideration of giving Wall Street firms more time to tap the Fed's emergency loan program is part of an ongoing effort by the central bank to bring back stability to fragile financial markets and help to bolster shaky confidence on the part of investors.

Policymakers _ in the White House, in Congress and other federal agencies _ will need to work together to come up with ways to make the U.S. financial system more resilient and stable and to prevent a repeat of the types of problems that brought about the end of Bear Stearns, an 85-year-old institution, Bernanke said.

Although those efforts are already under way and will be the focus of a House Financial Services Committee hearing Thursday, it will fall to the next president and next Congress to settle them. Both Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson are scheduled to testify at Thursday's hearing.

The Bush administration has proposed revamping the nation's financial regulatory structure. That plan would make the Fed an ubercop in charge of financial market stability. But the Fed would lose daily supervision of big banks. Bernanke said the Fed must maintain this power if it is to be an effective overseer of financial stability.

The Fed, which regulates banks, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which oversees investment firms, announced an information-sharing agreement on Monday aimed at better detecting potential risks to the financial system.

Over the longer term, though, Congress may need to adopt legislation to bolster supervision of investment banks and other large securities dealers, Bernanke said.

Bernanke recommended that Congress give a regulator the authority to set standards for capital, liquidity holdings and risk management practices for the holding companies of the major investment banks. Currently, the SEC's oversight of these holding companies is based on a voluntary agreement between the SEC and those firms.

 
 

Comments
20
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- TovSquirrel See Profile I'm a Fan of TovSquirrel permalink

capitalism & a "free market" at its best

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 07/08/2008
- ld See Profile I'm a Fan of ld permalink

Coupled with the earlier bail-out of the big financial institutions by accepting bad mortgages as loan collateral, we now have what have what has to be the finest example of corporations pigging out on the taxpayer dollar ever. Working and middle class are just plain being destroyed by Chaney/Bush and the other Republicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 07/08/2008
- calhar See Profile I'm a Fan of calhar permalink

Whats with the Fed bailing these greedy people out.As far as i am concerned the can all go bankrupt and the country would be a hundred years ahead. All they do is take money out of the econonomy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 07/08/2008
- MufsMom See Profile I'm a Fan of MufsMom permalink

I understand we don't want the markets to crash, but their attitude toward homeowners is the government won't save people from bad financial decisions...unless, of course, you are a wealthy Republican. Obscene.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 07/08/2008
- outnow See Profile I'm a Fan of outnow permalink

Borrowers need protection such as a law prohibiting foreclosure temporarily. The other protections are good but come too late. The crisis is in deflating the assets in real estate, i.e., the value of the homes of the borrowers. Eliminating pre-payment penalties might help some borrowers re-finance. Requiring proof of income might help prevent future borrowing and brokering of loans with securitization.

I believe in using the bankruptcy courts to "cram down" upside-down mortgage balances against lenders and holders in due course. If the market falls, then the outstanding balances should be reduced to reflect the market. The assumption that the market would go up indefinitely was erroneous. But to allow it to drop too far does nobody any good except for investors who buy at foreclosures.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 07/08/2008
- research See Profile I'm a Fan of research permalink

Ya See Conservatives?

The Wealthy DO GET MORE HELP FROM GOVERNMENT!

I don't want banking or the stock market to crash. Fine let's help them.

Once things are working again, I expect taxes on wealthy folks to more then pay for what it cost us.

That's the social contract.

We help you when your down,

you pay a greater share when you are riding high.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 PM on 07/08/2008
- ubetchaiam See Profile I'm a Fan of ubetchaiam permalink

The Fed is just pushing off the inevitable as long as possible; get ready for the next great depression.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 07/08/2008
- biwee See Profile I'm a Fan of biwee permalink

If there were any true Americans in the US Congress, we would return to the rule of the US Constitution, and the FED would be abolished. But, as with the unnecessary war of choice in Iraq, the Democrats are just as evil as the
Repubbies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:54 PM on 07/08/2008
- feo See Profile I'm a Fan of feo permalink

So, when my investments tanks thanks to mismanagement: tough. When bankers and other gamblers lose some cash: Bail out. Free markets at their finest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 07/08/2008
- zizyphus See Profile I'm a Fan of zizyphus permalink

The FED should all pack up and go home. Haven't they done enough damage? Now they are giving the money launderers the keys to the treasury. Sucking leeches. Wall Street and their handmaidens the CIA and FED have taken over. If we spent the money on education that we spend on defense, people would be asking for the FED to hit the road. People have no idea what the FED is, what it does, or how they are undermining our security.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 07/08/2008
- darthdarcy See Profile I'm a Fan of darthdarcy permalink

As long as the Fed keeps waving the big carrot of these huge bail outs that the America people pay for the Tax payers then Wall St. will not see fit to reform and the solution to the Sub Prime Crisis that would have not cost any Tax Payer on single dime would have been to Peg the Sub Primes at 3% above the Fed Rate or even Prime Rate not to go below 6.25-6.5% and forgive all Penalties to date 1/2 or more are illegal anyway this way no bank or lender would have lost money and the borrowers would have remained almost all of them in their homes..

Again this solution would not have required a bail out by the fed which means the American Tax payer musty pay it plus Interest...

Why hasn't Obama or even McCain suggested this simple fair solution that spares the American Tax Payers from bailing out Banks and Lenders who make billions..we have socialist banking in this country but not Single Payer Health Care or Nationalized Oil and Energy or our failing hurting ever more dangerous Airlines...

Socialism for Billionaires only...!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 07/08/2008
- holeybuybull See Profile I'm a Fan of holeybuybull permalink

The FED is now going to close the barn door after all the horses have escaped. Thanks Bernanke and Greenspan, with an assist by McCain's Phil Graham(sp), Newt Gingrich and the Republican "CONtract on America. Gotta love that "free market" socialism that bails out the corporations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 07/08/2008
- mellene See Profile I'm a Fan of mellene permalink

This is so typical that the Feds can extend a helping hand to Wall Street firms but spit on the ordinary Americans when it comes to lending them a hand of extension in saving their homes. It's totally disgusting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 07/08/2008
- edva See Profile I'm a Fan of edva permalink

The way to make the economy more "resilient" (I love that term - resilient to what exactly? Capitalism needs to be resilient to it's own inherent characteristics?) is to correct the huge, growing wealth inequity in our society. Money should flow to the workers, not the investors and CEO's. Unfortunately, our government has sold out to "Wall St." to such an extent that the stability of our entire nation now depends on the reckless greed of the few, to the detriment of the many.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 07/08/2008
- joebhed See Profile I'm a Fan of joebhed permalink

"money should flow to workers".

Actually, money should flow to the priorities of the American people, who, acting through their elected government, decide whether those priorities ought to be health, education, welfare, infrastructure, environment, art and music, OR, war, derivatives, commodity futures and hedge funds.

And, then, MAYBE, money should flow to the investors and CEOs.
That's the way it should be.
It's the "trickle-up" monetary system, OF, BY and FOR the PEOPLE.

That's the way it would be, if FDR had accepted the recommended plan from the Chicago School economists for a government-issue, debt-free money system in this country.
That's exactly the way it would be.

And, MAYBE, will be.
If we can get the masses to understand the fractional-reserve lending system in this country, people would revolt.

Peacefully.
With a pen.
Abolish the FED.
Let the people control the money, and they will also control their government.
Go to the American Monetary Institute's web site.
Download their monetary reform bill.

Or else, let the bankers control the money.
You see the results.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 PM on 07/08/2008
- Chavez08 See Profile I'm a Fan of Chavez08 permalink

"Money should flow to the workers, not the investors and CEO's"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 PM on 07/08/2008
- bascombe See Profile I'm a Fan of bascombe permalink

and not one penny to a single citizen.

unless maybe you're a connected repug.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 07/08/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

Stock Quote

Enter a ticker symbol below:

Data provided by AOL



Related Tags