More

Bush Signs Wiretapping Bill Granting Telecoms Immunity

JENNIFER LOVEN | July 10, 2008 11:35 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush, left, shakes hand with Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Jay Rockerfeller, D-W.Va, right, after signing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, (FISA), Thursday, July 10, 2008, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington. House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio is at center. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

WASHINGTON — President Bush signed a bill Thursday that overhauls rules about government eavesdropping and grants immunity to telecommunications companies that helped the U.S. spy on Americans in suspected terrorism cases.

He called it "landmark legislation that is vital to the security of our people."

Bush signed the measure in a Rose Garden ceremony a day after the Senate sent it to him, following nearly a year of debate in the Democratic-led Congress over surveillance rules and the warrantless wiretapping program Bush initiated after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It was a battle that pitted privacy and civil liberties concerns against the desire to prevent terrorist attacks and Democrats' fears of being portrayed as weak when it comes to protecting the country.

Its passage was a major victory for Bush, an unpopular lame-duck president who nevertheless has been able to prevail over Congress on most issues of national security and intelligence disputes.

Bush said the 9/11 attack "changed our country forever" and taught the intelligence community that it must know who America's enemies are talking to and what they are saying.

"In the aftermath of 9/11," Bush said, "few would have imagined that we would be standing here seven years later without another attack on American soil. The fact that the terrorists have failed to strike our shores again does not mean that our enemies have given up."

Even before Bush signed the legislation, the American Civil Liberties Union said it would challenge the new law in court.

The president said the bill gives the government anti-terror tools it needs without compromising Americans' civil liberties.

Bush was joined at the ceremony by Vice President Dick Cheney, Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and more than a dozen members of Congress.

The ACLU's lawsuit was filed on behalf of several civil rights groups. It wants a federal judge in New York to rule that the law is an unconstitutional violation of free speech and the right against unlawful search and seizure. It also asks that the judge permanently block intelligence officials from conducting surveillance under the law.

"The new law gives the government the power to conduct dragnet surveillance that has no connection to terrorism or criminal activity of any kind," said Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, in a conference call to reporters.

"A law like this is fundamentally inconsistent with the Constitution and with the most basic democratic values," he said.

Roger Atwood, communications director for the Washington Office on Latin America, a human rights organization for the region, said the new law will impede the group's work.

"The mere suspicion that information provided to us, to our staff, will be accessed by the U.S. government can seriously affect WOLA's credibility and our effectiveness in Latin America in moving our work forward," Atwood said in the conference call.

___

Associated Press writer Christine Simmons contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — President Bush signed a bill Thursday that overhauls rules about government eavesdropping and grants immunity to telecommunications companies that helped the U.S. spy on Americans i...
WASHINGTON — President Bush signed a bill Thursday that overhauls rules about government eavesdropping and grants immunity to telecommunications companies that helped the U.S. spy on Americans i...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:07 AM on 07/11/2008
That picture of Bushitler makes me sick.
09:25 AM on 07/11/2008
So here we go again,moving another step closer to rule by decree.Thank you Dubya,the Fhuror would be proud!
10:21 PM on 07/10/2008
PART 1 OF 2

The House Judiciary Committee will take up Kucinich's H. Res. 1258 demanding impeachment of Bush. See “Pelosi Says House Judiciary May Hold Hearings on Kucinich Impeachment Resolution,” Politico.com, 10 July 2008, www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0708/Pelosi_says_House_Judiciary_may_hold_hearings_on_Kucinich_impeachment_resolution.html#comments SEE ALSO http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.RES.1258:

We must hope the Committee considers, simultaneously, impeaching Dick Cheney. If Congress impeached Bush and removed him from office, Cheney would be President.

Cheney is the worst arch criminal ever in US government. SEE www.usalone.com/jaffee_on_impeachment2.htm --- detailing the felonies Cheney committed while VP.

Were Cheney President, he'd invade Iran, drill every US oil field, devastate the environment to enrich US mega-corporations and the already filthy rich, spy on citizens worse than the Bush has... He would fire the few moderating influences of Bush's administration, Condi Rice first. Cheney is psychopathic enough to start WW III.

On 24 April 2007, Kucinich introduced H. Res. 333, which seeks Cheney's impeachment. SEE
http://kucinich.house.gov/spotlightissues/documents.htm
AND
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c110:1:./temp/~c110QXQ0AQ::

H. Res. 333 remains alive & has 27 Co-Sponsors. SEE http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.res.00333:

It reached the House Floor, then was referred to the Judiciary Committee. SEE http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.res.00333:

CONTINUED IN PART 2
10:18 PM on 07/10/2008
PART 2 OF 2

Kucinich's Bush-impeachment resolution alleges offenses Kucinich did not allege in his Cheney-impeachment resolution. But virtually all Bush's crimes are also Cheney's, too, directly or because of criminal complicity or conspiracy. SEE www.usalone.com/jaffee_on_impeachment2.htm AND COMPARE http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.RES.1258:

Nothing prohibits the Judiciary Committee's taking up H. Res. 333 or investigating Cheney's crimes not alleged there but involved with Bush's impeachable offenses.

I urge all to press Pelosi and John Conyers and other House-members to have the Judiciary Committee entertain H. Res. 333 together with Kucinich's Bush-impeachment resolution (H. Res. 1258). SEE http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.RES.1258: AND http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.res.01258: AND www.usalone.com/jaffee_on_impeachment2.htm

Congress has time enough to impeach Cheney and Bush and remove them from office. We ought not be deterred because House-members or Senators may contrive to stall the process. Instead, we ought protest loudly all such maneuvers and demand that the obstructors be investigated for whether they were complicit in the crimes of Cheney and Bush.

I urge all also to tell Pelosi and Conyers and other Reps that the Judiciary Committee ought take up impeaching Cheney first, if it will not consider the two impeachment resolutions together --- so Bush will not be removed alone and Cheney become President.
10:00 PM on 07/10/2008
67 Days.

That's how long BushCo can wiretap and internet spy on you and everyone else.

The FISA court can't stop it.

BushCo gets to keep the spy data, even if the court rules the spying illegal.

4th amendment: gone.

Been to a foreign web site?

Been to a Naughty web site?

What will you tell the judge?

BushCo can point at any dissenter, any huff poster, any news caster, any politician.

BushCo can spy on everything they do only and on the phone for 67 days, with total impunity.

Anyone in the world.

67 days.

no evidence, no warrant.
07:25 AM on 07/11/2008
Obama wants this law and is going to use it. Been telling you liberal nuts for a month now obama is going to do the exact same crap bush is. I'm sure you libs will paint him as a hero for it though.
03:12 PM on 07/11/2008
Why don't you check out my profile before you jump to conclusions.
09:54 PM on 07/10/2008
Obama= Third Bush term.
09:46 PM on 07/10/2008
thank you gutless Obama--you are a complete disgrace--you lied about your support and you want to be our leader--only your ultra-liberals will make up excuses for your flip flopping character--sad day ,as Senator Dodd described it--
10:01 AM on 07/11/2008
I don't think liberals will put up with it, not like the repukelikan sheep that sat on their asses and did nothing to stop it. I'm still voting for Obama, Mcsame will never get my vote. If you vote for Mcsame it will get worse at least with Obama he can maybe be reasoned with.
09:46 PM on 07/10/2008
"Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither and will lose both."

-- Benjamin Franklin
10:08 AM on 07/11/2008
"Those who give up liberty for a sandwich deserve to be removed from office"

--KCFreedom
09:05 PM on 07/10/2008
Members of Congress knew they had to vote FOR immunity if they wanted their telephone, cell phone and internet connections to work consistently through the November election. Campaign contributions are an added bonus.

The American public does not realize that private contractors are copying ALL telephone and internet communications for the U.S. government under FISA. Help get that work out, it ought to alarm business and anyone developing valuable intellectual property.

Many of these private contractors are corrupt, They can sell what they have wherever they want. They operate with immunity and impunity. It WILL change. Support the ACLU's privacy suit.
08:11 PM on 07/10/2008
A BIG thank you to all of our Democratic(?) representatives (?) for keeping us safe! YEAHHHHHHHHH A special shout out and big fist pound to my brother Barack "fillibuster" Obama!!!!!
07:59 PM on 07/10/2008
Not too bad for a lame duck president.

Thanks Barry, for making this possible.
07:40 PM on 07/10/2008
Obama voted for this! FOR SHAME!
07:20 PM on 07/10/2008
Damn, it didn't take W and his lackies too long to get the bill into law. What was it about 30 hours. See our congress isn't paralized. When it comes to making money, and taking money they act swiftly and decisevely as long was we get screwed. If they were to get screwed, you think that they would have even voted on the law? What was that figure I read? the telecoms have paid out over 100 million to both parties since 2001. Now you know why the bill passed. So they wouldn't have to pay out any money to us for invading our privacy when they knowingly violatied the constutition at the bequest of the president of the US. Kind of think Darth was behind it all cause W isn't smart enough to know the difference between criminal and civil courts. However about December, he will issue Scooter a great Christmas present.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MaeScott
Nubian Queen
07:02 PM on 07/10/2008
If you are concerned, then let your other senators and reps know about it.
It will take more than just one man to effect real change.
You know that.
Get busy.
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
07:28 PM on 07/10/2008
Breaking News: A corrupt and lawless party with a right wing and a "centrist" wing has got a stranglehold on the government. They make the rules and they aren't giving it back. It's over. The End is near. More at 11.
01:56 AM on 07/11/2008
Obama is now the leader of the Democratic Party. He led them right down this path.
06:56 PM on 07/10/2008
Fascist takeover nearly complete.

Stay tuned for next allowed terror attack to begin rounding up all the "liberals".

Democracy in the the U.S: Born July 4th, 1776, Died: July 9, 2008

Wow.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AggieReal
Nothing fails like prayer. Do something.
07:50 PM on 07/10/2008
I think this is a lot of overreaction.. not to the various Bush crimes..but on this specific FISA thing... I don't care who wants to listen in on my phone conversations..I'm not involved in any illegal activity.. if you're not up to serious illegal activity I mean really.big deal... what a bunch of nonsense.... it was a different age when the constitution was written.. .. cell phones and e-mail have never been guaranteed as private...
08:52 PM on 07/10/2008
Well if you don't mind the government listening to your phone calls or reading your email then why don't you move to Russia,China, North Vietnam or other countries that do just what you don't mind. Would you like the government to read your mail? How about enter your house when they want? Tell you what you read, view on TV, listen to on the radio. The constitution covers all of these thing even if they are not mentioned by devise. Its the idea that the government cannot without just cause and a warrant go into your private life. Becareful what you are willing to give up in the name of security. You should stand up for your rights that your forefathers and so many after them fought and gave their lives for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reasonlives
08:53 PM on 07/10/2008
Aggie where did you get your law degree? Do you have any legal authority at all for your childish, simplistic statements? No, because there is none.
Since you do not believe in the Constitution or in any civil liberties or privacy rights or limits on govt powers, shoulnt you be on Rush Limbaugh's website, posting inane comments?