9 US Soldiers Killed In Afghanistan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - 9 US Soldiers Killed In Afghanistan stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JASON STRAZIUSO | July 13, 2008 09:48 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Face covered Taliban militants pose before they execute two Afghan women in Ghazni province, Afghanistan, on Saturday, July 12, 2008. Taliban fighters told Associated Press Television News that the two were executed for allegedly running a prostitution ring catering to U.S. soldiers and other foreign contractors at a U.S. base in Ghazni city. (AP Photo/Rahmatullah Naikzad)

KABUL, Afghanistan — A multi-pronged militant assault on a small, remote U.S. base close to the Pakistan border killed nine American soldiers and wounded 15 Sunday in the deadliest attack on U.S. forces in Afghanistan in three years, officials said.

The attack on the American troops began around 4:30 a.m. and lasted throughout the day. Militants fired machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and mortars from homes and a mosque in the village of Wanat in the mountainous northeastern province of Kunar, NATO's International Security Assistance Force said in a statement.

"Although no final assessment has been made, it is believed insurgents suffered heavy casualties during several hours of fighting," NATO said in a statement.

U.S. officials say militant attacks in Afghanistan are becoming more complex, intense and better coordinated than a year ago. Monthly death tolls of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan surpassed U.S. military deaths in Iraq in May and June. And last Monday, a suicide bomber attacked the Indian Embassy in Kabul, killing 58 people in the deadliest attack in the Afghan capital since 2001.

U.S. officials are considering drawing down additional forces from Iraq in coming months, in part because of the need for additional U.S. troops in Afghanistan. U.S. officials have said they need at least three more brigades in Afghanistan _ or more than 10,000 troops.

NATO confirmed nine of its soldiers had been killed and 15 wounded. A Western official said the nine dead were Americans, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the troops' nationalities. Four Afghan soldiers also were wounded, NATO said.

Lt. Col. Rumi Nielson-Green, the top U.S. military spokeswoman in Afghanistan, said she could not comment because the fighting was ongoing.

The attack was the deadliest for U.S. troops in Afghanistan since June 2005, when 16 American troops were killed _ also in Kunar province _ when their helicopter was shot down by a rocket-propelled grenade. Those troops were on their way to rescue a four-man team of Navy SEALs caught in a militant ambush. Three SEALs were killed, the fourth was rescued days later by a farmer.

Story continues below

The latest assault came at a time of rising violence in Afghanistan. Also on Sunday, a suicide bomber targeting a police patrol killed 24 people, including 19 civilians, while U.S. coalition and Afghan soldiers killed 40 militants elsewhere in the south.

More than 2,300 people _ mostly militants _ have died in insurgency-related violence this year, according to an Associated Press tally of official figures. Attacks in eastern Afghanistan are up 40 percent this year compared with last year.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned during a visit to Kabul last week that there are more foreign fighters, including al-Qaida members, in Pakistan's tribal areas, militants who cross the border and launch attacks against U.S. and Afghan troops.

Mullen has said he hopes improved security in Iraq will allow troops to be shifted this year from Iraq to Afghanistan, where violence is rising.

Violence in Iraq is at its lowest level in four years and Iraqi forces are taking on more responsibility, trends that could allow Gen. David Petraeus, the top American commander in Iraq, to recommend to President Bush in September that he resume a troop withdrawal that is being put on hold this month so Petraeus has time to assess the overall situation. A top Bush aide, Ed Gillespie, said Sunday that withdrawing more troops from Iraq after that assessment always has "been a possibility."

Another cause for concern in Afghanistan is the high casualty tolls for civilians killed in violence. This month, an Afghan government commission found that U.S. aircraft killed 47 civilians during a bombing run in Nangarhar province, while a separate incident in Nuristan province is alleged by an Afghan officials to have killed 22 civilians.

The tolls have prompted the International Committee of the Red Cross this week to ask all sides to show restraint and avoid civilian casualties. But violence continued around the country on Sunday.

A suicide bomber on a motorcycle blew himself up next to a police patrol in the southern province of Uruzgan, killing 24 people. The bomb attack on a police patrol at a busy intersection of the Deh Rawood district killed five police officers and 19 civilians, wounding more than 30 others, said Juma Gul Himat, Uruzgan's police chief. Most of those killed and wounded were shopkeepers and young boys selling goods in the street, he said.

Elsewhere, Taliban militants executed two women in central Afghanistan late Saturday after accusing them of working as prostitutes on a U.S. base.

The women, dressed in blue burqas, were shot and killed just outside Ghazni city in central Afghanistan, said Sayed Ismal, a spokesman for Ghazni's governor. He called the two "innocent local people."

Taliban fighters told Associated Press Television News the two women were executed for allegedly running a prostitution ring catering to U.S. soldiers and other foreign contractors at a U.S. base in Ghazni city.

1st Lt. Nathan Perry, a U.S. military spokesman, said he had not heard allegations "anything close to that nature."

Meanwhile, at least 40 militants were killed following an attack on Afghan and U.S.-led coalition forces in Helmand province, the coalition said in a statement. The militants attacked the combined forces near Sangin on Saturday from "multiple concealed and fortified positions," the coalition said. Thirty "enemy boats" and several small bridges have been destroyed on the Helmand River during two days of fighting, it said.

Also Sunday, a soldier with NATO's International Security Assistance Force died in a roadside blast in Helmand province, a statement said. The soldier's nationality was not released and it wasn't clear if the death was connected to the two-day battle.

In the north, a soldier serving with ISAF died of wounds caused by an explosion Saturday, the military alliance said in a statement. The statement did not give any further details of the explosion. The soldier's nationality was not disclosed.

There are nearly 53,000 troops from 40 nations serving in the ISAF in Afghanistan.

___

Associated Press writers Noor Khan in Kandahar and Rahim Faiez and Fisnik Abrashi in Kabul contributed to this report.

KABUL, Afghanistan — A multi-pronged militant assault on a small, remote U.S. base close to the Pakistan border killed nine American soldiers and wounded 15 Sunday in the deadliest attack on U.S...
KABUL, Afghanistan — A multi-pronged militant assault on a small, remote U.S. base close to the Pakistan border killed nine American soldiers and wounded 15 Sunday in the deadliest attack on U.S...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
956
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (11 pages total)

AbolishTheFed
Care to fill in the blanks?
Posted 09:33 PM on 07/13/2008

http://www.laughparty.com/funny-pictures/Angry-Orangutan-961.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 07/13/2008
photo

Still stalking people LiberalTexian?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 07/13/2008

Replying to someone on an open thread is not stalking, you paranoid pant load.

YOU who think that the dictionaries are written by "da Jooooooooos."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 07/13/2008

Nothing like a Rupauline WooWoo Spammer meltdown on a balmy summer night.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 07/13/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

Go well with margaritas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 07/13/2008

Go well with Cape Cods, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:45 PM on 07/13/2008

Nothing like reading a neo con obamabot meltdown as they resort to rovian neo con troll tactics because they have NO FACTS to support their warmonger.

ROFLMAO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 07/13/2008
photo

This site not anal retentive enough for you? We have moderators, we don't need "hall monitors" as well. Thanks anyway!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 07/13/2008

No one asked you, WooWoo.

No one on this site, except for you and your constipation conspiracy WooWoo friends, likes spammers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 07/13/2008
- Nochnoi I'm a Fan of Nochnoi 130 fans permalink
photo

So true... just got back from a very lovely walk.... fireflies and all.... stunning evening!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 07/13/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

Afghanistan hooba luba danda booga.

(There, now I'm on topic.)

I liked the NewYorket cover. Nicely done. 0bama camp needs to mature a bit and start appreciating satire.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 07/13/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

I agree, Hume.

If they are offended, it only means the satire hits too close to home.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:47 PM on 07/13/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

Don't flatter yoiurself. You didn't agree with me. Like an idjit, you failed to recongnize that it is satire aimed at Right Wingers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 PM on 07/13/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

I asked HumeSkeptic for proof of a plan for "world domination by US corporations" and he referred me to the PNAC papers on "benevolent hegemony". Problem is, US CORPORATIONS aren't part of the "benevolent hegemony".

I also asked HumeSkeptic for proof that "the loss of even millions of lives of innocent civilians and of our soldiers as an acceptable investment to realize those profits." He snarkily replied that he was surprised I would ask for proof of death and destruction in a war. He was obviously avoiding answering the REAL question, which was how can he prove that these people were killed "as an acceptable investment to to realize those profits".

So, HumeSkeptic, you are very good at stating opinions, but where are the facts?? The opinions I'm speaking of are when you talk of all this war for CORPORATE PROFIT.

I don't disagree that there are strong geo-political forces at work, or that PNAC was extremely influential in shaping US foreign and energy policy, but show me where CORPORATE PROFIT is the goal. Please.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 07/13/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

PNAC consists of people. As you know, corporations are not people. Now, go and look at who were the signers of the original PNAC documents. You will see many names that also appear as Presidents and Members of Boards of oil corporations.

See the connection, Smelly? No?

Again, just as a reminder, a corporation is not a person. You got that? Are you with me so far?

Now, part of "benevolent hegemony" is control of oil of other countries by U.S. corporations. To control oil results in bigger profits for corporations. Look it up. That is the reason why corporations own and sell oil.

Another part of PNAC strategy is pre-emptive wars to achieve their goals, including hegemony.

Now, connect "benevolent hegemony", pre-empyive wars, corporations, and profits. Are you with me, Smiley?

See what happened? You found the connection all by yourself, with just a little help from me.

Good.

Now, historically, wars are known for causing death and destruction, often in millions, and often great suffering for civilians. If you want proof that wars do that, borrow a Middle School level history book from your local library. If you are lazy, just Google Iraq war and Vietnam war. Those are relatively recent.

So, you see, there is empirical proof. All you need is a little bit of brain matter to recognize it as such.

But, since you lack that, Smiley, I'm always here to help.

You are welcome.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 07/13/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

Thanks.

At any point, All you would have had to say was "Many signers of PNAC are also Presidents and Members of Boards of oil corporation".

You could have left out all the condescending shite, but I get it that you are a weakling who has to act like a complete mutherfokker to feel good about yourself.

Pr_ick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 07/14/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

How many of the 151 signers were on Oil boards? What percentage?

Or were you talking about the 25 guys who signed the "Statement of Principles"?? What percentage of those 25 guys were Presidents of oil companies/on oil boards?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 AM on 07/14/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

Rsponse pending. Do read it when it appears. I wasted a lot of time on it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 PM on 07/13/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

I appreciate you wasting time on me, as I have wasted a lot of time on you.

PEACE.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 07/13/2008
- Nyland8 I'm a Fan of Nyland8 90 fans permalink
photo

LOL

When did it become Skeppy's job to teach you how to connect the dots. The fact that you persist in ignoring the results of the last 8 years of Bush's domestic and foreign policy is nobody's problem but your own. You can go through life thinking everything that's been happening is a mere coincidence, or you can stop breathing your own Methane.

It's nobody's choice but your own.

8

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 07/13/2008
- Nyland8 I'm a Fan of Nyland8 90 fans permalink
photo

Where is it written that Hume has to teach you to connect the dots? If you can't see the trend of US corporation dominating the world, then what else don't you see? You live in a capitalist society, and you need to be shown " ... where CORPORATE PROFIT is the goal ... " ?? !!!! ??? Huh ?

What did you think was the goal? Altruism?

Stop breathing your own Methane and learn to connect the dots. Your government is about to bail out investors who have big positions in Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. Do the math.

8

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 07/13/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

Thank you 8. For some reason they blocked my response.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 07/13/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

"Stop breathing your own Methane ...."

Oh, did I offend your senses by not bowing to your's and Hume's ideological points?

Again, I understand the Geo-Political-Economic manifestations (I connected the dots long ago), I just disagree with the conclusion that it was all for "corporate profits".

I think corporations have profited, I think some corporations are evil, but I'm not simple enough to label the ultimate motivation for our foreign policy "corporate profits".

I would say our "Plastic Lifestyle" is much more the reason, with a heavy dose of misguided altruism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 07/14/2008
- brainuser I'm a Fan of brainuser 4 fans permalink

OBL, assuming he is alive, is believed to be in the mountains separating Afghanistan and Pakistan, or in Pakistan itself. This may be the world's worst combat terrain and above the tree line. Yet almost all the footage we see is in flatlands, usually with lots of trees and orchards. What gives?

Also, a BBC or ITV video on the Brits' worse combat day since Korea showed such flatland terrain. The Brits were accompanied by Afghans without even weapons or helmets. Basically guides. All the combat was between the Brits and the Taliban, with the accompanying Afghans standing out in the open just smoking or with their hands in their pockets. Great. Lots of broken hands. "Hey, Afghan, get off the skyline!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 07/13/2008
photo

Uh, TV is not the real world.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 07/13/2008
- brainuser I'm a Fan of brainuser 4 fans permalink

OK, how about "news onsite documentary"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 AM on 07/14/2008

Wrong thread, you spamming Rupauline WooWoo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 07/13/2008
photo

For those of you wanting to comment on the New Yorker Cover. You may want to do that here.
"This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved." seems to be the word of the day over on that thread.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 07/13/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

I liked that cover. It is brilliant satire. It is good to see Americans maturing a bit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 07/13/2008
- soundfury I'm a Fan of soundfury 13 fans permalink

This cover is a "swiftboat" disguised as satire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 07/13/2008
- abouttime I'm a Fan of abouttime 24 fans permalink

The Russians had 20,000 troops killed trying to CONTROL the same enemies we supported back then and now call terists. The war hawks laughed at their arreogance. Of course the neocons make freinds by giving them money and weaspons - only problem the money dries up and well.... people die and the money and blood don't seem worth it all.
47 different languages and cultures in that territory called afganistan. They have been living there for thousands of years without our help -if you know what i mean?
Impeach Bush. NOW!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:13 PM on 07/13/2008

http://www.kickthemallout.com/article.php/Video-Ten_Signs_Country_Going_Fascist
You have GOT to watch it all the way to #1 which is a ROFLMAO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 07/13/2008
- BWonka I'm a Fan of BWonka 118 fans permalink
photo

Nothing you post is worth watching - never was, never will be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 PM on 07/13/2008

& there is the ROVIAN SMEARS from two obamabots. Who'd EVER have guessed.
Too bad FACTS to support your warmonger are in such SHORT supply that you have to resort to rovian troll tactics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 07/13/2008

Love what you have done with your home office, WooWoo

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/149/329474685_97120435a6.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 07/13/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 661 fans permalink
photo

... - ..- .--. .. -.. / ..-. ..- -.-. -.- .. -. --. / -- --- -.. -... --- - ...

America.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 PM on 07/13/2008
photo

Be more specific.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 07/13/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 661 fans permalink
photo

.... --- .-- / -- .- -. -.-- / -.-. --- -. ... . .-. ...- .- - .. ...- . ... / -.. --- . ... / .. - / - .- -.- . / - --- / ... -.-. .-. . .-- / .- / -.-. --- ..- -. - .-. -.-- / ..--..

There ya go.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 PM on 07/13/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 661 fans permalink
photo

If 1,000 were killed it wouldn't change one damn thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 PM on 07/13/2008
- soundfury I'm a Fan of soundfury 13 fans permalink

Why are posts being censored on this Huffpo article:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/13/yikes-controversial-emnew_n_112429.html

If the O camp calls it "tasteless and offensive" then why are some posts referring to it as sheer genius? The story is not going to get to the masses but the cover will, that is the intention of the magazine to exploit the masses ignorance.

H's friends are trying to sink O's campaign. This is racism pure and simple. Maybe she put them up to it. She will try to win this be the lowest possible means. I thought we were already in election mode, but when Democrats start attacking Democrats this way, something else is going on here. It's sickening and disgraceful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 07/13/2008
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1658 fans permalink
photo

Lighten up. It's political satire. And it is nicely done.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 07/13/2008
- soundfury I'm a Fan of soundfury 13 fans permalink

The O campaign doesn't think it's nicely done. I think it's outrageous and a great poster for the Repubs to hang on their wall. Who;s side are you on anyway?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 07/13/2008
photo

If you are smart enough to get it why don't you give others the credit to get it as well?

It is not racism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 07/13/2008
- soundfury I'm a Fan of soundfury 13 fans permalink

It is racism, because their intention was not the story but the cover. The story is only written to cover their a$$. If the O campaign is angry about it, how is it that you are okay with it?

I am 100% behind this candidate. This cover will be all over the place. It is hideous and slanderous. There is nothing redeeming about it at all, satire or not. This was meant to hurt him, not help him, and it will.

When I'm referring to masses, I'm referring especially to Appalachia and that includes PA, OH, and VA, crucial states in this election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:04 PM on 07/13/2008

The cover is excellent satire.

The "masses," if asked, would probably tell you that The New Yorker is the magazine that comes in the Sunday Times.

With a circulation of approximately 1 million, "the masses" will never see this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 07/13/2008
photo

shhh. Every comment I posted on that thread go into "pending"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 07/13/2008
- soundfury I'm a Fan of soundfury 13 fans permalink

They will see it on the MSM. They will loop it everywhere. The only thing that will stick in people's minds is the picture. They have been waiting with baited breath to use something against him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 07/13/2008
- olivia I'm a Fan of olivia 96 fans permalink

The masses - the ones not sophisticated enough to understand the irony in the cover - will see it on the newsstands.

I guess if they cannot see the irony they were never going to vote for O anyway, though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 PM on 07/13/2008

You liberals have no sense of humor and are consumed by hate which the people of Afghanistan are about to find out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 PM on 07/13/2008
- BWonka I'm a Fan of BWonka 118 fans permalink
photo

So says a Bu$h-lovin' fool who still believes Mission Accomplished and all the other Bu$hCo lies.... pitiful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:09 PM on 07/13/2008

Another PUMA:

BradPittsburgh
I belong to a very large group that will work very hard to see to it Mrs. Clin ton receives the nomination. Barry can not defeat the Republican nominee.
posted 07/12/2008 at 19:34:34

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 07/13/2008

I heard that someone was told that because of America's illegal wars, it has become America VS the REST of the world. He said yes, that's true & we even have our own flag. It's the same as yours, only it's on fire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 07/13/2008
- Podewumun I'm a Fan of Podewumun 32 fans permalink

Not to worry, FTA, sooner or later Congress will get around to passing that all-important Flag Burning Amendment, and then you can sleep well at night knowing...well, whatever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 07/13/2008

The muderators also can't stand FACTS showing O's support (& WORSE) of the fake war on terror.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 PM on 07/13/2008
- Podewumun I'm a Fan of Podewumun 32 fans permalink

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz roll over, honey, you're boring zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 07/13/2008

How about you enlist in his planned escalation of Afghanistan, you want some excitement.
You support the warmonger (O) you support the illegal wars TOO.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 07/13/2008

Another name get banned?

Your "style" seeps through every time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:00 PM on 07/13/2008
- BWonka I'm a Fan of BWonka 118 fans permalink
photo

New name, same stupidty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 07/13/2008

IF you support the illegal war in Afghanistan, then you REALLY NEED to see this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk 2 minutes 18 seconds

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 07/13/2008

It's easier to support when you ignore the FACTS (same for O).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 07/13/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (11 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect