Bush, Congress, Both?: Who's To Blame For Energy Prices?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush, Congress, Both?: Who's To Blame For Energy Prices? stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

TERENCE HUNT | July 13, 2008 07:51 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush walks to Marine One as he departs the White House in Washington, Friday, July 11, 2008, for Camp David, Md. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Saturday tried to pin the blame on Congress for soaring energy prices and said lawmakers need to lift long-standing restrictions on drilling for oil in pristine lands and offshore tracts believed to hold huge reserves of fuel.

"It's time for members of Congress to address the pain that high gas prices are causing our citizens," the president said. "Every extra dollar that American families spend because of high gas prices is one less dollar they can use to put food on the table or send a child to college. The American people deserve better."

With gasoline prices above $4 a gallon, Bush and his Republican allies think Americans are more willing to allow drilling offshore and in an Alaska wildlife refuge that environmentalists have fought successfully for decades to protect. Nearly half the people surveyed by the Pew Research Center in late June said they now consider energy exploration and drilling more important than conservation, compared with a little over a third who felt that way only five months ago. The sharpest shift in attitude came among political liberals.

Democrats say they are for drilling, but argue that oil companies aren't going after the oil where they already have leases. So why open new, protected areas? they ask. Democrats say there are 68 million acres of federal land and waters where oil and gas companies hold leases, but aren't producing oil.

"Americans are fed up every time they go to fill up and they're right to demand action. But instead of a serious response, President Bush and his allies simply repeat the same old line more drilling," Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said in the Democrats' radio address.

"Democrats support more drilling," he said. "In fact, what the president hasn't told you is that the oil companies are already sitting on 68 million acres of federal lands with the potential to nearly double U.S. oil production. That is why in the coming days congressional Democrats will vote on 'Use It or Lose It' legislation requiring the big oil companies to develop these resources or lose their leases to someone else who will."

"But we know that drilling by itself will not solve the problem of high gas prices," Van Hollen said. "We cannot drill our way to energy independence."

He cited Democrats' calls to tap the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve, because it is full and "America's rainy day is now." And he said the country must focus on new energy policies that focus on alternatives to oil.

Bush said that Democrats are at fault and that "Americans are increasingly frustrated with Congress' failure to take action.

"One of the factors driving up high gas prices is that many of our oil deposits here in the United States have been put off-limits for exploration and production. Past efforts to meet the demand for oil by expanding domestic resources have been repeatedly rejected by Democrats in Congress."

Bush repeated his call for Congress to lift the restrictions, including a ban on offshore drilling. A succession of presidents from George H.W. Bush to Bill Clinton to the current president have sided against drilling in these waters as has Congress each year for 27 years, seeking to protect beaches and coastal states' tourism economies.

(This version CORRECTS that Bush and allies think Americans `more willing to allow' drilling. Moving on general news and financial services. AP Video.)

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Saturday tried to pin the blame on Congress for soaring energy prices and said lawmakers need to lift long-standing restrictions on drilling for oil in pristine la...
WASHINGTON — President Bush on Saturday tried to pin the blame on Congress for soaring energy prices and said lawmakers need to lift long-standing restrictions on drilling for oil in pristine la...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
57
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- RRK70 I'm a Fan of RRK70 16 fans permalink

"America is addicted to oil"-George Bush 2006

So when confronted with addiction, find a new source to support your habit!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 07/17/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 155 fans permalink

Very good interview on Charlie Rose last night. The energy expert said that with Pres. Carter's policies, we were well on our way to energy independence. Pres. Reagan dismantled the programs to encourage alternative energy production and conservation, saying essentially "Why worry? We can go on using cheap oil for a long time."

With Bush, all we have gotten is blockage of programs to get us off of oil, and a lot of noise about drilling for oil in places where the local citizens have already declared that they are opposed to it. Bush and McCain both have made noise about our need to solve our enegy problems, but they have both behaved exactly opposite to what their words have said.

One of the first things that the team of Clinton and Gore did when they took office was announce a program to team with Detroit to produce cars to reduce our need for petroleum. I think that their problem was naivete. Detroit has a long history of controlling the market to maximise their quarterly profits, whereas the foreign automakers have taken the point of view of making cars that people both want and need. Detroit in the 1990s had no intention of helping to get us off of our oil addiction.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 07/16/2008

If Bush et al were really sincere about the notion that drilling would help, then why have they not started drilling where they already have the rights to drill. These places are places that are much less expensive to drill than in Alaska. Not only beside that if you want to bring in the national security issue, Alaska is a bad idea also. These extra places is just a move to make more latitude for big oil to make as much money as they can before the viable alternatives come online. Like someone said before it will not help anything for years, by then we may have something else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 07/16/2008
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

Why have "they" not started drilling? The rig count is at a 22 year high- there were 1913 working rigs as of last week what do you suppose hose rigs are doing? Could it be they are DRILLING? The "unused leases" is a lot of Dem taling points BS. The primary exploratory tool is seismic- Drilling is the culmination of a lot of time, money and effort and the usual result is a dry hole. The point is exploration not wells for wells sake. The Dems will mention the number of acres under lease ( and paid handsomely for) but do they mention the areas where the gov't won't grant drilling permits? Do they ever mention geology or the great effort and expense of the oil companies in seeking hydrocarbons? How many wells do you suppose the government has drilled?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 07/17/2008

Bush and the republican congress are the ones that failed to act and dug a whole so deep that now almost drastic measures have to be taken. The republicans have been in charge for the last six years, complete control! Now this congress has not been a model of stellar works either. Only if there was eno7ugh of a majority of democrats so republicans could not vote them down. I think maybe things would be different with congress now. The republican still have the power of the veto and not enough dems to over ride them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 07/16/2008
- jay1975 I'm a Fan of jay1975 4 fans permalink
photo

Oil has it's biggest drop right after Bush announces the end of the Executive off-shore drilling ban. Coincidence or just the market reacting to the possibility of a future influx of oil? Just as threatening words can raise the cost, promising words can lower them. Speculation and the futures market are a real mofo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 07/15/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 291 fans permalink

the drilling can't produce any oil for 7-14 years.

So should we run policy based on Wall street's Irrationality?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 AM on 07/16/2008
- jay1975 I'm a Fan of jay1975 4 fans permalink
photo

And what will oil cost in 7-14 years if we do not drill? It will take at least a generation to replace every vehicle with electric cars and until then we need oil, plain and simple. What you say now was said ten years ago. Will it take $10 gas and another ten years before you figure it out? Oil, coal and nuclear must be used as a bridge to future alternative energy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 07/16/2008
- jay1975 I'm a Fan of jay1975 4 fans permalink
photo

This problem has been looming since the 70's and to say that only one political party is to blame shows great ignorance. Neither party has done anything to plan for our future after the cat was let out of the bag in the late 70's. Do I support Bush? No. Do I blame him for the current energy issue? No. He was on watch when all of our failed policies and regulations collapsed at once. Now neither side will comprimise and that is only making things worse for us all. Both parties need to get their heads out of their backsides and work together or we are screwed. Drill and go nuclear while funding alternative development and creat a cleaner bridge to an energy independent future. Compromise or be left behind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 07/15/2008
photo

Nancy Pelosi promised lower gas prices if Democrats were elected during the 2006 election. She is lied.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 AM on 07/15/2008
- CCverve I'm a Fan of CCverve 6 fans permalink

68 MILLION ACRES ALREADY LEASED to oil companies with the potential to double US capacity sitting untapped...and you believe more leases granted will produce what? Secondly, Iraq has finally met it pre war production levels...the only difference is will be US oil companies +(Shell and Total)...are getting to refine it now and for the future..Are you starting to SEE anything here? OIL's there... prices still going up. Nancy Pelosi nor the democratic is your problem

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:50 PM on 07/15/2008
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

baseless Dem taling points

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 PM on 07/17/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 94 fans permalink

She was incompetent. She lied for the votes. She doesn't know HOW to lower the prices again.

The answer is pretty straight forward:

1) End the war in Iraq and quit threatening Iran

2) Strengthen laws against and impose harsher penalties for gaming the energy market, GREATLY expand regulatory capability for the energy sector.

3) (Optional) Threaten - and then begin the legislative steps, as necessary - creating a state owned monopoly for energy (nationalizing assets) if Big Oil doesn't stop collusion.

4) Create a REAL energy policy for CAFE - one for which the future fuel economy targets of five years from now are not already achieved by my completely stock 1955 Karmann Ghia. In fact, adopting European standards within ONE year should be strongly considered. END the tax subsidy for massive vehicles.

5) Transfer subsidies from Big Oil and Big Energy to individuals, to aid in the installation of long-lasting equipment (20+ year expected lifetimes) for wind and solar, and force "the grid" to buy surplus energy from individuals.

6) Compel installation of solar collectors and energy saving technologies on every new federally owned or funded construction, and upgrades on existing structures when they need a new roof or renovation, seriously restricting exemptions to just historic buildings and other limited but sensible situations (eg permanent shadow).

That ought to do it...
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 07/15/2008
- darthdarcy I'm a Fan of darthdarcy 48 fans permalink
photo

Who's to blame for Energy Prices...?

PHIL GRAMM John McCain's Phil Gramm...

Also Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley..the crooked Texas Politicians and Businessmen...

Republicans who favored all these loopholes and deregulation that's who is to blame for the prices such as they are...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 07/15/2008
- research I'm a Fan of research 291 fans permalink

BushCo,

the most Oil industry heavy administration in history,
presides over the Iraq Middle east destabilization war crime, admittedly for OIL.
Bush appeases, kisses, holds hands with, give Nukes to, gives weapons to...
The country and family most involved in the 9/11 attacks:
The Bin Ladens and the Saudis.
Following the money...Who benefited most from 9/11 and the Iraq War crime?
The Bin Ladens, the Saudis and BushChenyOil cronies inc..
And some of you people want to believe that there is no intent, but just supply and demand or peak oil, or some other fantasy.
BushCo robbed the world, right in front of your face!

And now IRAN
Here's why we are going to invade Iran:

to get back the oil fields:

n 1951 Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh was elected prime minister. As prime minister, Mossadegh became enormously popular in Iran after he nationalized Iran's oil reserves. In response Britain embargoed Iranian oil and invited the United States to join in a plot to depose Mossadegh, and in 1953 President Dwight D. Eisenhower authorized Operation Ajax. The operation was successful, and Mossadegh was arrested on 19 August 1953.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:38 PM on 07/14/2008
- Mojane I'm a Fan of Mojane 11 fans permalink

Europeans have been paying way, way more for petrol/gas that we ever have, and probably still do. However, they've manufactured small cars and most people drive them. They also have rail systems that make ours look pathetic, except for cargo transport which is mostly how we use rails, rather than people as Europe does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 07/14/2008
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

They also have twice the unemployment rate, twice the taxes, half the productivity, twice the vacation and half the freedom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 07/20/2008
- Mojane I'm a Fan of Mojane 11 fans permalink

Create a "crisis", then create a "solution", then create yourself as "savior". Just in the nick of time. Damn they're good. Dear fellow Amooricans, don't y'all worry, your SUVs are safe. Guzzle on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 07/14/2008

It's us. But we elected those who would enable this situation and they do it because it is profitable to them.

If you want to be a Hero....

http://www.lyrics007.com/John%20Lennon%20Lyrics/Working%20Class%20Hero%20Lyrics.html

..."Keep you doped with religion and sex and TV,
And you think you're so clever and classless and free,
But you're still f0cking peasents as far as I can see,..."

It's no wonder why they got rid of him.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:00 PM on 07/14/2008
- shel3364 I'm a Fan of shel3364 35 fans permalink

Isn't this the same buffoon (Bush) who was stunned when a reporter asked him about $4 gallon gas this spring?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 07/14/2008

To help decrease the oilmongers stealing more of your money, fill up only half your tank when you go to the gas station. Then, the suppliers have to keep the gas in their storage tanks, and not ours, and so expand the market supply and drive down demand. Read this from Michael Klare, at Alternet and The Nation - http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080707/klare : ...if the Administration truly wanted to spare Americans further pain at the pump, there is one thing it could do that would have an immediate effect: declare that military force is not an acceptable option in the struggle with Iran. Such a declaration would take the wind out of the sails of speculators and set the course for a drop in prices. The Iranians have made it plain that they would retaliate by attempting to block the flow of Gulf oil and otherwise cause turmoil in the energy market. Most analysts assume that an encounter will produce a global oil shortage and prices well over $200 per barrel. It is not surprising, then, that every threat by Bush/Cheney (or their counterparts in Israel) has triggered a sharp rise in prices.

If we repeal The Commodities and Futures Modernization Act, which contains the Enron Loophole, tomorrow prices would go down from 25 to 50%...as was testified to before the Senate Commerce Committee Hearing by Professor Michael Greenberger, the former director of the Commodities and Futures Commission... hello, Congress? Are you there???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 07/14/2008
- Chavez08 I'm a Fan of Chavez08 58 fans permalink
photo

What is slavery?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 07/14/2008

It's pretty simple, actually. Ronald Reagan and every administration since are responsible. The US should have learned a lesson from the 1970s and reorganized its energy infrastructure around efficiency. We didn't. The failure to prepare for the inevitable financial crunch when the demand for oil would outstrip cheap supply now leaves us in bad financial shape. Please note that this is not an energy crisis. We have plenty of energy. Or did you notice blackouts and empty gas stations? I didn't. This is simply a cheap energy crisis. Energy, especially from hydrocarbons is still plentiful but it ain't cheap any more. Since we are consuming so much of these now expensive hydrocarbons and have not learned in time to consume little, we are now cash strapped. The time to make changes was thirty years ago. A few wise moves twenty years ago would have done wonders and even ten years ago we could have done a lot to ease the pain today. But all of those opportunities are gone. There is virtually nothing that can be done today but to write off the whole energy infrastructure as quickly as possible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

We are late to resume drilling, but not too late. We are in the midst of a grave crisis. The effects will get progressively worse unless more supply is produced soon.

Who is causing the real problems?

ANWR Exploration
House Republicans: 91% Supported
House Democrats: 86% Opposed

Coal-to-Liquid
House Republicans: 97% Supported
House Democrats: 78% Opposed

Oil Shale Exploration
House Republicans: 90% Supported
House Democrats: 86% Opposed

Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Exploration
House Republicans: 81% Supported
House Democrats: 83% Opposed

Refinery Increased Capacity
House Republicans: 97% Supported
House Democrats: 96% Opposed

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

Resume? When did it ever stop? Support California and Florida in resistance to off-shore drilling! It destroys the oceans, beaches and wildlife living there. Try cleaning off the black tar after walking along the Texas gulf coast.

There is no short-term answer to high-energy costs. More drilling just adds to oil company profits and won’t bring prices down at the pump…EVER! We red-state Texans pay more for gasoline than our neighbors and we allow drilling wherever they please!

There are too many consumers on Earth and only a finite amount of irreplaceable oil. Small limited supply + high demand = high prices forever! The only answer is to supply our energy needs in other renewable ways…BUT ones that do not take the food out of our mouths. Solar, Wind, Geothermal, and Tidal energy are the best options but must be made more efficient. Nuclear fusion is great, but it needs much more research. Nuclear fission is a possible answer BUT NOT until we can recycle or dispose safely of the radioactive waste. We cannot keep storing radioactive waste in water tanks at the nuclear power plants forever!

We need a call reminiscent of President Kennedy’s moon challenge…a call from President Obama for us to become energy independent within one decade. This vision/goal would powerfully unite us. It would create millions of “green” jobs through science education and ingenuity in breakthrough technologies. Our children must have a secure energy future. Yes, we can!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 07/14/2008

Since when does reality care about political votes? Since never?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:28 PM on 07/14/2008
- leduck I'm a Fan of leduck 47 fans permalink
photo

got home late
but this is too good to pass up
anwar: not that much oil really -- would not affect gas prices much
coal to liquid: learn about thrmodynamics. this would waste energy. better off just burning coal directly
oil shale: oh brother -- it's worse then tar sands. no private company would waste it's time
outer continental shelf: go ahead and do it but it's not cheap. it's not low lying fruit
increase refinery capacity: why wouldn't private oil companies want to build more refineries?
well, they can build ones to handle heavy oil, but their is no point in building any that handle light sweet crude

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 07/15/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect