Bush lifts oil drilling ban, wants Congress to act

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush lifts oil drilling ban, wants Congress to act stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FELLER | July 14, 2008 10:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush makes a statement on drilling for oil on the outer continental shelf, Monday, July 14, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline prices into political leverage. Democratic lawmakers rejected Bush's plan as a symbolic stunt.

With gas prices topping $4.10 a gallon nationally, Bush made his most assertive move to extend oil exploration, an energy priority of his presidency. By lifting the executive prohibition against coastal drilling, Bush rescinded a White House policy that his own father put in place in 1990.

The move will have no practical effect unless Congress acts, too. Both executive and legislative bans must be lifted before offshore exploration can happen.

Bush had called on Congress a month ago to go first, then reversed himself on Monday. He said the country could no longer afford to wait.

"Failure to act is unacceptable. It's unacceptable to me and it's unacceptable to the American people," Bush said in an event held in the Rose Garden.

"Democratic leaders can show that they have finally heard the frustrations of the American people by matching the action I've taken today, repealing the congressional ban, and passing legislation to facilitate responsible offshore exploration," Bush said.

The president's direct link between record gas prices and offshore drilling glossed over a key point. Even if Congress agreed, the exploration for oil would take years to produce real results. It is not projected to reduce gas prices in the short term. Even the White House routinely emphasizes there is no quick fix.

That did not stop Bush from building his case around today's prices at the pump.

Story continues below
advertisement

He said every extra dollar that families must spend on gas is one they could be using to put food on their table or to send a child to school. The American people, he said, are now "waiting to see what the Congress will do."

The White House says that acting now on a long-term solution would send a serious signal to the market that more oil supply will be coming on line. That, in turn, could ease oil prices, advocates say. Business groups and many Republican lawmakers applauded the move to expand the energy supply in the U.S.

Democrats were unmoved.

"The Bush plan is a hoax," responded House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. "It will neither reduce gas prices nor increase energy independence."

Several Democratic leaders in Congress said oil companies are already sitting on millions of acres of public and coastal lands.

Yet a proposal by Democrats to release oil from an emergency reserve has been rejected by the White House as a gimmick that won't reduce prices.

So the election-year stalemate remains.

Congressional Democrats, joined by some GOP lawmakers from coastal states, have long opposed lifting the prohibition that has barred energy companies from waters along both the East and West coasts and in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. A succession of presidents, including the current one, has sided with Congress for each of the last 27 years in barring drilling in these waters.

The main goal has been to protect beaches and coastal states' tourism economies. But Bush says that with today's technology, exploration can be conducted along the Outer Continental Shelf in ways that keep the drilling out of sight and protect the environment.

The congressional ban is renewed yearly, typically as part of a spending bill. The White House said it was too soon to comment on a potential Bush veto.

Under Bush's proposal, states would help decide how drilling would be conducted off their shores. It is unclear how much oil would be available. Bush said it could eventually be enough to produce 10 years' worth of America's current oil production.

Both presidential campaigns weighed in.

Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, called Bush's move "a very important signal" and prodded his Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama, to drop his opposition to offshore drilling. "If we can show that we have significant oil reserves off our coasts, that will clearly affect the futures market and affect the price of oil," McCain said.

Obama favors another economic stimulus package that includes energy rebates, as well as stepped up efforts to develop alternative fuels. "If offshore drilling would provide short-term relief at the pump or a long-term strategy for energy independence, it would be worthy of our consideration, regardless of the risks," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "But most experts, even within the Bush administration, concede it would do neither."

Environmental groups also criticized Bush.

The public, though, is growing impatient for answers.

Nearly half the people surveyed by the Pew Research Center last month said they now consider energy exploration and drilling more important than conservation, compared with a little over a third who felt that way only five months ago. The sharpest shift in attitude came from those who had previously viewed exploration as a less important priority, including people who identified themselves as liberals, independents and Democrats.

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline price...
WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline price...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
958
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
- Harrier I'm a Fan of Harrier 10 fans permalink

The reason why this is insane is because Texas still has oil fields that have been certified as being ready use, The have passed all the environmental regulations, and would give 20% more oil. In addition to that, lawmakers have approved oil companies shutting down 200 refineries. Even if the oil could be pumped out now, there is no refining capacity in this country

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 AM on 07/15/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 138 fans permalink

If Americans living in coastal states really wanted more offshore drilling, they would let the politicians know about it, wouldn't they? Since they haven't complained about a lack of offshore drilling, it is probably safe to conclude that they don't want even more of it. So, what possible motivation could Dubya have for making noise about this issue now?

Could it possibly have something to do with the upcoming election? Nah, he wouldn't be so crass as to imitate the Republican campaign strategy of making a lot of noise about something that isn't very important, just to get "his" people elected, would he?

On the other hand, he might be far more likely to prevent Congress from passing legislation that could help us get off of our oil addiction entirely, since both he and his veep are oil-men. Yep, since that is exactly what he has done, I guess it is only fair to expect him to do more of the same, right up until next January. Then, it's "Don't let the door hit ya on the butt on your way out boys!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:57 AM on 07/15/2008
- SmellyOne I'm a Fan of SmellyOne 28 fans permalink
photo

Why isn't drilling for oil very important? I know that you will say "Won't see oil for ten years, won't affect the price today, will only account for a small percentage of energy used".

Those same arguments could be said about any major solar or wind project. Ooops!!! Do you want to apply the same logic to solar and wind projects? NO, you don't!!!!

The only, only, only, only reason NOT to drill for more oil in the U.S. is the potential environmental impact.

A comprehensive energy plan should include as much domestic drilling as possible.

More oil drilling will NOT slow down Alt Energy techs at all.

Stop being babies about drilling for oil!!!! Do somehting in your own home to conserve, buy a hybrid, then in a few years turn it in for an electric car. By that time you should have enough solar panels on your house to run your car, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 AM on 07/15/2008
photo

They are running scared because Americans are starting to turn against the no oil for America crowd. Why doesn't Pelosi allow it to go to the floor for a vote?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 AM on 07/16/2008
photo

Attention to all Democrats running for office in November.

Not only should you refuse to open up any new drilling, you should run on your refusals.

Be proud, say it loud: Expensive gas is GOOD for America!

(You know you believe it, why hide your true feelings?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 AM on 07/15/2008

Why does this president continue to try and delude the American public into thinking that if we overturn federal restrictions on offshore drilling gas prices will decline? Like John McCain tried to accomplish with his "gas tax holiday," Bush seems to be marketing offshore drilling as the ultimate solution, ignoring the reality that revoking the prohibitions and commencing exploration and drilling is a process that will take several years and will do nothing to alleviate high prices for the immediate future.

Consider an ulterior motive to the president's call for offshore drilling. Is it any wonder that oil prices have risen from around $20 per barrel to nearly $150 per barrel during Bush's tenure in office?

"Failure to act is unacceptable," Bush declares. Mr. President, do you genuinely believe your administration has devoted sufficient energies to developing alternate sources of fuel? Are you convinced that requiring cars to average 35 miles per gallon by the year 2020 is the best we could ask of automobile manufacturers? You have had so many opportunities during your administration to direct this country's attention away from a dependence on oil and towards alternate fuels - please do not blame others for your own failure to act.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:05 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

" Is it any wonder that oil prices have risen from around $20 per barrel to nearly $150 per barrel during Bush's tenure in office?"

Yeah, but oil was still around $50 per barrel in January of 2007.

What happened in January of 2007?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 AM on 07/15/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 138 fans permalink

The Republican governor of California has already said that there is no way that off shore drilling will be increased off of California. Of course, it is not up to the Governor or the Pres, but the people living here don't want it.

Maybe Bush is trying to insure that McCain doesn't have a chance in California, by pissing us off more than we already are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 07/14/2008

Thanks mamacat. I live in California and love paying high prices for gasoline, in fact I'm looking forward to paying more when oil goes to $300. I hope they never drill off our coast, it might hurt the environment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:36 AM on 07/15/2008
photo

Anyone stupid enough to believe that the oil recovered off our coast will only be shipped to America please raise their left hand. No the other left hand you morons.
Oil goes into one international oil market, it doesn't have little American flags in it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 07/14/2008

If the world market has access to more oil, the price will obviously come down. Who are you calling moron?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 AM on 07/15/2008
photo

And you believe that do you? Wow. The price will come down. LMFAO

You probably believe the money from said oil will stay in the US as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 07/15/2008

Any oil added to the world market would obviously help to lower the world price. Which is my left hand?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 AM on 07/15/2008

In watching CSPAN, it would appear Bush won't have his way. This country has bought and paid for 700 million barrels of oil that are being kept in reserve, and Congress is asking us to call or email the White House and tell them to give us some of our oil! I did my bit.

As for the drilling, the oil companies have permits to drill on 68 million acres in the United States lower 48, and 10 million in Alaska, all of which is NOT on protected lands. The government is telling them they may drill all they want, but only on these 78 million acres. They are making it a use it or lose it proposition, but it doesn't appear they are ready to cave to Bush. In fact, I love the way they stress that we have two oilmen in the White House who have proven they are in it for the oil.

Let's hope that at tomorrow's impeachment vote, they will remember this frustrated attitude with this rogue administration. And let's hope they don't cave in again to these tyrants in the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 07/14/2008

Is there oil below those 68 million acres? How much? Is it worth drilling for?

700 million barrels in the SPR, that's enough for 35 days, right? What are we going to do on day 36?

The SPR is like a one gallon spare tank for a 3000 mile cross country vacation trip in a 6mpg RV without any gas money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 07/14/2008

The oil companies don't have the manpower or refineries to actually drill anywhere else including the leased land to which they already have access. This is just BushCo's last ditch effort to get those doors back open - the last of so many many favors for their cronies and their own personal coffers thanks to speculative results that would come of it - before they leave office.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 07/14/2008
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 33 fans permalink

"700 million barrels in the SPR, that's enough for 35 days, right? What are we going to do on day 36?"
True if the SPR was used as the sole source of oil for our entire country. Of course, that would mean that Canada and the US suddenly stopped selling those combined 10 million barrels per day to the US they currently do. The key to use of the SPR is to use it strategically as a shock and awe tool. Make surprise announcements such as teh release of 10 million barrels to US refiners at $35 per barrel --and make the announcement 1 hour before end of trading on the last day of the month and force speculators to take a massive drubbing. Then announce that Congress has authorized a pool of 100 million barrels of oil that Congress can release at any time in any proportion without notice at any time the market goes too high. See how many day traders think driving up oil is a risk free bet then.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 07/15/2008
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

Oil companies are drilling the hell out of what they have to drill!!! The rig count is at a 22 year high- the problem is the largest potential reserves are off limits, we are drilling more and more wells to less a nd less oil be well. The 68 million acreas you cite is bought and paid for- it is not like pulling teats on a dairy herd!!! The majority of leased acreage is non-prospectivie meaning it either has no obvious potential or it is bone dry. It is about geology- the oil and natural gas is where mother nature put it and it is hard to find. Do some research and quit listneing to the dem talking points. Now this matter is squarely in the hands of the do nothing Congress that has painted us in the corner we are in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 07/14/2008
- thinklib I'm a Fan of thinklib 11 fans permalink

You speak the truth.

The idea is to open up the big, proven oil reserves. Doing so should lower prices almost immediately because oil futures won't be bid up at the rate they're going now. Drilling now also helps our cause for energy independence in the future.

If Democrats continue to put ideology ahead of the suffering of real people, the country will turn on them quickly - just in time for an election.

My money is on the Democrats doing a reversal and voting to drill domestically. For every Huffpo fan out there cheering on the Democrats' stonewalling on this issue, there are hundreds of other people who want to start drilling yesterday.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 PM on 07/14/2008
- raker I'm a Fan of raker 78 fans permalink

High gas prices are a boot on our neck, trying to make us cry uncle and let them despoil our country for oil. How many freaking countries does George and Bar's boy need to despoil before he's had enough?

There is no oil shortage. It's a sham and a lie, like everything else in this corrupt administration. Don't cry uncle. Impeach. And defeat Nancy Pelosi for being too cowardly to impeach these criminals. And is it too late to trade in Obama for trashing the 4th Amendment? I have buyer's remorse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 07/14/2008

This proposal to lift the ban on offshore drilling is nothing but leverage for speculation in oil futures plain and simple. Attention oil men: we've had enough.
It is OUTRAGEOUSLY expensive to set up drilling offshore, the oil companies will not invest the $$ in it. Even if they were willing to invest the cash, they simply don't have the manpower or the refining capability to pull it off. But the speculators would spin a very different scenario. Prices probably would dip slightly for just a spilt second - like a dealer giving a free bump to his junkie customer who is 6 months sober - before prices shot up to $7 a gallon.
The most critical point to make against lifting this ban is that the ILLUSION of increased supply it would create will immediately throw conservation efforts out the window that many in the US have been forced to adopt out of sheer inability to afford $4 gas. $4 gas is the best thing that could have ever happened to our country. We need to be forced into changing our ways, and sadly, since so many people are so hell-bent on demanding their "god-given right as an american" to cheap gas for their 5 mpg SUBeast, this is the only way to get it done.
Let the age of vulgar wealth and profits for the oil men go the way of the dinosaurs that begat them in the first place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 07/14/2008
- EinChicago I'm a Fan of EinChicago 33 fans permalink

"The most critical point to make against lifting this ban is that the ILLUSION of increased supply it would create will immediately throw conservation efforts out the window that many in the US have been forced to adopt out of sheer inability to afford $4 gas. "

And therein lies the real reason. After years of being ignored, environmentalists are enjoying their 15 minutes of glory and want to cling on to it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 07/15/2008

Nope, not clinging to any 15 minutes of anything, pretty much meant exactly what I said.
But I hope typing your comment made you feel better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 07/16/2008

It's official, Pelosi does not care about high gas prices. What she won't admit though is why she doesn't care. The libs in Congress are happy about the way things are for two reasons; one, they think high prices will make people drive less and two, she thinks this will help democrats win seats.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 07/14/2008

"What I think the president ought to do is he ought to get on the phone with the OPEC cartel and say we expect you to open your spigots. One reason why the price is so high is because the price of crude oil has been driven up. OPEC has gotten its supply act together, and it's driving the price, like it did in the past. And the president of the United States must jawbone OPEC members to lower the price."

~George W. Bu$h, January 26, 2000

According to his own statement, he was capable of accomplishing lower fuel prices on his own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 07/14/2008

Yeah, but remember how that turned out? He went crawling to our friends in Saudi Arabia and asked them to increase their oil exports. They said, "Ehhhhhh..­...don't think so!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:40 PM on 07/14/2008
- peacekitten I'm a Fan of peacekitten 603 fans permalink
photo

thanks for posting these links.

i hope some of it will penetrate the cranial plates of the posters who seem to be having an abundance of cro-mag moments today.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 07/14/2008
- ZHarris I'm a Fan of ZHarris 48 fans permalink
photo

Neo-Cons don't click on links... They're afraid they might lurn something.­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:22 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

How oil gets into the water via oil drilling and production operations, and their associated support operations:

http://oils.gpa.unep.org/facts/operational.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:17 PM on 07/14/2008
- Lemeritus I'm a Fan of Lemeritus 108 fans permalink
photo

interesting headline:

"Bush trumps Congress; Moves first on drilling"

Is this an act Congress wanted to introduce? Or is Bush acting to prevent Congress from limiting off-shore drilling? (Not that it matters -- we should take the salaries we pay those people we call our "representatives" and enjoy a REAL gas tax holiday.)

And what, pray, is Obama's position?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 07/14/2008
- woodchips I'm a Fan of woodchips 2 fans permalink

How is it that a country like Norway manages to reap enormous benefits for its citizen from their petroleum reserves, while in the US, we seem to give away our natural resources for the benefit of huge corporations and to the detriment of the people? If any new drilling is opened up, a large percentage of the profits should be returned to the people. Enough is enough. The natural resources of the US rightly belong to its people and they should be compensated fairly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 PM on 07/14/2008

The natural resources of the US were burning in the people's engines for eight decades. Environmentalists and other "crazy folk" were trying to warn the people that some moderation might be advantageous. We were generally laughed at. Now, why are you all complaining about the logical consequences of your own actions so much? I don't get it. Do you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 PM on 07/14/2008
- woodchips I'm a Fan of woodchips 2 fans permalink

True enough. As you sow, so shall you reap. Like so many things, the consequences should have been clear to any thinking person. A shame that there are so few of those in positions of power.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 07/14/2008
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 138 fans permalink

I have visited and talked with Norwegians. Their thoughts on matters are very different than ours.
I mentioned that we consider many things about them socialist.

The reply was that their small businesses are privately owned, so how could they be socialist?

What about your socialised medicine?

We don't consider that socialism. Any country that takes money from its citizens in taxes, but whose citizens cannot get health care for their children, is not a democracy, was the reply.

At one point, when they were starting their oil economy, they tried to have American corporations run the derrick operations. They had to get rid of the American bosses, because they just don't know how to treat people with respect. Once they ousted the Americans and replaced them with their own people, things went swimmingly.

I think they have a democratic society, and some facets of a socialist government. Unlike the U.S., which has a republican democracy, in principle, and an elitest society.

They value the friendship of the U.S., but wouldn't want to live here. I had strangers come up to me and make that point very clearly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 07/14/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect