Bush lifts oil drilling ban, wants Congress to act

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush lifts oil drilling ban, wants Congress to act stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FELLER | July 14, 2008 10:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush makes a statement on drilling for oil on the outer continental shelf, Monday, July 14, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline prices into political leverage. Democratic lawmakers rejected Bush's plan as a symbolic stunt.

With gas prices topping $4.10 a gallon nationally, Bush made his most assertive move to extend oil exploration, an energy priority of his presidency. By lifting the executive prohibition against coastal drilling, Bush rescinded a White House policy that his own father put in place in 1990.

The move will have no practical effect unless Congress acts, too. Both executive and legislative bans must be lifted before offshore exploration can happen.

Bush had called on Congress a month ago to go first, then reversed himself on Monday. He said the country could no longer afford to wait.

"Failure to act is unacceptable. It's unacceptable to me and it's unacceptable to the American people," Bush said in an event held in the Rose Garden.

"Democratic leaders can show that they have finally heard the frustrations of the American people by matching the action I've taken today, repealing the congressional ban, and passing legislation to facilitate responsible offshore exploration," Bush said.

The president's direct link between record gas prices and offshore drilling glossed over a key point. Even if Congress agreed, the exploration for oil would take years to produce real results. It is not projected to reduce gas prices in the short term. Even the White House routinely emphasizes there is no quick fix.

That did not stop Bush from building his case around today's prices at the pump.

Story continues below
advertisement

He said every extra dollar that families must spend on gas is one they could be using to put food on their table or to send a child to school. The American people, he said, are now "waiting to see what the Congress will do."

The White House says that acting now on a long-term solution would send a serious signal to the market that more oil supply will be coming on line. That, in turn, could ease oil prices, advocates say. Business groups and many Republican lawmakers applauded the move to expand the energy supply in the U.S.

Democrats were unmoved.

"The Bush plan is a hoax," responded House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. "It will neither reduce gas prices nor increase energy independence."

Several Democratic leaders in Congress said oil companies are already sitting on millions of acres of public and coastal lands.

Yet a proposal by Democrats to release oil from an emergency reserve has been rejected by the White House as a gimmick that won't reduce prices.

So the election-year stalemate remains.

Congressional Democrats, joined by some GOP lawmakers from coastal states, have long opposed lifting the prohibition that has barred energy companies from waters along both the East and West coasts and in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. A succession of presidents, including the current one, has sided with Congress for each of the last 27 years in barring drilling in these waters.

The main goal has been to protect beaches and coastal states' tourism economies. But Bush says that with today's technology, exploration can be conducted along the Outer Continental Shelf in ways that keep the drilling out of sight and protect the environment.

The congressional ban is renewed yearly, typically as part of a spending bill. The White House said it was too soon to comment on a potential Bush veto.

Under Bush's proposal, states would help decide how drilling would be conducted off their shores. It is unclear how much oil would be available. Bush said it could eventually be enough to produce 10 years' worth of America's current oil production.

Both presidential campaigns weighed in.

Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, called Bush's move "a very important signal" and prodded his Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama, to drop his opposition to offshore drilling. "If we can show that we have significant oil reserves off our coasts, that will clearly affect the futures market and affect the price of oil," McCain said.

Obama favors another economic stimulus package that includes energy rebates, as well as stepped up efforts to develop alternative fuels. "If offshore drilling would provide short-term relief at the pump or a long-term strategy for energy independence, it would be worthy of our consideration, regardless of the risks," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "But most experts, even within the Bush administration, concede it would do neither."

Environmental groups also criticized Bush.

The public, though, is growing impatient for answers.

Nearly half the people surveyed by the Pew Research Center last month said they now consider energy exploration and drilling more important than conservation, compared with a little over a third who felt that way only five months ago. The sharpest shift in attitude came from those who had previously viewed exploration as a less important priority, including people who identified themselves as liberals, independents and Democrats.

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline price...
WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline price...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
958
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 07/14/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 662 fans permalink
photo

Start drilling in gated communities, build new refineries there, bury the nuke waste from power plants there, that would put an end to that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 07/14/2008

Does any one here making comments have a $30,000 a year utility bill like Al Gore? Would you liberals agree that is a very big carbon footprint for one house and for the man who is screaming the world is melting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

Gee, I don't see how this has ANYTHING to do with this post.
Glad to hear you listen to Rush and Sean Hannity, while you hate Al Gore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 07/14/2008
- derekc06 I'm a Fan of derekc06 25 fans permalink
photo

it's all offset with carbon credits... and you're retarded

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:51 PM on 07/14/2008

Actually, his carbon footprint is 20 times the average household.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 07/14/2008

Your liquor consumption is 100 times the national average.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 07/14/2008
- ZHarris I'm a Fan of ZHarris 48 fans permalink
photo

What other Rush Limberger talking points do you intend to expose us to today? Why not just post them all at once and save us the pain of enduring them slowly over time?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 07/14/2008
- cindyw I'm a Fan of cindyw 47 fans permalink
photo

I'd agree that it is indeed a big footrprint, but If Al Gore moved to a trailer tomorrow, would my energy bill go down?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

A total diversion of the reason why we are where we are, courtesy of Bushco. Blaming the Dems for the oil crisis, with the enabling help of the MSM.
Pay no attention to what's behind the curtain.

Totally disgusting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 07/14/2008
- ranch111 I'm a Fan of ranch111 7 fans permalink
photo

It's really a state's right issue. California will not drill. Let the states decide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:45 PM on 07/14/2008

Neo-Federalist only play the state's rights card when it comes to the abortion issue, if a tanker run's a ground and ruins your fisheries, your plum out luck. States will not drill and there is little George Bush can do about it in the short time has left, this is a plitical diversion, peroid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 07/14/2008
- Pdubya I'm a Fan of Pdubya 44 fans permalink

agreed, but since when (well, i can think of a date) has the federal government given a damn about states's rights?

that said, drilling here, properly conducted, will provide some benefit in reducing gas prices. but, it will take a while to ramp up these efforts. even so, it will be a temporary fix. not entirely because of supply/demand scenarios, but rather because of the deeper issue - our fiat currency and monetary system.

the wall street journal, astute economists (close by at huffpo, hale bonedad) have tracked oil vs. gold compared to oil vs. the u.s. dollar. deeper research will reveal just why we have inflation, that it is a purposeful enterprise by the new world order elites, and just another mechanism to rid the u.s. of its constitution, enslave the middle class, and reign in a global government.

until we address our constitution, specifically who really can issue money (hint: not the federal reserve) and what is really to be legal tender (hint: it isn't the federal reserve note), and eradicate all of the agreements that call for using our dollar in exchange for oil supply, we will repeat this cycle.

california, alaska, and florida oil will just be a new-found hunk of crack we'll inject into our veins. the oil tycoons and central bankers won't give up their profits (the IMF is the real criminal in volume of profit) easily.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 07/14/2008

Yeah, right. Florida's Governor was against drilling to get elected. Now, he's changed his mind.
Don't trust Arnold, he came to power with Enron's help.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

And what about the neighboring states? California is big, but what about the states that are much closer together?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 07/14/2008
- NL207 I'm a Fan of NL207 9 fans permalink

"California will not drill"

Then California should have no rights to water or hydropower generated from the upriver Colorado basin .

States rights issue, yes?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 07/15/2008
- oogabooga I'm a Fan of oogabooga 9 fans permalink

If this drilling is so incredibly urgent, what stopped Bush and the Republic Party-controlled Congress from lifting the ban during 2001-2007? That oil would be coming onstream right now when we need it. What happened Republic Party? Did you forget to look ahead then? Or did you in fact like the higher oil price and oil company stocks skyrocketing? And now the timing of Bush's ban lift throws the issue and blame for oil prices back to the hapless Dems. The Republic Party oil guys have already collected.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 07/14/2008
- TheBlackCat I'm a Fan of TheBlackCat 283 fans permalink
photo

Conservatives are for states rights. THis is their BIGGEST platform, the protection of the states against federal interferance. I have always admired this about the Republican party, because I agree that in post cases, states rights SHOULD superceed federal rights.

Florida is against offshore driling. They have always been against offshore drilling. Both a Republican and a BUSH, Jeb Bush spent a huge amount of time during his governorship in Florida in trying to set up safeguards to prevent offshore drilling from ever happening. Republican politicians and citizens alike in Florida do not want offshore drilling.

If you are for drilling off of Florida, you cannot honestly call yourself a Republican. The administration is outright saying they are no longer Republican except in name only by pushing for this. They have no loyalty to the ideology of Republicanism. They are placing their corporate interests above state interests. That is not what Republicanis. That is Corporatocracy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 07/14/2008
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

OK, let me get this straight- if you favor drilling offshore Florida you cannot be a Republican so i guess you must be a Democrat? I'm afraid I don't follow the logic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

If he really wanted to increase supply to drive down the price of petroleum, he would release oil from the national reserves. That would have an immediate impact, just as it did in the '70s when Carter did the same thing.

Alas, he and his oil buddies are focused on maximizing profits, which is exactly what this move does.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 07/14/2008
- Chris I'm a Fan of Chris 12 fans permalink

Releasing for the reserves is a short term fix, liek the tax holdiay. It is not a long term solution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 07/14/2008
- peacekitten I'm a Fan of peacekitten 643 fans permalink
photo

newsflash.

there is not now, nor will there ever be, enough oil in drilling off the american coastlines like florida and california, or alaska.

canada is now the u.s.'s largest supplier of imported oil, sending us approximately 840 million barrels in 2006, and surpassing saudi arabia. we are the recipients of about 99% of their output. what's more is that there is a provision in NAFTA that prohibits them from cutting off our supply. canada's proven reserves are estimated at 179 billion barrels, or about 150 years' worth at current production.

so why exactly does every last bit of salvageable wilderness have to be destroyed for literally a drop in the bucket?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 07/14/2008

Seriously, do you know anyone who has ever spent any time in ANWAR? Working or tourism?

You've heard the description, but maybe some have not. "An area the size of La Guardia airport within a territory the size of South Carolina." That's a pretty small footprint. You've also heard that caribou populations actually increased and thrived in the areas around the pipeline.

We cannot conserve our way out of this crisis and still maintain our economy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 07/14/2008

The chances of the oil companies drilling in ANWR even if they were allowed to is slim. They can't even explore and drill on their existing leases what makes you think they are going to drill in ANWR? The same bs excuse will be trotted out then too. Oh it costs too much to drill so we're just going to pay a few million to lease the land and do nothing on it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 07/14/2008

SweetS, you really want to maintain this economy. I'd prefer a healthy one myself, not the disaster we have now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 07/14/2008
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 312 fans permalink

We have 2200 U.S. platforms in the Gulf. Ten other countries are building them in the region.

So please tell me how us not drilling any more protects the gulf? By the way if you knew anything about the Gulf , you would know that fishing is best around these platforms.

Letting others drill ( and our drilling is by far the safest) ends up us buying thier oil, increased trade deficits and a further devaluation of the dollar. There has not been a platform spill in 40 years even with the worst hurricanes. Yes there will be at some point.. just like there are Airplane crashes... but we still fly.


Regards

yes i want massive wind and solar farms.. I want appollo /manhattan style projects and I want my Chevy Volt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:54 PM on 07/14/2008
- peacekitten I'm a Fan of peacekitten 643 fans permalink
photo

(part 2 of 2)

prudhoe bay is now one of the most polluted waterways in the world, averaging about a thousand chemical spills a year. the underground aquifer which stretches about fifteen hundred miles along the coast is no longer potable.

what did you miss about the canadian reserves? they are already on line and producing. alberta will become the world's largest oil producer in the next couple of decades.

so tell me again, why do we have to destroy some of our last salvageable wilderness when there are reserves on line NOW that have a much longer life?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

You keep repeating that bogus claim of no spills in the gulf for 40 years even though I've seen multiple posters refute that claim with hard facts...what gives?

And yes, the fishing is good around platforms, but always to the detriment of the fish and the people who eat them [clue: catch enough snapper/grouper from around oil platforms and you WILL find oil in their gullets].

And you keep ignoring the simple fact that oil drilling is a polutiing activity, one that will within a decade negatively impact the beaches around the coast of Florida. Naysay it if you like, but I've seen it happen, and know for a fact that enough oil is lost in everyday operation around drilling rigs and oil production platforms to do damage, and it is loss that is usually never reported [if a spill isn't large enough to warrant a containment effort--they only do that because it can't be dissapated enough to hide it--then usually they will attempt to conceal it and not report it].

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 07/14/2008
- peacekitten I'm a Fan of peacekitten 643 fans permalink
photo

(part 1 of 2)

viper,

don't talk down to me about the energy industry. i worked in it for a number of years.

there are plenty of platform accidents you never hear about. one of the guys i used to work with was on the last helicopter off a rig in the north sea that capsized and sank in two miles of water during a storm. that was only about twenty years ago, not forty.

do you have any idea how much money it costs to sink a well offshore? especially if it's a dry hole?

don't you remember ixtoc I, the SEDCO rig ripped off its moorings during a storm in the mexican gulf in 1979? it spewed for TWO months 55,000 barrels of high sulfur crude PER DAY? the wellhead was spewing so hard that not even red adair's men could cap it because the concrete plugs kept blowing out of it . they had to sit and wait until the pressure subsided enough they could get a plug to stick. by the time all was said and done, there was a blob 100 miles long and ten miles wide of oily goo floating on the water. six foot tar balls washed up on the beaches of padre and galveston, destroying both the fishing and tourism business. four feet of sand were bulldozed from the beaches to clean up the tar and the mountains of dead fish that washed up for months and rotted in the texas sun.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 07/14/2008
- peacekitten I'm a Fan of peacekitten 643 fans permalink
photo

"if you knew anything about the gulf"

i was born and raised in texas.

you were saying?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 07/14/2008
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

Viper- what do you think of Boone Picken's plan?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:15 PM on 07/14/2008
- NL207 I'm a Fan of NL207 9 fans permalink

Newsflash:
There are about 1.7 TRILLION bbls of recoverable oil available in the Green River oil shale formation. That's about 275 years worth at the current rate of US consumption . Your team opposes drilling this.

There are another 10.3 Billion bbls in ANWR section 1002. "expected value of the technically recoverable oil is 10.3 billion barrels from the ANWR Coastal Plain of the Alaska North Slope. The original oil in place corresponding to this recovery is 27.8 billion barrels."
source: http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/analysis_publications/arctic_national_wildlife_refuge/html/analysisdiscussion.html#anwr%20coastal%20plain%20assessment

This is only a small part of ANWR. Petrogeologists say there might be anywhere from a few million to 80 Billion more in other areas of ANWR which are unexplored.

Offshore is underwater and even less well explored. Recent strike in previously OVERLOOKED rock under Gulf of Mexico: "Chevron’s new Jack field will produce a total of 10–15 billion barrels of oil. By itself, that could increase U.S. proven oil reserves by 50 percent! "
source: http://www.cgfi.org/2006/09/12/big-gulf-oil-strike-could-save-100-million-acres-of-us-forests/

How do YOU know that further exploration will not produce significant new sources of oil?
How is the expolration going to destroy wilderness?
How do you know any new find is a "drop in the bucket"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 07/15/2008
- refah I'm a Fan of refah 2 fans permalink

Oh yea, of course a unitary executive would do anything possible to boost its own authoritarian madness. What is at issue here beyond that is what long term destruction will ensue from sucking every last drop of oil out of the earth.

The planet is made of elements that function in concert to provide a stable platform for life. When oil is suctioned from the deep core of the planet eventually the integrity of the continental shelf will degrade to a point where possible increased erosion and earthquake activity is inevitable.

Wouldn't it be far better to stop wasting our time granting runaway corporate greed all the power and instead put humanity's future survival first? It will be in getting beyond the lust for oil that will increase the chance of steering away from the abyss.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 07/14/2008
- rh654 I'm a Fan of rh654 14 fans permalink

A Master Stroke of the pen by Bush.

While I don't like Bush - don't agree with offshore drilling...

Energy has become and likely will be the BIG issue this election - much bigger than Iraq.

While yes drilling won't affect prices, won't add a lot of oil to the world supply for a decade and then even only a very modest amount...

The reality is that many voters don't care at all about the details what they will know is this:

Bush has made available the ability to drill.

McCain supports drilling.

Obama does not support drilling.

While many of us know the reality of drilling - MANY Americans will view it as "Well at least BushMcCain want to do something about it and Obama just keeps saying "No"".

The Republicans have a very good chance to get back into the race on the back of the cost of gasoline and the price of Energy.

Obama better be careful and not say "No" too often or it might become his downfall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 07/14/2008
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
photo

If only we had more refineries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

The lack of them is by design of big oil. Throw in the Enron loophole and viola, a way to rape the environment. All for a increase in less than 2% production, which will not do ANYTHING to the price per barrel for years, if at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 07/14/2008

The refineries are only operating at 85% capacity, by design. America is an oil junky. We once styled ourselves as americans, we have become american'ts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 07/14/2008
- TxAggie I'm a Fan of TxAggie 5 fans permalink

We do not have a shortage of gasoline in the US, our refineries do not need to be at 100% utilization. Demand for gasoline in the US is shrinking but worldwide it is growing. What we have is a worldwide shortage which is running the price up. We need more domestic supply for our econmy's sake.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 07/18/2008
- shinxy I'm a Fan of shinxy 2 fans permalink
photo

No matter how much oil we drill from our coastlines, it's not going to make a difference! Seriously! We use 20 million barrels a day, and the Administration is claiming we could get 16 billion barrels from our coastlines. Even if we were somehow able to drill it out all at once, we're talking only a little over 2 years of oil. That is an incredibly short term solution to a long term problem, and oh, by the way, it will take over eight years to even get started! By then I am almost certain our consumption will have increased!

Breaking our dependency on foreign oil is NOT going to happen by making our own oil. It's going to happen when we stop using oil and develop alternative energy. That's the future, that's where we should be putting that money towards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

The administration is big oil. Nearly everyone in the administration has a background in oil. They don't care about getting us off foreign oil and they don't want to develop independence from oil. They want to create a crisis to get their drilling legislation through. They want to ra.pe and pillage taxpayer coffers until China refuse to lend us any more money. They want to keep the price of oil elevated. Everyone already knows the solutions are with alternative forms of energy, (not ethanol from corn which is just more Government welfare for farmers) as oil is a finite resource. The problem is that our Government is now tied too closely with business interests and corporations and their lobbying groups are controlling our Congress. The problems that plague America, exist only because of corporate control and blatant corruption.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 07/14/2008

Exactly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 07/14/2008

well, i guess george is finally going to get what he's wanted for the past 7 1/2 years. since that secret energy meeting at the white house, he's been determined to get drilling where it's not been allowed. for what? so he and his buds can reap the riches, for many years to come. even the saudis have said, there is plenty of oil, why are the prices so high? becuse bush and the boys want it that way. so sad for so many people. i don't think off shore drilling is so bad, and we need to seek alternatives for energy, but come on guys, the man's been destroying the very fiber of this country, and the constitution for the past 8 years, would someone PLEASE wake up.... how many executive orders has he signed?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 07/14/2008
- Woodn88s I'm a Fan of Woodn88s 8 fans permalink
photo

Come on guys...............there will be a new ride at Disney World......Bungee jumping from the oil rig
They'll set it up next to the Magic Kingdom!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

LOL....no, just kidding, didn't laugh at all...really wasn't that funny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 07/14/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect