Bush lifts oil drilling ban, wants Congress to act

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush lifts oil drilling ban, wants Congress to act stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FELLER | July 14, 2008 10:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush makes a statement on drilling for oil on the outer continental shelf, Monday, July 14, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline prices into political leverage. Democratic lawmakers rejected Bush's plan as a symbolic stunt.

With gas prices topping $4.10 a gallon nationally, Bush made his most assertive move to extend oil exploration, an energy priority of his presidency. By lifting the executive prohibition against coastal drilling, Bush rescinded a White House policy that his own father put in place in 1990.

The move will have no practical effect unless Congress acts, too. Both executive and legislative bans must be lifted before offshore exploration can happen.

Bush had called on Congress a month ago to go first, then reversed himself on Monday. He said the country could no longer afford to wait.

"Failure to act is unacceptable. It's unacceptable to me and it's unacceptable to the American people," Bush said in an event held in the Rose Garden.

"Democratic leaders can show that they have finally heard the frustrations of the American people by matching the action I've taken today, repealing the congressional ban, and passing legislation to facilitate responsible offshore exploration," Bush said.

The president's direct link between record gas prices and offshore drilling glossed over a key point. Even if Congress agreed, the exploration for oil would take years to produce real results. It is not projected to reduce gas prices in the short term. Even the White House routinely emphasizes there is no quick fix.

That did not stop Bush from building his case around today's prices at the pump.

Story continues below
advertisement

He said every extra dollar that families must spend on gas is one they could be using to put food on their table or to send a child to school. The American people, he said, are now "waiting to see what the Congress will do."

The White House says that acting now on a long-term solution would send a serious signal to the market that more oil supply will be coming on line. That, in turn, could ease oil prices, advocates say. Business groups and many Republican lawmakers applauded the move to expand the energy supply in the U.S.

Democrats were unmoved.

"The Bush plan is a hoax," responded House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. "It will neither reduce gas prices nor increase energy independence."

Several Democratic leaders in Congress said oil companies are already sitting on millions of acres of public and coastal lands.

Yet a proposal by Democrats to release oil from an emergency reserve has been rejected by the White House as a gimmick that won't reduce prices.

So the election-year stalemate remains.

Congressional Democrats, joined by some GOP lawmakers from coastal states, have long opposed lifting the prohibition that has barred energy companies from waters along both the East and West coasts and in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. A succession of presidents, including the current one, has sided with Congress for each of the last 27 years in barring drilling in these waters.

The main goal has been to protect beaches and coastal states' tourism economies. But Bush says that with today's technology, exploration can be conducted along the Outer Continental Shelf in ways that keep the drilling out of sight and protect the environment.

The congressional ban is renewed yearly, typically as part of a spending bill. The White House said it was too soon to comment on a potential Bush veto.

Under Bush's proposal, states would help decide how drilling would be conducted off their shores. It is unclear how much oil would be available. Bush said it could eventually be enough to produce 10 years' worth of America's current oil production.

Both presidential campaigns weighed in.

Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, called Bush's move "a very important signal" and prodded his Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama, to drop his opposition to offshore drilling. "If we can show that we have significant oil reserves off our coasts, that will clearly affect the futures market and affect the price of oil," McCain said.

Obama favors another economic stimulus package that includes energy rebates, as well as stepped up efforts to develop alternative fuels. "If offshore drilling would provide short-term relief at the pump or a long-term strategy for energy independence, it would be worthy of our consideration, regardless of the risks," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "But most experts, even within the Bush administration, concede it would do neither."

Environmental groups also criticized Bush.

The public, though, is growing impatient for answers.

Nearly half the people surveyed by the Pew Research Center last month said they now consider energy exploration and drilling more important than conservation, compared with a little over a third who felt that way only five months ago. The sharpest shift in attitude came from those who had previously viewed exploration as a less important priority, including people who identified themselves as liberals, independents and Democrats.

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline price...
WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline price...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
958
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (19 pages total)

Don't buy the hype ! Dems are ready to cave on this as well -

7/9/08

"Faced with mounting pressure from voters to respond to record gasoline prices, some senior Democratic lawmakers Tuesday opened the door to a compromise with Republicans that would open more land on and offshore to oil and gas exploration and production"

never a good sign when Reid sends Durbin out to "open the door"

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/9/102928/5539/505/548685

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 07/14/2008
- shockmagog I'm a Fan of shockmagog 137 fans permalink
photo

The 28 percenters who can't wait to get up in the morning to vote against their own best interests should be pleased with the president's resolute and forthright action. Git 'er done!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:38 PM on 07/14/2008
- Amennyc I'm a Fan of Amennyc 16 fans permalink
photo

Santa Barbara is so beautiful. The oil rigs you see off the cities coast add a great deal to the natural beauty. I get the same feeling when I check into a hotel, open the curtains to see a view of air conditioning units on the roof. So beautiful.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 07/14/2008
- TheRebel82 I'm a Fan of TheRebel82 3 fans permalink

Just trying to give another huge break to big oil before this joke of a president leaves office. This imbecile should have been impeached YEARS ago!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 07/14/2008
- mrqapla I'm a Fan of mrqapla 2 fans permalink

9/11 was an inside job.

End the war.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

If 9/11 was an inside job, who, in this administration, had the brains to plan it?

gotha!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 07/14/2008

Wilburrr, that would be "let's not invade Iraq until we've privatized military support for profit" Cheney, Rumsfeld, Prince Bandhar(sp) Bush, and the Likud party.
You got nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 07/14/2008
- Fez I'm a Fan of Fez 27 fans permalink
photo

Here's the reality about peak oil. Every year we consume 2.7% more oil than is being discovered and added to world reserves. We have passed the peak and are now mining oil (i.e., consuming more than we are replacing). Opening up ANWR, the OCS and other sensitive areas not only won't produce any gas for 10+ years, it won't change this dynamic. Probably the only way to solve this problem is to have exporting countries reduce their annual exports by 2.7% and importing countries reduce their annual imports by 2.7%. This "oil depletion protocol" is being developed by several countries and at least will stop us from consuming more than we can produce. Otherwise, in one scientist's metaphor, we are in a jet plane, flying without a functioning altimeter, gas gage or landing gear, assuring ourselves that we just fine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 07/14/2008

Proof positive that this bunghole is in the bag for the oil companies. His solution to his own disastrous policy is to 'stay the course' with an exploration policy that will simply insure that we run out of a finite resource that much faster. Great job. Seriously.

Why aren't we impeaching, again? Ms. Pelosi?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 07/14/2008

67

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 07/14/2008

Volvo, I'm tired of this lame excuse for not impeaching Bush/Cheney. The House should begin impeachment proceedings, which would be televised. With the list of treasonous offenses that have been committed debated on the floor, perhaps the public would be forced to pay attention. If ratified and sent to the Senate, the Bush supporters on both sides would be exposed as the enemies of the people. Even if this attempt is not successful, the non koolaid drinkers might vote these thugs out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 07/14/2008
- underdog I'm a Fan of underdog 12 fans permalink

Does anybody have a number on the amount of diesel fuel it takes to run an illegal occupation­/rebuildin­g profit bonanza?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 07/14/2008
- Grannysue I'm a Fan of Grannysue 131 fans permalink
photo

Oh Good more absurd pandering to big oil!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 07/14/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 620 fans permalink
photo

Shocking isn't it ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 PM on 07/14/2008

Actually the pandering began when Daddy Bush practically banned domestic drilling. This put the independents and wildcatters that were keeping the price down out of business. I was living in LA when this happened and it killed the state's economy. It really hurt TX too. A lot of oil biz people hate Bush because of this too. Bush is nothing but a NWO communist, as are the most of the Dems that are in power now that 's why they are not demanding Bushie's impeachment. Just do a search on The New World Order or Bilderberg Group you will get a good idea of how our country is being destroyed and how they are using a left right paradigm to play and divide the American people. Just do a search and research for yourself. Yes some of the stuff is kooky by a lot of it is true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 07/14/2008

I propose lifting the ban on drilling politicians. Oh, there is no ban on that. Well, what are we waiting for? How do we know that they're not an energy source? Let's start at the top and work our way down.
If the first few we drill don't produce results, we should still continue, in the name of further study.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

as corpulent and full of gas as most of them are, I think you are on to something. By my estimation we could have an energy source that could last into the next millennium. Would they be providing energy we could consider 'carbon neutral' or would they be fossil fuels?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 PM on 07/14/2008

Wilburr, I think they would consider them "fossil fools".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 07/14/2008

another non-solution for the country. ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 07/14/2008

GoodGuys : ( They already tried slippin' us the Gas Tax Moratorium­... )


-ralph

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 07/14/2008
- Chris I'm a Fan of Chris 11 fans permalink

And we still wait for the dems to propose something beyond windfall taxes that will not work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 07/14/2008
- kasinca I'm a Fan of kasinca 162 fans permalink
photo

This is to take the eye off of KKKarl Rove. Lifting this ban is doing nothing for the oil problems we face. Dubya is a clueless moron.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 07/14/2008
- Triangle1 I'm a Fan of Triangle1 4 fans permalink
photo

You'd think if HuffPo was going to use a third party news source to write their news (AP), they'd at least read the first paragraph of the article. There's a typo in your lead story! Get it together!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 07/14/2008
- OgreDaddy I'm a Fan of OgreDaddy 33 fans permalink
photo

Bush is using the pressure of $4.00 per gallon gas to give YET ANOTHER lucrative deal to
Big Oil and Big energy.

Oil companies have not built a new refinery in 20 years and lifting restrictions will do nothing
to help the immediate crisis.

The oil companies are not using the land they already have, so why on earth does anyone believe they with suddenly start making use of these protected areas. Riiiiiiight!

It's a SCAM a RUSE a MANIPULATION of FACT.

It's all about making Oil holding portfolios richer for the oil companies and nothing more.
They will sit on these reserves and do NOTHING!

I can't believe how foolish people are listening to oil company backed propaganda.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

Hydrogen is where it's at

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

Hydrogen fuel cells are the next step in Big Oil domination. They're too costly in all respects, and present the same bastards that exploit us now with another high-priced opportunity to continue doing so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 07/14/2008
- peacekitten I'm a Fan of peacekitten 576 fans permalink
photo

nobody ever stops to think how the energy companies plan on getting their hydrogen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 07/14/2008
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
photo

I agree, and for the life of me, I can't understand why it hasn't taken off. Maybe there are safety concerns that I am unaware of.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

hmmmm .... because it can't be liquefied, maybe you can't store enough of it to get your car around the block.... that could be a problem.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 07/14/2008

whiteboyblues : Problem is...

- They want an arm and a leg for the fuel cells, and

- Hydrogen + Average Intellect = Combustive Event


-ralph

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 PM on 07/14/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect