Bush lifts oil drilling ban, wants Congress to act

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush lifts oil drilling ban, wants Congress to act stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

BEN FELLER | July 14, 2008 10:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush makes a statement on drilling for oil on the outer continental shelf, Monday, July 14, 2008, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline prices into political leverage. Democratic lawmakers rejected Bush's plan as a symbolic stunt.

With gas prices topping $4.10 a gallon nationally, Bush made his most assertive move to extend oil exploration, an energy priority of his presidency. By lifting the executive prohibition against coastal drilling, Bush rescinded a White House policy that his own father put in place in 1990.

The move will have no practical effect unless Congress acts, too. Both executive and legislative bans must be lifted before offshore exploration can happen.

Bush had called on Congress a month ago to go first, then reversed himself on Monday. He said the country could no longer afford to wait.

"Failure to act is unacceptable. It's unacceptable to me and it's unacceptable to the American people," Bush said in an event held in the Rose Garden.

"Democratic leaders can show that they have finally heard the frustrations of the American people by matching the action I've taken today, repealing the congressional ban, and passing legislation to facilitate responsible offshore exploration," Bush said.

The president's direct link between record gas prices and offshore drilling glossed over a key point. Even if Congress agreed, the exploration for oil would take years to produce real results. It is not projected to reduce gas prices in the short term. Even the White House routinely emphasizes there is no quick fix.

That did not stop Bush from building his case around today's prices at the pump.

Story continues below
advertisement

He said every extra dollar that families must spend on gas is one they could be using to put food on their table or to send a child to school. The American people, he said, are now "waiting to see what the Congress will do."

The White House says that acting now on a long-term solution would send a serious signal to the market that more oil supply will be coming on line. That, in turn, could ease oil prices, advocates say. Business groups and many Republican lawmakers applauded the move to expand the energy supply in the U.S.

Democrats were unmoved.

"The Bush plan is a hoax," responded House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. "It will neither reduce gas prices nor increase energy independence."

Several Democratic leaders in Congress said oil companies are already sitting on millions of acres of public and coastal lands.

Yet a proposal by Democrats to release oil from an emergency reserve has been rejected by the White House as a gimmick that won't reduce prices.

So the election-year stalemate remains.

Congressional Democrats, joined by some GOP lawmakers from coastal states, have long opposed lifting the prohibition that has barred energy companies from waters along both the East and West coasts and in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. A succession of presidents, including the current one, has sided with Congress for each of the last 27 years in barring drilling in these waters.

The main goal has been to protect beaches and coastal states' tourism economies. But Bush says that with today's technology, exploration can be conducted along the Outer Continental Shelf in ways that keep the drilling out of sight and protect the environment.

The congressional ban is renewed yearly, typically as part of a spending bill. The White House said it was too soon to comment on a potential Bush veto.

Under Bush's proposal, states would help decide how drilling would be conducted off their shores. It is unclear how much oil would be available. Bush said it could eventually be enough to produce 10 years' worth of America's current oil production.

Both presidential campaigns weighed in.

Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, called Bush's move "a very important signal" and prodded his Democratic rival, Sen. Barack Obama, to drop his opposition to offshore drilling. "If we can show that we have significant oil reserves off our coasts, that will clearly affect the futures market and affect the price of oil," McCain said.

Obama favors another economic stimulus package that includes energy rebates, as well as stepped up efforts to develop alternative fuels. "If offshore drilling would provide short-term relief at the pump or a long-term strategy for energy independence, it would be worthy of our consideration, regardless of the risks," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "But most experts, even within the Bush administration, concede it would do neither."

Environmental groups also criticized Bush.

The public, though, is growing impatient for answers.

Nearly half the people surveyed by the Pew Research Center last month said they now consider energy exploration and drilling more important than conservation, compared with a little over a third who felt that way only five months ago. The sharpest shift in attitude came from those who had previously viewed exploration as a less important priority, including people who identified themselves as liberals, independents and Democrats.

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline price...
WASHINGTON — President Bush on Monday lifted an executive ban on offshore oil drilling and challenged Congress to follow suit, aiming to turn the enormous public frustration about gasoline price...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
958
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
photo

He hasn't done enough damage yet, I guess. Why interrupt a perfect string of disasters and sell-outs to multi-national corporations intent on looting the country.

Let's get something straight: There is no shortage of oil. There is a shortage of refining capacity. That shortage was created by oil companies, on purpose, to keep demand high and therefore the price of petroleum products high.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 07/14/2008

You're going to have to show your evidence of this claim; otherwise it's just another I Hate Bush rant.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:32 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

Arab Oil Industry:

"In large measures, the high level of oil prices today has been driven by concerns about the availability of spare crude oil production capacity to meet growing global demand for oil products, and the potential for supply disruptions in crude production. Consequently, major oil consumers, including the United States, have pushed oil-producing countries to raise their production capacities. However, the ability to meet forecast demands for oil will be driven by refining capacity issues, not crude oil availabili­ty." http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7&section=0&article=103677&d=17&m=11&y=20077)

A few less biased sources:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/refinery_capacity_data/refcapacity.html

http://www.exorthodoxforchrist.com/refineries_(news).htm

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:y_QgII3t-EYJ:vmsstreamer1.fnal.gov/VMS_Site_03/Lectures/Colloquium/presentations/050601Kaufmann.ppt+US+Refining+Capacity+1990&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=20&gl=ca

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:y_QgII3t-EYJ:vmsstreamer1.fnal.gov/VMS_Site_03/Lectures/Colloquium/presentations/050601Kaufmann.ppt+US+Refining+Capacity+1990&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=20&gl=ca

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 AM on 07/15/2008

The tens of thousands of oil supertanker voyages through US coastal areas and ports to bring the billions of gallons of oil into the US is a far greater hazard than all over the horizon off shore drilling. All the oil is coming into the US whether it's from US coastal resources or on supertankers. Supertankers registered and licensed in countries like Panama was the world's largest flag state for oil tankers, with 528 of the vessels in its registry. Six other flag states had more than 200 registered oil tankers: Liberia (464), Singapore (355), China (252), Russia (250), the Marshall Islands (234) and The Bahamas (209) all well known for their lack of safety and environmental standards. These supertankers are constantly having problems with spills, mostly small, but sometimes huge. In contrast, US coastal oil must meet all US environmental and safety standards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

A negative impact on tourism and beaches isn't a hazard, it is a CERTIANTY. Unlike a major oil spill, it isn't a matter of IF it will happen, but a simple condition of operation; drilling starts, and beaches will immediately begin to diminsh in quality. it may take a few years before the effects are obvious, but it will happen if oil drilling/production begins...i­t is only a matter of time.

Oil spills happen; many are small enough to go undetected, and many are purposefully covered up by oil companies. Oil will dissapate in rough weather, and can be dissapated by mechanical means, if the spill is small enough [soap dumped on top of small oil spills causes the oil to sink].

Oil, chemicals used in drilling and production processes, and large quantities of household and human waste will go into the water; perhaps environemtal controls will deal with most of it, but never all of it. As a result, beaches will deteriorate over time, every time, without exception.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 07/14/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 140 fans permalink

That is assuming of course, that there is any oil there in the first place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 07/14/2008

WTF does that have to do with the argument of:

We are not refining what we have, because of over capacity.
More oil 7 to 10 years from now will not solve the prices at the pump, today.
More gas omissions hurt the environment.
We as Americans, can do what some of the world has already done, GO GREEN.
We can create more jobs going green than will ever happen, polluting the world.
Our country will make money from newer, better methods of energy use.
Detroit would sell more autos to the world, if they was not in collusion with oil manufacturers.

Somethings are obvious to intelligent thinking people!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

It's not easy, being green.... :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 07/14/2008

Our vaunted environmental and safety standards didn't prevent Exxon from putting a drunk at the helm of a supertanker.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 07/14/2008

My point Supertankers are a greater hazard than off shore oil rigs, the record is clear. And no matter what we will have one or the other. The exposure to potential accidents is higher by not drilling offshore.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 07/14/2008
- wild1a I'm a Fan of wild1a 7 fans permalink

There is one inexhaustible non-polluting source of energy, geothermal. Iceland utilizes geothermal widely . Alcoa is building their largest smelter in Iceland and plans to exploit geothermal . Geothermal energy from tapping wells into dry hot rock formations above the molten earth's core has been proven feasible by MIT scientists, concluding that there is sufficient geothermal energy to supply the needs of the human race for millenia. Development related to refining the processes of drilling, the conversion of superheated steam to drive the turbines to generate electricity, and upgrading the electrical grids is needed Drilling more oil wells will not reduce the price of fuel. It will increase both because of speculation and supply and demand. It will eventually run out no matter how many wells are drilled.
Experience in developing geothermal resources exists. The technology of deep well drilling is well known. Extensive regions of hot dry rock suitable for tapping into are already mapped. The technology to be developed is identified.
It is unfortunate that the search for energy is left to politicians who know nothing about engineering. In a world that becomes ever more technical we have leaders who are unacquainted with the sciences and in fact derisive of them.
A well intended leadership would have already created a forum of the best engineers and scientists in the country with the necessary backgrounds to devise the right program for alternative energy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 07/14/2008
- peacekitten I'm a Fan of peacekitten 599 fans permalink
photo

do you have a link to any articles on that topic? i'd be interested to read more about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 07/14/2008
- wild1a I'm a Fan of wild1a 7 fans permalink

Google "geothermal mit" to get a bunch of hits on what research has been done by MIT. There are plenty of other websites that describe geothermal technological progress and activities. Even Chevron brags about their geothermal energy activities in Indonesia. Just Google "Geothermal" . I wish T. Boone Pickens would put his money into geothermal rather than wind. Large scale wind turbine farms have too many moving parts. It is distressfull to be an old engineer and see politicians going down so many blind paths.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

OK, so how about anyone living anywhere other than Iceland? There are a few geothermal areas scattered about, Al Gore has tapped his home into one in his remodel, but for the rest of us, how deep would we have to drill?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 07/14/2008
- wild1a I'm a Fan of wild1a 7 fans permalink

You do not understand the difference between hydro geothermal and hot dry rock geothermal. Extensive regions of the earth have the layer of hot dry rock above the outer limits of the core. To simplify: Drill two wells into the dry rock, water enters one and is returned as superheated steam from the other. A fractured chamber of rock at the bottom of the wells created by explosives augments the surface area to allow continuous steam generation negating the cooling factor of the injected water.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 PM on 07/14/2008

The answer to our oil problem is not more oil, period. Oil is a limited resource, and regardless of whether we have enough for 20 years or 100 years, it will eventually be exhausted to a point were supply will not be able to meet demand.

We need alternatives to oil, which is why I am glad the price of oil continues to go up. I hope it reaches $8 - $10 USD a gallon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 07/14/2008
- booboouu I'm a Fan of booboouu 3 fans permalink

you must have someone paying for your transportation costs...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 07/14/2008
- pizzmoe I'm a Fan of pizzmoe 20 fans permalink

Exactly. I would like to see the day when we don't need fossil fuel at all, but in the meantime, I need my vehicle for work, and rising gas prices only means harder times for most of us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:42 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

I agree. The price of oil, from a green standpoint, can't go up fast enough. Take public transportation!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 07/14/2008
- Crowhaul I'm a Fan of Crowhaul 13 fans permalink
photo

Classic neocapitalism: Use the gas crisis to get public assets released for private use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 07/14/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 629 fans permalink
photo

The free marketers like free gubmint handouts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 07/14/2008

Privatize the profits, socialize the costs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 07/14/2008

exactly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 07/14/2008

Exactly !

Well, at least we can be glad that when these things go south, the corporations don't go running to the taxpayer to reward their incompetence and greed with a huge bail out....


Oh, wait....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 07/14/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 140 fans permalink

The "crisis" being the largest consumer rippoff in history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 07/14/2008
- meleon I'm a Fan of meleon 7 fans permalink
photo

This should surprise no one, and if you're truly honest about it all, it was the plan all along. Nothing has happened by accident, and just because Bush, Cheney and crew won't be in office, they still will be moving the chess pieces that make up the world around just like now. The more time passes, the more I'm becoming convinced that 9/11 was known about and allowed to this end. I know I'll be attacked on that one, but it will not change my opinion it. Where there is smoke, there is fire, and the flames just keep climbing higher and higher and higher and again, if one is honest, you see it too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 07/14/2008
- williamg I'm a Fan of williamg 251 fans permalink
photo

At this point, seems there is not a silver bullet to fix our energy problems. I'm all for using every available technology (including nuclear - which seems to get a bum rap). Even then, gas will be expensive. This is our new reality.

Time to sell my FJ40.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

...or maybe put a smaller engine in it. They never sold diesels in the U.S., but the H series engine offered a 3.6 L that they manufactured up until 1980. I bet it would double your mileage... :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 07/14/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

Congress and senate need to vote today, and also pass a clean coal bill, so we can use the technology we already have to turn coal into a liquid, or gas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/14/2008

Raymondf
I'm not voting this year ...
Posted 04:36 PM on 06/23/2008

As if Congress listens to non-voters.

Run along. Everybody DOESN'T Love Raymond.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 07/14/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

I don't care whether you like me or not I love you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:35 PM on 07/14/2008

Volvo, what evidence do you have that CONgress listens to voters?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 PM on 07/14/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

I just love you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 07/14/2008
- Raymondf I'm a Fan of Raymondf 4 fans permalink

This retort is getting old but I love you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 07/14/2008
- Synoia I'm a Fan of Synoia 6 fans permalink

Clean coal? What have you been smoking? Coal?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 07/14/2008
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 140 fans permalink

They had plans for a coal gassification plant in our neighborhood 30 years ago.

Where is it?

Not economical. Not clean.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 07/14/2008

Good move. The sooner we start, the sooner we benefit.

Why don't we keep all options open? Yes, we need to conserve more. Yes, we need to develop alternative energy sources.

Why cant' we approach our problem from all sides?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/14/2008

Because of poseurs like you

SweetSydney
It's been replaced by a new BMW X5. Section 179 business deduction. The "Hummer rule" as it's derisively called.
Gas guzzling, 8 cylinder, with a DVD screen in the back for Sydney.
posted 07/12/2008 at 11:20:01

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/14/2008

When did he trade in the Jaguar?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 07/14/2008

Are Volvos known for their fuel effeciency?

Hypocrite.

I have no problem with higher cafe standards. Did I not acknowledge my car was a gas guzzler? Have you ever made full disclosure on this site?

However, you are to be commended for doing your part to reduce consumption. You certainly don't use much gas sitting in front of your monitor 18 hours a day, 7 days a week.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 07/14/2008
- LarsGruber I'm a Fan of LarsGruber 34 fans permalink

you'd be the first republican to express that, although probably not very sincerely.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 07/14/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 629 fans permalink
photo

How long does it take to build nucular power pants ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 07/14/2008
- Wilburrr I'm a Fan of Wilburrr 16 fans permalink
photo

do you mean safe ones?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 PM on 07/14/2008
- booboouu I'm a Fan of booboouu 3 fans permalink

good point...fo­r those of you that don't know, congress just passed a bill to hold up some types of alternative energy for two years;...w­onder why that is...?

Could it be, with the high cost of energy, we are starting to see the great change the dems promised..­.lol...

BTH change....­is hope and hope is change...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 07/14/2008

Its simply unnecessary. We have the technology to get off our oil addiction before any drilling would benefit us. I agree attack the problem from all sides, but you wouldn't add more fire to your house burning down, you'd use the solutions that make sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 07/14/2008

Let's reduce demand AND increase supply.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 07/14/2008
- Woodn88s I'm a Fan of Woodn88s 7 fans permalink
photo

Contennt,
Rest assured when the oil companies can figure out how to charge us for wind and sunshine (among others) the technology will be introduced

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

The administration is, in medical terms, putting a band-aid on a severed artery. This will do nothing to reduce gas prices simply because the oil we can add to the world supply is a drop in the bucket comparatively. All this will do make a few rich people a lot richer, nothing more.

A bad idea taking the country in the wrong direction. Once again, the Administration shows what it knows to do best.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 07/14/2008
- booboouu I'm a Fan of booboouu 3 fans permalink

lets hope the dems don't pull tha band-aid off...like they have for the last 30 years...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 07/14/2008
- 957 I'm a Fan of 957 13 fans permalink

About time not congress should follow with a bil saying all oil produced will stay and be used right here in the unites states. The tree hugger crowd and a good percentage of people on this blog seem to be wetting themselves over this, its like the end of the environment as we know it is at hand ..maybe they should concern themselvs with that hugh floating island the size of texas made up of plastic/ro­pe/garbage etc mans throwaways thats floating out in the pacific snagging and killing countless turtles fish and other sea creatures, I wonder why their not yapping about that that floating pile of debris has killed more animals that the alaska oil spill yet that crowd is pretty silent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 07/14/2008

We are concerning ourselves with the garbage patch, too.

http://tpzoo.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/plastics-china-and-the-great-pacific-garbage-patch-oh-my/

You may want to introduce yourself to the thought that the American way of life as you know it, is over. The only ones who will be able to afford it are the mega-rich, who fooled you into believing the free-market ideology was serving your(!) best interests.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 07/14/2008
- lornejl I'm a Fan of lornejl 629 fans permalink
photo

Oh dear God why oh why did the obstructionist dems keep us from drilling between 2000 - 2006 ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 07/14/2008
- incontempt I'm a Fan of incontempt 2 fans permalink

Too busy chasing republican oilmen out of their backyards!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:29 PM on 07/14/2008
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 07/14/2008

IT'S ABOUT TIME ! And to ALL you nay sayers I'm waiting for YOUR reaction when winter comes and heating oil is at a high premium. Remember the angst and anger during the Arab oil embargos of 1973 & 79. It wasn't just "Right Wingers' who were going crazy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 07/14/2008
- Paul I'm a Fan of Paul 32 fans permalink

How is drilling offshore exploratory wells going to help anyone this winter? Even if they find something, it will be years before the oil comes to market. We are sucking down 20 million barrels a day - how much new oil are they likely to get to market and at what rate?

Do the math - it won't help.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 07/14/2008
photo

People like PublicusOrator don't do math. It gets in the way of their BS.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 07/14/2008
- Radarman I'm a Fan of Radarman 5 fans permalink
photo

What would you recommend we do in the next 4 months to solve the problem? Winter is coming so we need your solution now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 07/14/2008
- shades3 I'm a Fan of shades3 33 fans permalink

Thank you Paul. Drilling DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU WILL BE SAVING MONEY ON FILLING YOUR GASTANK ANYTIME SOON.
It's an empty gesture which may turn some voters against the Democrats who know that it will be YEARS before any benefit will be seen by any ordinary people.

BUT, it may very well be spun to make some voters believe that the Democrats are against new cheap oil, which they will be convinced is right around the corner.

Some people will believe anything.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 07/14/2008
- Lemeritus I'm a Fan of Lemeritus 108 fans permalink
photo

I repeat:
1. How soon will it help us?
2. How long will it help us?
3. Will it once again push real research into alternative energy to the bottom of the pile?
4. How much will it cost us -- not only environmentally, but in our ability to truly compete in the post-petroleum world?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:36 PM on 07/14/2008

i wear socks and sweaters and deal with it. some of us couldn't afford gas costs last year either. This isn't going to do anything for anyone except the oil companies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 PM on 07/14/2008

The idea that drilling in ANWR or in offshore waters will decrease oil prices is a LIE.

The Energy Information Administration has estimated that if we throw the doors open to drilling in ANWR, the price per barrel for oil will decrease BY LESS THAN 1% 20 YEARS FROM NOW.

Bushies and oil companies are just trying to spin their way into another oil bonanza. Don't listen to their propaganda and lies.

www.saibotchilizm.org

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 07/14/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last » (19 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect