Obama Iraq Speech: US Strategy Is Unsound

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama Iraq Speech: US Strategy Is Unsound stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GLEN JOHNSON | July 15, 2008 12:17 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., waves after speaking at the NAACP convention in Cincinnati, Monday, July 14, 2008. (AP Photo/Al Behrman)

WASHINGTON — Sen. Barack Obama said Tuesday that overall U.S. interests have been hurt rather than helped by the Bush administration's decision to increase troop strength in Iraq 18 months ago, and vowed to stick to his plan to withdraw combat troops within 16 months of becoming president.

Obama said his White House rival, Sen. John McCain, "has argued that the gains of the surge mean that I should change my commitment to end the war. But this argument misconstrues what is necessary to succeed in Iraq, and stubbornly ignores the facts of the broader strategic picture that we face."

In a speech delivered in advance of an overseas trip, Obama said fighting al-Qaida and the Taliban in Afghanistan would be his top priority. Beyond that, he called for securing all nuclear weapons and materials from terrorists and rogue states, achieving energy security and rebuilding international alliances.

With his speech, Obama sought to cast the debate over the war in Iraq _ and in particular the surge _ in a wider context.

"Senator McCain wants to talk of our tactics in Iraq; I want to focus on a new strategy for Iraq and the wider world," he said.

"This war distracts us from every threat that we face and so many opportunities we could seize. This war diminishes our security, our standing in the world, our military, our economy, and the resources that we need to confront the challenges of the 21st century. By any measure, our single-minded and open-ended focus on Iraq is not a sound strategy for keeping America safe.

Obama's successful run through the Democratic presidential primaries was fueled in part by his opposition to Bush's plans for an invasion of Iraq in 2003, and his 16-month timetable for a withdrawal has long been a staple of his speeches.

In recent weeks, though, McCain has challenged him to readjust his views to take the results of the so-called surge into account.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Senator Obama is departing soon on a trip abroad that will include a fact-finding mission to Iraq and Afghanistan," McCain said in prepared remarks.

"And I note that he is speaking today about his plans for Iraq and Afghanistan before he has even left, before he has talked to General Petraeus, before he has seen the progress in Iraq, and before he has set foot in Afghanistan for the first time. In my experience, fact-finding missions usually work best the other way around: First you assess the facts on the ground, then you present a new strategy."

Obama answered bluntly.

"In the 18 months since the surge began, the strain on our military has increased, our troops and their families have borne an enormous burden, and American taxpayers have spent another $200 billion in Iraq," he said.

He added that in Afghanistan, "June was our highest casualty month of the war. The Taliban has been on the offensive, even launching a brazen attack on one of our bases. Al-Qaida has a growing sanctuary in Pakistan."

The speech billed as a major address by the campaign offered no new policy, but a high-profile explanation of his opposition to the war and his pledge to complete a U.S. troop pullout within 16 months of becoming president. It also gave him a forum for criticizing President Bush and McCain.

"I will end this war as president," he said, speaking from a podium that said "Judgment to Lead." Obama addressed the crowd with a line of American flags behind him.

Obama delayed his appearance for half an hour for a presidential news conference that the White House announced Tuesday morning during the same time that Obama was scheduled to be speaking just three blocks away.

President Bush was asked what advice he might give Obama as he prepared to visit Iraq. The president said he would ask Obama to listen carefully to Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander, and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker.

"It's a temptation to let the politics at home get in the way, you know, with the considered judgment of the commanders," Bush said. He defended his policy and maintained that the effort in Iraq was succeeding and acknowledged that the war in Afghanistan remained "a tough fight."

Meanwhile, the New York Daily News reported that the Obama campaign altered its Web site to remove a statement that Bush's surge of troops in Iraq "is not working." Over the weekend, the site was changed to describe an "improved security situation" at the cost of U.S. lives.

Campaign aide Wendy Morigi told the newspaper that Obama is "not softening his criticism of the surge. We regularly update the Web site to reflect changes in current events."

___

AP Special Correspondent David Espo contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — Sen. Barack Obama said Tuesday that overall U.S. interests have been hurt rather than helped by the Bush administration's decision to increase troop strength in Iraq 18 months ago, ...
WASHINGTON — Sen. Barack Obama said Tuesday that overall U.S. interests have been hurt rather than helped by the Bush administration's decision to increase troop strength in Iraq 18 months ago, ...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
1024
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (18 pages total)
- DMcD I'm a Fan of DMcD 11 fans permalink
photo

The "war of attrition" -------- he's 400 years old , and still has a job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 07/16/2008
- OBXartist I'm a Fan of OBXartist 56 fans permalink

McCain said, "I know how to win wars." Really?! To which wars would he be referring? Which wars has McCain won? He had nothing to do with the planning or implementation of current conflicts in Iraq or Afghanistan, nothing to do with the first Gulf War, nothing to do with Bosnia or Grenada. As I recall, we lost Vietnam. So, exactly what is the genesis of McCain's vaunted experience in winning wars? He flew a plane during a war that America lost. Thousands of people did that. It doesn't make them qualified to be Commander in Chief any more than it does McCain.

And, as I also recall, McCain crashed four planes prior to being shot down in Vietnam, graduated at the bottom of his class (894th out of a class of 899) at the Naval Academy, and would never have been accepted into flight school if his father and grandfather had not been admirals. It's time for the media to call McCain on all this puffery.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:07 PM on 07/16/2008
- bongogirl I'm a Fan of bongogirl 3 fans permalink
photo

Well said...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 07/16/2008

Hmmm . . . knows how to win wars? But never a president or member of the joint chiefs of staff, sec. of state, and doesn't realize the Chech republic no longer exists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 07/16/2008
- TJRich I'm a Fan of TJRich 6 fans permalink

I knew that as soon as Obama finished speaking, McCain would pop up with a "response", not a plan. So far he promised to out-Obama Obama. Meanwhile Bush is spinning and trying to co-opt whatever Obama plan he can. I hear now a US rep will meet with Iranians in Switzerland. The drone shot in Pakistan was made 'after' Obama stated his position.

While McCain is sputtering and declaring 'Why, ah 'll catch Obama' he should be reminded that their captives don't languish in Afghan Hilton, they are beheaded.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 07/16/2008
- Angelic11 I'm a Fan of Angelic11 23 fans permalink
photo

..."know how to win wars!" "WTF?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 AM on 07/16/2008

Obama doesn't care what happens in Iraq, civil war, Iranian occupation, Syrian occupation, the fall of the elected Iraqi government, genocide..­..... just get out.

" At the time he first proposed his timetable, Mr. Obama argued -- wrongly, as it turned out -- that U.S. troops could not stop a sectarian civil war. He conceded that a withdrawal might be accompanied by a "spike" in violence. Now, he describes as "an achievable goal" that "we leave Iraq to a government that is taking responsibility for its future -- a government that prevents sectarian conflict and ensures that the al-Qaeda threat which has been beaten back by our troops does not reemerge." How will that "true success" be achieved? By the same pullout that Mr. Obama proposed when chaos in Iraq appeared to him inevitable. . . .

The message that the Democrat sends is that he is ultimately indifferent to the war's outcome -- that Iraq "distracts us from every threat we face" and thus must be speedily evacuated regardless of the consequences. That's an irrational and ahistorical way to view a country at the strategic center of the Middle East, with some of the world's largest oil reserves. Whether or not the war was a mistake, Iraq's future is a vital U.S. security interest. If he is elected president, Mr. Obama sooner or later will have to tailor his Iraq strategy to that reality." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/15/AR2008071502531.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 07/16/2008
- rwe2late I'm a Fan of rwe2late 31 fans permalink

Ah
the imperial doctrine, controlling the resources of other countries is "vital" to our national "security".

Obviously, if every nation adopted that doctrine, there would be quite a conflict, (oh yes, WW1,WW2, etc.).

Even if it would not be so profitable for our multinationals, or glorious for our military, maybe we should just purchase what we "need".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 07/16/2008
- TJRich I'm a Fan of TJRich 6 fans permalink

Hear, hear!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 07/16/2008
photo

"rollingdivision" wrote:

"Whether or not the war was a mistake, Iraq's future is a vital U.S. security interest."

Not if We The People get the oil monkey off our national back. Not if We the People remain faithful to the principle of The Rule of Law as enshrined in our Constitution.

The invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation launched and sustained by over 900+ *documented* lies about WMDs and debunked claims of connections between Saddam Hussein and 9/11, is no excuse for remaining in an *illegal war* of aggression and corporate resource piracy, and the continued looting of our nation's treasury by Bushevik corporate cronies through no-bid contracts.

So unless you think Cheney crony KBR serving rotting food and contaminated water to our Armed Forces personnel in Iraq, and even electrocuting a few while they're at it with unsafe and *incompetently* rendered shoddy work adds up to "support our troops," you've another think comin' on the strategic intelligence of our nation bleeding itself economically white with Cheney's PNAC grab for empire.

Bring them home - now.

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 07/17/2008
- rwe2late I'm a Fan of rwe2late 31 fans permalink

The counter-productive so-called “war on terror” will remain counter-productive as long as it is continued, regardless where it is conducted, regardless what countries are invaded or occupied.
That is why BOTH McCain and Obama are dead wrong.
A counter-productive “war” is not made less counter-productive by continuing it.
An unsound neoCON policy is not made sound by repackaging it as "intelligent" neoCON policy.

Obama has stated he would continue to EXPAND the military, INTENSIFY the destruction of Afghanistan, CONTINUE to occupy bases in IRAQ, HEIGHTEN the confrontation with IRAN, SUPPORT the expansion of apartheid Israel, and ATTACK alleged bases in Pakistan .

The SOURCE of anti-US "terrorism" is found in the hundreds of overseas military bases, the invasions and occupations, and the despotic governments the US supports in the slippery name of fighting "terrorists" or radicals, or insurgents. The antipathy is generated not by what US citizens allegedly believe, but by what our government does in our name abroad. The source lies not in a geographical location, but in our actions.

Our economy is being ruined by an over-dependence on war making and war profits. Our freedoms are being lost to militarism and war fever. Our leaders misuse our soldiers, and then claim that to change their bad policies would somehow dishonor the brave soldiers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 07/16/2008

"I will end this war as president"
Wasnt Nixon campaigning on the same ticket in '68?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 AM on 07/16/2008

I can't remember what Nixon campaigned on, but perhaps someone might know (maybe you). Was the U.S. handing out OUR tax dollars to the enemies so that they would fight WITH us? and since that was a different war at a different time, I would like to know how Maliki can go around handing out money in the streets in THIS WAR, when the money from oil revenues was supposed to pay for the war, instead WE keep on sending BILLIONS each month to fund the Iraq war while we go broke.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 AM on 07/16/2008

From Wikipedia on the 1968 presidential campaign:

"Nixon promised peace with honor, and, though never claiming to be able to win the war, Nixon did say "new leadership will end the war and win the peace in the Pacific."

Im all for Obama.
Apart from that i dont believe him anything he announces on Middle East policy. His decisions will be driven by realities not by wishful thinking.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 07/16/2008
- rwe2late I'm a Fan of rwe2late 31 fans permalink

Nixon (falsely) promised to END the war.

Obama merely promises to CONTINUE the war with greater "sophistication", (or should I say greater sophistry?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 07/16/2008
- TJRich I'm a Fan of TJRich 6 fans permalink

Wasn't he that crooked president that HRC worke for?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 07/16/2008

Prisoner of war status and twice demanding the US invade and continue to escalate a war in the wrong country (Vietnam and Iraq), so that our hand-picked successor is demanding we leave, does not demonstrate he knows how to win wars.

Lying about the safety of the situation in Iraq, calling Iraq safe when he is protected by 100 armed-to-the-teeth troops and 4 helicopter gunships, does not demonstrate he knows how to win a war or even judge when we're winning or losing.

Calling a surge a success when our main enemy, Ahmadinejad gets a hero's welcome in the sttreets of Baghdad while US leaders have to sneak into a protected zone with armed-to-the-teeth escorts does not demonstrate McCain knows how to win a war or even pick where to fight.

Supporting the invasion of a country that was no threat to the United States does not demonstrate a knowledge of when and where to go to war.

Ignoring the costs of a war so that he argues for military victory when we would be bankrupted by debt well before that victory happens does not demonstrate McCain knows how to win a war.

No, McCain has no qualifications that show he would make even a mediocre commander-in-chief.
Graduating near last from his war college does not demonstrate he knows how to win wars.

He was a courageous prisoner-of-war. That's the extent of his competence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 AM on 07/16/2008
- 1stThron I'm a Fan of 1stThron 3 fans permalink

This war distracts us because the Democrats have been hell bent to neutralize the military's success when the initial evasion of Iraq did not result in the 10,000 deaths they predicted. The Democrats have invested heavily in the failure of Iraq which if Barry becomes president he will feel the consequences. Pakistan's ruling government will always question, "If we side with the US and Barry and then the anti-war Democrats force Barry to abandon Pakistan were toast." It will be hard for Barry Flippy Floppy to convence other leaders he is a stay the course guy.

As bad as the troop deaths in Iraq are, the troops are statistically safer their than patients admitted to our nation's hospitals. If you compare troop deployments to troop deaths from initial envasion through January, 2005 to total hospitals discharges and preventable deaths during the same period, hospital zones were 2-4 times more dangerous than the Iraq/Afghanistan war zone. Why? Because the Democrat majority that implemented Medicare rules created a reimbursement system that pays more for a preventable medical errors than for good care. Democrats do not understand that you get what you reward.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:35 AM on 07/16/2008

This is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard. Please spare us the bull about Barry and his wishes of wanting a failed Iraq. If you haven't known by now the Iraqi war is an illegal war. It doesn't matter whether we are winning or not. We need to get our butts out of there.

Just take your nonsense somewhere else.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 AM on 07/16/2008
- 1stThron I'm a Fan of 1stThron 3 fans permalink

No, this is not the most "ridiculous thing" you have heard, the fact that the Iraq war is "an illegal war" is because you have "no ruling authority" to make such a claim.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 07/16/2008

If say the course lead to victory, how would we define it? Need more troops stay the course or surge working say the course. Is it our goal to leave troops on the rock (Iraq) forever. We need an end game (plan). So far, Obama is the only plan on the table.
Should we waite for McCain to catch up or for Bush to follow Obama's lead.
How long will other countries hold US i-o-u's? Resourses and money are limited. The future is in doubt. Inflation is just a hint of things to come as our dollar deflates.
Iraqi oil is not promise to us. It will be sold to the highest bidder. Why do we sacrifice troops? For Iraqis to get rich through corrupted dealings with US dollars. This is the most absurd US disaster being past off as 'foriegn policy,' history will ever record.

If we are going to fail in anything, the US might as well look good in doing so.

Compared to McCain, no one can deny, Obama make the US look so 'dame good' (swell).

More of the same or something new. Grown men are not afraid of the dark.

Obama and more

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 07/16/2008

McBush certainly knows how to cheerlead and drumbeat for invading foreign countries, and if that's what you support, then vote for McBush -- more of the McSame!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 07/16/2008

One thing democrats should bring up is that the 3,000 people who died on 911 have not been vindicated. The republicons and their VOTERS have spit on the graves of those who died that day by supporting the war in Iraq.Bin Laden is still free, yet these traitorous Americans still support his freedom by voting republicon. I won't let this stand and neither should anybody in the democratic party.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 AM on 07/16/2008
- sandals I'm a Fan of sandals 34 fans permalink

I want to know what wars John McBush has won?
Barack Obama is right and has always been right. Our foreign policy has been in the past a bi-partisan
group and now the past 8yrs it has become a partisan issue, we need to come together on this issue
this has made us strong as a nation in the past until Bush and his cronies took over.
We need to bring our troops home and we need to finish the fight in Afghanistan and Pakistan, our military has done their job, it is the Commander Guy who let them down.
We need a leader who is willing to take responsibility and not blame the military for things that may have gone wrong. Common sense would tell me that things change and sometimes we need to make those tough decisions.
I would also like to point out that the last time MCBUSH went to Iraq him and his posse went there and were bragging about the great deals they got on some rugs, does that mean Obama needs to go rug shopping? Because than he can make an informed decision, the rugs will save us all!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:22 AM on 07/16/2008

By being captured and held as a prisoner of war ? This is his expertise in winning wars ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:54 AM on 07/16/2008

Mcveign already supports one losing war, why would we want to give him another chance ? 911 happened on a republicons watch. More americans have died from terrorist attacks than ever before. So to all you phony republicon tough talkers, why do support Bin Laden's freedom? Keep Bin Laden free, vote GOP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:50 AM on 07/16/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (18 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect