Bush Claims Executive Privilege In Valerie Plame Leak

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bush Claims Executive Privilege In Valerie Plame Leak stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LAURIE KELLMAN | July 16, 2008 10:33 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Bush gestures in the briefing room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, July 15, 2008, where he called on Congress to move quickly to put into force legislation designed to prop up mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

WASHINGTON — President Bush invoked executive privilege to keep Congress from seeing the FBI report of an interview with Vice President Dick Cheney and other records related to the administration's leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity in 2003.

The president's decision drew a sharp protest Wednesday from Rep. Henry Waxman, chairman of House Oversight Committee, which had subpoenaed Attorney General Michael Mukasey to turn over the documents.

"This unfounded assertion of executive privilege does not protect a principle; it protects a person," the California Democrat said. "If the vice president did nothing wrong, what is there to hide?"

Waxman left little doubt he would soon move for a committee vote to hold Mukasey in contempt of Congress.

Bush's assertion of privilege prevented Mukasey from complying with the House subpoena for records bearing on the unmasking of Plame at a time that the administration was trying to rebut criticism from her husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, of Bush's rationale for going to war in Iraq.

Cheney's chief of staff in 2003, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, was later convicted of perjury, obstruction and lying to the FBI about his role in leaking Plame's name and CIA affiliation to a reporter. Last July, Bush commuted Libby's 2 1/2-year sentence, sparing him from serving prison time.

In grand jury testimony played at his trial, Libby acknowledged he told the FBI early in the Plame probe that "it's possible" he spoke to Cheney about whether to share information with reporters about Wilson's wife.

Other records sought by the House committee include notes about Bush's 2003 State of the Union address, during which he made the case for invading Iraq in part by saying Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was pursuing uranium ore in Africa to make a nuclear weapon. In the spring of 2003, Wilson claimed publicly that he had gone to Africa for the CIA to investigate the report and advised the administration it was false months before Bush cited it in the State of the Union speech.

Story continues below

Waxman held off an immediate contempt citation of Mukasey, but only as a courtesy to lawmakers not present Wednesday and to give all members a chance to read up on the matter. He made clear that he thinks Mukasey, who requested that Bush invoke executive privilege to shield the records, has earned a contempt citation.

"We'll act in the reasonable and appropriate period of time," Waxman said.

In a Tuesday letter to Bush, Mukasey said the assertion of the privilege would not be about hiding anything but rather protecting the separation of powers as well as the integrity of future Justice Department investigations of the White House. Several of the subpoenaed reports, Mukasey wrote, summarize conversations between Bush and advisers.

"I am greatly concerned about the chilling effect that compliance with the committee's subpoena would have on future White House deliberations and White House cooperation with future Justice Department investigations," Mukasey wrote Bush. "I believe it is legally permissible for you to assert executive privilege with respect to the subpoenaed documents, and I respectfully request that you do so."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., wrote to Mukasey later Wednesday suggesting that the attorney general should have recused himself from the dispute because he is the subject of the subpoena and he gave Bush advice about it.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said Bush invoked the privilege on Tuesday.

The Bush administration had plenty of warning. Waxman said last week that he would cite Mukasey for contempt unless the attorney general complied with the subpoena. The House Judiciary Committee also has subpoenaed some of the same documents from Mukasey, as well as information on the leak from other current and former administration officials.

Congressional Democrats want to shed light on the precise roles, if any, that Bush, Cheney and their aides may have played in the leak.

State Department official Richard Armitage first revealed Plame's identity as a CIA operative to columnist Robert Novak, who used former presidential counselor Karl Rove as a confirming source for a 2003 article.

___

Associated Press writer Lara Jakes Jordan contributed to this report.

WASHINGTON — President Bush invoked executive privilege to keep Congress from seeing the FBI report of an interview with Vice President Dick Cheney and other records related to the administratio...
WASHINGTON — President Bush invoked executive privilege to keep Congress from seeing the FBI report of an interview with Vice President Dick Cheney and other records related to the administratio...
Filed by Dan Duray  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
483
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 131 fans permalink

You guys had better look at this link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3dAnSMzUlo&feature=PlayList&p=443CE5D8F95152C7&index=0&playnext=1

Bush has gone to the EXTREME on Executive Privilege. He's one step away from being our dicktator! You better read and get wise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 07/17/2008

Bush is only delaying the inevitable...he will be going down, along with cheney, wolfawitz and rumsfeld.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 AM on 07/17/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 109 fans permalink

I wish I shared your optimism.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 07/17/2008
- TheLar I'm a Fan of TheLar 19 fans permalink
photo

It's executive privilege to be a traitor?!?!?! What a nimrod!
Next thing you know, he'll say it's his executive privilege that he can have sex with anything he wants.

BushSex! ---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKb7w7XEb1U

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:12 AM on 07/17/2008

Monster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 AM on 07/17/2008
- HallStyle I'm a Fan of HallStyle 11 fans permalink
photo

The BUSH administration has over stepped there boundaries so many times. They have stepped on, spit at, and burned the constitiuon on so many occasions. Even if they don't impeach him they need to do something.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 AM on 07/17/2008
- Vinca I'm a Fan of Vinca 6 fans permalink

IF only Nancy Pelosi would ONLY CHANGE HER MIND< GW BUSH SHOULD LEAVE IN DISGRACE, GET IMPEACHMENT STARTED < I DON'T CARE IF TIME IS SHORT< THE HISTORY BOOKS NEED TO TELL ABOUT IT. I THINK THE HISTORY BOOKS WILL SCRUB UP GW BUSH AND MAKE HIM BETTER

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 07/17/2008

How can treason be protected by executive privilege?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:14 AM on 07/17/2008

gig : Reverse that...

Treason is the reason for their contention. And could they possibly show that I'm wrong ?

Sure. All they have to do is prove that they have nothing to hide ! ( Given their talent for pulling rabbits out of the Hat they're typically ' talking through ', it should be easy for them ! )

My grandmother once admonished " What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive "... A very long time ago ! They can't possibly sustain their Glass House indefinitely !
( Rest in peace, dearest one. )

Their ' Executive Privilege ' is going the way of the Edsel ! It's just a question of when their thinly veiled excuse will no longer carry the weight of their own water.

This administration, it's cronies, and waterbearers are hauling quite a pantload... Perhaps too much to bear !


More to follow. -ralph

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 07/17/2008
- Lemeritus I'm a Fan of Lemeritus 114 fans permalink
photo

I thought they pulled rabbits out of some place else.

I do not hold out much hope of seeing "executive privilege" going to way of the Edsel, particularly since Justice Alito practically wrote the book on the subject.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 07/17/2008
- Vinca I'm a Fan of Vinca 6 fans permalink

OUTING A CIA AGENT IS TREASON< I THINK> YOU ARE RIGHT< HOW COULD THAT BE PROTECTED?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 07/17/2008
- jsinclair I'm a Fan of jsinclair 14 fans permalink

So called "impeachment" hearings are beginning, but --incredibly-- only on the subject of "abuses" of power.

Impeachment is about CRIMES. The House needs to grow a pair and start to enumerate and collect evidence documenting President Bush's CRIMES.

God knows there are enough of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:18 AM on 07/17/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 109 fans permalink

I think Dennis K brought THIRTY SIX articles to the floor, so there are at least that many that are enumerated. Additionally, Dennis cited a good deal of evidence in the articles, so we've got a good start...
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 07/17/2008
- olivia I'm a Fan of olivia 95 fans permalink

Traitor.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:19 AM on 07/17/2008
- Vinca I'm a Fan of Vinca 6 fans permalink

THEY FINALLY GOT TEFLON DON

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 07/17/2008
- ShanniC I'm a Fan of ShanniC 7 fans permalink
photo

Will he ever be impeached or is this just an American citizen's pipe dream. I hate the fact that he is going to leave office scot free. Ugh!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 07/17/2008
- olivia I'm a Fan of olivia 95 fans permalink

Indicted for war crimes after he leaves office. My dream for justice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 07/17/2008
- RTIII I'm a Fan of RTIII 109 fans permalink

Sentenced to life in prison, the firing squad, or the hangman's noose are the three reasonable ends I foresee.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 07/17/2008
- iswideopen I'm a Fan of iswideopen 79 fans permalink
photo

Guilty...............

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 07/17/2008
- lungfish I'm a Fan of lungfish 106 fans permalink
photo

I would think that these "patriots" would do their patriotic duty and stand up, under oath, and tell the truth. Apparently everyone of the GOP and more than a few of the Dems have no sense of duty or shame.....

None of us would know who Valerie Plame is if Cheney hadn't decided to try to make an example out of Joe Wilson for his outing of the Iraq spin machine. Cheney is at the bottom of the Plame matter and it is not executive privilege to refuse to discuss a decision to knowingly and willingly out an active, undercover CIA agent.

Its treason.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 07/17/2008

Executive privilege ... meaning ... guilty

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 PM on 07/16/2008
- genseric13 I'm a Fan of genseric13 6 fans permalink

Valerie Flame, the biggest hullabaloo about nothing. We used to have tough 1950s men running the CIA and these 9-11 disasters didn't happen. Now we have analysts more worried about their hairdo then defending the Country against terrorists. I tell you, it's ridiculous and one of the big reasons we are no longer a great country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 PM on 07/16/2008

she worried about her hairdo?valery plame set up a front company if africa NIGER to be exact to follow the money trail to the terrorists.How they were getting it ,who was giving it.When her cover was blown the ccompany and anyone associated with their covers were blown.I think you should take a deep look in the mirror if you want to know why we are no longer "a great country!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 07/17/2008
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 172 fans permalink
photo

"a great country!"as Jim Crow? or a country to which a president resigned,
another one impeached for lying to a Grand Jury?
The latter prove to be a great country.
911 disaster occurred on the Bush KIngdoom. genseric13

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 AM on 07/17/2008

Valarie Plame, the biggest hullabaloo???? Since when is treason hullabaloo?

Thomas Paine stated in his pamphlet Common Sense (1776): "For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:31 AM on 07/17/2008
- olivia I'm a Fan of olivia 95 fans permalink

Or maybe it's because we have a president who cares more about his golf game and vacations than about our safety.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 AM on 07/17/2008
- kevenseven I'm a Fan of kevenseven 501 fans permalink
photo

He certainly could not be troubled to read the Aug - memo.

All of 430, and he could not be troubled to read it.

And Rice read it, but she was too stupid to understand it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 AM on 07/17/2008
photo

genseric13, wanna know why Plame's cover was blown?

Because she found that U.S, Black Ops were smuggling WMD's into Iraq to cover "W"'s you-know-what.

This ain't no Bond flick, dude, no episode of "24".

This is Orwell.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 AM on 07/17/2008
- kevenseven I'm a Fan of kevenseven 501 fans permalink
photo

Who says this is not a great country?

It would, however, benefit if you were to emigrate. Consider Paraguay. Fàscists still welcome, I believe.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 AM on 07/17/2008
- nellie I'm a Fan of nellie 502 fans permalink
photo

He may as well claim executive privilege for his entire term in office—an eight-year-long crime spree.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 07/16/2008

Well said Nellie !!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 AM on 07/17/2008
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 430 fans permalink
photo

Still waiting for one of these "strict constructionists" to show me where "executive privilege" is mentioned in the Constitution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 PM on 07/16/2008
- Jeff1958 I'm a Fan of Jeff1958 44 fans permalink
photo

Al Gore had another question for those "strict constructionists" in 2000. Those "strict constructionists" are a bunch of hypocrites, consistently inconsistent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 07/16/2008
- genseric13 I'm a Fan of genseric13 6 fans permalink

It's known as the separation of powers. You may have heard of it. Any one of the 3 branches can destroy the other if unchecked. For example, the court recently ruled the FBI erred in searching the congressman's office for evidence.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 07/16/2008
- ObamAtomic I'm a Fan of ObamAtomic 172 fans permalink
photo

Separation of power 3 branches executive,legislative,judiciary,you are wrong
on your statement ( the court recently ruled the FBI ),
what court ?appeals,district court?excuse me,blabbing are you?.
Case on point ,the executive is asserting authorities over the two other branches

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 AM on 07/17/2008
- olivia I'm a Fan of olivia 95 fans permalink

The idea was that three 3 branches would be independent, so there would be checks and balances.

Stacking the judiciary with Bush cronies destroyed all that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 AM on 07/17/2008
- kevenseven I'm a Fan of kevenseven 501 fans permalink
photo

Where is Separation of Powers expressed in the Constitution?

The Constitution does, however, give to Congress the power to "advise and consent".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:42 AM on 07/17/2008
- kmac23va I'm a Fan of kmac23va 11 fans permalink

The problem we're having with this administration and the separation of powers is simple. The executive claims executive privilege. The legislative says it doesn't apply. In these cases, the judicial must rule...except that the legislative's process is to refer the matter to the Department of Justice...which is an executive department. So a corrupt executive can use this process to cover for itself, which is precisely what is going on here.

The only solution I can think of is for Congress to exercise its authority to enforce contempt citations itself, or for disputes to be immediately referred to SCOTUS (one shot, no appeal). I don't think you could move Justice out of the executive and to the judicial, because the technical head of the judicial branch is the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS, which is a lifetime appointment and basically can only be removed via impeachment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 AM on 07/17/2008
- mosh I'm a Fan of mosh 10 fans permalink
photo

huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 07/17/2008
- Lemeritus I'm a Fan of Lemeritus 114 fans permalink
photo

"Executive privilege" does not strictly exist in the Constitution, just as Congress' power to issue subpoenas does not exist. They are extensions of the enumerated powers under Section 2 of the Constitution and one scarcely be spoken in the same breath without the other (i.e., the Supreme Court in US v Nixon: ""To read the Article II powers of the President as providing an absolute privilege as against a subpoena essential to enforcement of criminal statutes on no more than a generalized claim of the public interest in confidentiality of nonmilitary and nondiplomatic discussions would upset the constitutional balance of 'a workable government' and gravely impair the role of the courts under Article III.")

Until recently, there was a dynamic tension between the two which blunted the force of one against the other. But never before has the government been so partisanly stacked in favor of the executive (to the point where some staffers actually believe their oath of office is to the president).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 AM on 07/17/2008
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (13 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect