General Petraeus: Al Qaida May Be Shifting Focus Back To Afghanistan From Iraq

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - General Petraeus: Al Qaida May Be Shifting Focus Back To Afghanistan From Iraq stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT BURNS | July 20, 2008 07:31 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Gen. David Petraeus, left, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, talks with Brig. Gen. David Perkins, the top spokesman for the U.S., military command in Baghdad, in his office at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad Saturday, July 19, 2008. Senior leaders of al-Qaida may be diverting fighters from the war in Iraq to the Afghan frontier area, Petraeus told The Associated Press on Saturday. (AP Photo/Robert Burns)

BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S. commander in Iraq said Saturday.

"We do think that there is some assessment ongoing as to the continued viability of al-Qaida's fight in Iraq," Gen. David Petraeus told The Associated Press in an interview at his office at the U.S. Embassy.

Whatever the result, Petraeus said no one should expect al-Qaida to give up entirely in Iraq.

"They're not going to abandon Iraq. They're not going to write it off. None of that," he said. "But what they certainly may do is start to provide some of those resources that would have come to Iraq to Pakistan, possibly Afghanistan."

He said there are signs that foreign fighters recruited by al-Qaida to do battle in Iraq are being diverted to the largely ungoverned areas in Pakistan from which the fighters can cross into Afghanistan. U.S. officials have pressed Pakistan for more than a year to halt the cross-border infiltration. It remains a major worry not only for the war in Afghanistan but also for Pakistan's stability.

Discussing al-Qaida in cautious terms, Petraeus said he is not certain of the reliability of the intelligence information about the terrorist network's latest thinking. He was adamant, however, that until now al-Qaida has seen Iraq as its best opportunity for establishing a militant Islamic state closer to the Persian Gulf.

"That could be under review," Petraeus said. "We do think they are considering what should be the main effort."

He offered a mostly upbeat assessment of conditions in Iraq just weeks before he is to make a recommendation on whether to further reduce U.S. troop levels. Petraeus said the country is showing fresh signs of promise not only on the security front, where insurgent attacks are down sharply, but also politically.

Story continues below
advertisement

He applauded the latest evidence of movement toward reconciliation by Sunnis and Shiites _ the announcement Saturday that Iraq's largest Sunni Arab political bloc had ended a nearly yearlong boycott of the Shiite-led government.

"It's a very important step forward," Petraeus said after an aide interrupted the AP interview to deliver the news. The general flashed a wide smile and instructed the aide to pass along his congratulations to top government officials, who have come under enormous pressure from U.S. officials to reconcile.

Petraeus declined to say what he might recommend to President Bush regarding further U.S. troops reductions. The assessment, he said, is based on a range of factors, including the prospects for Iraqi government approval of legislation required before provincial elections can be held this fall.

He would not talk about specific troop levels later this year. But the enthusiasm of Petraeus's description of security, political and even economic progress in 2008 gave the impression he may be inclined to tell Bush that fewer than the current 15 combat brigades will be needed by year's end.

Petraeus said he was encouraged at the possibility of al-Qaida reconsidering Iraq as its highest priority war front.

"There is some intelligence that has picked this up," he said, adding, "It's not solid gold intelligence.

This information, while unconfirmed, parallels reports that fewer foreign fighters are joining the insurgency in Iraq.

"We do know the foreign fighter flow into Iraq has been reduced very substantially," he said. From a peak of 80 to 100 foreign fighters entering Iraq each month, the total has dropped as low as 20 per month, he said.

He attributed the decline to a combination of factors. They include the intense U.S. and Iraqi military operations against al-Qaida in Baghdad, Mosul and elsewhere, and stronger actions by neighboring countries to prevent militants from crossing into Iraqi territory. He mentioned Saudi Arabia as an example.

The other main source of violence in Iraq over the past year _ Shiite militia extremists _ also has been curbed. Petraeus said that whether leaders of those Shiite groups, who fled in many cases to Iran, end up returning to fight for control of such Baghdad sections as Sadr City will be a critical bellwether.

"This will be very important because it will be an indicator of whether Iran intends to start a new chapter in its relationship with Iraq, or not," he said.

Petraeus said Iraq's prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, got an encouraging response when he traveled recently to Tehran to express concern about the role of Iranian-supported Shiite extremists in Iraq.

Al-Maliki "received assurances from the highest levels that Tehran wants nothing but constructive relations."

Petraeus is due to leave his post in Baghdad in September to head U.S. Central Command, with responsibility for U.S. military operations in Afghanistan, Pakistan as well as Iraq. He is to be replaced in Baghdad by Gen. Raymond Odierno, who until February had served as the No. 2 commander in Iraq.

BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S...
BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
233
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

they have NEVER shifted out of Afghanistan ! are you frigging KIDDING us ?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 07/20/2008
- meneghin I'm a Fan of meneghin 4 fans permalink

Sounds like a military version of the chicken and the egg story. People can be fooled only for a limited time, how embarrassing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 PM on 07/20/2008

Not true, meneghin. When it comes to america, P.T. Barnum's saying that "a sucker is born every minute" requires a 21st century update to "a sucker is born every second".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 07/20/2008
- Krikkit I'm a Fan of Krikkit 14 fans permalink

That's the dumbest, most duplicitous, most irresponsible assessment I've EVER heard from a military leader.

A little history: Zarkawi, the top al Qaeda guy in Iraq was at odds with Zawahri, Bin Laden's second in command. Zarkawi urged Sunnis to strike at Shi'a rather than US troops, while Zawahiri wanted to engage US forces and personnel. Once Zarkawi was killed, the Sunnis started turning against al Qaeda in Iraq. Iraq was NEVER the centeral territory of al Qaeda, despite the fact that they had fighters there.

Our intelligence assessments have been that al-Qaeda regrouped in the border regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan because we didn't have enough forces in Afghanistan to prevent it from happening. It isn't something that *may be* happening, it already long since has happened. Furthermore, they have apparently been able to recruit a large number of westerners that have been trained, people that would easily pass in London or New York city without comment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 PM on 07/20/2008

In the US military, how is a soldier to proceed when issued an order by a commanding officer that is clearly in violation of law?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 07/20/2008

The surge worked, Obama said it wouldn't work.

Congrats to the troops for winning a war that Pelosi and Reid said was unwinnable.

Now finish the job in Afghanistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 PM on 07/20/2008

yea right tell me another story sheeeeesh

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:34 PM on 07/20/2008
- hawkseye I'm a Fan of hawkseye 3 fans permalink

The surge did not acomplish its goals. It has reduced violence which is a great blessing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 07/20/2008
- Yola I'm a Fan of Yola 13 fans permalink

So where has Al Qaida been? They have always been in Afghanistan! There was no Al Qaida in Iraq until we invaded that country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 07/20/2008

These posts by hopeandchange are the primary reason I asked the monitors to expand the choices with "Flag as stupid". Not my fault that they didn't listen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 07/20/2008

That would save a lot of time. The trouble is, though, that ignorant people would flag intelligent comments due to lack of comprehension.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 07/20/2008
- lisakaz2 I'm a Fan of lisakaz2 107 fans permalink
photo

I hope this guy is less transparent as a general than he is as a pol. I love tha question a kid asked his mom: how did Al Qaeda get into Iraq or how can they shift "focus" general?

He's trying to keep his job. End of story.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 07/20/2008

Well, this is evidence of what results from firing all of the generals that wouldn't agree with W. Where did they get this meat puppet - a central casting call? If this is an example of "military intelligence", our troops are doomed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 PM on 07/20/2008

Al Qaeda never left Afghanistan and never dropped their focus on it. Read "Imperial Hubris" All this was predicted in that hard to read (because it's so frightening) book. As usual, we (our Government and military) are behind the curve and do not understand what is really happening. Iraq is a tragic side show. The fight was always in Afghanistan and moved to Pakistan. Now it is in both places and it's deadly serious. They have nukes in Pakistan. This is where the fight is for the very survival of civilization. Obama has always understood this. Arianna is right. Look at his score card.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 07/20/2008

Wow, How Convenient!

Did they take the Two humped camel backed express?

Is Al Queda going back to Afghanistan because they are tired of fighting an Oil War?

It is hard to take "Anyone" from this administration seriously about this war anymore especially the military and their puppet generals.

This war is lasting longer then all of wold war II did - a waste of breath anymore.

People need to be held accountable for this disgrace - accountable!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 07/20/2008

This is absolutely disgusting. Presented with the facts on the ground here in the U.S., Bush and McCain are now ready to declare victory in Iraq. That's it! Just, victory. As it became clear to so many, why didn't the Bush admin just declare it years ago?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 07/20/2008
- kellygrrrl I'm a Fan of kellygrrrl 642 fans permalink
photo

if there were gobs of oil on Catalina Island - is that were Al-Qaida would be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 07/20/2008

Maybe there are two Al-Qaidas.... the one that exists to fight against the US controlling the resources in the fanatical religious Islamic regions of the world, and the one that the B o o SHH administration claims to exist whereever the resources are that the facists wish to control.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 07/20/2008
- syllepsis I'm a Fan of syllepsis 24 fans permalink

Disingenuous. He knows the goal of al Qaeda in Iraq- which was a loose affiliate, not part of al Qaeda proper- was not to establish an Islamic state in Iraq, because that was impossible. It was to bleed the Americans dry while diverting attention from their base in Pakistan/Afghan wilderness.
Also, a subsidiary goal was to give Tehran a scare, and if possible involve Iran in a war with the U.S. I would not be surprised if al Qaeda agents were feeding Cheney stories about Iranian nukes. If the CIA had not overriden the Vice President last year, who knows what would have happened.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 07/20/2008

So now the lefties will admit that al-Qaida is in Iraq. Maybe if you guys could have pulled your heads out of your asses sooner, we would have had an easier time winning over there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 07/20/2008

Yeah..Al-Qaeda got there right AFTER we invaded Iraq-a country that was NO THREAT to us...and who had nothing to do with 9/11!!! Stick YOUR head BACK in the sand,Sparky!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 07/20/2008

fight 'em over there so we don't have to fight them here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 07/20/2008

Too much neo-conartist kool-aid in your diet!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 07/20/2008
- colleen2 I'm a Fan of colleen2 5 fans permalink

Yes and if we ALL click our heels and sprinkle magic fairy dust right wingers will suddenly become smart.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 07/20/2008
- syllepsis I'm a Fan of syllepsis 24 fans permalink

Of course 'al Qaeda' was (and is) in Iraq.
Your traitor King made sure they'd have a porous border and plenty of chaos for them to open their maiden franchise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 07/20/2008
- alvdh1 I'm a Fan of alvdh1 25 fans permalink

Hope and Change,

Your observation doen't even deserve a comment when it is obviously Fixed News educated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 07/20/2008

The comments are hyperbole. On what evidence does P-tray-us make these comments?

"Petraeus said he is not certain of the reliability of the intelligence information about the terrorist network's latest thinking."

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hyperbole

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 07/20/2008
- Krikkit I'm a Fan of Krikkit 14 fans permalink

Apparently monkeys do fly out of the nether regions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 07/20/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect