General Petraeus: Al Qaida May Be Shifting Focus Back To Afghanistan From Iraq

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - General Petraeus: Al Qaida May Be Shifting Focus Back To Afghanistan From Iraq stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ROBERT BURNS | July 20, 2008 07:31 AM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Gen. David Petraeus, left, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, talks with Brig. Gen. David Perkins, the top spokesman for the U.S., military command in Baghdad, in his office at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad Saturday, July 19, 2008. Senior leaders of al-Qaida may be diverting fighters from the war in Iraq to the Afghan frontier area, Petraeus told The Associated Press on Saturday. (AP Photo/Robert Burns)

BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S. commander in Iraq said Saturday.

"We do think that there is some assessment ongoing as to the continued viability of al-Qaida's fight in Iraq," Gen. David Petraeus told The Associated Press in an interview at his office at the U.S. Embassy.

Whatever the result, Petraeus said no one should expect al-Qaida to give up entirely in Iraq.

"They're not going to abandon Iraq. They're not going to write it off. None of that," he said. "But what they certainly may do is start to provide some of those resources that would have come to Iraq to Pakistan, possibly Afghanistan."

He said there are signs that foreign fighters recruited by al-Qaida to do battle in Iraq are being diverted to the largely ungoverned areas in Pakistan from which the fighters can cross into Afghanistan. U.S. officials have pressed Pakistan for more than a year to halt the cross-border infiltration. It remains a major worry not only for the war in Afghanistan but also for Pakistan's stability.

Discussing al-Qaida in cautious terms, Petraeus said he is not certain of the reliability of the intelligence information about the terrorist network's latest thinking. He was adamant, however, that until now al-Qaida has seen Iraq as its best opportunity for establishing a militant Islamic state closer to the Persian Gulf.

"That could be under review," Petraeus said. "We do think they are considering what should be the main effort."

He offered a mostly upbeat assessment of conditions in Iraq just weeks before he is to make a recommendation on whether to further reduce U.S. troop levels. Petraeus said the country is showing fresh signs of promise not only on the security front, where insurgent attacks are down sharply, but also politically.

Story continues below
advertisement

He applauded the latest evidence of movement toward reconciliation by Sunnis and Shiites _ the announcement Saturday that Iraq's largest Sunni Arab political bloc had ended a nearly yearlong boycott of the Shiite-led government.

"It's a very important step forward," Petraeus said after an aide interrupted the AP interview to deliver the news. The general flashed a wide smile and instructed the aide to pass along his congratulations to top government officials, who have come under enormous pressure from U.S. officials to reconcile.

Petraeus declined to say what he might recommend to President Bush regarding further U.S. troops reductions. The assessment, he said, is based on a range of factors, including the prospects for Iraqi government approval of legislation required before provincial elections can be held this fall.

He would not talk about specific troop levels later this year. But the enthusiasm of Petraeus's description of security, political and even economic progress in 2008 gave the impression he may be inclined to tell Bush that fewer than the current 15 combat brigades will be needed by year's end.

Petraeus said he was encouraged at the possibility of al-Qaida reconsidering Iraq as its highest priority war front.

"There is some intelligence that has picked this up," he said, adding, "It's not solid gold intelligence.

This information, while unconfirmed, parallels reports that fewer foreign fighters are joining the insurgency in Iraq.

"We do know the foreign fighter flow into Iraq has been reduced very substantially," he said. From a peak of 80 to 100 foreign fighters entering Iraq each month, the total has dropped as low as 20 per month, he said.

He attributed the decline to a combination of factors. They include the intense U.S. and Iraqi military operations against al-Qaida in Baghdad, Mosul and elsewhere, and stronger actions by neighboring countries to prevent militants from crossing into Iraqi territory. He mentioned Saudi Arabia as an example.

The other main source of violence in Iraq over the past year _ Shiite militia extremists _ also has been curbed. Petraeus said that whether leaders of those Shiite groups, who fled in many cases to Iran, end up returning to fight for control of such Baghdad sections as Sadr City will be a critical bellwether.

"This will be very important because it will be an indicator of whether Iran intends to start a new chapter in its relationship with Iraq, or not," he said.

Petraeus said Iraq's prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, got an encouraging response when he traveled recently to Tehran to express concern about the role of Iranian-supported Shiite extremists in Iraq.

Al-Maliki "received assurances from the highest levels that Tehran wants nothing but constructive relations."

Petraeus is due to leave his post in Baghdad in September to head U.S. Central Command, with responsibility for U.S. military operations in Afghanistan, Pakistan as well as Iraq. He is to be replaced in Baghdad by Gen. Raymond Odierno, who until February had served as the No. 2 commander in Iraq.

BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S...
BAGHDAD — After intense U.S. assaults, al-Qaida may be considering shifting focus to its original home base in Afghanistan, where American casualties are running higher than in Iraq, the top U.S...
Filed by Nick Graham  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
233
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)

Betray-us is the Commander on the ground....­..and this liar can't say for sure whether or not Al-Qaeda is moving forces into Afghanistan????? This is the SAME LIAR who told the committee in Washington,at McNUTS" behest, that Al-Qaeda was the BIGGEST threat to our troops...w­hen "the facts on the ground" showed them to be about 8-10% of the insurgency!!! Great..we have an incompetent liar heading our army in Iraq and Afghanistan!!! We also have an incompetent liar in the White House and heading the State an justice department­s......par for the course!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 07/20/2008

You are not a patriot. In fact you're un-American. Funny how all you flag burners are on the left.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 07/20/2008

Your definitions of patriot and un-American must be written by C-our*L Ro v-e.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 07/20/2008
- innerpeace I'm a Fan of innerpeace 16 fans permalink

In places like Montana,Id­aho,Arkans­as,etc the flag burners are on the right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 07/20/2008

I flagged your comment as abusive..s­ince I served in the military! Righty punks stoop to name -calling because they always LOSE on the facts!!! Again..Bet­ray-Us IS a liar...NOT because I call him one..but because the facts on the ground PROVE that he is!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 07/20/2008

I'm patriotic enough to know i don't support fascists who stomp on our Constituti­on...like you do!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 07/20/2008
- lisakaz2 I'm a Fan of lisakaz2 83 fans permalink
photo

Why is that? Is the truth not patriotic?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 07/20/2008
- nellie I'm a Fan of nellie 492 fans permalink
photo

We know Iraq is about oil.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 07/20/2008

I think you lost that argument at 4 dollars a gallon. Pelosi is the terrorist in this country. She's holding us all hostages.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 07/20/2008
- rcampbell I'm a Fan of rcampbell 9 fans permalink

The only vaguely traitorous thing Pelosi has done is take impeachment off the table.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 07/20/2008
- kellygrrrl I'm a Fan of kellygrrrl 640 fans permalink
photo

you honestly want to take the position that the Dems are responsible for the gas prices?

boy, talk about kool-aid drinkers

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 07/20/2008

ok, put on your thinking cap. if you put two oil men in the white house, would they want a stable middle-east (and lower oil prices) or would they prefer for oil companies to make record profits?

some of you right-wingers take too many short-cuts in thinking. as a general rule, follow the money and you will see who's responsible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 07/20/2008

When will Iraqi oil, NOW being pumped out of the ground at pre-war levels,BEGIN to pay for this war...asYO­UR heroes said would happen??? More lies from the fascist leaders you covet and love!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 07/20/2008

HopeandChange, I "hope" you're able to process this concept: It was about controlling the oil supply. Corporations don't increase their bottom lines by flooding the market with product. They can only profit obscenely by restricting access to product. You do understand "supply side economics"­(reagonomi­cs), don't you?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 PM on 07/20/2008
- kellygrrrl I'm a Fan of kellygrrrl 640 fans permalink
photo

well, isn't that convenient

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 AM on 07/20/2008
- doofmann02 I'm a Fan of doofmann02 2 fans permalink

More smoke and mirrors from a politician/general. AL Qaeda has been in friggin Afghanistan and Pakistan for YEARS. It's just more BS to cover what they should have done years ago. Pull out the Thesaurus and call it whatever you want. The minute our soldiers stop playing beat cops on the corner, it will meltdown afterwards, but it will be the Iraqis problem, not ours.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:28 AM on 07/20/2008

I had no idea that GWB was such a good ventriloquist. His hand is so far up General Petraeus' a-h ole it's not even funny.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 07/20/2008
- Mojane I'm a Fan of Mojane 11 fans permalink

The TIMING is transparant enough for the crow to hit the window. Obama taking a major (and much more close-up) tour of the region. Obama with a consistent message on Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran from the get-go. Election getting close. And oh, what they hey, let's all pick up on his message and maybe the yokels will think it was us all along with the great ideas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:26 AM on 07/20/2008

it would be sweet if someone came up with a video timeline of all this stuff... obama would appear preminiscent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 PM on 07/20/2008
- Soulsurfer I'm a Fan of Soulsurfer 32 fans permalink

Wow, master of the obvious. We move a bunch of troops there, the extremists move to somewhere else, where they can still kill our soldiers. Iraq will go down in history as the biggest strategic blunder in the history of the USA. What an incredible waste.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 07/20/2008

The "good" soldier ... at this point I do not know what to think of Petreaus ... I know what I'm staring to think and I'm not liking it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 07/20/2008
- grn1 I'm a Fan of grn1 6 fans permalink

Wow perfect timing for al-Qaida to move to Afghanistan after all Iraq's prime minister is kicking out US troops. This gomer is just laying out the media pablum so we can declare success instead of genocide and failure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 AM on 07/20/2008

what a crock..lia­rs all

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 07/20/2008

What a crock!!!..­Liars all

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:02 AM on 07/20/2008
- Nova16 I'm a Fan of Nova16 34 fans permalink

The "surge is credited for the "stall" in Iraq. For every "surge" in Iraq there has been an equal and opposite "countersurge". The only difference this time is that the "countersurge" is in Afghanistan where the killing and mayhem continues. Surge-countersurge, sometimes it's hard to tell the landscape from the geography.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 07/20/2008
- Romeover I'm a Fan of Romeover 31 fans permalink
photo

Petraeus' comments read better if you merely substitute "United States" for "al Qaida".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:58 AM on 07/20/2008
- Krikkit I'm a Fan of Krikkit 14 fans permalink

Lol. Good one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 07/20/2008
- Gma11 I'm a Fan of Gma11 12 fans permalink

Gotta love it!! So many of the European leaders are anxious to get their picture taken with Obama. Boooosh is not going to have as easy of a time as spinning Brown's statement.

(Although on MTP, Brokaw made it clear, with a laugh, that al-Maliki must have heard from someone in the White House.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 AM on 07/20/2008
photo

This guy has been playing politics with the lives of our troops. He should be ashamed of himself. Hopefully, Obama will fire him right after the inauguration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:46 AM on 07/20/2008
- Gma11 I'm a Fan of Gma11 12 fans permalink

Al-Qaida MAY have shifted focus back to Afghanistan.

Absolutely incredible!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 AM on 07/20/2008
- jdmccl I'm a Fan of jdmccl 4 fans permalink

The general is not playing politics, at least american politics because he is heavily involved with Iraq politics due to the nature of his mission. Obama will listen to his army of advisors before making any remark but he probably understands that this general is the only one for the job. He is not an armchair quarterback such as Clark and Sanchez.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:40 AM on 07/20/2008
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (8 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect