...No need for absolutism. That kind of certainty can only lead to ...
only is an absolute itself
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
...No need for absolutism. That kind of certainty can only lead to ...
only is an absolute itself
Where's the article?
Finally, an explanation I can get behind.
I started doing TM at 15. After only a few years of it I was starting to experience all sorts of interesting things that were not part of my family's repertoire, nor of the culture I grew up in (Texas is as far from 'culture' as you can possibly get): out of body experiences while sleeping, lucid dreams, enhanced awareness when smoking pot, chills when listening to certain types of music and certain times when I felt like I was connected to the entire universe. None of those experiences happened WHILE I was meditating. They all seemed to be a result of it.
It sounds like these experiences (none of which proved a spiritual component to the physical universe) might have been caused by the extra amount of serotonin that was being dumped into my bloodstream due to the meditation technique.
I have to say that those experiences caused me to have a far greater appreciation of my place in the 'universe', and moved me to learn about 'deep time'.
There is no such thing as a soul and we are not spiritual being. That is simply a product of religious imagination and has no proof whatsoever. Indeed, 'soul' and 'spirit' are not measurable except for the number of words people throw around pretending they exist.
Knowing there is a biological origin of those experiences brings me to an even greater appreciation of how the physical universe becomes aware of itself.
"There is no such thing as a soul and we are not spiritual being."
There's enough basic logic in your post. No need for absolutism. That kind of certainty can only lead to embarrassing revelations later. They needn't be religious.
Spirituality in many ways, is the antithesis of religion. One is dogmatic, the other is exploration.
Sort of. To be empirically accurate, he/she should have said:
"There is absolutely no hard evidence for a soul, so given the lack of evidence we should tentatively disbelieve unless and until new evidence presents itself."
But that's not as pithy-sounding of a soundbite.
David Brooks spoke frankly about the presidential and...
Writing for the Daily Beast, Michael Kinsley relays a disturbing story about John...
You got to give credit to the American people, who managed to get through an...
In Debate II, John McCain twice laid out the criteria for how the American...
In 2004, America's malleable mainstream media allowed itself...
We've come to lower our expectations for real debates in the...
The insta-polls, which provide viewers with a somewhat skewed but important insight into how each...
Madonna went on VP candidate "Sarah fucking Paling" at her Madison Square Garden show Monday...
In her "No Bias, No Bull" segment Wednesday night, Campbell Brown pleaded with the...
NEW YORK — A runaway train of a sell-off turned the anniversary of...
Since our last...
In the past week of campaigning, Sarah Palin's famous...
The view from a hovering...
Huffington Post | July 21, 2008 05:06 PM