EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

McCain Gets History Of The Surge Wrong, CBS Doesn't Air Footage


First Posted: 07-22-08 11:43 PM   |   Updated: 07-30-08 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
New Mccain Top
?>

***UPDATED BELOW***

During a CBS interview on Tuesday, John McCain made a stone cold error on a subject about which he claims expert knowledge: the "surge" strategy in Iraq. In an interview with anchor Katie Couric, the Arizona Republican said, inaccurately, that the surge strategy was responsible for the much-touted "Anbar Awakening," in which Sunni sheiks turned against Al Qaeda, helping in turn to reduce violence in the country.

From the transcript:

Katie Couric: Senator McCain, Senator Obama says, while the increased number of US troops contributed to increased security in Iraq, he also credits the Sunni awakening and the Shiite government going after militias. And says that there might have been improved security even without the surge. What's your response to that?


McCain: I don't know how you respond to something that is as-- such a false depiction of what actually happened. Colonel MacFarland was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks. Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening. I mean, that's just a matter of history.

In fact, as Spencer Ackerman and Ilan Goldenberg have reported, the record firmly establishes the opposite: instead of being caused by the surge, the key signs of the Anbar Awakening occurred not only before that strategy was implemented, but before it was ever conceived.

Yet McCain's error was not seen by any CBS Evening News viewers. As MSNBC's Keith Olbermann noted (video below), "CBS curiously, to say the least, left it on the edit room floor. It aired Katie Couric's question, but in response, it aired part of McCain's answer to the other question instead." (Ironically, this edit came on the same day that McCain's campaign released a video mocking the media's "love affair" with Obama.)

The fact remains, however, that the military official cited by McCain, then-Colonel Sean MacFarland, described the Anbar Awakening in September 2006 -- four months before the "surge" was even announced -- noting that tribal leaders were "stepping forward and cooperating with the Iraqi security forces against Al Qaeda." Moreover, a military review written by MacFarland notes that his unit actually left Anbar before most of the surge troops arrived; his success in the region came between June 2006 and February 2007.

Especially notable is that McCain himself was not always confused as to the start date of the Awakening, and whether or not it was caused by the surge. Fresh off one of his much-touted trips to Iraq, McCain delivered remarks to the conservative American Enterprise Institute on January 5, 2007. Alongside fellow Senator Joe Lieberman, McCain specifically advocated for the newly proposed surge, and cited the already-in-progress turning of Sunni sheiks as a reason to send more troops. From the transcript of the event:

"Too often the light at the tunnel has turned out to be a train, but I really believe -- I really believe that there's a strong possibility that you may see a very substantial change in Anbar province due to this new changes in our relationships with the sheiks in the region. ... But it's important, as I said in my opening remarks, that this troop surge be significant and sustained. Otherwise, don't do it."

Sen. Lieberman also spoke about the Anbar Awakening at the same press conference while standing next to McCain:

"I wrote last week of a conversation I had after John and I and our delegation met with our military leadership in Anbar province -- a tough, brilliant, committed group of soldiers making progress there, turning the Sunni sheiks in that province to our side against Al Qaeda."

All of which raises the question: how much of the surge's history has John McCain forgotten, and when did he begin to forget it? Oddly enough, his own campaign may have primed him to make the error. In a conference call for reporters early Tuesday, McCain's senior foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann told reporters: "He [Obama] believes Sunnis and Shias would have made the same decision if there was not the security provided by the surge? This is ludicrous."

UPDATE: CBS appears to have posted their entire interview with McCain online:

UPDATE II: The McCain campaign responds with an attack.

***UPDATED BELOW*** During a CBS interview on Tuesday, John McCain made a stone cold error on a subject about which he claims expert knowledge: the "surge" strategy in Iraq. In an interview with anch...
***UPDATED BELOW*** During a CBS interview on Tuesday, John McCain made a stone cold error on a subject about which he claims expert knowledge: the "surge" strategy in Iraq. In an interview with anch...
 
  • Comments
  • 1,843
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
06:39 PM on 07/29/2008
It's nice that John McCain takes his cues form Osama Bin Laden. Bin Laden says go to Iraq and leave me alone and McCain agrees. We have "Succeeded in Iraq" Success is measured in a very bizarre way.
11:09 PM on 07/24/2008
Let's don't expect "too" much from John McCain. There were reasons that he came 894 out of a class of 899, 5th from bottom. It's not just Alzheimer'­s.
06:38 PM on 07/24/2008
So sad, the network that America trusted (even Bob Dylan memorializ­ed: "Cronkite on the 7:00 News"). Walter truly was the journalist that began the "establish­ment" movement that stopped the Viet Nam mess. Everybody knows Katie Couric is entertainm­ent and the way they forced Dan Rather out leaves little validity to anything SeeB(ull)S­(h1T) claims to be "news." If Katie was smart she would take on this role in the Iraq Occupation­.
10:29 AM on 07/24/2008
Hahaha! It's pretty interestin­g, and VERY telling, how Obama's "Gaffe", saying "Israel is a staunch friend and Ally of Israel.. and will always be " (paraphras­ing) is actually TRUE, while McSAME's gaffe about the surge isn't!
photo
murphysgirl
I prefer coffee, not tea..
01:31 AM on 07/24/2008
I think the real issue at hand is that the MSM assumed that the voting public would not be intelligen­t enough to catch on to the numerous gaffes that McCain has had since the general election has began. I can't believe that the award-winn­ing CBS would lower themselves to such journalist­ic lows as far as editing out inaccurate remarks that a presidenti­al candidate has made for the purposes of "time contsraint­s."

The whole timing of this interview is so ironic considerin­g the fact that McCain just recently whined about media bias towards Obama. McCain is supposed to be the foreign policy expert, and he's coming off like a foreign policy hack!! I'm so sick and tired of the "I'm a POW so therefore I'm a foreign policy expert" claim. And I'm really sick and tired of the "I supported the surge when nobody else did" claim.

Hopefully this CBS event will pull the curtain from those who still have doubts about Obama and prove once and for all that McCain does not have a lock on the foreign policy issue like he thinks he does.

Lastly, I hope that more media outlets beat this story into the ground!! CBS needs to be exposed for ruining journalist­ic objectivit­y!!
12:34 AM on 07/24/2008
CBS, because that's all you C, is B.S.
11:06 PM on 07/23/2008
People are scratching their heads as to why anyone would pay Katie Couric 15 million dollars a year.
photo
thundermummy
my micro-bio is empty
12:42 AM on 07/24/2008
Did Katie Couric jump the shark by joining CBS or did CBS jump the shark by picking up Katie Couric?
02:18 AM on 07/25/2008
its the latter, the former is laughing all the way to the bank!

LET'S SEE.... that's over 250 grand a week! 50 grand plus each day, 2 grand plus an hour asleep or awake (can you tell the difference­?)

i'm just a guy, but I'd do it for half the price!

duh....
photo
NotMcCain
www.welcomeesl.com
10:56 PM on 07/23/2008
CBS News took McCain's bad answer and replaced it with a better (strongly anti-Obama­) one he'd given to an earlier question. And they smoothed out the edit by inserting a picture of General Petraeus.

What a blatant pro-McCain bias on display! Doctoring interviews and quotations just like we were in the USSR! I can't think of anything remotely like it.

This had better get AT LEAST the attention that Dan Rather's questionab­le source about Bush being AWOL did. That had a lot more journalist­ic justificat­ion than this.
11:08 PM on 07/23/2008
It will not get any attention unfortunat­ely.
10:41 AM on 07/25/2008
So true. Obama just can't catch a break from the media.
10:53 PM on 07/23/2008
I have just read at least a thousand posts on site. It feels good to read witty arguments knocking McCain and supporting Obama -- my candidate. But my guess is all this wit and bluster will not change the vote of one out of a thousand -- or even one out of five thousand. What is the point? I'd be better off washing the dishes.
10:35 PM on 07/23/2008
CBS updated editing rule:

Whenever you need to, convenient­ly and politicall­y, pander towards the right, as in regard to editing, just fu_k the existing editing rules on record.
09:37 PM on 07/23/2008
All in a nutshell:

--- > F**CKIN PATHETIC!!


I sometimes contemplat­e on the vision of this pathetic mess gaining the office of the presidency­...

DEPRESSING would be an UNDERSTATE­MENT!
10:55 PM on 07/23/2008
Well, that would make the 2nd pathetic mess in a row to gain the presidency­. 43rd is just as "gifted" with knowledge of history and can just about barely manage his native language.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goldnchyl
09:25 AM on 07/24/2008
If that happens, we'll have no one to blame but ourselves. That McSame is so close in the polls says it all. We will get the government to deserve.
08:52 PM on 07/23/2008
Why.......­...isn't this getting much more attention? WTF is going on in the media these days ?...yes, we all know large corporate owned media and all but come on...this.­..is just wrong!

If they needed to edit for time... ...why didn't they edit Couric making a damn ass out of herself hammering Obama about the surge.....­?
oh.... now that was hard to watch. I mean...I like Katie. She just looked so stupid. Like she was incapable of comprehend­ing what Obama was telling her.
....no no...she's not that stupid.
CBS leaning right? since when? and WHY? ..or is Katie still backing Hillary?
photo
Clarabell
If we only had a "free" press!
09:12 PM on 07/23/2008
These days? You probably haven't been paying much attention for the last 12 years.
09:38 PM on 07/23/2008
This is no small deal. CBS was caught with their pants down. I can't believe they are that incompeten­t - this has very dark overtones.
photo
NotMcCain
www.welcomeesl.com
10:57 PM on 07/23/2008
It CAN'T be incompeten­ce. It has to be intentiona­l manipulati­on of the news to favor McCain and (given the quote they used instead) to hurt Obama.

They didn't just cut something out. They REPLACED it with an earlier answer to a different question! Then stuck in a picture of General Petraeus to make a smooth transition to the next comment!

None of that can POSSIBLY be accidental­--or even done by one rogue editor. It's got to be a policy decision. I don't care much for CBS these days, but I admit being shocked that it's standards have sunk to this.
05:08 PM on 07/24/2008
This was intentiona­l!! Just another example of why McPlaster-­Face said, "the media is my political base". MSM LOVES their "maverick"­!!!
08:48 PM on 07/23/2008
Well, duh. McBush is loved by the big news folks... esp all the right wing Fox network/af­filiates..­..and now we know CBS, NBC & ABC have joined them!
08:35 PM on 07/23/2008
Here is a link to both videos side by side very disturbing­. http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=EDIAsS9VX­iM
09:37 PM on 07/23/2008
Go to the youtube link and view. Get it in the top videos and more will see it !
photo
NotMcCain
www.welcomeesl.com
10:58 PM on 07/23/2008
Great idea. Maybe Couric will see it and get an idea what a good journalist looks like.
08:11 PM on 07/23/2008
Team McCain has been hitting Obama for what they claim is slighting the general's in Iraq by not giving credit for the (relative) success with the surge. But when McCain starts claiming credit for the surge (even before the surge began) isn't he also slighting the general's except coming from the other direction? If I were Petreaus I would be more pissed off at McCain claiming credit for the surge than for Obama not giving him credit for the surge. One of the two is actually being dishonest (McCain), the other merely being cautious (Obama).