Wachovia Loses $8.9B, 6,350 Jobs

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Wachovia Loses $8.9B, 6,350 Jobs stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

IEVA M. AUGSTUMS | July 22, 2008 02:12 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Customers use an ATM outside a Wachovia branch bank in Charlotte, N.C., Friday, July 18, 2008. Wachovia says it lost $8.86 billion in the second quarter, hurt by a big goodwill charge and an increase in reserves for bad loans as mortgage defaults soar. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Wachovia Corp. reported a surprisingly large second-quarter loss Tuesday, deflating Wall Street's hopes that the nation's big banks are weathering the credit crisis well. The bank said it lost $8.86 billion, is slashing its dividend and eliminating 10,750 positions after losses tied to mortgages soared.

Even excluding one-time items, the results substantially missed analysts' estimates.

But by the afternoon its stock joined a modest Wall Street rally and rose as much as 13 percent _ after its shares sank to mid-1991 levels in premarket trading, and after Wachovia's new CEO said he plans to cut $2 billion of expenses by the end of next year and sell parts of the fourth-biggest U.S. bank.

Its shares rose $1.19, or 9 percent, to $14.37 in afternoon trading.

"Our reported results today are clearly a disappointing performance for which we take responsibility," said Wachovia's Chief Executive Bob Steel on a conference call with analysts. "We are serious about getting on top of these issues quickly and we believe we have a good grasp of the challenges facing the economy, the industry and Wachovia."

Three rating agencies _ Moody's Investors Service, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings _ downgraded their ratings on Wachovia's debt, citing increased expectations of losses in the bank's mortgage portfolio and its reduced flexibility to raise new capital.

Wachovia said it lost the equivalent of $4.20 per share in the April-June period. In the same timeframe last year, the bank earned $2.34 billion, or $1.22 per share.

Excluding $6.1 billion in write-downs to the value of its intangible assets and merger-related and restructuring charges of $128 million, Wachovia lost $2.67 billion, or $1.27 per share. Second quarter results include the bank's October acquisition of A.G. Edwards Inc., which the bank said the merger is proceeding as planned and is 40 percent complete.

Story continues below
advertisement

Analysts on average expected a loss of 78 cents per share on revenue of almost $8.4 billion.

Earlier this month, the Charlotte-based bank had projected a $2.6 billion to $2.8 billion quarterly loss, equal to $1.23 to $1.33 per share, excluding goodwill items.

"Wachovia's new management has pulled its head of out the sand and is fully acknowledging the problems not challenges," said Bart Narter, senior analyst at Celent, a Boston-based financial research and consulting firm. "While the company's wealth management, corporate and investment banks, and capital management groups all had more encouraging results than the general bank, the general bank is the bulk of Wachovia and it isn't performing well."

Wachovia cut its quarterly dividend to 5 cents per share from 37.5 cents, which will conserve approximately $700 million of capital per quarter. In April, Wachovia slashed its dividend 41 percent.

Steel, who replaced ousted Ken Thompson earlier this month, said it was "clearly prudent and necessary" to further cut the dividend.

"While this is a difficult decision, it is the best course for our shareholders over the long term," he said.

Steel said the company is moving to "sell selected non-core assets" and reduce the number of business customers who only use the bank for loans rather than other services. Wachovia expects to cut expenses during the second half of this year by $490 million and then reduce 2009 spending by $1.5 billion.

As part of that plan, Wachovia said it would lay off 6,350 workers, affecting more than 5 percent to fits roughly 120,000 employees. A majority of those jobs will come from the mortgage area, Steel said.

Wachovia also said it will also eliminate 4,400 open positions and contractors. The bank has already cut 2,000 retail mortgage jobs, it said.

During the quarter, the Wachovia boosted its provision for loan losses to $5.57 billion from $179 million a year ago, and added $4.2 billion to its reserves for bad loans.

Results also included a $975 million charge related to the tax treatment of leveraged leases, $936 million of losses from disrupted capital markets, a $590 million charge for other legal matters, and $391 million of losses on securities sales.

Wachovia's current problems stem largely from its acquisition of mortgage lender Golden West Financial Corp. in 2006 for roughly $25 billion at the height of the nation's housing boom. With that purchase, Wachovia inherited a deteriorating $122 billion portfolio of Pick-A-Payment loans, Golden West's specialty, which let borrowers skip some payments.

Wachovia's increase in loan loss reserves included $3.3 billion related to the "Pick-a-Payment" mortgage portfolio. In April, the bank tightened underwriting standards, and last month it stopped offering an option on "Pick-A-Payment" loans that let borrowers pay less than the interest owed. On Monday, Wachovia said it will stop offering home loans through brokers.

Wachovia said it is setting aside $10.96 billion for credit losses, up from $6.77 billion in the first quarter and $3.55 billion a year earlier. Net charge-offs, loans it doesn't think are collectable, increased more than eight-fold from a year earlier to $1.31 billion.

Profits in consumer and business banking, Wachovia's largest unit, fell 23 percent to $1.12 billion, hurt by rising credit costs, mainly for mortgages.

The corporate and investment banking unit had a $209 million profit, down 73 percent, reflecting write-downs tied to subprime mortgages, commercial mortgages, non-subprime debt and consumer mortgages.

Capital management profit fell 5 percent to $297 million, hurt by the liquidation of an Evergreen Investments fund, while wealth management profit rose 9 percent to $98 million.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Wachovia Corp. reported a surprisingly large second-quarter loss Tuesday, deflating Wall Street's hopes that the nation's big banks are weathering the credit crisis well. The b...
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Wachovia Corp. reported a surprisingly large second-quarter loss Tuesday, deflating Wall Street's hopes that the nation's big banks are weathering the credit crisis well. The b...
Filed by Dave Burdick  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
53
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- Janelynne I'm a Fan of Janelynne 23 fans permalink

It looks like Wachovia is going to have fewer tellers. Maybe they will shorten the banking day and be available even fewer hours, and offer more voice mail when you call for answers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 AM on 07/24/2008

What I want to know is if Wachovia "will stop offering home loans through brokers" then what does that mean for the value of the $25 billion that they spent on Golden West? Is it a non-operational millstone, still operating but non-synergistically (cannibalizing from in-house), or what?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:27 PM on 07/23/2008
- LeonBNJ I'm a Fan of LeonBNJ 20 fans permalink

We need to make the CEO's and other executives more accountable for their decisions and pay for bad ones. That must include caps on salaries, salaries tied more to long term performance (not just a good quarter but over 4-5 years). We must make executives make decisions in the best interests of stockholders and the general public. They got to stop being so greedy for fees. More importantly, they must realize that every customer is important, every employee is important, every account is important. Government regulators must also discourage and reject many more mergers of banks and other businesses. Wachovia is a good example of the harm that has resulted from merger mania in the long run.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 AM on 07/23/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

why are people always complaining about fed bailouts. does anyone see any fed bailout for wachovia. not to say there hasnt been any (Fed put up the guarantee money to make JPM buy BSC). however, there is NO indication that there will be any bailout here.

whats going to happen is maybe a bigger bank will merge with Wachovia. and that can only be a good thing. let the market run its course and GOVT. should not bail out any of these banks.

FNM and FRE are different because they carry the implicit backing of the US govt. Now if govt. told them that they do not have the backing that would have been different. these 2 GSE's had way lower cost of capital than traditional banks because of that. dont you think its kinda unfair.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:56 AM on 07/23/2008

Yet another instance of proto-adolescent behaviour in U.S. management: Wachovia was a well run bank with a strong region anchoring. Some years earlier it had been a serious rival to North Carolina National Bank which transmogrified into the present Bank of America. Not to be outdone, Wachovia overstretched itself to also have a transnational reach in its spendy acquisition of Golden West. In the end, Wachovia is the victim of its own silly attempt to run with Bank of America......

Is their aggregate loss a total of the $25 billion paid for Golden West + the $9 billion lost in non-producing loans?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 AM on 07/23/2008
Moderator's Pick

HuffPost's Pick

The original Wachovia bank was a very conservative organization. Made sound business decisions and made money.
The leader of First Union (Ed Crutchfield late 1990s) had this thing about Bank of America. The man just could not stand to be smaller than the competition. He once decided to build the tallest building in Charlotte only because BoA had already done so at the time. Under this man's leadership First Union bought banks up and down the coast so they could boast of being the biggest east coast bank. They forgot the customer was what was important and ended up with the worst customer satisfaction rating around. Things got very tight and they knew they were going to be bought out due to the bind they had put themselves in. Their big idea was to merge with Wachovia so that together they would be too large for anyone to buy them out. Kinda like covering your ass to keep your job. FUNB and Wachovia could not have been more different as far as management styles. No one at the time believed this could work and now they are being proven right. The sad part is all the folks that will lose their jobs, homes, cars, insurance and retirement benefits due to nothing more than upper management pride, greed and sheer stupidity. What a sorry bunch of executives First Union has had for way too long. And now they are bringing down what was once an outstanding financial institution, Wachovia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 07/23/2008
- Toonadude I'm a Fan of Toonadude 15 fans permalink

"The sad part is all the folks that will lose their jobs, homes, cars, insurance and retirement benefits due to nothing more than upper management pride, greed and sheer stupidity".
__________­__________­_________

Thank you for listing the KSAs for most upper management positions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 PM on 07/23/2008
photo

Why do the people keep voting against their own best interest? Bush's base are millionaires; he said so himself. What's wrong with the people; can't they see their being taken for a ride.

Our leaders are failing us miserably and you know who's going to pay. Nearly a trillion lost in Iraq, trillions more in the foreclosure mess...we don't speak of billions lost anymore!

We strengthen the laws against citizens claiming bankruptcy so individuals are stuck with debt the rest of their lives, but we give away the store to our corporations and the conservatives call us whinners for complaining about it?

We pay for most of the R & D across the world because of our standard of living. Of course we've used the most and taken the most? Where are we headed as a nation? We want cheap products and we want high wages, we want to pollute other countries and we want them to follow our environmental standards. We want other countries not to have nuclear weapons while we stockpile thousands.

We can't seem to agree on anything, not even taking care of each other through a national health care system. We're so fear-based and money fixated, we can't gain a conscencious on how to keep our country healthy. We are so ideologically divided, a fake smile and stab in the back are now commonplace in Washington.

What happen to the soul of America?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 AM on 07/23/2008
- Toonadude I'm a Fan of Toonadude 15 fans permalink

I don't know but do you happen to know what time American Idol comes on ??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 07/23/2008
- Wild West I'm a Fan of Wild West 3 fans permalink
photo

Time to take any large sums of cash out of the banks..they already have prepared everybody the worse is yet to come.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 AM on 07/23/2008
- WIpatriot I'm a Fan of WIpatriot 36 fans permalink
photo

Don't worry, folks, there's plenty more where that came from.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 PM on 07/22/2008

What a distortion: what was the loss of real money that they handled, and what was the loss attributed to the drop in the price of their stock held by stockholders??
Think - Say you go to a casino with $100. You play blackjack, and after a few hours you boost your bankroll to $1000. You continue to play and lose everything. When you get home, did you loose $100.00 or did you lose $1000.00 ??? Does it depend on if someone is going to reimburse you to go out and gamble again ???

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 07/22/2008
photo

Read up on "fractional reserve banking". Banks are allowed to loan out 9 times the amount of money that they actually hold in deposits

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 07/22/2008

"LOSE" not "LOOSE"! Financiers play FAST and LOOSE and often LOSE their shirts.....and YOURS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 AM on 07/23/2008
- iambusto I'm a Fan of iambusto 5 fans permalink

100$ is the incorrect answer. 1000$ is the correct answer.

Your emotions might tell you 100$ to make you feel better. but when the bankroll gets to 1000$, its 1000$. you should not differentiate between what was your original money and what is others money (or profits). whats under your bankroll is whats yours.

this thinking is very common with casino gamblers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 AM on 07/23/2008
- Rockwell I'm a Fan of Rockwell 65 fans permalink
photo

This is what you get with republican deregulation. The mortgage backed securities became insanely complicated and 1000 miles away from the "Bailey Building and Loan." The financial lobby along with a republican congress successfully killed any regulatory oversight of these new complicated financial schemes. Greed lead to abuse and everyone turned a blind eye because everyone was making money.

The only plus side is that Wachovia and other banks are taking it on the chin. Unlike Freddie and Fanny, they can't run to the federal trough. Their shareholders, executives and employees are paying the price rather than the taxpayers in general.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 PM on 07/22/2008

Oh what the heck. Let's just include this loss with the Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac bailout. I'm sure all of us Americans can support their continued good health from the trickle down from their golden parashoots. We need to stand behind the American worker and make sure these clowns have enough money to create the 10,000 they just eliminated

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:51 PM on 07/22/2008

Just print more $$$$. What we have is already devalued by 35%. 9.5 trillion in debt already and the interest we pay on that debt amounts to 16.9% of every thing that the Govt. collects in taxes.
How would you contend with paying 1/6th of every paycheck in interest??? Stop buying sh*t might help.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 07/22/2008

They could start by slashing the big payout to their former CEO who got them in this mess. I see lots of rank and file employees getting the boot instead. Makes me sick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 07/22/2008

Wooo, what a bad day in Charlotte. 6000 laid off??? We are in deep trouble. That surpasses the 5000 at B. Stearns that lost their jobs. I hope none of them applied at Wachovia. The B. Stearns and Wachovia folks just need to team up and grow cotton or something safe like that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:04 PM on 07/22/2008
- HamletsMill I'm a Fan of HamletsMill 232 fans permalink
photo

Yep. Maybe the 6,000 in Charlotte can get this gig now out on the plantation?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nC7uFUe_Ulo

"Stupid is, as stupid does." - Forrest Gump

Y'all enjoy pick'in cotton now, that is IF you can find work.

American managerial class = dumbest schmucks ever.

Give your clueless boss that multi-million dollar golden parachute while you, your wife, and your kids eat a dirt sandwich. No grits now either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 AM on 07/23/2008
- JJ30 I'm a Fan of JJ30 3 fans permalink

and in Dan Abrams words: "This is why America Hates Washington!"

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 07/22/2008
- PaMike I'm a Fan of PaMike 6 fans permalink

Bushonomics! Ain't it grand?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 07/22/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect